Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Explosiveness

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
explosive properties of explosives
Type of information:
other: Structural Analysis
Adequacy of study:
other information
Study period:
04 March 2016 to 17 March 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: Study report pertains to multiple endpoints.
Reference
Endpoint:
flash point of flammable liquids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
04 March 2016 to 17 March 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: Study report pertains to multiple endpoints.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: Study report pertains to multiple endpoints.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: Study report pertains to multiple endpoints.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.9 (Flash-Point)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
closed cup
Flash point apparatus:
Setaflash apparatus
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No. of test material: CBI
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 02 February 2018

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark
Key result
Flash point:
181.6 °C
Atm. press.:
102.9 kPa
Remarks on result:
no flash point up to 100°C

The flash point is the lowest temperature at 101.3 kPa, at which the test liquid in a closed test vessel evolves vapor, under the conditions defined in the test method, in such amount that a flammable vapor / air mixture was produced in the test vessel.

The flash point was corrected for the atmospheric pressure using the following equation:

Equation 1 Corrected flash point = C + 0.23 (101.325 - p), where:

C = observed flash point [°C]

p = ambient atmospheric pressure [kPa].

Test

Temperature (⁰C)

Observations
19.0 No flash.
24.0 No flash.
29.0 No flash.
34.0 No flash.
39.0 No flash.
44.0 No flash.
49.0 No flash.
54.0 No flash.
59.0 No flash.
64.0 No flash.
69.0 No flash.
69.0 (fresh sample) No flash.
74.0 No flash.
79.0 No flash.
84.0 No flash.
89.0 No flash.
94.0 No flash.
99.0 No flash.
104.0 (fresh sample) No flash.
109.0 No flash.
114.0 No flash.
119.0 No flash.
124.0 No flash.
129.0 No flash.
134.0 No flash.
139.0 No flash.
144.0 No flash.
149.0 No flash.
154.0 No flash.
159.0 No flash.
164.0 No flash.
169.0 No flash.
174.0 No flash.
179.0 No flash.
184.0 A blue flame spread across the sample cup.
184.0 (fresh sample) A blue flame spread across the sample cup.
179.0 (fresh sample) No flash.
180.0 (fresh sample) No flash.
181.0 (fresh sample) No flash.
182.0 (fresh sample) A blue flame spread across the sample cup.
182.0 (fresh sample) A blue flame spread across the sample cup.
180.0 (fresh sample) No flash.
Atmospheric pressure: 102.9 kPa
Corrected flash point: 181.6⁰C
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The flash point of the test item has been determined to be 182 ± 2 °C.
Executive summary:

The flash point of the test item has been determined to be 182 ± 2 °C, using a closed cup equilibrium method designed to be compatible with Method A.9 Flash Point of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008.

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: Study report pertains to multiple endpoints.
Reference
Endpoint:
auto-ignition temperature, other
Remarks:
Liquids and Gases
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
04 March 2016 to 17 March 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: Study report pertains to multiple endpoints.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: Study report pertains to multiple endpoints.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: Study report pertains to multiple endpoints.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.15 (Auto-Ignition Temperature (Liquids and Gases))
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No. of test material: CBI
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 02 February 2018

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark
Key result
Auto-ignition temperature:
382 °C
Atm. press.:
102.9 kPa
Remarks on result:
other: The test item has been determined to have an auto-ignition temperature of 382 ± 5 °C.

Data Evaluation: The auto-ignition temperature is the lowest temperature that will result in the ignition of the test item after being injected into the test flask.

Test

temperature (⁰C)

Test weight (g)

Ignition

delay (s)

Observations
200 (clean flask) 0.2 ˃300 No ignition. Grey fumes were emitted.
250 (clean flask) 0.3 ˃300 No ignition. Grey fumes were emitted.
300 (clean flask) 0.2 ˃300 No ignition. Grey fumes were emitted.
350 (clean flask) 0.2 ˃300 No ignition. Grey fumes were emitted.
400 (clean flask) 0.2 ˃300 No ignition. Grey fumes were emitted.
450 (clean flask) 0.2 2 An orange flame. Grey fumes were emitted.
422 (clean flask) 0.2 5 An orange flame. Grey fumes were emitted.
410 (clean flask) 0.2 3 An orange flame. Grey fumes were emitted.
404 (clean flask) 0.2 6 An orange flame. Grey fumes were emitted.
402 (clean flask) 0.2 3 An orange flame. Grey fumes were emitted.
400 (clean flask) 0.2 4 An orange flame. Grey fumes were emitted.
390 (clean flask) 0.2 ˃300 No ignition. Grey fumes were emitted.
396 (clean flask) 0.2 5 An orange flame. Grey fumes were emitted.
394 (clean flask) 0.2 6 An orange flame. Grey fumes were emitted.
392 (clean flask) 0.2 7 An orange flame. Grey fumes were emitted.
390 (clean flask) 0.4 7 An orange flame. Grey fumes were emitted.
388 (clean flask) 0.4 10 An orange flame. Grey fumes were emitted.
386 (clean flask) 0.4 5 An orange flame. Grey fumes were emitted.
384 (clean flask) 0.4 6 An orange flame. Grey fumes were emitted.
382 (clean flask) 0.4 7 An orange flame. Grey fumes were emitted.
380 (clean flask) 0.4 ˃300 No ignition. Grey fumes were emitted.
380 (clean flask) 0.6 ˃300 No ignition. Grey fumes were emitted.
380 (clean flask) 0.8 ˃300 No ignition. Grey fumes were emitted.
380 (clean flask) 1.0 ˃300 No ignition. Grey fumes were emitted.
380 (clean flask) 1.2 ˃300 No ignition. Grey fumes were emitted.
Room temperature: 20 °C
Atmospheric pressure: 102.9kPa
Conclusions:
The test item has been determined to have an auto-ignition temperature of 382 ± 5 °C.
Executive summary:

Auto-Ignition Temperature (Liquids and Gases) was determined to be 382 ± 5 °C, using a procedure designed to be compatible with Method A.15 Auto-Ignition Temperature (Liquids and Gases) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008.

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: Study report pertains to multiple endpoints.
Reference
Endpoint:
oxidising liquids
Type of information:
other: Structural Analysis
Adequacy of study:
other information
Study period:
04 March 2016 to 17 March 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: Study report pertains to multiple endpoints.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: Study report pertains to multiple endpoints.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: Study report pertains to multiple endpoints.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.21 (Oxidising Properties (Liquids))
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No. of test material: CBI
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 02 February 2018

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Based on the chemical structure of the test item the result for the oxidising properties has been predicted negative.
Executive summary:

Oxidizing Properties (Liquids) was predicted negative, based on the chemical structure of the test item, using a procedure designed to be compatible with Method A.21 Oxidising Properties (Liquids) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.14 (Explosive properties)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Fatty acids, lanolin, Me esters
EC Number:
284-974-4
EC Name:
Fatty acids, lanolin, Me esters
Cas Number:
85005-41-0
Molecular formula:
C20H40O2
IUPAC Name:
Fatty acids, lanolin, Me esters
Test material form:
liquid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No. of test material: CBI
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 02 February 2018

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark

Results and discussion

Results of test series for explosives
Key result
Remarks on result:
other: There are no structural alerts within the chemical structure of the test item.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Data evaluation: If there are no structural alerts within the structure then the explosive properties can be predicted negative.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Based on the chemical structure of the test item the result for the explosive properties has been predicted negative.
Executive summary:

Explosive properties was predicted negative, based on the chemical structure of the test item, using a procedure designed to be compatible with Method A.14 Explosive Properties of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008.