Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-517-3 | CAS number: 61-76-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Publication published in a peer reviewed journal with limitations in design and/or reporting but otherwise adequate for assessment.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 987
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Four Salmonella typhimurium strains (TA 98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537) were exposed to the test substance (0-10000 µg/plate) with or without metabolic activation for 20 minutes at 37°C. The top agar was added and poured onto the surface of a petri dish. The histidine-revertant colonies were counted after two days of incubation at 37°C.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Phenylephrine hydrochloride
- EC Number:
- 200-517-3
- EC Name:
- Phenylephrine hydrochloride
- Cas Number:
- 61-76-7
- Molecular formula:
- C9H13NO2.ClH
- IUPAC Name:
- phenylephrine hydrochloride
- Details on test material:
- - Analytical purity: 99.9%
- Name of test material: Phenylephrine HCl
- Supplier: Ganes
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254 induced male Sprague-Dawley rat and male Syrian hamster livers.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 100, 333, 1000, 3333, and 10000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Water
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- No metabolic activation for strains: TA1535 and TA 100
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- No metabolic activation for strains: TA1537
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine
- Remarks:
- No metabolic activation for strain: TA98
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation for all strains.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- - Bacterial strains: All strains were obtained from Dr. Bruce Ames (university of California, Berkley) and were stored as recommended (Maron and Ames, 1983). Prior to their use for mutagenicity assays, all cultures were grown overnight with shaking at 37µC in Oxiod broth, and their phenotypes were analyzed.
- Preparation of Liver S-9 fraction: The S-9 mixes were prepared immediately prior to use and contained 10% S-9.
- Preincubation Assay: The preincubation assay was performed as described previously( Haworth et al, 1983). The test chemical, Salmonella culture, and S-9 mix or buffer were incubated at 37µC, without shaking, for 20 minutes. Chemicals known or suspected to be volatile were incubated in capped tubes. The top agar was added, and the contents of the tubes were mixed and poured onto the surface of petri dishes that contained Vogel-Bonner medium (Vogel and Bonner, 1956). The histidine-revertant (his+) colonies arising on these plates were counted following 2 days incubation at 37°C. The plates were hand-counted when a precipitate was present; otherwise automatic colony counters were used. All chemicals were initially tested in a toxicity assay to determine the appropriate dose range. The toxicity assay was performed by using TA 100 or the system developed by Waleh et al (1982). Toxic concentrations were those at which a decrease in the number of his+ colonies was seen or at which there was a clearing in the density of the background lawn. At least five doses of the chemical were tested in triplicate. Experiments were repeated at least 1 week following the initial trial. Each chemical was tested initially at half-log doses up to a dose that elicited toxicity; subsequent trials ocassionally used narrower dose increments. Chemicals that were not toxic were tested to a maximum dose of 10 mg/plate. Chemicals that were poorly soluble were tested up to a dose defined by their solubility. A maximum of 0.05 mL solvent was added to each plate. During the initial stages of the testing program, chemicals were tested with 10% S-9. - Evaluation criteria:
- The data was evaluated as described previously (Hayworth et al, 1983). An individual trial was judged mutagenic (+) if a dose-related increase over the corresponding solvent control was seen, and it was judged weakly mutagenic (+W) if a low-level dose response was seen. A trial was considered questionable (?) if a dose-related increase was judged insufficiently high to justify a call of "+W" if only a single dose was elevated over the control, or if a non-dose related increase was seen. The distinction between a weak mutagenic response and a mutagenic response are highly subjective. A chemical was judged to be mutagenic (+), or weakly mutagenic (+W), if it produced a reproducible, dose related increase in his+ revertants over the corresponding solvent controls in replicate trials. A chemical was considered to be questionable (?) if a reproducible increase of his+ revertants did not meet the criteria for either a "+' or "+W" or if only a single doses produced an increase in his+ revertants in repeat trials. The chemicals were decoded only after a determination had been made regarding their mutagenicity or nonmutagenicity.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.