Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 234-454-8 | CAS number: 12004-35-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Sediment toxicity
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
PNEC sediment: Pending outcome of sediment testing program
A technical conclusion ii (no further information or testing required) was determined for all compartments of the EU Ni Risk Assessment except for the sediment compartment, which received a technical conclusion i (further information or testing required). EU Member States and the ECB (European Chemicals Bureau) have accepted a formal testing recommendation for sediments, which was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on May 28th, 2008.
The need for additional testing was the conclusion that the ecotoxicity results of the whole sediment toxicity tests conducted under the historic conclusion i) research program (2004-2005) were confounded by technical issues associated with the introduction of Ni into sediments in the laboratory, and the subsequent diffusional loss of Ni into overlying water. Briefly, relatively poor sorption of Ni to sediment particles resulted in the loss of dissolved Ni from the sediments. Furthermore, observed toxicity to the sediment toxicity test organisms was explained by Ni concentrations in overlying water, as opposed to Ni concentrations in the sediments. Interpretation of these ecotoxicity data required that conservative assumptions be applied to the outcome of these tests, which resulted in PNECsed (Predicted No Effects Concentration for nickel in sediments) values that were below ambient and natural background concentrations. These PNECsed values were neither scientifically defensible nor sustainable and their application would have led to the conclusion of risk at 100% of the operational sites within the RA, as well as at the regional scale. As such, the Danish Rapporteur and otherrecommended that further testing be conducted to generate the data to calculate a scientifically sound PNECsed, based on laboratory approaches aimed at controlling the diffusional loss of Ni from sediments and that could be validated in the field. The generation of these data will eliminate much of the uncertainty in the PNECsed derivation and bring closure to the conclusion i) for sediment.
To derive PNECsed values, the proposed research will be comprised of three components, including:
1. an evaluation of optimal sediment spiking techniques,
2. generation of reliable ecotoxicity data on sediment dwelling organisms providing effect concentrations relating to bulk sediment concentrations;
3. the development of an integrated, equilibrium-partitioning based bioavailability model for normalizing the sediment effect concentrations to bioavailable sediment concentrations under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions
Research proposals received by NiPERA have been designed to specifically address these components. Research proposed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) would evaluate multiple spiking methods to determine the distribution of Ni between pore-water and solid-sediment phases over time and would be compared to the distribution of Ni in naturally Ni contaminated field collected sediments under laboratory conditions. (The partitioning of Ni in spiked sediments would also be compared to Ni partitioning in the field, which would be used to validate the optimal spiking strategy to be used for further ecotoxicity testing. This research would be conducted by Natural Resources Canada/University ofand would be sponsored jointly by Rio Tinto). Once the optimal spiking approach is identified, extensive ecotoxicity testing would be conducted for nine benthic organisms and for eight sediment types to evaluate the bioavailability of Ni in a wide range of sediments and toxicity to a variety of benthic organisms, to provide effect concentrations relating to bulk sediment concentrations. These data would then be used to generate an integrated bioavailability model for toxicity in sediments. The toxicity model would be field-validated using an approach proposed byof.
A Technical Conclusion i) group was formed to provide technical guidance on the development of a scientifically defensible approach for the Ni sediment toxicity test program. The Technical Conclusion i) group is composed of sediment experts from academia, consulting, and EU Member States.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.