Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 248-882-8 | CAS number: 28173-59-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Study initiation date : 20 December 2021
Experimental starting date : 23 December 2021
Experimental completion date : 15 April 2022
Study completion date - 15 July 2022 - Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 022
- Report date:
- 2022
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-[(1-amino-9,10-dihydro-4-hydroxy-9,10-dioxo-2-anthryl)oxy]ethyl phenyl carbonate
- EC Number:
- 248-882-8
- EC Name:
- 2-[(1-amino-9,10-dihydro-4-hydroxy-9,10-dioxo-2-anthryl)oxy]ethyl phenyl carbonate
- Cas Number:
- 28173-59-3
- Molecular formula:
- C23H17NO7
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-[(1-amino-4-hydroxy-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracen-2-yl)oxy]ethyl phenyl carbonate
- Test material form:
- not specified
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of Test Item: FAT 93504
Physical Appearance (with colour): Solid (Red)
Batch No.: B/TE (20140120-2 (china))
Purity (as per certificate of analysis): 88.5 %
Storage Conditions: Ambient (21 to 29 ºC)
Test Item Code by Test Facility: D1303-001
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on species / strain selection:
- The rat is one of the recommented species by regulatory agencies for conducting in vivo mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Source of supply: In-house bred animals.
Animals were housed under standard laboratory conditions, in an environmentally monitored air-conditioned room with adequate fresh air supply (12 to 15 air changes per hour), room temperature 19.7 to 22.8 ºC and relative humidity 45 % to 65 % in main study, with 12 hours fluorescent light and 12 hours dark cycle. The temperature and relative humidity were recorded once daily.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- Corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- The test item was administered through oral route once a day for 3 consecutive days (0 day, 24 hours and 45 hours), using gavage cannula. All the doses were administered in an equal volume of 10 mL/kg bw/day the dose of 500 (G2), 1000 (G3) and 2000 (G4) mg/kg bw/day as low, mid and high dose, respectively. Vehicle control group (G1) animals were administered with vehicle. Positive control group (G6) animals were administered with cyclophosphamide monohydrate, at the dose volume of 10 mL/kg bw/day. Ethyl methanesulfonate and cyclophosphamide monohydrate were dissolved in distilled water and administered at a dose of 250 and 100 mg/kg bw/day, respectively.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once in every day
- Post exposure period:
- Animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation 3 hours after the third treatment and subjected to gross pathological examination. Bone marrow was collected for micronucleus test.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Vehicle control
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Low dose group
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Mid dose group
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- High dose group
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6 animals per dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Ethyl methanesulfonate
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow cells
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- SAMPLING TIME AND TISSUE COLLECTION
Animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation 3 hours after the third treatment and subjected to gross pathological examination. Bone marrow was collected for micronucleus test.
The femurs were isolated from each animal for bone marrow collection (except from G5 group). Bone marrow cells were obtained by cut opening the epiphyses of femur bone immediately following sacrifice. The marrow was flushed out into a centrifuge tube using the Foetal Bovine Serum (FBS). The femur bone marrow cells were centrifuged at about 2700±100 rpm for 10 minutes. Prior to smear preparation, the supernatant were discarded and the cell pellet was then resuspended in approximately 50 µL of Foetal Bovine Serum (FBS). - Evaluation criteria:
- BONE MARROW SMEARS SLIDE EVALUATION
All the slides including those of positive and vehicle controls were coded before microscopic evaluation to avoid group bias during evaluation. For each animal, a minimum of 500 erythrocytes (which included mature and immature erythrocytes) were scored from first slide of the animal to determine PCE: total RBC ratio along with the incidence of micronucleus. The subsequent slides were scored only for the number of PCEs and incidence of micronucleated PCEs. For each animal, a minimum of 4000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) were scored for the incidence of micronucleated immature erythrocytes (MNPCEs). - Statistics:
- Body weight of day 1, 2 and 3 was analyzed by SPSS version no. 27, at a 95 % level (p ≤0.05) of significance. Intergroup comparison of body weight of Day 1, 2 and 3 were done. Slides from main study were decoded after analysis, the number of PCE (polychromatic erythrocytes), RBC (red blood corpuscles), MNPCE (micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes) and PCE/total erythrocytes ratio (polychromatic erythrocytes/ total erythrocytes) and frequency of MNPCE was calculated. The data of positive control and the treatment groups were compared with that of the vehicle control for the incidence of MNPCEs and the proportion of PCEs among total RBCs by SPSS at a 95 % level (p ≤0.05) of significance. All analysis and comparisons were evaluated at the 95 % level of confidence (p <0.05). Percentage of micronucleus comparison between treated and control groups. Statistically significant changes obtained were designated by the superscripts in the summary table throughout the report as stated below:
*: Statistically significant (p <0.05).
