Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 801-260-5 | CAS number: 96383-55-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 30 Aug - 19 Nov 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 013
- Report date:
- 2013
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-tridecafluorooctyl 2-chloroprop-2-enoate
- EC Number:
- 801-260-5
- Cas Number:
- 96383-55-0
- Molecular formula:
- C11H6ClF13O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-tridecafluorooctyl 2-chloroprop-2-enoate
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): C6SFCLA
- Physical state: clear colourless liquid
- Lot/batch No.: G2X01
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 31 Oct 2014
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Atsugi Breeding Center, Charles River Laboratories Japan Inc.
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 32.3 - 38.2 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes, under following basis: body weight distribution
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: individual housing in Polycarbonate cages (TM-PC-S, Tokiwa Kagaku Kikai CO, Ltd.)
- Diet: pelleted diet for experimental animals (MF, Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd., lot No. 130612), ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21.3-22.9
- Humidity (%): 49.9-69.2
- Air changes (per hr): 6-20
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: olive oil containing 10% (v/v) cremophor
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: 2.5, 5, 10 mg/L
- Amount of vehicle: 10 mL/kg bw - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Test substance was weighed, was filled up to 50% of the final volume of the vehicle and was mixed using a magnetic stirrer. The vehicle was added to the measuring glass to adjust the final volume, and mixed by gentle turning.
A 1 mL-disposable syringe with a 27 G needle was used for the intraperitoneal injection of the test substance and negative control group. A 1 mL-disposable syringe with a gastric tube was used for the oral gavage of the positive control. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 48 h (from first treatment until collection of bone marrow)
- Frequency of treatment:
- twice at a 24-h interval
- Post exposure period:
- 24 h (after last treatment)
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
25, 50, 100 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Cyclophosphamide monohydrate (CP)
- Justification for choice of positive control: commonly used positive control in micronucleus test and recommended in the applied guideline
- Route of administration: by gavage
- Doses / concentrations: 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Frequency of treatment: twice (at a 24-h interval)
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow cell specimens
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
In the dose finding study the test substance was administered intraperitoneally to 3 male and 3 female mice at 30, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. All mice receiving 1000 mg/kg bw/day died after the first dosing. 2/3 male and 1/3 female of the 300 mg/kg bw/day group died after the second dosing, and a slight decrease in locomotor activity, hypothermia and tremor was observed in the surviving animals. No mortality was observed at 30 and 100 mg/kg bw/day. Therefore 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg bw/day were chosen for the main study.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields):
Treatment at 0 h and 24 h. Sampling at 48 h.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Both of the femurs were removed and the ends of the femur were cut off. Bone marrow cells were collected by washing the cavity with 0.5 mL of 10% (v/v) formalin. The cell suspension was mixed with a touch mixer, and was left to stand for 5 min to obtain the supernatant. The supernatant was mixed with 1 mL of 10% buffered formalin and centrifuged at about 170xg for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded. The precipitate was resuspended in a small amount of 10% buffered formalin, and the resulting cell suspension was stored in a serum tube at room temperature. The cell suspension was stained with the same volume of 500 µg/mL acridine orange just before microscopic observation, and was spread on a slide.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Bone marrow cell specimens were observed under a fluorescence microscope with B excitation filter in a blind manner. 1000 erythrocytes per animal (500 cells per area x 2 areas of view), including both immature and mature erythrocytes, were examined to determine the percentage of immature erythrocytes (IMEs) among total erythrocytes. A total of 2000 IMEs in 2 areas of view under the microscope (1000 IMEs per area) were examined for the number of micronucleated cells (MNIMEs). Erythrocytes stained with red fluorescence in the cytoplasm were recognised as IMEs, and erythrocytes without any fluorescence in the cytoplasm were recognised as mature erythrocytes. Small bodies with yellowish green fluorescence in the cytoplasm were recognised as micronuclei. Staining was performed according the method described in Hayashi et al., An application of acridine orange fluorescent staining to the micronucleus test. Mutat. Res. 1983; 120: 241-247. - Evaluation criteria:
- Criteria for a positive reaction: the test substance significantly increases the number of MNIMEs as compared to the negative control with dose-dependency.
- Statistics:
- Method of Kastenbaum and Bowman was applied for comparison of the number of MNIMEs in the test and negative control group. The percentage of IMEs among total erythrocytes was statistically analysed by EXSUS statistical software (Ver. 7.7.1, CAC Corporation). William´s test was applied to determine the difference between test and negative control goups regarding IMEs. F test for homogeneity of variance was applied for comparison of positive and negative controls regarding IMEs (Student´s t-test for comparison of mean values). Body weight parameters were evaluated with EXSUS software, Bartlett´s test, William´s test, Dunnett´s test, F-test, and STudent´s t-test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day: reduction of ratio IME/total erythrocytes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: 30 - 1000 mg/kg bw/day
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: mortality and signs of toxicity observed in animals of the 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day dose groups
- Evidence of cytotoxicity in tissue analyzed: not performed
- Rationale for exposure: recommended in guideline
- Harvest times: not performed
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay): no difference between negative control and test groups
- Ratio of PCE/NCE (for Micronucleus assay): at 100 mg/kg bw/day a slight reduction (statistically significant) in the percentage of IMEs was observed, when compared to the negative control (48.4±1.9% and 54.2±2.6%)
- Appropriateness of dose levels and route: Dose levels were chosen to produce no to little toxicity according to the guideline (reduction of IMEs). No further toxicity (mortailty or clinical signs) was observed. Statistically significant differences were detected in the percentage of IMEs between the test material (100 mg/kg bw/d) and the negative controls, indicating exposure to the test material in the bone marrow.
- Statistical evaluation: appropriate statistical evaluation was performed for the various parameters
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Results from the micronucleus test in mice.
Treatment group |
Dose level (mg/kg bw/day) |
MNIMEs (based on 10000 IMEs scored) |
IME ratio among total eryxthrocytes [%], mean of 5x1000 erythrocytes scored±SD |
|
|
|
Number |
Incidence [%], mean±SD |
|
Negative control (vehicle) |
0 |
10 |
0.10±0.05 |
54.2±2.6 |
Test item |
25 |
11 |
0.11±0.02 |
53.1±1.1 |
Test item |
50 |
13 |
0.13±0.06 |
53.2±2.5 |
Test item |
100 |
13 |
0.13±0.04 |
48.4±1.9* |
Positive control (CP) |
20 |
71## |
0.71±0.12 |
48.5±5.0 |
Historical negative control (Jan 2010-Mar 2013; 51 animals) |
0 |
- |
0.10±0.06 |
51.8±2.3 |
CP: cyclophosphamide
IME: immature erythrocyte
MNIMEs: micronucleated IMEs
##: significantly different (p≤0.01) from the negative control by Kastenbaum and Bowman´s method
*: significantly different (p≤0.05) from the negative control by William´s test
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
