Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 219-976-6 | CAS number: 2589-57-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
two in vitro studies according to resp. Guideline available:
in vitro reverse mutation testing in bacteria
in vitro Micronucelus Test in mammalian cells.
Further in vitro tests are not performed due to clear results in available studies.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- December 2015 - June 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: B.49 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
- Target gene:
- whole genom is targeted
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: peripheral
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- The blood sample was obtained from a healthy donor who neither smokes nor receives
medication. The following donor was chosen for the experimental part:
female, 34 years old - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Nominal concentration of test item solution (mg/mL): 400, 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.3, 3.2
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solubility of the test item was determined in a non-GLP pre-test. The test item was sufficiently soluble in DMSO.
Therefore, DMSO was chosen as solvent. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium;
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable):
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 47.5 h
- Exposure duration: 4 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 18 h
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): not applicable
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 22 h (Exposure duration + expression time)
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): not applicable
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): cytochalasin
B
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 10 % solution of Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: The slides were prepared by dropping the cell suspension onto a clean microscope slide.
The cells were then stained with a 10 % solution of Giemsa. All slides were independently
coded before microscopic analysis.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: at least 500 cells per culture, cytokinesis-block proliferation index
At least 1000 binucleate cells per culture were scored for micronuclei
NUMBER OF METAPHASE SPREADS ANALYSED PER DOSE (if in vitro cytogenicity study in mammalian cells):
CRITERIA FOR MICRONUCLEUS IDENTIFICATION: Only cells with sufficiently
distinguishable cytoplasmic boundaries and clearly visible cytoplasm were included
in the analysis.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
Cytotoxicity was calculated as reduction in CBPI compared to the CBPI of the concurrent
solvent control
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
-none
- OTHER: - Rationale for test conditions:
- according to Guideline
- Evaluation criteria:
- The test item is considered to have genotoxic effects if:
At least one test concentration shows a statistically significant increase of micronucleate
cells compared to the concurrent solvent control.
In at least one experimental condition a dose-related increase of micronucleate cells
can be observed.
Any of the results lies outside the range of the historical laboratory control data for solvent
controls. - Statistics:
- The number of binucleate cells with micronuclei in each treatment group was compared
with the solvent control. Statistical significance was tested using Fisher’s exact test at the
five per cent level (p 0.05)
For positive controls with high values of binucleate cells with micronuclei, the chi-squaretest
was used - Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: peripheral
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, under the experimental conditions reported, dimethyl-2,2'-
azobisisobutyrate induced the formation of micronuclei in human lymphocytes in
vitro.
The test item dimethyl-2,2'-azobisisobutyrate is considered as “genotoxic under the
conditions of the test”. - Executive summary:
One valid experiment was performed.
This study was performed to assess the genotoxic potential of dimethyl-2,2'-
azobisisobutyrate to induce formation of micronuclei in human lymphocytes cultured in
vitro in the absence and the presence of an exogenous metabolic activation system (liver
S9 mix from male rats, treated with Aroclor 1254).
The test item was dissolved in DMSO. A stock solution with a concentration of 400 mg/mL
(corresponding to a final test concentration of 2 mg/mL) and thereof a geometric series of
dilutions was prepared.
Human lymphocytes, on whole blood culture, were stimulated to divide by addition of phytohaemagglutinin
and exposed to solvent control, test item and positive control.
After exposure period and expression time in growth medium (= culture harvest time), the
cells were harvested and slides were prepared. Then, the proportion of binucleate cells
containing micronuclei was determined.
The following schedule was observed:
Procedure
Exp. I
Metabolic activation
Without S9 mix
With S9 mix
Exposure period
4 h
4 h
Expression time in growth
medium
18 h 18 h Culture harvest time
22 h
22 h
Concentrations selected for
scoring of micronuclei
2, 0.25 and 0.03 mg/mL
2, 1 and 0.5 mg/mL
One valid experiment with 2 experimental conditions - without and with metabolic activation
- was performed. All cell cultures were set up in duplicates. In order to assess the toxicity
of the test item to cultivated human lymphocytes, the cytokinesis-block proliferation
index was calculated for all cultures treated with solvent control, positive control and test
item. On the basis of these data, the concentrations indicated in the table above were selected
for micronuclei scoring.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 04.04.2003 - 23.04.2003
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with national standard methods
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- histidine and/or trypthophane
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1.2, 4.9, 20, 78, 313, 1250 and 50001.1 g/plate
In the dose-finding test, the growth inhibition by the test substance was observed at 5000 µg/plate in
all strains both with and without metabolic activation - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Based on the information from the sponsor, because the test substance was insoluble in water and
dissolved in DMSO and acetone at over 0.5g/g, DMSO was used as the solvent for the test substance. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- treated as negative controls
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-(2-Furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide, 2-Aminoanthracene, 2-Methoxy-6-chloro-9-[3-(2-chloroethyl)aminopropylamino]acridine*2HCl
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation;
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): not applicable
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 minutes
- Exposure duration: 48 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): not applicable
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): not applicable
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): not applicable
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): not applicable
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): not applicable
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): not applicable
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: not applicable
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: not applicable
NUMBER OF METAPHASE SPREADS ANALYSED PER DOSE (if in vitro cytogenicity study in mammalian cells): not applicable
CRITERIA FOR MICRONUCLEUS IDENTIFICATION: not applicable
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: growth inhibition expressed by colony numbers
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
not applicable - Rationale for test conditions:
- standard test conditions
- Evaluation criteria:
- In the dose-finding test and the main test, if the number of revertant colonies on the test plates
increased significantly in comparison with that on the control plates (based on twice as many as that of
the negative control), and dose-response and reproducibility were also observed, the test substance was
judged positive. - Statistics:
- Statistical analysis was not done
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Cytotoxicity was observed at the highest dose level.
- Conclusions:
- From the results described above, it is concluded that Dimethyl-2,2' -azobis(2-methylpropionate) is
mutagenic in the bacterial reverse mutation assay carried out under the experimental conditions. - Executive summary:
Mutagenicity potential of Dimethyl=2,2’- azobis(2-methylpropionate) was assessed with Salmonella
typhimurium TA100, TA1535, TA98, TA1537 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA.
In this study, dose-related increase in the number of revertant colonies more than twice in comparison
with that of the negative control and reproducibility were observed in E. coli WP2 uvrA with metabolic
activation.
From the above, it is judged that Dimethyl=2,2'-azobis(2-methylpropionate) has mutagenicity forward to
bacteria under the described study conditions.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (positive)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
no in vivo tests available. further information needed.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available (further information necessary)
Mode of Action Analysis / Human Relevance Framework
based on the available results, no clear mode of action can be identified.
The substance induces mutations in the bacterial strain E. Coli with metabolic activation
and induces micronuclei in mammalian cells with and without metabolic activation
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available information is conclusive and sufficient for classification as Mutagenic cat. 2.
However further information has to be generated to conclude on classification or non-classification as Mutagenic cat.1
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.