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- CLINICAL SIGNS OF TOXICITY AND MORTALITY
The animals dosed with the test item resulted in no clinical signs or mortality in any of the treated animals.
BODY WEIGHT
No statistically significant changes in body weight were observed in any of the treated animals when compared to vehicle control group.
GROSS PATHOLOGY
No gross pathological findings were observed in any of the animals dosed with the test item at the doses of 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw/day.
PCE: Total RBC Ratio and Incidence of Micronucleus
The average numbers of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCE) were observed for a minimum of 4000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs). The incidence of percent MNPCEs were 0.06, 0.07 and 0.08 in males treated with FAT 93504 at 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw/day respectively in comparison with the vehicle dosed animals.
In the positive control animals, the incidence of percent MNPCEs was 0.79.
Any other information on results incl. tables
TABLE 1 INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
Sex | Group & Dose (mg/kg) | Animal No. | Day | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
am | pm | am | pm | am | am | |||
Male
| G1 & 0 | Rg5006 | N | N | N | N | N | N |
Rg5007 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5008 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5009 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5010 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5011 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
G2 & 500 | Rg5012 | N | N | N | N | N | N | |
Rg5013 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5014 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5015 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5016 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5017 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
G3 & 1000 | Rg5018 | N | N | N | N | N | N | |
Rg5019 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5020 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5021 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5022 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5023 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
G4 & 2000 | Rg5024 | N | N | N | N | N | N | |
Rg5025 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5026 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5027 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5028 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5029 | N | N | N | N | N | N |
N: Normal Normal, EMS: Ethyl methanesulfonate
TABLE 1. (Contd.…). INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
Sex | Group & Dose (mg/kg) | Animal No. | Day | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
am | pm | am | pm | am | am | |||
Male
| G6 & 100 (CPA) | Rg5036 | N | N | N | N | N | N |
Rg5037 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5038 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5039 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5040 | N | N | N | N | N | N | ||
Rg5041 | N | N | N | N | N | N |
N: Normal, CPA: Cyclophosphamide monohydrate.
TABLE 2 INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL BODY WEIGHT
Sex | Group & Dose (mg/kg) | Animal No. | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 |
Male | G1 & 0 | Rg5006 | 209.60 | 212.97 | 218.60 |
Rg5007 | 232.39 | 238.11 | 242.90 | ||
Rg5008 | 257.86 | 260.02 | 267.21 | ||
Rg5009 | 248.14 | 250.06 | 259.22 | ||
Rg5010 | 255.49 | 258.97 | 268.02 | ||
Rg5011 | 271.01 | 278.58 | 284.90 | ||
Mean | 245.75 | 249.79 | 256.81 | ||
±SD | 21.77 | 22.41 | 23.16 | ||
G2 & 500 | Rg5012 | 212.11 | 229.86 | 220.70 | |
Rg5013 | 220.40 | 217.65 | 211.60 | ||
Rg5014 | 250.66 | 253.11 | 250.17 | ||
Rg5015 | 256.15 | 259.13 | 255.15 | ||
Rg5016 | 261.81 | 259.96 | 259.01 | ||
Rg5017 | 275.82 | 278.3 | 274.19 | ||
Mean | 246.16 | 249.67 | 245.14 | ||
±SD | 24.77 | 22.11 | 24.02 | ||
G3 & 1000 | Rg5018 | 212.48 | 219.56 | 210.46 | |
Rg5019 | 223.09 | 220.13 | 212.31 | ||
Rg5020 | 240.64 | 245.69 | 240.10 | ||
Rg5021 | 253.65 | 252.18 | 245.11 | ||
Rg5022 | 264.54 | 265.51 | 259.01 | ||
Rg5023 | 278.69 | 281.65 | 271.75 | ||
Mean | 245.52 | 247.45 | 239.79 | ||
±SD | 25.09 | 24.68 | 24.64 | ||
G4 & 2000 | Rg5024 | 220.29 | 218.90 | 211.90 | |
Rg5025 | 225.71 | 227.99 | 221.11 | ||
Rg5026 | 248.30 | 248.61 | 242.12 | ||
Rg5027 | 251.88 | 253.00 | 249.01 | ||
Rg5028 | 263.96 | 261.69 | 254.75 | ||
Rg5029 | 275.39 | 275.58 | 268.18 | ||
Mean | 247.59 | 247.63 | 241.18 | ||
±SD | 21.37 | 21.07 | 21.14 |
SD: Standard deviation
TABLE 2. (Contd.…). INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL BODY WEIGHT (g)
Sex | Group & Dose (mg/kg) | Animal No. | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 |
Male | G6 & 100 (CPA) | Rg5036 | 219.06 | 222.10 | 220.18 |
Rg5037 | 235.79 | 236.97 | 234.18 | ||
Rg5038 | 255.94 | 254.06 | 253.11 | ||
Rg5039 | 256.10 | 257.58 | 255.18 | ||
Rg5040 | 263.59 | 266.77 | 259.80 | ||
Rg5041 | 263.26 | 265.06 | 261.18 | ||
Mean | 248.96 | 250.42 | 247.24 | ||
±SD | 17.81 | 17.49 | 16.50 |
SD: Standard deviation, CPA: Cyclophosphamide monohydrate.
