Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-755-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 009
- Report date:
- 2009
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Remarks:
- Conducted according to guideline in effect at time of study conduct
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Remarks:
- Conducted according to guideline in effect at time of study conduct
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- Remarks:
- Conducted according to guideline in effect at time of study conduct
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (2E)-1,1,1,2,3,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,7-tridecafluoro-4-methoxyhept-2-ene; (3E)-1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,6,6,7,7,7-tridecafluoro-5-methoxyhept-3-ene; (3E)-1,1,1,2,2,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,7-tridecafluoro-3-methoxyhept-3-ene
- EC Number:
- 700-755-2
- Molecular formula:
- C8H3F13O
- IUPAC Name:
- (2E)-1,1,1,2,3,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,7-tridecafluoro-4-methoxyhept-2-ene; (3E)-1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,6,6,7,7,7-tridecafluoro-5-methoxyhept-3-ene; (3E)-1,1,1,2,2,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,7-tridecafluoro-3-methoxyhept-3-ene
- Details on test material:
- - Purity: >99% (wt%)
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- histidine (S. typhimurium), tryptophan (E. coli)
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Toxicity-mutation test: 33.3, 66.7, 100, 333, 667, 1000, 3333, and 5000 μg/plate
Mutagenicity test: 333, 667, 1000, 3333, and 5000 μg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Based on the solubility of the test substance and compatibility with the target cells.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- ethanol
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- other: 2-nitrofluorene (CAS 607-57-8; TA98 -S9); sodium azide (CAS 26628-22-8; TA100 and TA 1535 -S9); ICR-191 (CAS 17070-45-0; TA1537 -S9); 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide (CAS 56-57-5; WP2uvrA -S9)
- Positive control substance:
- other: benzo(a)pyrene (CAS 50-32-8; TA98 +S9); 2-aminoanthracene (CAS 613-13-8; TA100, TA1535, TA1537, WP2uvrA +S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: In the non-activated assays, 0.5 mL of sham mix and 100 μL of vehicle, test substance dilution, or positive control were added to pre-heated (45–48°C) glass culture tubes containing 2 mL of selective top agar, followed by 100 μL of tester strain. In the S9-activated assays, 100 μL of the vehicle, test substance dilution, or positive control were added to pre-heated (45–48°C) glass culture tubes containing 2 mL of selective top agar, followed by 100 μL of tester strain and 0.5 mL of S9 mix. All mixtures were vortexed and overlaid onto the surface of minimum glucose agar plate. After the overlay solidified, the plates were inverted and incubated for approximately 49-69 hours at 37±2°C. Plates that were not evaluated immediately following incubation were stored at approximately 4°C
DURATION
- Preincubation period: none
- Exposure duration: approximately 49-69 hours at 37±2°C
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): approximately 49-69 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: toxicity-mutation tests were plated in duplicate; mutagenicity tests plated in triplicate
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 microliters of a tester strain culture that contained approximately 0.92E9 to 1.17E9 bacterial cells per milliliter were innoculated per plate
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY: The appearance of the bacterial background lawn was assessed microscopically for test substance toxicity and precipitation. Toxicity was scored relative to the concurrent tester strain specific negative control, and evaluated as a decrease in the mean number of revertant bacterial colonies per plate. In addition, the thinning or disappearance of the bacterial background lawn was considered as signs of toxicity. A minimum of 3 non-toxic scorable dose levels were required to validate the study. A dose level was considered toxic if it caused a >50% reduction in the mean number of revertants per plate relative to the mean negative control value and exhibited a dose-dependent drop in the revertant count, or a reduction in the background lawn.
SCORING: Revertant colonies were counted with an automated colony counter. Plates that could not be accurately counted automatically were counted manually. - Evaluation criteria:
- -Strains TA1535 and TA1537:
Data were judged positive if the increase in mean revertants at the highest numerical dose response was ≥ 3.0-fold the mean concurrent negative control value (vehicle control). This increase in the mean number of revertants per plate must be accompanied by a dose response associated with increasing concentrations of the test substance unless observed at the top dose level only.
-Strains TA98, TA100 and WP2uvrA:
Data sets were judged positive if the increase in mean revertants at the highest numerical dose response was ≥ 2.0-fold the mean concurrent negative control value (vehicle control). This increase in the mean number of revertants per plate must be accompanied by a dose response associated with increasing concentrations of the test substance unless observed at the top dose level only.
