Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
mixture rules calculation
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
2012
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Calculation from experimentally derived Koc data using an equation form the 2003 EU Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment Part III, Chapter 4, Section 4.3
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: 2003 EU Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment Part III, Chapter 4, Section 4.3, p. 26
Deviations:
not applicable
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Log Kow was calculated using an equation derived from experimentally determined Koc values for analogue structures using the 2003 TGD equation for predominantly hydrophobic substances.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
other: calculation from log Koc values
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
3.75
Remarks on result:
other: weight-averaged value
Details on results:
Weight-averaged log Koc of the whole substance based on normalized composition: 3.14.
This value was used in the rearranged TDG equation mentioned above resulting in a log Pow value of 3.75.

Results

 

Table 1. Log Kocderived from QSAR

 

Structure

SMILES

Koc

Log Koc

Alcohol, C9

CCCCCCCCCO

504

2.7

Alcohol, C10

CCCCCCCCCCO

1057

3

Alcohol, C11

CCCCCCCCCCCO

2218

3.3

Alcohol ethoxylates, C9, 1 EO

OCCOCCCCCCCCC

561

2.7

Alcohol ethoxylates, C10, 1 EO

OCCOCCCCCCCCCC

1178

3.1

Alcohol ethoxylates, C11, 1 EO

OCCOCCCCCCCCCCC

2472

3.4

Alcohol ethoxylates, C9, 3 EO

OCCOCCOCCOCCCCCCCCC

697

2.8

Alcohol ethoxylates, C10, 3 EO

OCCOCCOCCOCCCCCCCCCC

1462

3.2

Alcohol ethoxylates, C11, 3 EO

OCCOCCOCCOCCCCCCCCCCC

3069

3.5

 

 

Table 2. Mean calculated and weight-averaged values for Log Koc

 

Mean Log Koccalc.

Weight-averaged Log Koc(for the whole substance)

Free alcohols (avg of C9, C10 and C11)

3.00

3.14

C9-EO (avg of 1EO and 3EO)

2.75

C10-EO (avg of 1EO and 3EO)

3.15

C11-EO (avg of 1EO and 3EO)

3.45

 

 

Using the rearranged TGD equation Log Pow= (Log Koc– 0.10)/0.81 results in a Log Powof 3.75 for substance Alcohols C9-11, ethoxylated, < 2.5 EO.

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
mixture rules calculation
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
2012
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
accepted calculation method
Justification for type of information:
QSAR prediction
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The calculations were performed for the linear free alcohols and ethoxylated alcohols (AE) with ethoxylation degree of 1 and 3, respectively, using
KOWWIN v1.68, Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows v4.10. US EPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
In order to derive a single value for risk assessment, the various calculated Log Pow values were weight-averaged using normalized values for composition (free alcohols, C9 AE, C10 AE and C11 AE).
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
other: QSAR
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
3.42
Remarks on result:
other: weight-averaged value

QSAR result; pH and temperature are not reported. For detailed description of the model and its applicability, see "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables".

Individual calculated values for log Pow (taken from the EPIsuite v 4.10 report, 2012)

structure

SMILES notation used in calculation

EPI log Pow calc.

Alcohol, C9

CCCCCCCCCO

3.3

Alcohol, C10

CCCCCCCCCCO

3.79

Alcohol, C11

CCCCCCCCCCCO

4.28

Alcohol ethoxylates, C9, 1 EO

OCCOCCCCCCCCC

3.02

Alcohol ethoxylates, C10, 1 EO

OCCOCCCCCCCCCC

3.51

Alcohol ethoxylates, C11, 1 EO

OCCOCCCCCCCCCCC

4

Alcohol ethoxylates, C9, 3 EO

OCCOCCOCCOCCCCCCCCC

2.47

Alcohol ethoxylates, C10, 3 EO

OCCOCCOCCOCCCCCCCCCC

2.96

Alcohol ethoxylates, C11, 3 EO

OCCOCCOCCOCCCCCCCCCCC

3.46

 

 

Mean calculated values for log Pow for each ‘sub’-group

 

Mean log Pow calc.

Free alcohols (avg of C9, C10 and C11)

3.79

C9-EO (avg of 1EO and 3EO)

2.745

C10-EO (avg of 1EO and 3EO)

3.235

C11-EO (avg of 1EO and 3EO)

3.73

 

 

Result:

Weight-averaged log Pow of the whole substance based on normalized composition: 3.42

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
accepted calculation method
Justification for type of information:
QSAR prediction
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Estimation by calculation (based on structure) according to Lyman et al. 1990; KOWWIN v1.68
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
other: QSAR
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
3.49 - 4.8
Remarks on result:
other: estimation based on structure
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
3.3 - 3.73
Remarks on result:
other: KOWWIN v1.68
Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
15-24 Jan 2020
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 123 (Partition Coefficient (1-Octanol / Water), Slow-Stirring Method)
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
slow-stirring method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Analytical method:
high-performance liquid chromatography
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
2.72
Temp.:
25 °C
pH:
>= 5.53 - <= 5.56

The concentration of the test item in the aqueous and 1 -octanol phase was determined after 118, 120, 122 and 124 hours, ensuring that an equilibrium concentration was established in both phases. At each test time, three different test solutions were analysed. The results are given in the table:

Time (h)

Octanol phases, test mixture (mg/g)

Aqueous phases, test mixture (mg/g)

1

2

3

1

2

3

118

23.66

23.59

23.42

0.04450

0.04492

0.04522

120

23.20

23.58

29.50

0.04408

0.04452

0.04477

122

23.35

23.14

30.06

0.04467

0.04417

0.04538

124

23.43

23.30

29.93

0.04406

0.04444

0.04508

For each time interval the Pow and log Pow values are calculated for each test mixture. The results are summarized in the table:

Time (h)

Calculated Pow values, test mixture (mg/g)

Calculated log Pow values, test mixture (mg/g)

1

2

3

1

2

3

118

531.7

525.2

517.9

2.726

2.720

2.714

120

526.3

529.6

515.5

2.721

2.724

2.712

122

522.7

523.9

502.2

2.718

2.719

2.701

124

531.8

524.3

507.1

2.726

2.720

2.705

pH values of aqueous phases were 5.54, 5.56 and 5.53, for mixtures 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

Description of key information

log Pow - 2.72 (slow-stirring method, OECD 123)

Supporting studies:

log Pow – calculation based on structure and fragments (Lyman et al. and KOWWIN v1.68): 3.30 -4.80 (avg = 4.05)
log Pow - calculated from weight-averaged log Koc value: 3.75
log Pow - calculated using KOWWIN v1.68 (weight-averaged value): 3.42

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Log Kow (Log Pow):
2.72
at the temperature of:
25 °C

Additional information

The key value for chemical safety assessment is obtained from the recent slow-stirring study (OECD 123).

In addition, the following types of supporting calculations were applied:

1. a combination of calculations according to Lyman et al. (1990) and KOWWIN v1.68 (structures considered not further specified); the average of the overall range (log Pow 3.30 – 4.80), i.e. log Pow 4.05, was used in the calculation to derive the key value

2. based on weight-averaged log Koc values using the TGD equation for predominantly hydrophobic substances: log Koc = 0.81 log Pow + 0.10 thus log Pow = (log Koc – 0.10)/0.81 (2003 EU Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment Part III, Chapter 4, Section 4.3, pp 24 – 27)

3. based on EPIsuite v 4.10, KOWWIN v 1.68 log Pow values for (possible) individual constituents of the substance; a weighting based on normalized composition was applied to derive a log Pow value for the whole substance.