3-Cyclopentene-1-acetaldehyde, 2,2,3-trimethyl-, reaction products with Me Et ketone, hydrogenated

Skin sensitisation

Administrative data

Endpoint:

skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Type of information:

migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

22 October - 6 December 1987

Reliability:

2 (reliable with restrictions)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: GLP study conducted in compliance with OECD guideline 406 with minor deviations: lack of data about test substance.

Cross-reference

Cross-reference 1

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:

reference to same study

Cross-reference 2

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:

reference to other study

Data source

Reference

Reference Type:

study report

Title:

Unnamed

Year:

1987

Report date:

1987

Materials and methods

Test guideline

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)

Deviations:

yes

Remarks:

no data on purity and certificate of analysis of test substance

Principles of method if other than guideline:

Not applicable

GLP compliance:

yes

Type of study:

guinea pig maximisation test

Test material

Test material information

Constituent 1

Reference substance name:

2-ethyl-4-(2,2,3-trimethyl-3-cyclopenten-1-yl)-2-buten-1-ol

EC Number:

248-908-8

EC Name:

2-ethyl-4-(2,2,3-trimethyl-3-cyclopenten-1-yl)-2-buten-1-ol

Cas Number:

28219-61-6

IUPAC Name:

2-ethyl-4-(2,2,3-trimethylcyclopent-3-en-1-yl)but-2-en-1-ol

Details on test material:

- Name of test material (as cited in study report): HR 87/600001
- Physical state: Colourless, slightly viscous liquid
- Date received: October 12, 1987
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:

guinea pig

Strain:

Dunkin-Hartley

Sex:

female

Details on test animals and environmental conditions:

TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Interfauna (UK) Limited, Huntingdon, UK
- Age at study initiation: 7-10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 308-395 g
- Housing: Housed in groups of up to four in solid-floor polypropylene cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Guinea Pig FD1 Diet (Special Diets Services Limited, Witham, UK), ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Mains tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17-23 °C
- Humidity (%): 40-65%
- Air changes (per hour): 15/hour
- Photoperiod (hours dark / hours light): 12 hours dark / 12 hours light

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction

Induction 1

Route:

intradermal and epicutaneous

Vehicle:

other: arachis oil (induction) and absolute ethanol (challenge)

Induction 2

Concentration / amount:

Range finding test:
- Intradermal induction exposure: 1, 5, 10 or 25% w/v in arachis oil
- Topical induction or challenge exposure: 50, 75 or 100% w/v in absolute ethanol

Main test:
- Intradermal induction exposure: 10% w/v in arachis oil
- Topical induction exposure: Undiluted
- Topical challenge exposure: 75% v/v in absolute ethanol

Challenge

Challenge 1

Route:

epicutaneous, occlusive

Vehicle:

other: arachis oil (induction) and absolute ethanol (challenge)

Challenge 2

Concentration / amount:

Range finding test:
- Intradermal induction exposure: 1, 5, 10 or 25% w/v in arachis oil
- Topical induction or challenge exposure: 50, 75 or 100% w/v in absolute ethanol

Main test:
- Intradermal induction exposure: 10% w/v in arachis oil
- Topical induction exposure: Undiluted
- Topical challenge exposure: 75% v/v in absolute ethanol

No. of animals per dose:

- Range finding test: 1 or 2 animals/dose
- Main test: 10 and 20 animals for control and test, respectively

Details on study design:

RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Intradermal induction exposure: Guinea pigs (1/dose) received injections (0.1 mL) of test material at concentrations of 1, 5, 10 or 25% w/v in arachis oil and observed for systemic toxicity and dermal irritation reactions at 24, 48 and 72 hours and 7 days
- Topical induction or challenge exposure: One or two guinea pigs [intradermally injected with Freund's Complete Adjuvant (FCA) 7 days earlier] applied with up to two dose levels of test material (50, 75 or 100% v/v) in absolute ethanol and observed for dermal irritation reactions at 1, 24 and 48 hours


MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE: INTRADERMAL
- No. of exposures: One
- Test groups: Intradermally injected with 0.1 mL of FCA, 10% w/v test material in arachis oil and 10% w/v test material emulsion in 1:1 preparation of FCA plus arachis oil on Day 0
- Control group: Intradermally injected with FCA, arachis oil or FCA plus arachis oil (1:1) on Day 0
- Site: Shoulder region (40 mm x 60 mm) on each side of mid-line
- Duration: Days 0-6

B. INDUCTION EXPOSURE: TOPICAL
- No. of exposures: One
- Exposure period: 48 hours
- Test groups: Filter paper patch loaded with undiluted test material (0.2-0.3 mL) topically applied on Day 7 via occlusive patch
- Control group: Only filter paper patch topically applied on Day 7 via occlusive patch
- Site: Shoulder region on each side of mid-line
- Frequency of applications: Single application
- Duration: Days 7-21

C. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE: TOPICAL
- No. of exposures: One
- Day of challenge: Day 21
- Exposure period: 24 hours
- Test groups: Filter paper patch loaded with 0.1-0.2 mL of 75% v/v test material in absolute ethanol topically applied on Day 21 via occlusive patch
- Control group: Filter paper patch loaded with vehicle only topically applied on Day 21 via occlusive patch
- Site: 0 (vehicle) or 75% v/v test material in absolute ethanol was applied to left or right shorn flank (50-70 mm X 50 mm), respectively
- Evaluation (hour after removal of challenge patch): 24 or 48 hours

Challenge controls:

A patch loaded with the vehicle only applied to the left flank via occlusive patch

Positive control substance(s):

yes

Remarks:

Historical data: Formaldehyde (40% aqueous solution)

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Concentration:

Not applicable

No. of animals per dose:

Not applicable

Details on study design:

Not applicable

Statistics:

Not applicable

Results and discussion

Positive control results:

Historical data (From March 4 to 28, 1987): Incidence of sensitisation for 40% formaldehyde was 95% (19/20) and classified as an extreme sensitiser to guinea pig skin.

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Results

Results 1

Reading:

1st reading

Hours after challenge:

24

Group:

test chemical

Dose level:

75% v/v in absolute ethanol

No. with + reactions:

0

Total no. in group:

20

Clinical observations:

None

Remarks on result:

other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 75% v/v in absolute ethanol. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: None.

Results 2

Reading:

2nd reading

Hours after challenge:

48

Group:

test chemical

Dose level:

75% v/v in absolute ethanol

No. with + reactions:

0

Total no. in group:

20

Clinical observations:

None

Remarks on result:

other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 75% v/v in absolute ethanol. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: None.

In vivo (LLNA)

Results

Results 1

Parameter:

SI

Remarks on result:

other: Not applicable

Results 2

Parameter:

other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)

Remarks on result:

other: Not applicable

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Intradermal sighting test - summary of results

 

Animal identification	Time of observation	Concentration of test material in arachis oil (% w/v)	Evidence of necrosis	Evidence of systemic toxicity
A	24 hours	1	None	None
	48 hours		None	None
	72 hours		None	None
	7 days		None	None
B	24 hours	5	None	None
	48 hours		None	None
	72 hours		None	None
	7 days		None	None
C	24 hours	10	None	None
	48 hours		None	None
	72 hours		None	None
	7 days		None	None
D	24 hours	25	Necrosis	None
	48 hours		Necrosis	None
	72 hours		Eschar	None
	7 days		Eschar	None

Conclusion: The concentration of the test material selected for the intradermal induction stage of the main study was 10% w/v in arachis oil BP

 

Table 2: Topical sighting test: Evaluation of reactions

 

Animal identification	Concentration of test material in absolute alcohol (% v/v)	Evaluation of application sites (hours after removal of patches)
		1	24	48
E	100	2	0	0
	50	2	0	0
F	100	2	0	0
	50	1	0	0
G	100	2	1	0
	75	1	0	0
H	100	2	1	0
	75	2	0	0

Conclusion: The undiluted test material and 75% (v/v) in absolute ethanol were selected for the main study topical induction and challenger, respectively.

 

Table 3: Main test: Topical induction - evaluation of reactions in test animals

No. of animals	Skin reaction (immediately after removal of dressings)
Test material: HR 87/600001
5	0
12	1
3	2
Control: Blank patch only
10	0

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:

not sensitising

Remarks:

Migrated information

Conclusions:

Under the test conditions, the test material HR 87/600001 is not classified as a skin sensitiser according to Directive 67/548/EEC and CLP Regulation (EC) N° 1272/2008.

Executive summary:

In a Magnusson & Kligman maximisation study (GPMT) performed according to OECD guideline 406 and in compliance with GLP, groups of 20 female albino Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs were intradermally induced with three injections of 0.1 mL of FCA, 10% w/v HR 87/600001 in arachis oil and 10% w/v HR 87/600001 emulsion in FCA on Day 0 on shoulder region on each side of mid-line. Control group of 10 animals was induced with FCA, arachis oil and 50% w/v arachis oil in FCA intradermal injections. After one week the same area was topically induced with 0.2-0.3 mL of undiluted test material via occluded filter paper patch for 48 hours for the treated group. Control group was patched with nothing applied to the filter paper. After 2 weeks of rest period, a challenge patch of 0 or 75% v/v test material in absolute ethanol was applied to left or right shorn flank of all animals, respectively. The test concentrations for the main study were determined from a sighting study using one or two animals.

 

Intradermal and topical induction indicated evidence of dermal irritation. No skin reactions were noted at the challenge sites of the test or control group animals at the 24 or 48-hour observations. HR 87/600001 produced a 0% (0/20) sensitisation rate and was considered to be a non sensitiser to guinea pig skin. Historical data on positive control (40% formaldehyde) exhibited evidence of sensitisation.

 

Under the test conditions, the test material HR 87/600001 is not classified as a skin sensitiser according to Directive 67/548/EEC and CLP Regulation (EC) N° 1272 /2008.