Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-954-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://chesar.echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The oral administration of Reaction mass of bis(2-ethylhexyl) hydrogen phosphate and 2-ethylhexyl dihydrogen phosphate to rats by gavage, at dose levels of 0, 60, 125 and 250 mg/kg bw/day, resulted in some effects in animals of either sex from all treatment groups, none of which were considered to be due to adverse systemic toxicity. The histopathological changes seen in the forestomach may be a result of local irritation of the test item rather than a true effect of systemic toxicity. The NOAEL for systemic toxicity was therefore determined to be 250 mg/kg bw/day. Additionally, no treatment related effects were detected in any of the reproductive parameters examined and therefore the NOEL for reproductive/developmental toxicity was greater than 250 mg/kg bw/day.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 16 September 2011 and 02 May 2012.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: A sufficient number of male and female Wistar Han™:RccHan™:WIST strain rats were obtained from Harlan Laboratories U.K. Ltd., Blackthorn, Bicester, Oxon, UK.
- Age at study initiation: approximately twelve weeks old.
- Weight at study initiation: At the start of treatment the males weighed 331 to 368g, the females weighed 193 to 228g:
- Housing: Initially, all animals were housed in groups of five in solid floor polypropylene cages with stainless steel mesh lids and softwood flake bedding. During the mating phase, animals were transferred to polypropylene grid floor cages suspended over trays lined with absorbent paper on a one male: one female basis within each dose group. Following evidence of successful mating, the males were returned to their original cages. Mated females were housed individually during gestation and lactation, in solid floor polypropylene cages with stainless steel mesh lids and softwood flakes.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): The animals were allowed free access to food (a pelleted diet was used).
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): The animals were allowed free access to water (mains drinking water was supplied from polycarbonate bottles attached to the cage).
- Acclimation period: The animals were acclimatised for a total of twelve days during which time their health status was assessed. A total of eighty animals (forty males and forty females) were accepted into the study.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): The temperature was set to achieve target values of 21 ± 2°C.
- Humidity (%): The humidity was set to achieve target values of 55 ± 15% .
- Air changes (per hr): The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen air changes per hour.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): low intensity fluorescent lighting was controlled to give twelve hours continuous light and twelve hours darkness. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- arachis oil
- Details on oral exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: For the purpose of this study the test item was prepared at the appropriate concentrations as a solution in Arachis oil BP. The stability and homogeneity of the test item formulations were previously determined in a 14-day range finder study. Results from the previous study showed the formulations to be stable for at least twenty one days. Formulations were therefore prepared twice monthly and stored at 4ºC in the dark. The test item was administered twice daily by gavage using a stainless steel cannula attached to a disposable plastic syringe. Control animals were treated in an identical manner with 8 ml/kg bw/day of Arachis oil BP. The volume of test and control item administered to each animal was based on the most recent scheduled body weight and
was adjusted at regular intervals. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Samples of test item formulations were taken and analysed for concentration of Reaction mass of bis(2-ethylhexyl) hydrogen phosphate and 2-ethylhexyl dihydrogen phosphate. The concentration of Reaction mass of bis(2-ethylhexyl) hydrogen phosphate and 2-ethylhexyl dihydrogen phosphate in the test item formulations was determined by high performance liquid chromatography mass selective (HPLC/MS) using an external standard technique.The results indicate that the prepared formulations were within ± 5% of the nominal concentration.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The test item was administered to rats for up to eight weeks (including a two week maturation phase, pairing, gestation and early lactation for females).
- Frequency of treatment:
- The test item was administered twice daily.
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- Control
- Dose / conc.:
- 60 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 125 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Ten males and ten females per dose group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: The dose levels were choosen based on the results of a 14-day range finder study.Chronological Sequence of Study:
i) Groups of ten male and ten female animals were treated twice daily at the appropriate dose level throughout the study (except for females during parturition where applicable). The first day of dosing was designated as Day 1 of the study.
ii) Prior to the start of treatment and once weekly thereafter, all animals were observed for signs of functional/behavioural toxicity.
iii) On Day 15, animals were paired on a 1 male: 1 female basis within each dose group for a maximum of fourteen days.
