Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 284-698-4 | CAS number: 84962-05-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Two key studies, bothin vitro and in vivo were carried out to evaluate skin irritation/corrosion and eye irritation potency of the test substance following OECD guidelines and GLP.
In vitro key study performed in 2013 using the EPISKIN(TM) reconstructed human epidermis model after a treatment period of 15 minutes followed by a post-exposure incubation period of 42 hours showed that FAT 93580 is non-irritant. To further substantiate the finding of key study a support primary irritation study performed on rabbit skin also did not show any observable response to treatment throughout the 72-hours observation period.
Similarly, a key study performed in 2013 to evaluate corrosivity potential of the test item using the EPISKIN(TM) in vitro Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Model after treatment periods of 3, 60 and 240 minutes showed FAT 93580 is non-corrosive.
An in vivo key study was performed in 2013 to assess the irritancy potential of the test item following single 3 minute, 1 and 4 hour, semi-occluded applications to the intact rabbit skin. The study was conducted according to OECD guideline 404 and in accordance with GLP. The test item produced a primary irritation index of 0.0 and was classified as non-irritant to rabbit skin according to the Draize classification scheme. No corrosive effects were noted.
A support study data from an in vivo study conducted in 1975 following US CFR guideline and classification performed according to EDTA subcommittee for toxicology showed the test item as non-irritating to rabbit skin.
Key in vitro eye irritation study was performed in 2013 to assess the ocular irritancy potential of the test item FAT 93580/A following application onto the cornea of the rabbit enucleated eye. Based on the irritation scores, test item FAT 93580/A was considered unlikely to have the potential to cause severe ocular irritancy in in vivo according to the results of the test.
An in vivo key study performed in 2013 to assess the irritancy potential of the test item to the eye of New Zealand White Rabbit. The study was conducted according to OECD guideline 405 and in accordance with GLP. The test item does not meet the criteria for classification as an eye irritant according to the Global Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals.
Added is another support study performed on Rabbit eye mucosa following the procedure prescribed by the Consumer Product Safety Commission of the USA mentioned in the code of Federal Regulations, also recorded ocular reactions after 24, 48 and 72 hrs. Based on the grade of ocular reaction the test substance is considered to be "non-irritant" to the rabbit eye.
Based on the data from all the in vitro and in vivo above studies a test item FAT 93580 is non-irritant and non–corrosive to the skin and also non–irritant to the rabbit eye.
Justification for selection of skin
irritation / corrosion endpoint:
The study was conducted according to OECD guideline 404 and in
accordance with GLP
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
The study was conducted according to OECD guideline 405 and in
accordance with GLP
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Identification: Sapamine CSN
Batch: 0024141800
Purity: not supplied
Expiry date: not supplied
Storage Conditions: room temperature in the dark - Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories UK
- Age at study initiation: 12 to 20 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 2.30 to 2.93 kg
- Housing: Individually housed in suspended cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17-23 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 15/hr
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: 18th June 2013 - 28th June 2013 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- other: contralateral flank
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 g moistened with 0.5 mL distilled water
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 minutes, 1 hour and 4 hours
- Observation period:
- 1, 24, 48, 72 hrs
- Number of animals:
- 3 male rabbits
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 3 suitable sites on the back of the rabbit
- Type of wrap if used: 2.5 cm X 2.5 cm cotton gauze patch, secured with surgical adhesive tape
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Residual test item was removed by gentle swabbing with cotton wool soaked in distilled water.
- Time after start of exposure: 3 minutes, 1 hour and 4 hours
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize Scheme
Dermal irritation was graded in each animal according to the following scoring scale:
- Erythema and eschar formation:
0 no erythema
1 very slight erythema (barely perceptible)
2 well-defined erythema
3 moderate to severe erythema
4 severe erythema (beet redness) to slight eschar formation (injuries in depth).
- Edema formation:
0 no edema
1 very slight edema (barely perceptible)
2 slight edema (edges of area well-defined by definite raising)
3 moderate edema (raised approximately 1 millimeter)
4 severe edema (raised more than 1 millimeter and extending beyond area of exposure). - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: all scores were zero at all time points.
