Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 611-631-1 | CAS number: 58190-57-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation/corrosion: Key study: Test method OECD 439. GLP study. EAC3 was determined to be non-irritant to the skin.
Eye irritation/corrosion: Key study: Test method OECD 437. GLP study. EAC3 does not require a classification as a severe eye irritant.
Key study: Test method OECD 405. GLP study. EAC3 was considered to be non irritant to the eye.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- July 11, 2012 - July 13, 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Test method according to OECD Guideline 439. GLP study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- other: In vitro: Human skin
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- The test system used was EPISKIN-SM, a three-dimensional human epidermis model.
- Type of coverage:
- other: In-vitro test
- Preparation of test site:
- other: In-vitro test
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: In-vitro test. Negative and positive controls were conducted.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 50 µL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 15 minutes.
- Observation period:
- After approx. 42 hours.
- Number of animals:
- Not applicable: In-vitro test.
3 replicate wells for the test item and 3 negative controls + 3 positive controls were used - Details on study design:
- PRE-INCUBATION (Day -1):
The assay platewells were filled with a pre-warmed medium (2 mL per well, 37 ºC). The epidermis units were placed, with the media below in contact with the epidermis, into each prepared well and then incubated overnight at 37°C in an incubator with 5% CO2.
APPLICATION AND RINSING (Day 0):
- Test skin units: 50 μL of test item (3 replicates)
- Negative control skin units: 50 μL Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) (3 replicates)
- Positive control skin units: 50 μL Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate (SDS) 5% aq. solution (3 replicates)
- For additional control for staining effects of the test item, 50 μL of the test item was applied evenly to the epidermal surface.
The treated plates were incubated for 15 min. exposure time at room temperature (21.7-22.3 ºC). Then, the EPISKIN-SM units were removed and rinsed with PBS 1x solution (0.9%). The units were place into the plate well with fresh pre-warmed maintenance medium (2mL/well) and incubated for 42 h at 37 ºC with 5% CO2.
MTT TEST (Day 2):
The EPISKIN-SM units were transferred into the MTT solution filled wells (2 mL of 0.3 mg/mL MTT per well). The staining control well instead, was transferred to well filled with fresh assay medium. The units were incubated for 3 h at 37 ºC with 5% CO2, protected from light.
FORMAZAN EXTRACTION (Day 2):
The epidermises from each disk were separated with the aid of forceps and both parts (epidermis and collagen matrix) and were placed into a tube of 500 µL acidified isopropanol. The capped tubes were thoroughly mixed by using a vortex mixer and then incubated for 2 hours at room temperature protected from light with gentle agitation (~150 rpm) for formazan extraction.
CELL VIABILITY MEASUREMENT (Day 2):
2×200 μL samples from each tube were placed into the wells of a 96-well plate. The OD (Absorbance / Optical Density) of the samples in a 96-well plate spectrophotometer was read at a wavelength 540 nm, using acidified isopropanol solution blank (6×200 μL). The viability was expressed as a % relative to negative control. - Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The mean relative viability of test item EAC3 after 15 minutes exposure and 42 hours post incubation period (based on the optical activity measured at 540 nm) was 115% (SD± 8.89). According to EU classification, the substance was determined to be non-irritant since the mean tissue viability % was >50.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The mean relative viability of test item EAC3 after 15 minutes exposure and 42 hours post incubation period was 115% (SD± 8.89). According to EU classification, the substance is considered to be non-irritant since the mean tissue viability % was >50.
- Executive summary:
An in-vitro skin irritation test in the EPISKIN model was performed on the substance EAC3 in accordance with OECD Guideline 439 and GLP. Disks of EPISKIN (three units / chemical) were treated with EAC3 and incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature. Exposure of test material was terminated by rinsing with PBS. Epidermis units were then incubated at 37°C for 42 hours in an incubator with 5% CO2. The viability of each disk was assessed by incubating the tissues for 3 hours with MTT solution at 37°C in 5% CO2 protected from light. The formazan extract in acidified isopropanol was then spectrophotometrically evaluated for optical density (OD) and quantified. SDS 5% and PBS treated epidermis were used as positive and negative controls respectively. For each treated tissue, optical density (OD) was calculated and the tissue viability was expressed as a % relative to negative control. Following exposure with EAC3, the mean treated skin value was 115% and therefore non-irritant to the skin (>50%). All validity criteria were within acceptable limits and therefore the study can be considered as valid.
Reference
CELL VIABILITY:
The results of the optical density (OD) measured at 540 nm of each extract and the calculated % viability of the cells:
Substance |
Optical density (OD) |
Viability (%) |
|
Negative control (PBS) |
1 |
0.797 |
104 |
2 |
0.744 |
97 |
|
3 |
0.753 |
98 |
|
Mean |
0.765 |
100 |
|
Stand. dev. (SD) |
3.79 |
||
Positive control (SDS 5%) |
1 |
0.246 |
32 |
2 |
0.207 |
27 |
|
3 |
0.083 |
11 |
|
Mean |
0.179 |
23 |
|
Stand. dev. (SD) |
10.97 |
||
Test ítem (EAC3) |
1 |
0.856 |
112 |
2 |
0.959 |
125 |
|
3 |
0.823 |
108 |
|
Mean |
0.879 |
115 |
|
Stand. dev. (SD) |
8.89 |
VALIDITY OF THE TEST:
The mean OD value of the three negative control tissues was 0.765.
The positive control result showed a mean of 23% viability.
Each standard deviation value (SD) of the % viability was below 18.
Control OD values were below historically established boundaries.
The SD calculated from individual % tissues viabilities of the three identically test item treated replicates was 8.89.