iv) Following evidence of mating (designated as Day 0 post coitum) the males were returned to their original cages and females were transferred to individual cages.
v) On completion of mating (during Week 6), five selected males per dose group were evaluated for functional/sensory responses to various stimuli.
vi) Pregnant females were allowed to give birth and maintain their offspring until Day 5 post partum. Evaluation of each litter size, litter weight, mean offspring weight by sex, clinical observations and landmark developmental signs were also performed during this period.
vii) At Day 4 post partum, (Day 5 post partum for seven females due to technician error) five selected females per dose group were evaluated for functional/sensory responses to various stimuli.
viii) Blood samples were taken from five males from each dose group for haematological and blood chemical assessments on Day 42. Following completion of the female gestation and lactation phases, the male dose groups were killed and examined macroscopically.
ix) Blood samples were taken from five randomly selected females from each dose group for haematological and blood chemical assessment on Day 4 post partum. At Day 5 post partum, all females and surviving offspring were killed and examined macroscopically. - Positive control:
- No
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: All animals were examined for overt signs of toxicity, ill-health and behavioural change immediately before the first dose, up to thirty minutes after each dosing occasion, and one and three hours after each dosing occasion, during the working week. Animals were observed immediately before the first dose, soon after each dosing occasion, and one hour after each dosing occasion at weekends (except for females during parturition where applicable). Observations were recorded.
FUNCTIONAL OBSERVATIONS: Prior to the start of treatment and at weekly intervals thereafter, all animals were observed for signs of functional/behavioural toxicity at least one hour after the second dose. Functional performance tests were also performed on five selected males and females from each dose level, prior to termination, together with an assessment of sensory reactivity to various stimuli.
BEHAVIOURAL ASSESSMENTS:Detailed individual clinical observations were performed for each animal using a purpose built arena. The following parameters were observed: Gait, Hyper/Hypothermia, Tremors, Skin colour, Twitches, Respiration, Convulsions, Palpebral closure, Bizarre/Abnormal/Stereotypic behaviourUrination, Salivation, Defecation, Pilo-erection, Transfer arousal, Exophthalmia, Tail elevation, Lachrymation
FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE TESTS: Motor Activity: Purpose-built 44 infra-red beam automated activity monitors were used to assess motor activity. Animals were randomly allocated to the activity monitors. The tests were performed at approximately the same time each day, under similar laboratory conditions. The e
valuation period was thirty minutes for each animal. The percentage of time each animal was active and mobile was recorded for the overall thirty minute period and also during the final 20% of the period (considered to be the asymptotic period, Reiter and Macphail, 1979). Forelimb/Hindlimb Grip Strength: An automated meter was used. Each animal was allowed to grip the proximal metal bar of the meter with its forepaws. The animal was pulled by the base of the tail until its grip was broken . The animal was drawn along the trough of the meter by the tail until its hind paws gripped the distal metal bar. The animal was pulled by the base of the tail until its grip was broken. A record of the force required to break the grip for each animal was made. Three consecutive trials were performed for each animal. The assessment was developed from the method employed by Meyer et al (1979).SENSORY REACTIVITY:Each animal was individually assessed for sensory reactivity to auditory, visual and proprioceptive stimuli. This assessment was developed from the methods employed by Irwin (1968) and Moser et al (1988).
The following parameters were observed: Grasp response, Touch escape, Vocalisation, Pupil reflex, Toe pinch, Blink reflex , Tail pinch, Startle reflex,
Finger approach.
BODY WEIGHT: Individual body weights were recorded on Day 1 (prior to dosing) and then weekly for males until termination and weekly for females until mating was evident. Body weights were then recorded for females on Days 0, 7, 14 and 20 post coitum, and on Days 1 and 4 post partum.
FOOD CONSUMPTION: During the maturation period, weekly food consumption was recorded for each cage of adults. This was continued for males after the mating phase. For females showing evidence of mating, food consumption was recorded for the periods covering post coitum Days 0-7, 7-14 and 14-20. For females with live litters, food consumption was recorded on Days 1 and 4 post partum. Food efficiency (the ratio of body weight change/dietary intake) was calculated retrospectively for males throughout the study period (with the exception of the mating phase) a nd for females during the pre-mating phase. Due to offspring growth and milk production, food efficiency could not be accurately calculated during gestation and lactation.
