Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-267-9 | CAS number: 10102-18-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Well performed study (clear from Materials & Methods section). However, some information is missing (e.g., control performance, measurements of pH and Se concentrations). Se concentrations were measured but not reported and clearly not used for calculation of effect concentrations. Most likely Se concentrations did not deviate much from nominal concentrations.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 221 (Lemna sp. Growth Inhibition Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Frequency: no data
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- see test conditions
- Test organisms (species):
- Lemna minor
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Duckweed
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Department of Plant Physiology of the Wageningen Agricultural University, the Netherlands
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): no data
- Treatment of inoculum: duckweed was disinfected by immersing the fronds in 70% ethanol, followed by 1% NaOCl and rinsing with sterilised water
- Method of cultivation: The stock culture was kept in glass petri dishes, which were sterilized at 150°C for 2 h. The stock culture was kept sterile and transferred to fresh medium every 2 weeks. All incubations were performed in a laminar flow chamber. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 2 wk
- Hardness:
- Can be calculated (0.5 g Ca(NO3)2.4H2O and 0.25 g MgSO4.7H2O per L)
- Test temperature:
- 23 ± 1°C
- pH:
- 5.0 ± 0.1
- Dissolved oxygen:
- No data
- Salinity:
- Not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- No data
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Incubation chamber used: yes
- Test vessels: disposable high petri dishes (diameter 9.5 cm, height 5 cm), cleaned in 0.1 N HNO3 for 24 h and rinsed with Milli-Q water
- No. of fronds per vessel: 10
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: no
- Detailed composition if non-standard medium was used: medium modified by Rombach according to Gorham (see Table 1 "other information")
- The growth medium was sterilized (120°C, 20 min) before use
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: synthetic test medium composed using Milli-Q water as dilution water
- Composition see Table 1
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: yes
- Photoperiod: 16:8 (light:dark)
- Light intensity and quality: 80 µmol/m²/s
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- The number of fronds was enumerated twice a week, viz., on days 4, 7, 11 and 14. A distinction was made between fully grown (1), near-fully grown (3/4), half-grown (1/2), and newly formed (1/4) fronds.
- Multiplication rate (MR): The MR is a measure for the rate of increase in the number of fronds (MR= 1000(log n1 - log n0)/t; t= t1-t0 (days); n1= number of fronds on day t1 and n0 is number of fronds on day t0).
- Percentage of surface coverage: Determined by image processing (PC Vision Plus framegrabber) and software package TIM (Difa Measuring Systems BV, Breda, the Netherlands) - Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 80 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- Se
- Basis for effect:
- other: % surface coverage
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 800 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- Se
- Basis for effect:
- other: multiplication rate
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 1 700 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- Se
- Basis for effect:
- other: % surface coverage
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 3 500 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- Se
- Basis for effect:
- other: multiplication rate
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- No data
- Conclusions:
- Reliable (Klimisch 2) study on the toxicity of Se (IV) to duckweed (Lemma minor). The toxicity was evaluated based on the effect on multiplication rate and percentage of surface coverage. Using the results for multiplication rate the 2-week NOEC and EC50 were 800 and 3500 µg Se/L, respectively. The NOEC and EC50 based on % surface coverage were 80 and 1700 µg Se/L, respectively.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Well performed study (clear from Materials & Methods section). However, some information is missing (e.g., control performance, measurements of pH and Se concentrations). Se concentrations were measured but not reported and clearly not used for calculation of effect concentrations. Most likely Se concentrations did not deviate much from nominal concentrations.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 221 (Lemna sp. Growth Inhibition Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Frequency: no data
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- see test conditions
- Test organisms (species):
- Lemna minor
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Duckweed
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Department of Plant Physiology of the Wageningen Agricultural University, the Netherlands
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): no data
- Treatment of inoculum: duckweed was disinfected by immersing the fronds in 70% ethanol, followed by 1% NaOCl and rinsing with sterilised water
- Method of cultivation: The stock culture was kept in glass petri dishes, which were sterilized at 150°C for 2 h. The stock culture was kept sterile and transferred to fresh medium every 2 weeks. All incubations were performed in a laminar flow chamber. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 2 wk
- Hardness:
- Can be calculated (0.5 g Ca(NO3)2.4H2O and 0.25 g MgSO4.7H2O per L)
- Test temperature:
- 23 ± 1°C
- pH:
- 5.0 ± 0.1
- Dissolved oxygen:
- No data
- Salinity:
- Not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- No data
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Incubation chamber used: yes
- Test vessels: disposable high petri dishes (diameter 9.5 cm, height 5 cm), cleaned in 0.1 N HNO3 for 24 h and rinsed with Milli-Q water
- No. of fronds per vessel: 10
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: no
- Detailed composition if non-standard medium was used: medium modified by Rombach according to Gorham (see Table 1 "other information")
- The growth medium was sterilized (120°C, 20 min) before use
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: synthetic test medium composed using Milli-Q water as dilution water
- Composition see Table 1
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: yes
- Photoperiod: 16:8 (light:dark)
- Light intensity and quality: 80 µmol/m²/s
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- The number of fronds was enumerated twice a week, viz., on days 4, 7, 11 and 14. A distinction was made between fully grown (1), near-fully grown (3/4), half-grown (1/2), and newly formed (1/4) fronds.
