Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Meets generally accepted scientific standards, well documented and acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Evaluation of skin sensitization potential of nickel, chromium, titanium and zirconium salts using guinea-pigs and mice
Author:
Ikarashi Y, Momma J, Tsuchiya T, Nakamura A
Year:
1996
Bibliographic source:
Biomaterials 17: 2103-2108

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
The sensitization potential of titanium tetrachloride was evaluated in the guinea pig maximization test.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Titanium tetrachloride
EC Number:
231-441-9
EC Name:
Titanium tetrachloride
Cas Number:
7550-45-0
Molecular formula:
Cl4Ti
IUPAC Name:
titanium tetrachloride
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): TiCl4
- Analytical purity: The test substance was obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, no data on purity

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Japan SLC Inc.
- Weight at study initiation: 350-400 g

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
no data

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
other: saline or ethanol
Concentration / amount:
intradermal injection (induction): 0 and 1%; topical application (induction): 0 and 1%; Challenge: 0, 2 and 5 %
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
other: epicutaneous
Vehicle:
other: saline or ethanol
Concentration / amount:
intradermal injection (induction): 0 and 1%; topical application (induction): 0 and 1%; Challenge: 0, 2 and 5 %
No. of animals per dose:
controls: 5 each challenge dose
inducted animals: 10 each challenge dose
Positive control substance(s):
not specified

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
2 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 2 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
5 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 5 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
2 %
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
1/10 animals with grade 1 erythema
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 2 %. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: 1/10 animals with grade 1 erythema.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
5 %
No. with + reactions:
5
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
5/10 animals with grade 1 erythema
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 5 %. No with. + reactions: 5.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: 5/10 animals with grade 1 erythema.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Due to the results of the GPMT, the test substance has to be classified as skin sensitizer at a dose level of 5% but not at 2% and below.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information