WATER CONSUMPTION: Water intake was measured daily throughout the study (with the exception of the mating phase and Day 20 of gestation for female Number 39 due to a technician error).
LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS: Haematological and blood chemical investigations were performed on five males and five females selected from each test and control group prior to termination (Day 42 for males and Day 4 post part um for females). Blood samples were obtained after the first dosing occasion and from the lateral tail vein. Where necessary repeat samples were taken by cardiac puncture at termination. Animals were not fasted prior to sampling. HAEMATOLOGY:The following parameters were measured on blood collected into tubes containing potassium EDTA anti-coagulant:Haemoglobin (Hb)Erythrocyte count (RBC)Haematocrit (Hct)Erythrocyte indices - mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH)- mean corpuscular volume (MCV)- mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC) Total leucocyte count (WBC)Differential leucocyte count - neutrophils (Neut) - lymphocytes (Lymph) - monocytes (Mono) - eosinophils (Eos) - basophils (Bas)Platelet count (PLT)Reticulocyte count (Retic)- Methylene blue stained slides were prepared but reticulocytes were not assessedProthrombin time (CT) was assessed by ‘Innovin’ and Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was assessed by ‘Actin FS’ using samples collected into sodium citrate solution (0.11 mol/l).
BLOOD CHEMISTRY:The following parameters were measured on plasma from blood collected into tubes containing lithium heparin anticoagulant:
UreaCalcium (Ca++)GlucoseInorganic phosphorus (P)Total protein (Tot.Prot.)Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT)AlbuminAlanine aminotransferase (ALAT)Albumin/Globulin (A/G) ratio (by calculation)Alkaline phosphatase (AP)Sodium (Na+)Creatinine (Creat)Potassium (K+)Total cholesterol (Chol)Chloride (Cl-)Total bilirubin (Bili)Bile acids (Bile) - Sacrifice and pathology:
- PATHOLOGY:Adult males were killed by intravenous overdose of a suitable barbiturate agent followed by exsanguination on Day 43. Adult females were killed by intravenous overdose of a suitable barbiturate agent followed by exsanguination on Day 5 post partum. Surviving offspring were terminated via intracardiac overdose of sodium pentobarbitone. Any females which failed to achieve pregnancy or produce a litter were killed on or after Day 26 post coitum.For all females, the uterus was examined for signs of implantation and the number of uterine implantations in each horn wasrecorded. This procedure was enhanced; as necessary, by staining the uteri with a 0.5% ammonium polysulphide solution (Salewski 1964).All adult animals and offspring, including those dying during the study, were subjected to a full external and internal examination, and any macroscopic abnormalities were recorded.ORGAN WEIGHTS:The following organs, removed from animals that were killed at the end of the study, were dissected free from fat and weighed before fixation : Adrenals Prostate Brain Seminal vesicles Epididymides Spleen Heart Testes Kidneys Thymus Liver Thyroid (weighed post-fixation with Parathyroid) Ovaries Uterus (weighed with Cervix)Pituitary (post fixation)
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Samples of the following tissues were removed from all animals and preserved in buffered 10% formalin, except where stated: Adrenals Ovaries Aorta (thoracic) Pancreas Bone & bone marrow (femur including stifle joint) Bone & bone marrow (sternum) Pituitary Prostate Brain (including cerebrum, cerebellum and pons) Oesophagus Caecum Rectum Coagulating gland Salivary glands (submaxillary) Colon Sciatic nerve Duodenum Seminal vesicles Epididymides •Skin (hind limb) Eyes *Spinal cord (cervical, mid-thoracic and lumbar) Gross lesions Heart Spleen Ileum (including peyer’s patches) Stomach Jejunum Thyroid/parathyroid Kidneys Trachea Liver Testes• Lungs (with bronchi) Thymus Lymph nodes (cervical and mesenteric) Urinary bladder Mammary gland Uterus/Cevix Muscle (skeletal) Vagina• = preserved in Bouin’s fluid then transferred to 70% Industrial Methylated Spirits (IMS) approximately forty-eight hours later* = eyes fixed in Davidson’s fluid. All tissues were despatched for processing. The tissues from five selected control and 250 mg/kg bw/day dose group
animals, any animals dying during the study, and any animals which failed to mate or did not achieve a pregnancy were prepared as paraffin blocks, sectioned at a nominal thickness of 5 μm and stained with haematoxylin and eosin for subsequent microscopic examination. In addition, sections of testes and epididymides from all control and 250 mg/kg bw/day males were also stained with Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) stain and examined.Since there were indications of treatment-related stomach changes , examination was subsequently extended to include similarly prepared sections of the stomach from five animals per sex from the low and intermediate groups.Microscopic examination was conducted by the Study Pathologist. A peer review of the histopathology examinations was also performed in this phase of the study. - Other examinations:
