Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 245-629-3 | CAS number: 23386-52-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 24 - 26 March 1993
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Guideline and GLP compliant study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The test was performed in darkness. This is considered to have no effect on the outcome of the study.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test was performed in darkness.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: 0 (control), 8.1, 27, 90, 300, 1000 mg MRD-92-428 (CT-519-92S)/L
- Sampling method: Samples were removed from each treatment on Day 0, on Day 1 due to total mortality of a treatment, i.e., 1000 mg MRD-92-428 (CT-519-92S)/L, and 2 (composite of replicates 1-4) and analysed for carbon content. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: Individual treatment solutions were prepared by adding the appropriate amount of test material to laboratory dilution water in glass aspirator bottles. These solutions were mixed (< 10% vortex) on a magnetic stirrplate with teflon coated stirrbars for 1 hour. The treatments appeared clear. The WAF of each treatment solution was drawn through the outlet at the bottom of the vessel and divided into 4 replicate chambers. Test chambers were covered with glass to minimize evaporation and/or volatilization.
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): No. In addition, the measured concentrations were 80% of the nominal or greater and therefore, the nominal values were used. This indicates that even at the highest dose, > 80% of the test material was in the fraction < 0.45 µm (filtration prior to analysis) and not floating at or in the surface (removal of the test solution from the bottom of the test solution preparation vessel) - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Water flea
- Strain: not provided
- Source: Cultured in the Environmental Toxicology Laboratory of Exxon Biomedical Sciences, Inc.
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): < 24 hours
- Method of breeding: Daphnids are kept in 1 Liter glass culture vessels with dilution water (BW2 at 20 +/- 2°C) similar in characteristics to that used during the test. Cultures of Daphnia were fed about 3.12*10^5 cells/mL of Selenastrum capriornutum and about 6 µL/mL yeast/salmon starter/cereal leaves mixture. Algae are cultured in the Environmental Toxicology Laboratory of Exxon Biomedical Sciences, Inc. using modified ASM-1 medium.
- Feeding during test: The daphnids were not fed - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Hardness:
- 76 - 82 mg/L as CaCO3 in the dilution water
- Test temperature:
- 19.0 to 21.0 °C
- pH:
- 7.1 to 7.4
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 8.5 to 9.1 mg/L
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- nominal concentrations: 0 (control), 8.1, 27, 90, 300, 1000 mg MRD-92-428 (CT-519-92S)/L, corresponding to 7.78, 25.9, 86.4, 288 and 960 mg CH-SSS/L
Measured concentrations: 0 (control), 10.40, 32.31, 90.43, 295.5, and 917.2 mg a.i./L, determined by DOC analysis using a carbon content of a.i. of 48.84% - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 30 mL glass beakers, filled with 25 mL test solution
- No. of organisms per vessel: 5
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 4
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 4
- Biomass loading rate: 1 daphnia/5 mL
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Laboratory dilution water, Blend Water 2 (BW2). the dilution water is aerated by circulation within the holding tank and aged for at least 24 hours before introduction to the test system.
- Total organic carbon: 1.142 mg/L as measured in a monthly water quality analysis.
- Particulate matter: NA
- Metals: below levels of concern
- Pesticides :below levels of concern
- Chlorine: MA
- Alkalinity: 30 mg/L as CaCO3
- Culture medium different from test medium: No
- Intervals of water quality measurement: start and termination of the exposure.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: the test was performed in darkness
- Light intensity: NA
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : EC50 at 48 hours
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: about 3.2
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: control, 5, 10, 50, 100 and 1000 mg test item/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Ninety percent immobilization was observed in the 1000 mg test item/L treatment during the 48 hour exposure period. No other effects were reported. - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 439 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- other: immobilization
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% C.I.: 362 - 532 mg a.i./L
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 457 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: immobilization
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% C.I.: 377 - 554 mg test item/L
- Details on results:
- - Behavioural abnormalities: none, for immobilization see Table 3
- Other biological observations: few daphnids were trapped on the surface. This was not dose dependent.
- Mortality of control: none
- Other adverse effects control: none
- Abnormal responses: none
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: none
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: none - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The EC50 was determined using the Spearman-Karber method based on nominal concentrations.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- 48-hour-EC50 to daphnids: 439 mg a.i./L.
