Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 269-616-7 | CAS number: 68307-94-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The experimental phases of the study were performed between 29 July 2011 and 04 January 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted to GLP and in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do no effect the quality of the relevant results.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5375 - In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: is acceptable to the Japanese New Substance Law (METI)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Phosphoric acid, mono- and di-C6-10-alkyl esters
- EC Number:
- 269-616-7
- EC Name:
- Phosphoric acid, mono- and di-C6-10-alkyl esters
- Cas Number:
- 68307-94-8
- Molecular formula:
- Not applicable (a generic molecular formula cannot be provided for this specific UVCB substance)
- IUPAC Name:
- Esterification Products of Phosphorus Pentoxide and Alcohols C6-C10 (even numbered)
- Details on test material:
- Sponsor's identification: Esterification products of Phosphorus Pentoxide and Alcohols C6-C10 (Even numbered)
Description: Amber coloured slightly viscous liquid
Batch number: CI1E0447 solvent free
CAS No.: 68307-94-8
Identifier: TIS O2891
Date received: 13 June 2011
Expiry date: 29 May 2013
Storage conditions: Room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Not applicable.
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- For each experiment, sufficient whole blood was drawn from the peripheral circulation of a volunteer who had been previously screened for suitability. The volunteer had not been exposed to high levels of radiation or hazardous chemicals and had not knowingly recently suffered from a viral infection. The cell-cycle time for the lymphocytes from the donors used in this study was determined using BrdU (bromodeoxyuridine) incorporation
to assess the number of first, second and third division metaphase cells and so calculate the average generation time (AGT). The average AGT for the regular donors used in this laboratory has been determined to be approximately 16 hours under typical experimental exposure conditions.
Cell Culture:
Cells were grown in Eagle's minimal essential medium with HEPES buffer (MEM), supplemented "in-house" with L-glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin, amphotericin B and 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), at 37°C with 5% CO2 in humidified air. The lymphocytes of fresh heparinised whole blood were stimulated to divide by the addition of phytohaemagglutinin (PHA). - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbitone and beta-naphthoflavone induced rat liver, S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary Toxicity Test (Cell Growth Inhibition Test):
The dose range of test item used was 19.53 to 5000 µg/ml
Experiment 1:
4(20)-hour without S9: 0*,6.25, 12.5, 25, 50*, 75*, 100*, 150, 200 µg/ml
4(20)-hour with S9: 0*, 6.25, 12.5, 25*, 50*, 75*, 100*, 150, 200, µg/ml
Experiment 2
24-hour without S9: 0*,12.5, 25, 50*, 75*, 100*, 200 µg/ml
4(20)-hour with S9: 0*, 12.5, 25, 50*, 75*, 100*, 200, µg/ml
* Dose levels selected for metaphase analysis - Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle: Dimethyl sulphoxide
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- Used In the presence of S9 at 5 µg/ml
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- Used In the absence of S9 at 0.4 and 0.2 µg/ml fir 4(20)-hour and 24-hour cultures respectively.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHODS OF APPLICATION:
In medium
DURATION
- Pre-incubation period:
48 hours
- Exposure duration:
Experiment 1 – 4 hours with and without S9. Experiment 2 – 24 hours without S9, 4 hours with S9.
- Expression time (cells in growth medium):
20 hours for 4 hours exposure
- Selection time (in incubation with a selective agent):
Not applicable
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells):
24 hours
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (Cytogenetic assays):
Demecolcine
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays):
When slides were dry they were stained in 5% giemsa for 5 minutes, rinsed, dried and coverslipped using mounting medium.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
Duplicate cultures
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:
100/culture
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
-Method:
Mitotic index – A total of 2000 lymphocyte cell nuclei were counted and the number of cells in metaphase recorded and expressed as the mitotic index as a percentage of the vehicle control value.
-Scoring of Chromosome Damage:
Where possible the first 100 consecutive well-spread metaphases from each culture were counted, where there were approximately 30 to 50% of cells with aberrations, slide evaluation was terminated at 50 cells. If the cell had 44-48 chromosomes, any gaps, breaks or rearrangements were noted according to the simplified system of Savage (1976) recommended in the 1983 UKEMS guidelines for mutagenicity testing. Cells with chromosome aberrations were reviewed as necessary by a senior cytogeneticist prior to decoding the slides.
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy:
In addition, cells with 69 chromosomes or more were scored as polyploid cells and the incidence of polyploid cells (%) reported. - Evaluation criteria:
- A positive response was recorded for a particular treatment if the % cells with aberrations, excluding gaps, markedly exceeded that seen in the concurrent control, either with or without a clear dose-relationship. For modest increases in aberration frequency a dose response relationship is generally required and appropriate statistical tests may be applied in order to record a positive response.
- Statistics:
- The frequency of cells with aberrations excluding gaps and the frequency of polyploid cells was compared, where necessary, with the concurrent vehicle control value using Fisher's Exact test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: Human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- The test item did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations in either the absence or presence of metabolic activation (S9).
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Refer to information on results and attached tables.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS
PRELIMINARY TOXICITY TEST (CELL GROWTH INHIBITION TEST)
The mitotic index data are presented in Appendix 1 (5) and (6) (see attached background material - Appendix 1). The test item exhibited clear evidence of dose-related toxicity in all three exposure groups. A precipitate was observed in the parallel blood-free cultures at the end of the exposure period initially at 156.25 µg/ml and 312.5 µg/ml without and with S9-mix, respectively.
Microscopic assessment of the slides prepared from the treatment cultures showed that metaphase cells were present up to 78.13 µg/ml in the continuous exposure and 4(20) hour with S9, whereas metaphase cells were present at 156.25 µg/ml in the 4(20) hour without S9 exposure group.