- REPRODUCTIVE SCREENING:
MATING: Animals were paired on a 1 male: 1 female basis within each dose group, for a period of up to fourteen days. Cage tray-liners were checked each morning for the presence of ejected copulation plugs and each female was examined for the presence of a copulation plug in the vagina. A vaginal smear was prepared for each female and the stage of oestrus or the presence of sperm was recorded. The presence of sperm within the vaginal smear and/or vaginal plug in situ was taken as positive evidence of mating (Day 0 of gestation) and the males were subsequently returned to their original holding cages. Mated females were housed individually during the period of gestation and lactation.
PREGNANCY AND PARTURITION: Each pregnant female was observed at approximately 0830, 1230 and 1630 hours and around the period of expected
parturition. Observations were carried out at approximately 0830 and 1230 hours at weekends and public holidays. The following was recorded for each female:
i) Date of pairing
ii) Date of mating
iii) Date and time of observed start of parturitioniv)Date and time of observed completion of parturition
LITTER DATA:On completion of parturition (Day 0 post partum), the number of live and dead offspring was recorded. Offspring were individually identified within each litter by tattoo on Day 1 post partum.For each litter the following was recorded:
i )Number of offspring born
ii) Number of offspring alive recorded daily and reported on Days 1 and 4 post partum
iii) Sex of offspring on Days 1 and 4 post partum
iv) Clinical condition of offspring from birth to Day 5 post partum
v)Individual offspring weights on Days 1 and 4 post partum (litter weights were calculated retrospectively from this data)
PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT: Live offspring were assessed for surface righting reflex on Day 1 post partum. - Statistics:
- The following parameters were subjected to statistical analysis:
Quantitative functional performance data
Body weight and body weight change
Food and water consumptions during gestation and lactation
Pre-coital interval and gestation length
Litter size and litter weights
Sex ratio
Corpora lutea and implantation sites
Implantation losses and viability indices
Offspring body weight and body weight change
Offspring surface righting
Haematology, blood chemistry, adult absolute and body weight relative organ weights - Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Episodes of increased salivation were evident in animals of either sex treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day from Day 7 (females) and Day 12 (males) onwards. An isolated incident of noisy respiration was evident in one female treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day on Day 6. At 125 mg/kg/day, increased salivation was also evident in males between Days 12 and 41. No such effects were detected in female s treated with 125 mg/kg bw/day or animals of either sex treated with 60 mg/kg bw/day. Increased salivation was likely due to unpalatability due to local irritancy.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Males treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day showed a significant reduction in body weight gain during the first week of treatment. Although statistical analysis did not reveal any significant intergroup differences. A slight reduction in body weight gain was also evident in these males during Weeks 2 and 6; resulting in a reduction in overall body weight gain. No such effects were detected in females treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day or animals of either sex treated with 125 or 60 mg/kg bw/day.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Males treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day showed a slight reduction in food consumption and food efficiency during the first two weeks of treatment.
- Food efficiency:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No adverse effect on food consumption or food efficiency was detected for females during the pre-mating, gestation or lactation phases of the study.
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- no effects observed
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no toxicologically significant effects detected in the haematological parameters examined .Males from all treatment groups showed statistically significant reductions in prothrombin time. In the absence of a true dose related response the intergroup differences were considered not to be of toxicological importance. Males treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day also showed a statistically significant reduction in platelet count and activated partial thromboplastin time. All individual values were within the normal ranges for rats of the strain and age used, therefore the intergroup differences were considered not to be of toxicological importance.