- Executive summary:
The acute toxicity of MRD-92 -428 (CT-519 -925) - which contains 95 -97% a.i. - to Daphnia magna was determined in a static test under GLP. The test was performed similar to EEC C.2 and OECD 202. The test was started with a control and nominal concentrations of 8.1, 27, 90, 300, 1000 mg MRD-92-428 (CT-519-92S)/L, corresponding to 7.78, 25.9, 86.4, 288 and 960 mg a.i./L assuming an average content of a.i. of 96%. The concentrations were analyzed by DOC analyses using a carbon content of CH-SSS of 48.84%. The mean measured concentrations were 0 (control), 10.40, 32.31, 90.43, 295.5, and 917.2 mg a.i./L for nominal concentrations of 7.78, 25.9, 86.4, 288 and 960 mg a.i./L All values were > 80 % and hence results were based on nominal concentrations. For each test concentration and the control, 4 replicates with 5 daphinds each were set up in 30 mL vessels filled with 25 mL test solution. The test was performed in darkness. After 48 hours of exposure, 0, 0, 0, 0, 15 and 100 % of the daphnids were immobilized at 0 (control),7.78, 25.9, 86.4, 288 and 960 mg a.i./L. The corresponding 48 h EC50 value is 439 mg a.i./L.
This study is considered to be acceptable for the risk assessment.
Reference
Table 1 Dissolved oxygen, pH and temperature in the test solutions
Nominal concentration of MRD-92-428 (CT-519-92S) [mg/L] |
0 hours |
48 hours |
||||
Dissolved oxygen [mg/L] |
pH |
Temperature [°C] |
Dissolved oxygen [mg/L] |
pH |
Temperature [°C] |
|
0 |
9.4 |
7.3 |
20.9 |
8.5 |
7.3 |
19.0 |
8.1 |
9.2 |
7.4 |
20.9 |
8.6 |
7.4 |
19.2 |
27 |
9.2 |
7.4 |
21.0 |
8.5 |
7.4 |
19.6 |
90 |
9.2 |
7.4 |
21.0 |
8.5 |
7.4 |
19.5 |
300 |
9.2 |
7.4 |
21.0 |
8.5 |
7.4 |
19.2 |
1000 |
9.2 |
7.4 |
21.0 |
9.1* |
7.1* |
20.0* |
* Since 100% immobilization was observed after 24 hours, these values were determined at the 24 hour observation interval.
Table 2: Results of the dose verification analysis
Nominal concentrations |
Measured concentrations* |
||||
[mg test item/L] |
[mg a.i./L] |
Day 0 |
Day 2 |
mean |
% of nominal a.i./L |
Control |
0 |
- |
- |
||
8.1 |
7.78 |
10 |
10.85 |
10.40 |
133.8 |
27 |
25.92 |
32.59 |
32.03 |
32.31 |
124.7 |
90 |
86.4 |
94.14 |
86.72 |
90.43 |
104.7 |
300 |
288 |
291.7 |
299.3 |
295.5 |
102.6 |
1000 |
960 |
967.8 |
866.6** |
917.2 |
95.5 |
*calculated from DOC measurements using a carbon content of a.i. of 48.84 %.
** measured after 24 hours due to 100% immobilization
Table 3: Immobilization
Nominal concentrations |
Immobilization [%] |
||
[mg test item/L] |
[mg a.i./L] |
Day 1 |
Day 2 |
Control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8.1 |
7.78 |
0* |
0 |
27 |
25.92 |
0 |
0* |
90 |
86.4 |
0 |
0* |
300 |
288 |
0 |
15* |
1000 |
960 |
100 |
100 |
*One of the non-immobilized daphnids was floating on the surface.
Note: in the control and at nominal test concentrations of 7.78 to 288 mg a.i./L all daphnids were normal throughout the exposure period.
Description of key information
48 h EC50: 439 mg a.i./L
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect concentration:
- 439 mg/L
Additional information
For this endpoint one Klimisch 1 study is availabe (Cytec Tarigia, 1993).
The acute toxicity of MRD-92 -428 (CT-519 -925) - which contains 95 -97% a.i. (calculations were performed with the average concentration of 96%)- to Daphnia magna was determined in a static test under GLP. The test was performed similar to EEC C.2 and OECD 202. The test was started with a control and nominal concentrations of 8.1, 27, 90, 300, 1000 mg MRD-92-428 (CT-519-92S)/L, corresponding to 7.78, 25.9, 86.4, 288 and 960 mg a.i./L. The concentrations were analyzed by DOC analyses using a carbon content of a.i. of 48.84%. The mean measured concentrations were 0 (control), 10.40, 32.31, 90.43, 295.5, and 917.2 mg a.i./L for nominal concentrations of 7.78, 25.9, 86.4, 288 and 960 mg a.i./L All values were > 80 % and hence results were based on nominal concentrations. For each test concentration and the control, 4 replicates with 5 daphinds each were set up in 30 mL vessels filled with 25 mL test solution. The test was performed in darkness. After 48 hours of exposure, 0, 0, 0, 0, 15 and 100 % of the daphnids were immobilized at 0 (control),7.78, 25.9, 86.4, 288 and 960 mg a.i./L. The corresponding 48 h EC50 value is 439 mg a.i./L.
This study is considered to be acceptable for the risk assessment.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.