Therefore, the dose selection for Experiments 1 and 2 was based on toxicity in accordance with the OECD 473 test guideline.
CHROMOSOME ABERRATION TEST - EXPERIMENT 1
The dose levels of the controls and the test item are given in the table below:
Group Final concentration of Esterification products of Phosphorus Pentoxide and Alcohols C6-C10 (Even numbered) (µg/ml)
4(20)-hour without S9 0*,6.25, 12.5, 25, 50*, 75*, 100*, 150, 200, MMC 0.4*
4(20)-hour with S9 0*, 6.25, 12.5, 25*, 50*, 75*, 100*, 150, 200, CP 5*
*: dose levels selected for metaphase analysis
MMC: Mitomycin C
CP: Cyclophosphamide
The qualitative assessment of the slides determined that the toxicity was similar to that observed in the Preliminary Toxicity Test and that there were metaphases suitable for scoring present up to the test item dose level of 100 µg/ml in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (S9).
The results of the mitotic indices (MI) from the cultures after their respective treatments are presented in Form 1, Appendix 2 (see attached background material - Appendix 2). These data show an approximate 50% growth inhibition was achieved at 100 µg/ml in the presence of S9. However, in the absence of S9, an 18% growth inhibition was observed at 100 µg/ml but there were no metaphases present above this dose level.
The selection of the maximum dose level for metaphase analysis was based on toxicity, and was 100 µg/ml both in the absence and presence of S9, because there were no metaphases present above this dose level.
The chromosome aberration data are given in Form 1, Appendix 2 (see attached background material - Appendix 2). All of the vehicle control cultures had frequencies of cells with chromosome aberrations within the expected range. The positive control items induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.
The test item did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations in either the absence or presence of metabolic activation (S9).
The polyploid cell frequency data are given in Form 1, Appendix 2. The test item did not induce a statistically significant increase in the numbers of polyploid cells at any dose level in either of the exposure groups.
CHROMOSOME ABERRATION TEST - EXPERIMENT 2:
The dose levels of the controls and the test item are given in the table below:
Group Final concentration of Esterification products of Phosphorus Pentoxide and Alcohols C6-C10 (Even numbered) (µg/ml)
24-hour without S9 0*,12.5, 25, 50*, 75*, 100*, 200, MMC 0.2*
4(20)-hour with S9 0*, 12.5, 25, 50*, 75*, 100*, 200, CP 5*
*: dose levels selected for metaphase analysis
MMC: Mitomycin C
CP: Cyclophosphamide
The qualitative assessment of the slides determined that there were metaphases suitable for scoring present at the maximum test item dose level of 100 µg/ml in the presence and absence of S9.
The results of the mitotic indices (MI) from the cultures after their respective treatments are presented in Form 2, Appendix 2 (see attached background material - Appendix 2). These data show 29% and 21% growth inhibition was achieved at 100 µg/ml in the absence and presence of S9, respectively. The selection of the maximum dose level for metaphase analysis was similar to Experiment 1, and was based on toxicity.
The chromosome aberration data are given in Form 2, Appendix 2 (see attached background material - Appendix 2). All of the vehicle control cultures had frequencies of cells with chromosome aberrations within the expected range. The positive control items induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.
The test item did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with chromosome aberrations in either the absence or presence of metabolic activation.
The polyploid cell frequency data are given in Form 2, Appendix 2 (see attached background material - Appendix 2). The test item did not induce a significant increase in the numbers of polyploid cells at any dose level in either of the exposure groups. - Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type:
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
See 'Overall Remarks, attachments'
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The test item did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with chromosome aberrations in either the absence or presence of a liver enzyme metabolising system in either of two separate experiments. The test item was therefore considered to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro. - Executive summary:
Introduction.
This report describes the results of an in vitro study for the detection of structural chromosomal aberrations in cultured mammalian cells. It supplements microbial systems insofar as it identifies potential mutagens that produce chromosomal aberrations rather than gene mutations (Scott et ai, 1990). The method used was compatible to that described in the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (1997) No. 473 "Genetic Toxicology: Chromosome Aberration Test" and Method B10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 of 30 May 2008, UK, DoH Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals for Mutagenicity as detailed in the UKEMS Recommended
Procedures for Basic Mutagenicity Tests (1990), US EPA OPTT8 870.5375 Guideline and is acceptable to the Japanese New Chemical Substance Law (METI).
Methods.
Duplicate cultures of human lymphocytes, treated with the test item, were evaluated for chromosome aberrations at up to four dose levels, together with vehicle and positive controls. Four treatment conditions were used for the study, i.e. In Experiment 1, a 4-hour exposure in the presence of an induced rat liver homogenate metabolising system (S9), at a 2% final concentration with cell harvest after a 20-hour expression period and a 4-hour exposure in the absence of metabolic activation (S9) with a 20-hour expression period. In Experiment 2, the 4-hour exposure with addition of S9 was repeated (using a 1% final S9 concentration); whilst in the absence of metabolic activation the exposure time was increased to 24 hours.
The dose levels used in the main experiments were selected using data from the preliminary toxicity test and were as follows.
Group
Final concentration of Test Item (µg/ml)
4(20)-hour without S9
0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200
4(20)-hour with S9 (2%)
0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200
24-hour without S9
0, 12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 200
4(20)-hour with S9 (1%)
0, 12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 200
Results.
All vehicle (solvent) control groups had frequencies of cells with aberrations within the range expected for normal human lymphocytes.
All the positive control items induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations indicating that the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.
The test item did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations, in either of two separate experiments, using a dose range that included a dose level that induced or exceeded approximately 50% mitotic inhibition.
Conclusion.
The test item was considered to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
