Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 241-620-3 | CAS number: 17636-10-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012-04-18 - 2012-07-24
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-Guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, Guideline No. 487 "In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test".
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- slight modification of the expression phase and harvest time, which is not compromising the outcome of the study.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Hess. Ministerium für Umwelt, Energie, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium 3-mercaptopropanesulphonate
- EC Number:
- 241-620-3
- EC Name:
- Sodium 3-mercaptopropanesulphonate
- Cas Number:
- 17636-10-1
- Molecular formula:
- C3H8O3S2.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium 3-sulfanylpropane-1-sulfonate
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): sodium 3-mercaptopropanesulphonate
- Substance type: organic
- Physical state: yellowish powder
- Analytical purity: approx. 85 %, dose calculation adjusted to purity
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature, moisture protected,
- Stability in solvent: stable
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human lymphocytes
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Blood samples were obtained from healthy, non-smoking donors not receiving medication. For this study, blood was collected from a female donor (23 years old) for the first experiment, from a 27 year-old female donor for Experiment IIA and from a 33 year-old female donor for Experiment IIB. All donors had a previously established low incidence of micronuclei in their peripheral blood lymphocytes. Blood samples were drawn by venous puncture and collected in heparinized tubes. The tubes were sent to Harlan CCR to initiate cell cultures within 24 hrs after blood collection. If necessary, the blood was stored before use at 4 °C.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- liver S9 mix from phenobarbital/beta-naphthoflavone treated male rats
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I without S9-mix: 0, 13.6, 23.8, 41.7, 73.0, 127.8, 223.6, 391.3, 684.7, 1198.3, 2097.0 µg/mL
Experiment IIA without S9-mix: 0, 13.6, 23.8, 41.7, 73.0, 127.8, 223.6, 391.3, 684.7, 1198.3, 2097.0 µg/mL
Experiment I with S9-mix: 0, 13.6, 23.8, 41.7, 73.0, 127.8, 223.6, 391.3, 684.7, 1198.3, 2097.0 µg/mL
Experiment IIA and B with S9-mix: 223.6, 391.3, 684.7, 1198.3, 2097.0 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: deionised water, the final concentration of deinonised water in the culture medium was 10 % (v/v)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen due to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Concurrent solvent controls (culture medium with 10 % deionised water) (local tap water deionised at Harlan CCR)).
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Mitomycin C (2.0 µg/mL - Exp. 1), Demecolcin (150 ng/mL - Exp. 2), Cyclophosphamide (10 µg/mL - Exp. 1 and 2)
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- other: demecolcin
- Remarks:
- Dilutions of stock solutions were prepared on the day of the experiment. Stability of Demecolcin, Mitomycin C and CPA in solution is unknown but a mutagenic response in the expected range is sufficient biological evidence of chemical stability.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 40 hours
- Exposure duration: 4 and 20 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium):
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells):
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): cytochalasin B
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: at least 1000 binuecleate cells per culture
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: To describe a cytotoxic effect the CBPI (cytokinesis-block proliferation index) was determined in approximately 500 cells per culture and cytotoxicity is expressed as % cytostasis. A CBPI of 1 (all cells are mononucleate) is equivalent to 100 % cytostasis (7).
OTHER: - Evaluation criteria:
- The micronucleus assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
a) The number of micronuclei found in the negative and solvent controls falls within the range of the laboratory historical control data.
b) The positive control substances should produce significant increases in the number of cells with micronuclei.
Evaluation of Results
A test item can be classified as non-mutagenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells in all evaluated dose groups is in the range of the laboratory historical control data and/or
- no statistically significant or concentration-related increase in the number of micronucleated cells is observed.
A test item can be classified as mutagenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells is not in the range of the historical laboratory control data and
- either a concentration-related increase of micronucleated cells in three test groups or a statistically significant increase of the number of micronucleated cells is observed. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance was confirmed by means of the Chi square test. However, both biological and statistical significance should be considered together. If the criteria for the test item mentioned above are not clearly met, the classification with regard to the historical data and the biological relevance is discussed and/or a confirmatory experiment is performed.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- In absence and presence of S9 mix, no increase in the number of micronucleated cells was observed after treatment with the test item. In exp. IIA without S9 mix stat. sig. increases (0.8, 1.0 % micronucleated cells) were in range of historical controls.