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no toxicologically significant effects detected in the blood chemical parameters examined .Females treated with 250 and 125 mg/kg bw/day showed a statistically significant reduction in cholesterol and alkaline phosphatase. All individual values were within the normal ranges for rats of the strain and age used, and in the absence of any histology correlates the intergroup differences were considered not to be of toxicological importance.
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no toxicologically significant effects detected in the organ weights measured. Males from all treatment groups and females treated with 250 and 125 mg/kg bw/day showed statistically significant reductions in thyroid/parathyroid weight both absolute and relative to terminal body weight.
Males treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day also showed a statistically significant increase in absolute and relative spleen weight. Females from all treatment groups showed statistically significant reductions in liver weight both absolute and relative to terminal body weight. The majority of individual values were within the normal ranges for rats of the strain and age used and in the absence of true dose related responses or any histology correlates the intergroup differences were considered not to be of toxicological importance. Males treated with 60 mg/kg bw/day showed a statistically significant reduction in absolute and relative seminal vesicles weight. In the absence of a similar effect detected at 250 mg/kg bw/day or any histology correlates the intergroup differences were considered not to be of toxicological significance. - Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Seven males and three females treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day had sloughing on the non-glandular region of the stomach. One male and one female treated with 125 mg/kg bw/day and one male treated with 60 mg/kg bw/day also had sloughing on the non-glandular region of the stomach and another female from the 125 mg/kg bw/day dose group had sloughing on the glandular and non-glandular region of the stomach. No toxicologically significant effects were detected in females treated with 60 mg/kg bw/day. One male and one female treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day, one female treated with 125 mg/kg bw/day, two females treated with 60 mg/kg bw/day and one control male showed reddened lungs at necropsy. In the absence of treatment, in the case of the control male, or any toxicologically significant histology correlates in treated groups, the macroscopic findings were within the range of normal background alterations. One female treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day had increased pelvic space in the left kidney. In the absence of any histology correlates the intergroup difference was considered of no toxicological importance.
- Neuropathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Focal to multifocal squamous hyperplasia with hyperkeratosis, submucosal inflammation, and sometimes erosion in the forestomach were seen in treated animals of all dose groups.
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse systemic toxicity seen
- Remarks on result:
- other: not determinable due to absence of adverse systemic toxic effects
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- The oral administration of Reaction mass of bis(2-ethylhexyl) hydrogen phosphate and 2-ethylhexyl dihydrogen phosphate to rats by gavage, at dose levels of 0, 60, 125 and 250 mg/kg bw/day, resulted in some effects in animals of either sex from all treatment groups, none of which were considered to be due to adverse systemic toxicity. The histopathological changes seen in the forestomach may be a result of local irritation of the test item rather than a true effect of systemic toxicity. The NOAEL for systemic toxicity was therefore determined to be 250 mg/kg bw/day. Additionally, no treatment related effects were detected in any of the reproductive parameters examined and therefore the NOEL for reproductive/developmental toxicity was greater than 250 mg/kg bw/day.
- Executive summary:
Introduction.
The study was designed to investigate the systemic toxicity and potential adverse effects of the test item on reproduction (including offspring development) and are compatible with the requirements of the OECD TG 422.
This study was also designed to be compatible with the Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH).
Methods.
The test item was administered twice daily by gavage to three groups, each of ten male and ten female Wistar Han™:RccHan™:WIST strain rats, for up to eight weeks (including a two week maturation phase, pairing, gestation and early lactation for females), at dose levels of 0, 60, 125 and 250 mg/kg bw/day. A control group of ten males and ten females was dosed with vehicle alone (Arachis oil BP).
Clinical signs, behavioural assessments, body weight change, food and water consumption were monitored during the study.
Pairing of animals within each dose group was undertaken on a one male: one female basis within each treatment group on Day 15 of the study, with females subsequently being allowed to litter and rear their offspring to Day 5 of lactation.
During the lactation phase, daily clinical observations were performed on all surviving offspring, together with litter size and offspring weights and assessment of surface righting reflex.
