Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
2018-12-20
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
Please refer to the QMRF and QPRF files provided under the section attached justification.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals
Version / remarks:
May 2008
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Estimates the log octanol-water partition coefficient, log KOW, of chemicals using an atom/fragment contribution method.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
calculation method (fragments)
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SMILES: CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCN
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
6.73
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: QSAR predicted value. The substance is within the applicability domain of the model.

KOWWIN Program (v1.68) Results:

===============================

 

Log Kow(version 1.68 estimate): 6.73

 

SMILES : CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCN

CHEM  :

MOL FOR: C16 H35 N1

MOL WT : 241.46

 

TYPE

 NUM

LOGKOW FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION

COEFF

VALUE

Frag

1

-CH3[aliphatic carbon]

 0.5473

0.5473

Frag

 15

-CH2- [aliphatic carbon]

 0.4911

7.3665

Frag

1

-NH2[aliphatic attach]

-1.4148

 -1.4148

Const

 

Equation Constant

 

0.2290

Log Kow =

 

 

 

6.7280

 

Conclusions:
Using KOWWIN v1.68 the logPow of the test item was calculated to be 6.73 at 25 °C. The substance is within the applicability domain of the model.
Executive summary:

The logPow was calculated using KOWWIN v1.68 as part of EPISuite v4.11 from US Environmental Protection Agency.

Using KOWWIN v1.68 the log Kow of the test item was calculated to be 6.73 at 25 °C (EPI Suite, 2014).

The adequacy of a prediction depends on the following conditions:

a) the (Q)SAR model is scientifically valid: the scientific validity is established according to the OECD principles for (Q)SAR validation;

b) the (Q)SAR model is applicable to the query chemical: a (Q)SAR is applicable if the query chemical falls within the defined applicability domain of the model;

c) the (Q)SAR result is reliable: a valid (Q)SAR that is applied to a chemical falling within its applicability domain provides a reliable result;

d) the (Q)SAR model is relevant for the regulatory purpose.

 

For assessment and justification of these 4 requirements the QMRF and QPRF files were developed and attached to this study record.

 

Description of the prediction Model

The prediction model was descripted using the harmonised template for summarising and reporting key information on (Q)SAR models. For more details please refer to the attached QSAR Model Reporting Format (QMRF) file. 

 

Assessment of estimation domain

The assessment of the estimation domain was documented in the QSAR Prediction Reporting Format file (QPRF). Please refer to the attached document for the details of the prediction and the assessment of the estimation domain.

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
from 2020-02-12 to 2020-02-20
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 107 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), Shake Flask Method)
Version / remarks:
27 July 1995
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.8 (Partition Coefficient - Shake Flask Method)
Version / remarks:
31 May 2008
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
flask method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Analytical method:
gas chromatography
mass spectrometry
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
> 2.47
Temp.:
20 °C
pH:
7.34

Ratio of solvents (n-octanol : water)

Measured concentration in n-octanol phase (μg/mL)

Measured concentration in aqueous phase (μg/mL)

pH

Recovery

Mean 1:1

1373.2

< 5

7.46

103 %

Mean 1:2

1983.3

< 5

7.34

100 %

Mean 2:1

1016.6

< 5

7.85

102 %

 

Ratio of solvents (n-octanol : water)

Partition coefficient Pow

Log Partition coefficient Log Pow

1:1

274.6

2.44

1:2

396.7

2.60

2:1

203.3

2.31

Mean all

302.6

2.47

Conf. int. (95 %)

71.436

0.103

 

In conclusion, the partition coefficient (Pow) of the test item in an n-octanol - water two-phase system could not unambiguously determined because the concentration in the water phase was below the detection limit. Based on the conditions used in this study, the Pow of the test item was determined to be 302.6 ± 71.436 (95 % confidence interval) using the shake flask method. The log Pow is > 2.47 ± 0.103 (95 % confidence interval).

Conclusions:
The log Pow was determined to be > 2.47.
Executive summary:

A study was conducted according to OECD No. 107 and EU Regulation No 440/2008, Part A, Method A.8. to determine the octanol-water partition coefficient with the flask method. Therefore, three experiments were carried out applying different n-octanol:water ratios (1:1, 1:2 and 2:1). the partition coefficient (Pow) of the test item in an n-octanol:water two-phase system could not unambiguously determined because the concentration in the water phase was below the detection limit. Therefore, the Pow is biased by the initial concentration and the solvent ratio.The log Pow is > 2.47 ± 0.103 (95 % confidence interval) under the test conditions.

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Data waiving:
study technically not feasible
Justification for data waiving:
the study does not need to be conducted because the substance does not dissolve in water or in octanol

Description of key information

Using KOWWIN v1.68 the logPow of the test item was calculated to be 6.73 at 25 °C. The substance is within the applicability domain of the model (reference 4.7-1).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Log Kow (Log Pow):
6.73
at the temperature of:
25 °C

Additional information

A study was conducted according to OECD No. 107 and EU Regulation No 440/2008, Part A, Method A.8. to determine the octanol-water partition coefficient with the flask method. Therefore, three experiments were carried out applying different n-octanol:water ratios (1:1, 1:2 and 2:1). The partition coefficient (Pow) of the test item in an n-octanol:water two-phase system could not unambiguously determined because the concentration in the water phase was below the detection limit. The log Pow is > 2.47 ± 0.103 (95 % confidence interval) under the test conditions (reference 4.7-3). The study was waived because the test item is practically insoluble in water as determined in reference 4.8-1 (reference 4.7-2).

The logPow was calculated using KOWWIN v1.68 as part of EPISuite v4.11 from US Environmental Protection Agency. Using KOWWIN v1.68 the log Kow of the test item was calculated to be 6.73 at 25 °C (EPI Suite, 2014). The substance is within the applicability domain of the model. The calculation based on the uncharged molecule (reference 4.7-1).

In conclusion, the study according to OECD No. 107 and EU Regulation No 440/2008, Part A, Method A.8. could not unambiguously determined the log Pow because the concentration in the water phase is below the detection limit. The low solubility of the water leads to methodological limitations. Because the test item is practically insoluble in water also other tests are technically not feasible. Therefore, the study was waived and instead the value of the QSAR prediction was used as key value for chemical safety assessment.