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: all scores were zero at all time points
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Primary irritation index is "0"
- Other effects:
- All animals showed expected gain in body weight during the study.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test item produced a primary irritation index of 0.0 and was classified as non-irritant to rabbit skin according to the Draize classification scheme. No corrosive effects were noted.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed on FAT 93580/A to assess the irritancy potential of the test item following single 3 minute, 1 and 4 hour, semi-occluded applications to the intact rabbit skin. The study was conducted according to OECD guideline 404 and in accordance with GLP.
3-minute and 1-hour semi-occluded applications of the test item to the intact skin of one rabbit produced no evidence of skin irritation. A single 4-hour, semi occluded application of the test item to the intact skin of three rabbits produced no evidence of skin irritation. All the scores at all time points tested were zero.
The test item produced a primary irritation index of 0 and was classified as non-irritant to rabbit skin according to the Draize classification scheme. No corrosive effects were noted.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Identification: Sapamine CSN
Batch: 0024141800
Storage Conditions: room temperature in the dark - Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories UK
- Age at study initiation: 12 to 20 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.30 to 2.49 kg
- Housing: Individually housed in suspended cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 to 23 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 15 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 01st July 2013 To: 18th July 2013 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 ml (approximately 80 mg) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 72 hrs
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 7 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 male rabbits
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scale for scoring ocular irritation
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: hand-slit lamp - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: No scores at any time point.
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.11
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.66
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.77
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- All animals showed expected gain in body weight during the study.
- Other effects:
- Moderate conjuctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment. Moderate conjuctival irritation was noted in one treated eye and minimal conjuctival irritation was noted in two treated eyes at the 24 and 48 hour observations. Minimum conjuctival irritation was noted in one treated eye at the 72 hour observation.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test item does not meet the criteria for classification as an eye irritant according to the GHS of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test item to the eye of New Zealand white Rabbit. The study was conducted according to OECD guideline 405 and B.5 Method of EC in accordance with GLP.
A single application of the test item to the non-irritated eyes of 3 male rabbits produced iridial inflammation and moderate conjunctival irritation. Two treated eyes appeared normal at the 72 hour observation and one treated eye appeared normal at the 7 day observation.
The mean 24/48/72 hr score was as follows;
Cornea opacity: 0
Iris: 0.11
Conjuctivae redness: 1.66
Chemosis: 0.77
Moderate conjuctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment. Moderate conjuctival irritation was noted in one treated eye and minimal conjuctival irritation was noted in two treated eyes at the 24 and 48 hour observations. Minimum conjuctival irritation was noted in one treated eye at the 72 hour observation.
Based on the findings of the study, the test item does not meet the criteria for classification as an eye irritant according to the GHS of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals.
Reference
Individual Scores and Individual Total Scores for Ocular Irritation
Rabbit Number and Sex |
73300 Male |
73339 Male |
73340 Male |
||||||||||
IPR=O |
IPR=O |
IPR=O |
|||||||||||
Time After Treatment |
1 Hour |
24 Hours |
48 Hours |
72 Hours |
7 Days |
1 Hour |
24 Hours |
48 Hours |
72 Hours |
1 Hour |
24 Hours |
48 Hours |
72 Hours |
CORNEA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E = Degree of Opacity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
F = Area of Cornea Involved |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Score (E x F) x 5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
IRIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Score (D x 5) |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
CONJUNCTIVAE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A=Redness |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
B = Chemosis |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
C = Discharge |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Score (A+ B +C)x 2 |
12 |
8 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
10 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
10 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
Total Score |
17 |
13 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
10 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
15 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
IPR= Initial pain reaction
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Test item FAT 93580 did not show any irritation/ corrosive effects in both in vitro and in vivo tests conducted to determine its potency to cause skin irritation/ corrosion. Similarly, no effects were noted in eye irritation tests. Hence, test substance can be classified as non- irritant and non – corrosive to the skin and also non – irritant to the eye.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.