Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-649-8 | CAS number: 1474044-69-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Study performed between 12 September 2011 and 23 September 2011
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted to GLP and in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do no effect the quality of the relevant results.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2400 (Acute Eye Irritation)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (JMAFF), Testing Guidelines for Toxicology Studies, 12 NohSan No. 8147, amended 10 December 2002
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Esterification products of Fatty acids C18 unsaturated and triethanolamine
- EC Number:
- 939-649-8
- Cas Number:
- 1474044-69-3
- Molecular formula:
- Not applicable (a generic molecular formula cannot be provided for this specific UVCB substance)
- IUPAC Name:
- Esterification products of Fatty acids C18 unsaturated and triethanolamine
- Test material form:
- liquid: viscous
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Three New Zealand White (Hsdlf:NZW) strain rabbits were supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd.
- Age at study initiation: Twelve to twenty weeks old.
- Weight at study initiation: 2.48 to 2.82 kg.
- Fasting period before study: None.
- Housing: The animals were individually housed in suspended cages.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Free access to food (2930 Teklad Global Certified Rabbit diet) was allowed throughout the study.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Free access to mains drinking water was allowed throughout the study.
- Acclimation period: At least five days.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Set to achieve limits of 17 to 23°C
- Humidity (%): Set to achieve limits of 30 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr): At least fifteen changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- A volume of 0.1 ml of the test item was placed into the conjunctival sac of the right eye.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single application.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 72 hours
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- MEASUREMENT OF PH:
The pH of the test item was determined prior to commencement of the study and found to be as follows:
Undileted as supplied: pH approximately 7.7 (immediately)
90% v/v aqueous preparation of the test item: pH approximately 8.8 (immediately)
: pH approximately 8.8 (after 10 minutes)
PROCEDURE:
Immediately before the start of the test, both eyes of the provisionally selected test rabbits were examined for evidence of ocular irritation or defect with the aid of a light source from a standard ophthalmoscope. Only animals free of ocular damage were used.
Initially, a single rabbit was treated. A volume of 0.1 ml of the test item was placed into the conjunctival sac of the right eye, formed by gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The upper and lower eyelids were held together for about one second immediately after treatment, to prevent loss of the test item, and then released. The left eye remained untreated and was used for control purposes. Immediately after administration of the test item, an assessment of the initial pain reaction was made according to the six point scale shown in Appendix 1 (see attached background material; Appendix 1 - Initial Pain Reaction).
After consideration of the ocular responses produced in the first treated animal, two additional animals were treated.
SCORING SYSTEM:
Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made approximately 1 hour and 24, 48 and 72 hours following treatment, according to the numerical Draize Scale for Scoring Ocular Irritation (see Appendix 2 - attached background material).
Any other ocular effects were also noted.
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: Examination of the eye was facilitated by the use of the light source from a standard ophthalmoscope.
Other:
Any clinical signs of toxicity, if present, were also recorded.
Individual bodyweights were recorded on Day 0 (the day of dosing) and at the end of the observation period.
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (Animal 70933 - male)
- Time point:
- other: Mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effects observed at any time point
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (Animal70989 - male)
- Time point:
- other: Mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effects observed at any time point
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (Animal 70990 - male)
- Time point:
- other: Mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effects observed at any time point
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (Animal 70933 - male)
- Time point:
- other: Mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effects observed at any time point
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (Animal 70989 - male)
- Time point:
- other: Mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effects observed at any time point
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (Animal 70990 - male)
- Time point:
- other: Mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effects observed at any time point
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (redness)
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (Animal 70933 - male)
- Time point:
- other: Mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (redness)
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (Animal 70989 - male)
- Time point:
- other: Mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (redness)
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (Animal 70990 - male)
- Time point:
- other: Mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (Animal 70933 - male)
- Time point:
- other: Mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 24 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Score of 1 at 1 hour observation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (Animal 70989 - male)
- Time point:
- other: Mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 24 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Score of 1 at 1 hour observation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (Animal 70990 - male)
- Time point:
- other: Mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 24 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Score of 1 at 1 hour observation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Individual and group mean scores for ocular irritation are given in Table 1 and Table 2.
Pale yellow coloured staining of the fur was noted around all treated eyes during the study.
No corneal or iridial effects were noted during the study.
Minimal conjunctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one and 24 hours after treatment.
All treated eyes appeared normal at the 48-Hour observation. - Other effects:
- Bodyweight
Individual bodyweights and bodyweight changes are given in Table 3.
All animals showed expected gain in bodyweight during the study.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1 Individual Scores and Individual Total Scores for Ocular Irritation
Rabbit Number and Sex |
70933Male |
70989Male |
70990Male |
|||||||||
IPR= 2 |
IPR = 2 |
IPR = 2 |
||||||||||
Time After Treatment |
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
CORNEA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E = Degree of Opacity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
F = Area of Cornea Involved |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Score (E x F) x 5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
IRIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Score (D x 5) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
CONJUNCTIVAE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A = Redness |
1Sf |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1Sf |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1Sf |
1Sf |
0Sf |
0 |
B = Chemosis |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
C = Discharge |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Score (A + B + C) x 2 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
Total Score |
6 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
IPR= Initial pain reaction
Sf = Pale yellow coloured staining of the fur
Table 2 Individual Total Scores and Group Mean Scores for Ocular Irritation
Rabbit Number and Sex |
Individual Total Scores At: |
|||
1 Hour |
24 Hours |
48 Hours |
72 Hours |
|
70933Male |
6 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
70989Male |
6 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
70990Male |
6 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
Group Total |
18 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
Group Mean Score |
6.0 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Table 3 Individual Bodyweights and Bodyweight Changes
Rabbit Number |
Individual Bodyweight (kg) |
Bodyweight Change (kg) |
|
Day 0 |
Day 3 |
||
70933Male |
2.48 |
2.50 |
0.02 |
70989Male |
2.67 |
2.71 |
0.04 |
70990Male |
2.82 |
2.87 |
0.05 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information minimal irritant Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The test item produced a maximum group mean score of 6.0 and was classified as a minimal irritant (Class 3 on a 1 to 8 scale) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.
The test item does not meet the criteria for classification according to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation or the Globally Harmonised Classification System. - Executive summary:
Introduction.
The study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test item to the eye of the New Zealand White rabbit. The method was designed to be compatible with the following:
- OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 405 “Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion” (adopted 24 April 2002)
- Method B5 Acute Toxicity (Eye Irritation) of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008
- United States Environmental Protection Agency Health Effects Test Guidelines OPPTS 870.2400 Acute Eye Irritation August 1998
- Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (JMAFF), Testing Guidelines for Toxicology Studies, 12 NohSan No. 8147, amended 10 December 2002
- Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1992
Result.
A single application of the test item to the non-irrigated eye of three rabbits produced minimal conjunctival irritation. All treated eyes appeared normal at the 48‑Hour observation.
Conclusion.
The test item produced a maximum group mean score of 6.0 and was classified as a minimal irritant (Class3 on a 1 to 8 scale) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.
The test item does not meet the criteria for classification according to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation or the Globally Harmonised Classification System.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.