Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 941-627-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.29 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 75
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 22 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No repeated-dose toxicity study by inhalation was available
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Subacute exposure to Chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 4.61 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 112.5
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 519.25 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 7.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance & ECETOC (2010)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 15
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance & ECETOC (2010)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.29 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 75
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Subacute exposure to Chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 4.61 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 112.5
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 7.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance & ECETOC (2010)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 15
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance & ECETOC (2010)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.08 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 300
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 25 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Subacute exposure to Chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 66.67 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 30
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 2.4
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 4.67 µg/cm²
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 30
- Dose descriptor:
- other: NOAEL
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Subacute exposure to Chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.89 mg/cm²
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 12.5
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- other: NOAEL
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
For acute toxicity, NOAEL could be derived from the LD0 obtained by oral route and dermal route. For acute inhalation toxicity, according to ECETOC (2010) and Rusch et al. (2009), it is acceptable to take 1/3 of a LC50 that will be considered as the non-lethal dose. Therefore, the non-lethal dose will be 4650 mg/m3 / 3 = 1550 mg/m3. This non-lethal dose will be considered as the NOAEL for both systemic and local effects. This NOAEL then have to be converted considering the differences in exposure between the test animals (rats) and workers. An adjustment factor of 3 was eventually applied to the inter- and intraspecies AF in accordance with ECETOC (2010) in order to obtain a conservative DNEL.
For long-term exposure, only an assessment of the toxicity of the substance following a repeated dermal exposure was available. It was used to perform a route-to-route extrapolation from the dermal route to inhalation. In order to be conservative and as no actual absorption values are available, it has been decided to consider that dermal absorption in the rat was 50% less effective than the human absorption by inhalation, while it has been determined that inhalation and dermal absorption should be similar.
The assessment was considered as a short-term toxicity study.
ECETOC (2010) Guidance on Assessment Factors to Derive a DNEL.
Rusch G, Bast C, Cavender F (2009) Establishing a point of departure for risk assessment using acute inhalation toxicology data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. Aug;54(3):247-55
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.07 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 150
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 10.86 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No repeated-dose toxicity study by inhalation was available
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Subacute exposure to Chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.15 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 225
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 258.33 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 7.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance & ECETOC (2010)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 30
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance & ECETOC (2010)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.07 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 150
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Subacute exposure to Chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.15 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 225
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 7.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance & ECETOC (2010)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 30
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance & ECETOC (2010)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.04 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 25 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 33.33 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 60
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 2.4
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.33 µg/cm²
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 60
- Dose descriptor:
- other: NOAEL
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Subacute exposure to Chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.94 mg/cm²
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- other: NOAEL
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.02 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 12.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No repeated-dose toxicity study by oral route was available
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
For acute toxicity, NOAEL could be derived from the LD0 obtained by oral route and dermal route. For acute inhalation toxicity, according to ECETOC (2010) and Rusch et al. (2009), it is acceptable to take 1/3 of a LC50 that will be considered as the non-lethal dose. Therefore, the non-lethal dose will be 4650 mg/m3 / 3 = 1550 mg/m3. This non-lethal dose will be considered as the NOAEL for both systemic and local effects. This NOAEL then have to be converted considering the differences in exposure between the test animals (rats) and workers. An adjustment factor of 3 was eventually applied to the inter- and intraspecies AF in accordance with ECETOC (2010) in order to obtain a conservative DNEL.
For long-term exposure, only an assessment of the toxicity of the substance following a repeated dermal exposure was available. It was used to perform a route-to-route extrapolation from the dermal route to inhalation and oral route. In order to be conservative and as no actual absorption values are available, it has been decided to consider that dermal absorption in the rat was 50% less effective than the human absorption by inhalation and by oral route, while it has been determined that inhalation, oral, and dermal absorption should be similar.
The assessment was considered as a short-term toxicity study.
ECETOC (2010) Guidance on Assessment Factors to Derive a DNEL.
Rusch G, Bast C, Cavender F (2009) Establishing a point of departure for risk assessment using acute inhalation toxicology data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. Aug;54(3):247-55
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.