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- In the absence and presence of S9 mix, no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest applied concentration.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: No relevant influence on pH value was observed.
- Effects of osmolality: No relevant influence on osmolarity value was observed.
- Precipitation: No precipitation of the test item in the culture medium was observed.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Yes
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: In the absence and presence of S9 mix, no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest applied concentration. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
The test item sodium 3-mercaptopropanesulphonate, dissolved in deionised water, was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes in vitro in the absence and presence of metabolic activation by S9 mix in three independent experiments. The following study design was performed:
|
Without S9-Mix |
With S9-Mix |
|
|
Exp. I |
Exp. IIA |
Exp. I and IIB |
Exposure period |
4 hrs |
20 hrs |
4 hrs |
Recovery |
16 hrs |
- |
16 hrs |
Cytochalasin B exposure |
20 hrs |
20 hrs |
20 hrs |
Preparation interval |
40 hrs |
40 hrs |
40 hrs |
Total culture period |
88 hrs |
88 hrs |
88 hrs |
So, in Experiment I, the exposure period was 4 hours with and without S9 mix and in Experiment IIA, the exposure period was 20 hours without S9 mix. In Experiment IIB, the exposure period was 4 hours with S9 mix. The cells were prepared 40 hours after start of treatment with the test item.
In each experimental group two parallel cultures were analysed. 1000 binucleate cells per culture were scored for cytogenetic damage on coded slides. To determine a cytotoxic effect the CBPI was determined in approximately 500 cells per culture and cytotoxicity is described as % cytostatis.The highest applied concentration in this test on toxicity (2097.0 µg/mL of the test item, approx. 10 mM) was chosen with regard to the molecular weight and the purity (85 %) of the test item and with respect to the current OECD Guideline 487.
Dose selection of the cytogenetic experiment was performed considering the toxicity data and in accordance with OECD Guideline 487.
No precipitation of the test item in the culture medium was observed. No relevant influence on osmolarity or pH value was observed.
No relevant cytotoxicity, indicated by reduced CBPI and described as cytostasis could be observed up to the highest applied concentration.
In the absence and the presence of S9 mix, no biologically relevant increase in the number of cells carying micronuclei was observed.
The micronucleus rates of the cells after treatment with the test item (0.25 - 1.00 % micronucleated cells) were close to the range of the solvent control values (0.20 - 0.65 % micronucleated cells) and within the range of the laboratory historical control data. However, in Experiment IIA in the absence of S9 mix statistically significant increases (0.8 and 1.0 % micronucleated cells) were observed after treatment with 223.6 and 2097.0 µg/mL. The values are in the range of the historical solvent control data (0.05 - 1.45 %micronucleated cells) and therefore biologically irrelevant.
Appropriate mutagens were used as positive controls. In both experiments, either Demecolcin (150.0 ng/mL), MMC (2.0 µg/mL) or CPA (10.0 µg/mL) were used as positive controls and showed distinct statistically significant increases in cells with micronuclei.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the in vitro micronucleus test in human lymphocytes, when tested up to the highest required concentration.
Therefore, sodium 3-mercaptopropanesulphonate is considered to benon-mutagenic in this in vitro micronucleustest, when tested up to the highest required concentration.