- Multiplication rate (MR): The MR is a measure for the rate of increase in the number of fronds (MR= 1000(log n1 - log n0)/t; t= t1-t0 (days); n1= number of fronds on day t1 and n0 is number of fronds on day t0).
- Percentage of surface coverage: Determined by image processing (PC Vision Plus framegrabber) and software package TIM (Difa Measuring Systems BV, Breda, the Netherlands) - Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 800 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- Se
- Basis for effect:
- other: % surface coverage
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 2 400 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- Se
- Basis for effect:
- other: multiplication rate
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 5 300 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- Se
- Basis for effect:
- other: % surface coverage
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 11 500 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- Se
- Basis for effect:
- other: multiplication rate
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- No data
- Conclusions:
- Reliable (Klimisch 2) study on the toxicity of selenium (VI) to duckweed (Lemma minor). The toxicity was evaluated based on the effect on multiplication rate and percentage of surface coverage. Using the results for multiplication rate the 2-week NOEC and EC50 were > 2400 and 11500 µg Se/L, respectively. The NOEC and EC50 based on % surface coverage were 800 and 5300 µg Se/L, respectively.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Well performed study (clear from Materials & Methods section). However, some information is missing (e.g., control performance, measurements of pH and Se concentrations). Se concentrations were measured but not reported and clearly not used for calculation of effect concentrations. Most likely Se concentrations did not deviate much from nominal concentrations.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 221 (Lemna sp. Growth Inhibition Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Frequency: no data
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- see test conditions
- Test organisms (species):
- Lemna minor
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Duckweed
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Department of Plant Physiology of the Wageningen Agricultural University, the Netherlands
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): no data
- Treatment of inoculum: duckweed was disinfected by immersing the fronds in 70% ethanol, followed by 1% NaOCl and rinsing with sterilised water
- Method of cultivation: The stock culture was kept in glass petri dishes, which were sterilized at 150°C for 2 h. The stock culture was kept sterile and transferred to fresh medium every 2 weeks. All incubations were performed in a laminar flow chamber. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 2 wk
- Hardness:
- Can be calculated (0.5 g Ca(NO3)2.4H2O and 0.25 g MgSO4.7H2O per L)
- Test temperature:
- 23 ± 1°C
- pH:
- 5.0 ± 0.1
- Dissolved oxygen:
- No data
- Salinity:
- Not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- No data
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Incubation chamber used: yes
- Test vessels: disposable high petri dishes (diameter 9.5 cm, height 5 cm), cleaned in 0.1 N HNO3 for 24 h and rinsed with Milli-Q water
- No. of fronds per vessel: 10
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: no
- Detailed composition if non-standard medium was used: medium modified by Rombach according to Gorham (see Table 1 "other information")
- The growth medium was sterilized (120°C, 20 min) before use
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: synthetic test medium composed using Milli-Q water as dilution water
- Composition see Table 1
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: yes
- Photoperiod: 16:8 (light:dark)
- Light intensity and quality: 80 µmol/m²/s
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- The number of fronds was enumerated twice a week, viz., on days 4, 7, 11 and 14. A distinction was made between fully grown (1), near-fully grown (3/4), half-grown (1/2), and newly formed (1/4) fronds.
- Multiplication rate (MR): The MR is a measure for the rate of increase in the number of fronds (MR= 1000(log n1 - log n0)/t; t= t1-t0 (days); n1= number of fronds on day t1 and n0 is number of fronds on day t0).
- Percentage of surface coverage: Determined by image processing (PC Vision Plus framegrabber) and software package TIM (Difa Measuring Systems BV, Breda, the Netherlands) - Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 800 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- Se
- Basis for effect:
- other: % surface coverage
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 800 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- Se
- Basis for effect:
- other: multiplication rate
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 2 900 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- Se
- Basis for effect:
- other: % surface coverage
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 8 600 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- Se
- Basis for effect:
- other: multiplication rate
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- No data
- Conclusions:
- Reliable (Klimisch 2) study on the toxicity of selenium dioxide to duckweed (Lemma minor). The toxicity was evaluated based on the effect on multiplication rate and percentage of surface coverage. Using the results for multiplication rate the 2-week NOEC and EC50 were 800 and 8600 µg Se/L, respectively. The NOEC and EC50 based on % surface coverage were 800 and 2900 µg Se/L, respectively.
Referenceopen allclose all
Description of key information
The most critical NOEC and EC50 for higher aquatic plants were 80 and 1700 µg Se/L, respectively, obtained from a 14-d growth inhibition study with duckweed (Lemna minor) for the endpoint % surface coverage.
These effect concentrations were obtained from the experiment with disodium selenite and will be used in the statistical extrapolation approach for determination of a waterborne PNEC.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater plants:
- 1 700 µg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater plants:
- 80 µg/L
Additional information
Jenner and Janssen-Mommen (1993) investigated the toxicity of SeO2, Na2SeO3, and Na2SeO4 to duckweed (Lemna minor) in a 14-d growth inhibition study according to the OECD 221 guideline. Percentage surface coverage was identified as the most sensitive endpoint, yielding NOEC values of 800, 80, and 800 µg Se/L for SeO2, Na2SeO3, and Na2SeO4, respectively, whereas EC50 values of 2900, 1700, and 5300 µg Se/L were obtained for SeO2, Na2SeO3, and Na2SeO4, respectively.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.