Extensive functional observations were performed on five selected males from each dose group after the completion of the mating phase, and for five selected parental females from each dose group on Day 4 post-partum. Haematology and blood chemistry were evaluated prior to termination on five selected males and females from each dose group.
Adult males were terminated on Day 43, followed by the termination of all females and offspring on Day 5 post-partum. All animals were subjected to a gross necropsy examination and histopathological evaluation of selected tissues was performed.
Results.
Adult Responses:
Mortality: There were no unscheduled deaths.
Clinical Observations.
Episodes of increased salivation were evident in animals of either sex treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day and in males treated with 125 mg/kg bw/day during the treatment period. An isolated incident of noisy respiration was also evident in one female treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day on Day 6. No such effects were detected in females treated with 125 mg/kg bw/day or animals of either sex treated with 60 mg/kg bw/day. Such effects on salivation are likely due to the palatability of the test substance which is a known skin irritant.
Behavioural Assessment.
There were no toxicologically significant changes in the behavioural parameters measured.
Functional Performance Tests.
There were no toxicologically significant changes in functional performance.
Sensory Reactivity Assessments.
There were no treatment-related changes in sensory reactivity.
Body Weight.
Males treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day showed a reduction in body weight gain during Weeks 1, 2 and during the final week of treatment. No such effects were detected in females treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day or animals of either sex treated with 125 or 60 mg/kg bw/day.
Food Consumption.
Males treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day showed a slight reduction in overall food consumption when compared to controls. No such effects were detected in females treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day or in animals of either sex treated with 125 or 60 mg/kg bw/day.
Water Consumption.
No toxicologically significant effect on water consumption was detected.
Reproductive Performance:
Mating and Fertility: There were no treatment-related effects on mating or conception rates for treated animals.
Gestation Lengths.
There were no treatment-related differences in gestation lengths. The distribution for treated females was comparable to controls.
Litter Responses:
Offspring Litter Size and Viability: Of the litters born, litter size at birth and subsequently on Day 1 and 4 post-partum were comparable to controls. There were no significant intergroup differences in sex ratio.
Offspring Growth and Development.
Offspring bodyweight gain and litter weights at birth and subsequently on Day 1 and 4 post-partum were comparable to controls.
Offspring Observations.
No clinically observable signs of toxicity were detected for offspring from all treatment groups.
Laboratory Investigations:
Haematology: There were no toxicologically significant effects detected in the haematological parameters examined.
Blood Chemistry: There were no toxicologically significant effects detected in the blood chemical parameters measured.
Pathology:
Necropsy: Sloughing on the non-glandular and/or glandular regions of the stomach were evident in a number of animals treated with 250 and 125 mg/kg bw/day and in one male treated with 60 mg/kg bw/day. No such effects were detected in females treated with 60 mg/kg bw/day.
Organ Weights.
No toxicologically significant effects were detected in the organ weights measured.
Histopathology.
Stomach: Focal to multifocal squamous hyperplasia with hyperkeratosis, submucosal inflammation, and sometimes erosion in the forestomach were noted in a dose-related manner in treated animals of all dose groups. The minimally increased incidence of mucosal glandular dilation in the glandular stomach of females from intermediate and high dose groups were considered secondary to the locally irritant effects in the forestomach.
Conclusion.
The oral administration of Reaction mass of bis(2-ethylhexyl) hydrogen phosphate and 2-ethylhexyl dihydrogen phosphate to rats by gavage, at dose levels of 0, 60, 125 and 250 mg/kg bw/day, resulted in some effects in animals of either sex from all treatment groups, none of which were considered to be due to adverse systemic toxicity. The histopathological changes seen in the forestomach may be a result of local irritation of the test item rather than a true effect of systemic toxicity. The NOAEL for systemic toxicity was therefore determined to be 250 mg/kg bw/day. Additionally, no treatment related effects were detected in any of the reproductive parameters examined and therefore the NOEL for reproductive/developmental toxicity was greater than 250 mg/kg bw/day.
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
The read-across hypothesis proposed is that the organism is not exposed to common compounds but rather, because of structural similarity, that different compounds have similar toxicological and fate properties. In this case the ECHA Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF) Scenario 2 is used.