Table 2: Summary of results of the in vitro micronucleus test in human lymphocytes with sodium 3-mercaptopropanesulphonate
Exp. |
Preparation |
Test item |
Proliferation |
Cytostasis |
Micronucleated |
|
interval |
concentration |
index |
in %* |
cells |
|
|
in µg/mL |
CBPI |
|
in %** |
Exposure period 4 hrs without S9 mix |
|||||
I |
40 hrs |
Negative control |
2.00 |
|
0.45 |
|
|
Solvent control1 |
1.98 |
|
0.25 |
|
|
Positive control2 |
1.74 |
25.7 |
11.90S |
|
|
684.7 |
2.05 |
n.c. |
0.45 |
|
|
1198.3 |
2.11 |
n.c. |
0.25 |
|
|
2097.0 |
2.10 |
n.c. |
0.35 |
Exposure period 20 hrs without S9 mix |
|||||
IIA |
40 hrs |
Negative control |
1.96 |
|
0.25 |
|
|
Solvent control1 |
1.90 |
|
0.25 |
|
|
Positive control3 |
1.51 |
46.9 |
3.00S |
|
|
223.6 |
1.80 |
11.0 |
0.80S |
|
|
1198.3 |
1.69 |
23.2 |
0.50 |
|
|
2097.0 |
1.67 |
25.2 |
1.00S |
Exposure period 4 hrs with S9 mix |
|||||
I |
40 hrs |
Negative control |
1.82 |
|
0.30 |
|
|
Solvent control1 |
2.01 |
|
0.20 |
|
|
Positive control4 |
1.58 |
29.6 |
4.40S |
|
|
684.7 |
1.92 |
9.7 |
0.30 |
|
|
1198.3 |
1.91 |
10.2 |
0.45 |
|
|
2097.0 |
1.90 |
11.6 |
0.35 |
IIB |
40 hrs |
Negative control |
2.01 |
|
0.70 |
|
|
Solvent control1 |
1.91 |
|
0.65 |
|
|
Positive control4 |
1.71 |
29.7 |
6.00S |
|
|
684.7 |
1.93 |
n.c. |
1.00 |
|
|
1198.3 |
1.95 |
n.c. |
0.85 |
|
|
2097.0 |
1.97 |
n.c. |
0.65 |
* For the positive control groups, the relative values are related to the negative controls; for the test item treatment groups the values are
related to the solvent controls
** The number of micronucleated cells was determined in a sample of 2000 binucleated cells
S The number of micronucleated cells is statistically significantly higher than corresponding control values
1 Deionised water 10.0 % (v/v)
2 MMC 2.0 µg/mL
3 Demecolcin 150.0 ng/mL
4 CPA 10.0 µg/mL
Table 3: Cytotoxicity of sodium 3-mercaptopropanesulphonate to the cultures of human lymphocytes.
Concentration |
Exposure time |
Preparation interval |
CBPI |
Cytostasis (%) |
Without S9 mix |
||||
Negative control |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
2.00 |
--- |
Solvent control |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.98 |
--- |
13.6 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
n.d. |
n.d. |
23.8 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
n.d. |
n.d. |
41.7 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
n.d. |
n.d. |
73.0 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
n.d. |
n.d. |
127.8 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
n.d. |
n.d. |
223.6 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
2.02 |
n.c. |
391.3 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
2.06 |
n.c. |
684.7 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
2.05 |
n.c. |
1198.3 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
2.11 |
n.c. |
2097.0 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
2.10 |
n.c. |
With S9 mix |
||||
Negative control |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.82 |
--- |
Solvent control |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
2.01 |
--- |
13.6 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
n.d. |
n.d. |
23.8 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
n.d. |
n.d. |
41.7 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
n.d. |
n.d. |
73.0 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
n.d. |
n.d. |
127.8 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
n.d. |
n.d. |
223.6 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.94 |
7.0 |
391.3 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.87 |
13.9 |
684.7 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.92 |
9.7 |
1198.3 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.91 |
10.2 |
2097.0 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.90 |
11.6 |
Experimental groups evaluated for
cytogenetic damage are shown in bold characters
* Mean value of two cultures
n.d. Not determined
n.c. Not calculated as the CBPIwas equal or
higher than solvent control value
Toxicity - Experiment IIA
In Experiment IIA the CBPI in two cultures (500 cells per culture) was determined.
Table 4: Cytotoxicity of sodium 3-mercaptopropanesulphonate to the cultures of human lymphocytes.
