Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 208-807-1 | CAS number: 542-28-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012-05-03 to 2012-05-31
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline Study OECD 476 with GLP compliance
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- δ-valerolactone
- EC Number:
- 208-807-1
- EC Name:
- δ-valerolactone
- Cas Number:
- 542-28-9
- Molecular formula:
- C5H8O2
- IUPAC Name:
- tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one
- Test material form:
- other: liquid, colorless, clear
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material: Delta-Valerolactone
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- - Hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) locus in Chinese hamster V79 cells
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: MEM (Minimal Essential Medium)
- Properly maintained: yes
- Used cell batch checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes, before freezing
- Used cell batch checked for karyotype stability: yes, before freezing
- "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes, HAT-medium before freezing - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbital/beta-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9 (Wistar rat (Hsd Cpb: WU))
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- CYTOTXICITY TEST
8.1 to 1030 µg/mL with/without metabolic activation
MUTAGENICITY TEST
1030 µg/mL = equal to approximately 10 mM, recommended highest concentration for freely-soluble test items
1st Experiment, 4h exposure period:
with S9-mix: 64.4, 128.8, 257.5 515.0 and 1030.0 µg/mL
without S9-mix: 128.8, 257.5 515.0 and 1030.0 µg/mL
2nd Experiment:
4h exposure period; with S9-mix: 64.4, 128.8, 257.5 515.0 and 1030.0 µg/mL
24h exposure period; without S9-mix: 64.4, 128.8, 257.5 515.0 and 1030.0 µg/mL
In experiment I and II the cultures at the lowest concentration of 32.2 µg/mL with and without metabolic activation and additionally in experiment I the concentration of 64.4 µg/mL without metabolic activation were not continued, since a minimum of four analysable concentrations is required by the guidelines. - Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle: deionised water
On the day of each experiment (immediately before treatment), the test item was dissolved or suspended in deionised water. The final concentration of deionised
water in the culture medium was 10 % (v/v). The solvent was chosen due to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without S9 -mix: ethylmethane sulfonate (EMS), final concentration: 0.150 mg/mL = 1.2 mM; with S9 -mix: 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA), final concentration: 1.1 µg/mL = 4.3 µM. Historical control data were included in the report.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 24h
- Exposure duration: without S9-mix: 4/24h, with S9-mix: 4h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): about 8 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 6-thioguanine (11 µg/mL)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 10 % methylene blue in 0.01 % KOH solution
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Duplicate cultures were used for all experimental groups
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 3 - 5×10E5 cells for assessment of mutation rates. Following seeding of approx. 500 cells, colonies with more than 50 cells were counted for viability determination.
PRE-TEST: A pre-test on toxicity was performed in order to determine the concentration range for the mutagenicity experiments.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Osmolarity and pH value: The osmolarity and pH-value were determined in the solvent control and in the highest concentration of the
pre-experiment without metabolic activation.
- Precipitation: Precipitation was evaluated at the end of treatment by the unaided eye. - Evaluation criteria:
- - A test item is classified as positive if it induces either a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency or a reproducible and positive
response at one of the test points.
- A test item producing neither a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test
points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
A positive response is described as follows:
- A test item is classified as mutagenic if it reproducibly induces a mutation frequency that is three times above the spontaneous mutation frequency at least at one of the concentrations in the experiment.
- The test item is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase of the mutation frequency. Such evaluation may be considered also in the case that a threefold increase of the mutant frequency is not observed.
- However, in a case by case evaluation this decision depends on the level of the corresponding solvent control data. If there is by chance a low
spontaneous mutation rate within the laboratory's historical control data range, a concentration-related increase of the mutations within this range has to be discussed. The variability of the mutation rates of solvent controls within all experiments of this study was also taken into consideration. - Statistics:
- A linear regression (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. The number of mutant
colonies obtained for the groups treated with the test item were compared to the solvent control groups.
- A trend was judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability value) was below 0.05. However, both, biological relevance and statistical significance was considered together.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Relevant cytotoxic effects occurred in experiment I at 515 μg/mL and above without metabolic activation (both cultures). No relevant cytotoxic effects were noted in all of the other experimental parts up to 1030 μg/mL or approx. 10 mM.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- There was no relevant shift of pH and osmolarity of the medium even at the maximum concentration of the test item.
- The test item either formed an opalescent solution in water (pre-experiment) or a milky, homogeneous suspension (both main experiments). The opalescent solution or milky suspension indicated a concentration right at or slightly above the limit of solubility in water.
- In experiment I precipitation occurred at 1030 μg/mL in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. In experiment II precipitation was observed at 1030 μg/mL in the presence of metabolic activation.
PRE-TEST ON TOXICITY
- Cytotoxic effects were observed in the range-finding pre-test only without metabolic activation (4h exposure period) from a concentration of 257.5 µg/mL up to highest concentration tested, 1030 µg/mL.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
- The mutant frequency remained well within the historical range of solvent controls.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- Relevant cytotoxic effects indicated by a relative cloning efficiency I or cell density below 50% occurred in the first experiment at 515 μg/mL and above without metabolic activation (both cultures). The recommended toxic range of approximately 10-20% relative cloning efficiency I was covered without metabolic activation. No relevant cytotoxic effects were noted in all of the other experimental parts up to 1030 μg/mL or approximately 10 mM.
POSITIVE CONTROLS:
Both positive controls showed a distinct increase in induced mutant colonies. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.