Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 920-632-9 | CAS number: -
Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- particle size distribution (granulometry)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Well documented study performed according to EU acceptable method
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 110 (Particle Size Distribution / Fibre Length and Diameter Distributions)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- other quality assurance
- Type of distribution:
- counted distribution
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Slags, nickel smelting
- EC Number:
- 920-632-9
- Molecular formula:
- Not applicable, UVCB, inorganic
- IUPAC Name:
- Slags, nickel smelting
- Details on test material:
- Nickel slags are presented in the form of granules or massive(stones)
Partcle size distribution was determined on representatuive granulate sample collected at the manifacturing site.
Sample 09TT04683. The granules were tested in their original partcile size as placed on the market.
Constituent 1
Results and discussion
Particle sizeopen allclose all
- Percentile:
- D50
- Remarks on result:
- other: Migrated from fields under 'Mass median diameter' as D50 percentile. No source field for Standard deviation.
- Percentile:
- D50
- Mean:
- 1 714 µm
- Remarks on result:
- other: Granules 4683
- Percentile:
- other: D80
- Mean:
- 2 371 µm
- Remarks on result:
- other: Granules 4683
Any other information on results incl. tables
Particle size distribution, granulated slags
Sample |
|
09TT04683 |
|
Size |
|
Retained |
|
mesh |
mm |
g |
% |
|
5.000 |
1.71 |
0.96 |
6 |
3.360 |
9.13 |
5.13 |
8 |
2.380 |
23.92 |
13.45 |
16 |
1.190 |
90.70 |
50.98 |
20 |
0.841 |
29.78 |
16.74 |
30 |
0.595 |
15.89 |
8.93 |
40 |
0.420 |
5.14 |
2.89 |
50 |
0.297 |
1.24 |
0.70 |
140 |
0.106 |
0.28 |
0.16 |
|
-0.106 |
0.12 |
0.07 |
Sum |
|
177.91 |
100 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Nickel slags are presented in the form of granules or massive(stones)
Partcle size distribution was determined for the granulated slag. Granules were tested in their original partcile size as placed on the market.
D50 of parcle size for the slag granules is measured of 1714µm
D80 of parcle size for the slag granules is measured of 2374 µm - Executive summary:
Nickel slags are presented in the form of granules or massive(stones) Partcle size distribution was determined for the granulated slag. Granules were tested in their original partcile size as placed on the market. D50 of parcle size for the slag granules is measured of 1714µm. D80 of parcle size for the slag granules is measured of 2374 µm
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
