Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-041-0 | CAS number: -
Toxicological Summary
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 3.52 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 75
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 264.47 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Long term exposure – inhalation systemicDose description modification - Guidance [1. Appendix R8-1] was followed for route to route extrapolation as no relevant dose descriptor were available for inhalation exposure. As noted in R.8.4.2, as no information regarding inhalation absorption is available, a worse case scenario that 100% of the dose will be absorbed via the inhalation route. The dose descriptor was modified to take into account an 8 hour exposure and the respiratory volume corrected for light work.
NOAECcorr = NOAEL *1 / rat resp. volume * oral / inhalation absorption * human resting resp. volume / worker resp. volume
NOAECcorr(general) = 150 mg/kg/bw *(1 / 0.38) * (100% (default) / 100%(default)) * 6.7 m3 (8hr) / 10 m3 (8hr) = 264.47 mg/m3
Assessment factors -Default assessment factors [1. R-8.4.3.3.] were applied.
Assessment factor = Interspecies * Intraspecies * Exposure duration * Dose-response * Quality of whole database
Assessment factor (general) = 2.5 * 5 * 6 * 1 * 1 = 75
DNEL derivation - DNEL = NOAELcorr / Assessment factor
DNEL = 264.47 mg/kg bw/day / 75 = 3.52 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- No issues
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Subacute to chromic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- worker
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- No issues
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No issues
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 3.3 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 75
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Long term exposure –dermal systemic -
NOAELcorr = NOAEL/Allometric scaling*(ABS oral rat / ABS derm rat) * (ABS derm rat / ABS derm human)
NOAELcorr (general) = 150mg/kg bw/4 * (100% (default) / 15% (default)) * (100% (default) / 100% (default)) = 250mg/kg bw
Assessment factors - Default assessment factors [1. R-8.4.3.3.] were applied.
Assessment factor = Interspecies * Intraspecies * Exposure duration * Dose-response * Quality of whole database
Assessment factor (general) = 2.5 * 5 * 6 * 1 * 1 = 75
DNEL derivation - DNEL = NOAELcorr / Assessment factor
DNEL = 250 mg/kg bw/day / 75 = 3.3 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- No issues
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- sub-acute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 6
- Justification:
- rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- remaining
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- worker
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- no issues
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No issues
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
Wear eye protection
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Additional information - General Population
The substance is consumed in the manufacture of a pharmaceutical product and the substance is not exposed to the general population
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