Concentration |
Exposure time |
Preparation interval |
CBPI |
Cytostasis (%) |
Without S9 mix |
||||
Negative control |
20 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.96 |
--- |
Solvent control |
20 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.90 |
--- |
13.6 |
20 hrs |
40 hrs |
n.d. |
n.d. |
23.8 |
20 hrs |
40 hrs |
n.d. |
n.d. |
41.7 |
20 hrs |
40 hrs |
n.d. |
n.d. |
73.0 |
20 hrs |
40 hrs |
n.d. |
n.d. |
127.8 |
20 hrs |
40 hrs |
n.d. |
n.d. |
223.6 |
20 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.80 |
11.0 |
391.3 |
20 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.78 |
13.8 |
684.7 |
20 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.70 |
22.0 |
1198.3 |
20 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.69 |
23.2 |
2097.0 |
20 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.67 |
25.2 |
Experimental groups evaluated for
cytogenetic damage are shown in bold characters
* Mean value of two cultures
n.d. Not determined
Toxicity - Experiment IIB
In Experiment IIB the CBPI in two cultures (500 cells per culture) was determined.
Table 5: Cytotoxicity of sodium 3-mercaptopropanesulphonate to the cultures of human lymphocytes.
Concentration |
Exposure time |
Preparation interval |
CBPI |
Cytostasis (%) |
Without S9 mix |
||||
Negative control |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
2.01 |
--- |
Solvent control |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.91 |
--- |
223.6 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.97 |
n.c. |
391.3 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.94 |
n.c. |
684.7 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.93 |
n.c. |
1198.3 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.95 |
n.c. |
2097.0 |
4 hrs |
40 hrs |
1.97 |
n.c. |
Experimental groups evaluated for
cytogenetic damage are shown in bold characters
* Mean value of two cultures
n.c. Not calculated as the CBPI was equal or higher than solvent control
value
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
The study was performed according to the OECD Guideline 487 with deviations (expression phase and harvest time were slightly modified - these deviations are not considered to influence the outcome of the study) and is considered to be of the highest quality (reliability Klimisch 1). The vehicle water and the positive control substances fulfilled validity criteria of the test system. The positive controls mitomycin C, demecolcin and cyclophosphamide induced micronuclei and demonstrated the sensitivity of the test system and the activity of the used S9 mix. None of the cultures treated with 3-mercaptopropanesulphonate in the absence and in the presence of S9 mix showed biologically relevant or statistically significant increased numbers of micronuclei. Based on this test, 3-mercaptopropanesulphonate is considered not to be non-mutagenic in human lymphocytes. - Executive summary:
The test item 3-mercaptopropanesulphonate, dissolved in deionised water, was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes in vitro (Bohnenberger, 2012). Cultured human lymphcytes were used and the following study design was performed: experiment 1without S9 -mix (exposure period 4 hrs, recovery 16 hours, Cytochalason B exposure 20 hours, preparation interval 40 hours, total culture period 88 hours), experiment 2a without S9 -mix (exposure period 20 hrs, Cytochalasin B exposure 20 hours, preparation interval 40 hours, total culture period 88 hours), experiment 1 and 2b with S9 -mix (exposure period 4 hrs, recovery 16 hours, Cytochalasin B exposure 20 hours, preparation interval 40 hours, total culture period 88 hours). In each experimental group two parallel cultures were analysed. 1000 binucleate cells per culture were scored for cytogenic damage on coded slides. The highest applied concentration in the pre-test on toxicity (2097.0 µg/mL of the test item, approx. 10 mM) was chosen with regard to the molecular weight and the purity (85 %) of the test item and with respect to the current OECD Guideline 487. Dose selection of the cytogenetic experiment was performed considering the toxicity data in accordance with OECD Guideline 487. In the absence and presence of S9 mix, no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest applied concentration. In the absence and the presence of S9 mix, no increase in the number of micronucleated cells was observed after treatment with the test item. However, in experiment IIa in the absence of S9 mix statistically significant increases (0.8 and 1.0 % micronucleated cells) were observed after treatment with 223.6 and 2097.0 µg/mL. The values are clearly within the range of the historical control data (0.05 - 1.45 % micronucleated cells) and therefore regarded as biologically irrelevant. Appropriate mutagens were used as positive controls. The positive controls mitomycin C, demecolcin and cyclophosphamide induced statistically significant increases in cells with micronuclei and demonstrated the sensitivity of the test system and the activity of the used S9 mix. .
In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the in vitro micronucleus test in human lymphocytes. Therefore, sodium 3 -mercaptopropanesulphonate is considered to be non-mutagenic in this in vitro micronucleus test, when tested up to the highest required concentration.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.