All validity criteria were within acceptable limits and therefore the study can be considered as valid.
INDICATOR FOR POTENTIAL FALSE VIABILITY:
The test material did not interact with the MTT (based on no colour change observed).
The non specific colour % was calculated as 3.5% (below the threshold of 5.0) and therefore additional data calculation was not necessary.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Test method according to OECD 405. GLP study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: S&K-LAP Kft. 2173 Kartal, Császár út 135, Hungary
- Age at study initiation: ~13 weeks old (adult)
- Weight at study initiation: 3294 – 3525 g
- Housing: Individually in AAALAC approved metal wire rabbit cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 21 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 3°C
- Humidity (%): 49 – 89 %
- Air changes (per hr): 15-20 air exchanges/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours daily, from 6.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single exposure
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 72 hours.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 male animals.
- Details on study design:
- OBSERVATIONS: The eyes were examined at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment. Any clinical signs of toxicity or signs of ill-health during the study were recorded. Individual body weight was recorded at the beginning of the experiment and before euthanasia
SCORING SYSTEM: The eye irritation scores were evaluated according to the scoring system by Draize (1977) and OECD 405 (24 April 2002). - Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- Discharge
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- Discharge
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- Discharge
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- Redness
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- Redness
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- Redness
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Remarks:
- Opacity
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Remarks:
- Opacity
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Remarks:
- Opacity
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Initial Pain Reaction (IPR) (score 2) was observed in all animals. One hour after the application: Conjunctival redness (score 1 or 2), conjunctival chemosis (score 1 or 2) and conjunctival discharge (score 2 or 3) were found in all animals. At 24 hours after the application: Conjunctival redness (score 1) was found in all animals. In addition conjunctival discharge (score 1) was noted in one animal. At 48 and 72 hours after the application no signs of eye irritation or other clinical signs were observed. As all signs of eye irritation had fully reversed the study was terminated after a period of 72 hours observation.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Instillation of 0.1 mL of EAC3 into one eye of each of three rabbits resulted in effects conjunctival redness (score 1) in all animals and conjunctival discharge (score 1) in one animal att 24 hours after the application. Based on these results, EAC3 was considered to be non irritant to the eye according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
- Executive summary:
An acute eye irritation study of the test item EAC3 was performed in New Zealand White rabbits according to OECD Guideline 405 and GLP. 0.1 mL of the test item was placed as a single dose into the conjunctival sac of one eye of each animal (3 male rabbits). The untreated right eye served as control. Individual body weight was recorded at the beginning of the experiment and before euthanasia. Morbidity and clinical signs of toxicity were checked daily. No adverse effects were observed. The eyes were examined at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the application. Initial Pain Reaction (IPR) (score 2) was observed in all animals. At 24 hours after the application conjunctival redness (score 1) was found in all animals and conjunctival discharge (score 1) was noted in one animal. The effects were fully reversible within 48 hours. Based on these results, EAC3 was considered to be non irritant to the eye according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Reference
No mortality was observed.
The body weight and body weight change were considered to be normal with no indication of a treatment related effect.
There were no clinical signs observed that could be related to treatment.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation/corrosion:
Key study: An in-vitro skin irritation test in the EPISKIN model was performed on the substance EAC3 in accordance with OECD Guideline 439 and GLP. Disks of EPISKIN (three units / chemical) were treated with EAC3 for a 15 minutes exposure time and 42 hours post incubation, and incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature. SDS 5% and PBS treated epidermis were used as positive and negative controls respectively. For each treated tissue, optical density (OD) was calculated and the tissue viability was expressed as a % relative to negative control. Following exposure with EAC3, the mean treated skin value was 115% and therefore, it was concluded that the test item was non-irritant to the skin (mean tissue viability % >50).
Data waiving (other justification): In accordance with REACH Regulation Annex XI, the in-vivo skin irritation study does not need to be conducted since the following conditions are met:
- results are derived from an in-vitro method whose scientific validity has been established by a validation study, according to internationally agreed validation principles;
- results are adequate for the purpose of classification and labelling and risk assessment; and
- adequate and reliable documentation of the applied method is provided.
Eye irritation/corrosion:
Key study: An in vitro eye irritation study of the test item EAC3 was performed in isolated chicken’s eyes in accordance with the OECD Guideline 438 and GLP. The corneas were exposed to 30 μL of EAC3 for 10 seconds and then, the surface was rinsed with saline. The positive and negative control eyes were treated in a similar way with 30 μL Trichloroacetic acid 30 (w/v) %. and with 30 μL of Sodium chloride (Salsol solution 0.9%) respectively. The maximum corneal thickness change, corneal opacity change and fluorescein retention where calculated. The results suggest that the test item is not irritating. According to the guideline OECD 438, EAC3 does not require a classification as a severe eye irritant and an in vivo study is required for classification.
Key study: An acute eye irritation study of the test item EAC3 was performed in New Zealand White rabbits according to OECD Guideline 405 and GLP. 0.1 mL of the test item was placed as a single dose into the conjunctival sac of one eye of each animal (3 male rabbits). Initial Pain Reaction (IPR) (score 2) was observed in all animals. At 24 hours after the application conjunctival redness (score 1) was found in all animals and conjunctival discharge (score 1) was noted in one animal. The effects were fully reversible within 48 hours. Based on these results, EAC3 was considered to be non irritant to the eye according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Only one study available.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Only one in-vivo study is available.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation/corrosion: Based on the available data, the substance EAC3 is not classified for skin irritation in accordance with CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Eye irritation/corrosion: Based on the available data, the substance EAC3 is not classified for eye irritation in accordance with CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 .
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.