-Positive Control Values: Each mean positive control value must exhibit at least a 3.0-fold increase over the respective mean negative (vehicle) control value for each tester strain.
-Negative Control Values: The tester strain cultures must exhibit a characteristic mean number of spontaneous revertants per plate when plated along with the negative (vehicle) control under selective conditions. The acceptable ranges for the mean values of negative controls are: 8-60 for TA98, 60-240 for TA100, 4-45 for TA1535, 2-25 for TA1537, and 5-60 for WP2uvrA. - Statistics:
- For each tester strain, the mean of the number of revertants and the standard deviations were calculated.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- SOLUBILITY: The test substance was soluble in ethanol at 50 mg/mL, the highest stock concentration that was prepared for use on this study.
STERILITY CONTROLS: No contaminant colonies were observed on the sterility plates for the most concentrated test substance dilution (50 mg/mL) and the S9 and sham mixes.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: In the toxicity-mutation test, the maximum dose evaluated was 5000 μg/plate for tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and WP2uvrA in the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation. This dose was achieved using a concentration of 50 mg/mL and a 100 μL plating aliquot. The dose levels used in this test were 33.3, 66.7, 100, 333, 667, 1000, 3333, and 5000 μg/plate. The plate incorporation method was employed. This toxicity-mutation test was conducted 2 times. In the initial trial (T-1) the negative control values for TA98 with S9 activation were outside of the acceptable range. The data evaluated for this condition was collected in the second trial (T-2). No positive mutagenic responses were observed at any dose level in any tester strain in the absence or presence of S9 metabolic activation. No toxicity was observed at any dose level with any tester strain in either the absence or presence of S9. Test substance precipitation was observed starting at 3333 μg/plate in all test conditions except for TA98 both with and without S9 activation and WP2uvrA without S9 activation. For these test conditions precipitation was observed at 5000 μg/plate only. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Test substance precipitation was observed starting at 3333 μg/plate with all tester strains both with and without S9 activation.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Under the conditions of this study, the test substance showed no evidence of mutagenicity in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test either in the presence or absence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9. The test substance was concluded to be negative in this study.
This study and the conclusions which are drawn from it fulfill the quality criteria (validity, reliability, repeatability). - Executive summary:
The test substance was evaluated for mutagenicity in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test using the plate incorporation method. Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA were tested in the absence and presence of an exogenous metabolic activation system (Aroclor-induced rat liver S9). The test was performed in 2 phases. The first phase was the toxicity-mutation test, which established the dose range for the mutagenicity test, and provided a preliminary mutagenicity evaluation. The second phase was the mutagenicity test, which evaluated and confirmed the mutagenic potential of the test substance. Ethanol was chosen as the dosing vehicle based on the solubility of the test substance and compatibility with the target cells. The test substance was soluble in ethanol at 50 mg/mL, the highest stock concentration that was prepared for use on this study.
In the toxicity-mutation test, the maximum dose evaluated was 5000 μg/plate for tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and WP2uvrA in the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation. This dose was achieved using a concentration of 50 mg/mL and a 100 μL plating aliquot. The dose levels used in this test were 33.3, 66.7, 100, 333, 667, 1000, 3333, and 5000 μg/plate. The plate incorporation method was employed. No positive mutagenic responses were observed at any dose level in any tester strain in the absence or presence of S9 metabolic activation. No toxicity was observed at any dose level with any tester strain in either the absence or presence of S9. Test substance precipitation was observed starting at 3333 μg/plate in all test conditions except for TA98 both with and without S9 activation and WP2uvrA without S9 activation. For these test conditions precipitation was observed at 5000 μg/plate only.
Based on the toxicity-mutation test, the maximum dose evaluated in the mutagenicity test was 5000 μg/plate for tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and WP2uvrA in the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation. This dose was achieved using a concentration of 50 mg/mL and a 100 μL plating aliquot. The dose levels used in this test were 333, 667, 1000, 3333, and 5000 μg/plate for all tester strains. The plate incorporation method was employed. No positive mutagenic responses were observed at any dose level or with any tester strain in either the absence or presence of S9 metabolic activation. No toxicity was observed at any dose level with any tester strain in either the absence or presence of S9. Test substance precipitation was observed starting at 3333 μg/plate with all tester strains both with and without S9 activation. All criteria for a valid study were met. Under the conditions of this study, the test substance showed no evidence of mutagenicity in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test either in the absence or presence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9. It was concluded that the test substance was negative in this in vitro test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.