Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information
The substance was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of the Ames test with and without metabolic activation.
Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2008-08-08 to 2008-09-03
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP study according to OECD test guideline 471
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
10% liver S9 in standard co-factors
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary Toxicity Test: 0, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
- Mutation Test-Experiment 1 and 2: 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500 and 1500 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
9-aminoacridine
N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
benzo(a)pyrene
mitomycin C
other: 1,8-Dihydroxyanthraquinone, 2-Aminoanthracene
Remarks:
The first four chemicals are positive controlsin the absence of S9. The last three are non-mutagenic in the absence of S9.
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48 h

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: by the background bacterial lawn

Evaluation criteria:
The test material will be considered mutagenic (positive) in the test system if
- dose-related increase in revertant frequency over the dose range is tested and/or
- a reproducible increase at one or more concentrations in at least one bacterial strain with or without metabolic activation is determined
Statistics:
Standard deviation
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: Toxic effects (no bacterial background lawn) and precipitate was observed 5000 µg/plate on the strain of Salmonella used (TA 100)

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: yes

Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Table 1: Spontaneous Mutation Rates (Concurrent Negative Controls)

Mean numbers of revertant colonies per plate

Base-pair substitution type

Frameshift type

TA 100

TA 1535

TA 102

TA 98

TA 1537

Experiment 1

109

17

278

14

19

Experiment 2

68

24

213

18

17

Table 2: Experiment 1 - Without Metabolic Activation

Test substance concentration (µg/plate)

Mean numbers of revertant colonies per plate (standard deviation)

 

Base-pair substitution type

Frameshift type

 

TA 100

TA 1535

TA 102

TA 98

TA 1537

0

89 (5.8)

21 (4.6)

265 (24.8)

21 (6.0)

15 (2.3)

1.5

94 (2.0)

24 (4.9)

279 (6.6)

19 (4.7)

14 (1.5)

5

74 (2.5)

23 (5.5)

288 (10.5)

22 (4.0)

18 (2.6)

15

87 (7.1)

17 (7.0)

275 (17.2)

15 (6.5)

14 (1.7)

50

77 (7.2)

17 (0.6)

269 (12.3)

18 (3.5)

17 (2.5)

150

94 (6.5)

24 (3.8)

273 (2.3)

15 (2.3)

13 (1.2)

500

0 V (0.00)

23 (5.6)

0 V (0.00)

0 V (0.00)

0 V (0.00)

1500

0 T (0.00)

0 V (0.0)

0 T (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

Positive controls

Name

ENNG

ENNG

MMC

4NQO

9AA

Concentration (µg/plate)

3

5

0.5

0.5

80

Mean no. colonies per plate

375 (121.9)

252 (6.4)

1055 (112.4)

149 (7.8)

595 (85.4)

Table 3: Experiment 1 - With Metabolic Activation

Test substance concentration (µg/plate)

Mean numbers of revertant colonies per plate (standard deviation)

 

Base-pair substitution type

Frameshift type

 

TA 100

TA 1535

TA 102

TA 98

TA 1537

0

94 (7.2)

13 (1.0)

240 (7.5)

21 (4.5)

20 (0.6)

1.5

80 (14.6)

10 (1.5)

238 (23.5)

25 (2.6)

18 (3.6)

5

100 (15.0)

14 (3.2)

231 (45.3)

28 (1.5)

14 (2.0)

15

83 (6.5)

14 (1.7)

253 (25.7)

29 (3.0)

14 (2.6)

50

84 (19.6)

14 (2.6)

266 (9.5)

23 (3.1)

12 (5.6)

150

78 (4.7)

8 (2.6)

264 (6.1)

24 (7.6)

16 (6.7)

500

59 S (11.5)

0 V (0.00)

180 S (5.0)

12 (1.5)

6 S (1.0)

1500

0 T (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

Positive controls

Name

2AA

2AA

DAN

BP

2AA

Concentration (µg/plate)

1

2

10

5

2

Mean no. colonies per plate

966 (18.0)

277 (62.2)

807 (128.3)

287 (53.6)

237 (72.7)

Table 4: Experiment 2 -Without Metabolic Activation

Test substance concentration (µg/plate)

Mean numbers of revertant colonies per plate (standard deviation)

 

Base-pair substitution type

Frameshift type

 

TA 100

TA 1535

TA 102

TA 98

TA 1537

0

85 (3.6)

25 (4.4)

267 (43.2)

14 (4.7)

13 (5.2)

1.5

83 (6.4)

25 (1.5)

232 (27.8)

13 (0.6)

13 (3.5)

5

75 (7.8)

19 (6.2)

251 (3.6)

13 (3.2)

14 (3.0)

15

68 (7.0)

21 (10.0)

226 (19.1)

15 (2.3)

15 (3.5)

50

74 (14.0)

22 (5.0)

231 (16.6)

16 (2.0)

17 (4.0)

150

68 (10.1)

23 (4.2)

214 (21.2)

13 (4.0)

10 (1.0)

500

0 T (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

0 V (0.00)

0 V (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

1500

0 T (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

Positive controls

Name

ENNG

ENNG

MMC

4NQO

9AA

Concentration (µg/plate)

3

5

0.5

0.2

80

Mean no. colonies per plate

359 (10.4)

98 (16.8)

848 (236.2)

102 (9.7)

821 (278.5)

Table 5: Experiment 2- With Metabolic Activation

Test substance concentration (µg/plate)

Mean numbers of revertant colonies per plate (standard deviation)

 

Base-pair substitution type

Frameshift type

 

TA 100

TA 1535

TA 102

TA 98

TA 1537

0

73 (4.7)

18 (3.5)

243 (28.7)

22 (1.2)

16 (1.2)

1.5

72 (4.4)

13 (6.7)

243 (9.5)

14 (4.2)

9 (3.2)

5

77 (11.8)

11 (2.1)

240 (20.6)

17 (3.5)

16 (3.2)

15

75 (3.1)

14 (2.1)

268 (8.1)

19 (6.7)

11 (2.0)

50

71 (5.6)

9 (0.6)

270 (11.4)

16 (4.2)

10 (4.4)

150

57 (7.1)

11 (2.9)

262 (10.6)

18 (2.1)

6 (1.7)

500

0 V (0.00)

0 V (0.00)

191 S (32.3)

8 V (13.3)

4 S (4.4)

1500

0 T (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

0 T (0.00)

Positive controls

Name

2AA

2AA

DAN

BP

2AA

Concentration (µg/plate)

1

2

10

5

2

Mean no. colonies per plate

1289 (230.9)

277 (81.8)

736 (165.6)

327 (20.4)

180 (25.9)

ENNG N-ethyl-N´-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine

4NQO 4 -Nitroquinoline-1 -oxide

9AA 9 -Aminoacridine

MMC Mitomycin C

2AA 2 -Aminoanthracene

BP Benzo(a)pyrene

DAN 1,8 -Dihydroxyanthraquinone

S Sparse bacterial background lawn

T Toxic, no bacterial background lawn

V Very weak bacterial background lawn

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

The substance was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

Additional information from genetic toxicity in vitro:

Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
GLP study according to OECD test guideline 471.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the results in the OECD 471 Ames test, the substance is not considered to be mutagenic according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.