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Source: Phosphoric acid, 2-ethylhexyl ester [EC 235-741-0; CAS 12645-31-7]
Target: Phosphoric Acid, C8-12 (even-numbered) linear Alkyl Esters [EC not yet assigned; CAS not assigned]
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
For the Source substance, there is evidence from a screening for reproduction and developmental toxicity study (OECD 422). The study had NO(A)EL of 125 (125 or 250 for males/females), and 250 mg/kg bw/day (highest dose tested) for reproduction and development. In the Source study, 250 mg/kg bw/day was the highest dose tested; the NOEL at 125 mg/kg bw/day was due to local irritancy (stomach) and was most probably not due to systemic toxicity. Such effects in the rat may be considered as not relevant to man. The NOAEL can therefore be considered to be 250 mg/kg bw/day. Reproduction (mating and fertility) and in utero development were unaffected.
The data suggest that this type of substance may be predicted to have no appreciable effects on reproduction and development and to be of low to moderate systemic toxicity at relatively high doses. It may be predicted that such a study would allow read-across to the Target substance which shares several common characteristics with the Source substance.
4. DATA MATRIX
Please refer to attached justification. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse systemic toxicity
- Remarks on result:
- other: not determinable due to absence of adverse systemic toxic effects
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Referenceopen allclose all
Histopathology:
The following related microscopic findings were detected.
Groups |
1 (control) |
2 (60 mg/kg bw/day) |
3 (125 mg/kg bw/day) |
4 (250 mg/kg bw/day) |
||||
Tissues examined |
5 M |
5 F |
6 M |
5 F |
5 M |
5 F |
8 M |
7 F |
Squamous cell hyperplasia: Mean severity |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
8 |
7 |
Total Affected |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
8 |
7 |
Hyperkeratosis: Mean severity |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
8 |
7 |
Total Affected |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
8 |
7 |
Submucosal inflammation: Mean severity |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
8 |
7 |
Total Affected |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
8 |
7 |
Erosion: |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Total Affected |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Reproductive Performance
Mating
There were no treatment-related effects on mating performance.
Fertility
No treatment-related effects on fertility were detected for treated animals when compared to controls.
Two control females and one female treated with 60 mg/kg bw/day did not achieve pregnancy following evidence of mating. No histopathological correlates were evident in either the male or female reproductive organs however, the male partner treated with 60 mg/kg bw/day revealed a moderate multifocal squamous hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis with slight multifocal submucosal inflammation in forestomach. These findings are considered to possibly be the cause of unsuccessful mating. In the absence of any similar infertility effects detected at 250 mg/kg bw/day the intergroup differences were considered not to be related to test item toxicity.
Gestation Length
No treatment-related effects were detected in the length of gestation for treated females when compared to controls. All animals showed gestation lengths of 22½ to 24 days.
Litter Response
In total eight females from control, nine females from the 60 mg/kg bw/day dose group and ten females from the 125 and 250 mg/kg bw/day dose group gave birth to a live litter and successfully reared young to Day 5 age. The following assessment of litter response is based on all litters reared to termination on Day 5 of lactation/age.
Offspring Litter Size and Viability
No toxicologically significant effects were detected.
No significant differences were detected for corpora lutea, implantation counts, litter size or litter viability for treated animals when compared to controls. Statistical analysis of the data did not reveal any significant intergroup differences.
There were no intergroup differences in sex ratio (percentage male offspring) for litters from treated groups compared to controls. Statistical analysis of the data did not reveal any significant intergroup differences.
Offspring Growth and Development
No toxicologically significant effects were detected.
There were no significant differences in litter, offspring weights or surface righting reflex. Statistical analysis of the data did not reveal any significant intergroup differences.
No obvious clinical signs of toxicity were detected for offspring from treated females when compared to controls. The incidental clinical signs detected throughout the control and treated groups, consisting of small size, offspring found dead or missing, no milk in stomach, cold, weak, pale, no tail and physical injury were considered to be low incidence findings observed in offspring in studies of this type, and were unrelated to test item toxicity.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Adequate
- System:
- other: Local effects on stomach, irritation.
- Organ:
- other: no adverse systemic toxicity evident
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
No classification is suggested as no overt systemic toxicity was observed at the dosages tested.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)