TABLE 3 INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL GROSS PATHOLOGY
Sex | Group & Dose (mg/kg) | Animal No. | Gross Pathology Findings (Internal/External) |
Males
| G1 & 0 | Rg5006 | NAD |
Rg5007 | NAD | ||
Rg5008 | NAD | ||
Rg5009 | NAD | ||
Rg5010 | NAD | ||
Rg5011 | NAD | ||
G2 & 500 | Rg5012 | NAD | |
Rg5013 | NAD | ||
Rg5014 | NAD | ||
Rg5015 | NAD | ||
Rg5016 | NAD | ||
Rg5017 | NAD | ||
G3 & 1000 | Rg5018 | NAD | |
Rg5019 | NAD | ||
Rg5020 | NAD | ||
Rg5021 | NAD | ||
Rg5022 | NAD | ||
Rg5023 | NAD | ||
G4 & 2000 | Rg5024 | NAD | |
Rg5025 | NAD | ||
Rg5026 | NAD | ||
Rg5027 | NAD | ||
Rg5028 | NAD | ||
Rg5029 | NAD |
NAD: No Abnormalities Detected
TABLE 3. (Contd.…). INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL GROSS PATHOLOGY
Sex | Group & Dose (mg/kg) | Animal No. | Gross Pathology Findings (Internal/External) |
Males
| G6 & 100 (CPA) | Rg5036 | NAD |
Rg5037 | NAD | ||
Rg5038 | NAD | ||
Rg5039 | NAD | ||
Rg5040 | NAD | ||
Rg5041 | NAD |
NAD: No Abnormalities Detected, CPA: Cyclophosphamide monohydrate.
TABLE 4 INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL MICRONUCLEUS DATA
Sex | Group & Dose (mg /kg) | Animal No. | Total NCEs | Total PCEs | PCE: Total Erythrocytes Ratio | Mean of PCE: Total Erythrocytes Ratio | +SD | % Reduction of PCE: Total Erythrocytes Ratio | Total No. of PCE's Scored | Total Number of MNPCEs | % of MNPCEs | Mean of % of MNPCEs |
Males | G1 & 0
| Rg5006 | 242 | 260 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.01 | NA | 4050 | 3 | 0.07 | 0.06 |
Rg5007 | 250 | 252 | 0.50 | 4033 | 2 | 0.05 | ||||||
Rg5008 | 248 | 255 | 0.51 | 4059 | 2 | 0.05 | ||||||
Rg5009 | 253 | 259 | 0.51 | 4028 | 2 | 0.05 | ||||||
Rg5010 | 249 | 258 | 0.51 | 4077 | 3 | 0.07 | ||||||
| Rg5011 | 250 | 253 | 0.50 | 4047 | 3 | 0.07 | |||||
G2 & 500 | Rg5012 | 259 | 251 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.01 | 1.96 | 4043 | 2 | 0.05 | 0.06 | |
Rg5013 | 269 | 253 | 0.49 | 4080 | 2 | 0.05 | ||||||
Rg5014 | 255 | 247 | 0.49 | 4013 | 3 | 0.07 | ||||||
Rg5015 | 250 | 250 | 0.50 | 4066 | 3 | 0.07 | ||||||
Rg5016 | 248 | 257 | 0.51 | 4057 | 2 | 0.05 | ||||||
| Rg5017 | 253 | 248 | 0.50 | 4077 | 2 | 0.05 | |||||
G3 & 1000 | Rg5018 | 270 | 250 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 5.88 | 4042 | 2 | 0.05 | 0.07 | |
Rg5019 | 277 | 252 | 0.48 | 4050 | 3 | 0.07 | ||||||
Rg5020 | 268 | 248 | 0.48 | 4039 | 2 | 0.05 | ||||||
Rg5021 | 278 | 247 | 0.47 | 4059 | 4 | 0.10 | ||||||
Rg5022 | 271 | 252 | 0.48 | 4069 | 4 | 0.10 | ||||||
|
| Rg5023 | 273 | 253 | 0.48 | 4027 | 3 | 0.07 |
SD: Standard deviation.
TABLE 4. (Contd.…). INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL MICRONUCLEUS DATA
Sex | Group & Dose (mg /kg) | Animal No. | Total NCEs | Total PCEs | PCE: Total Erythrocytes Ratio | Mean of PCE: Total Erythrocytes Ratio | +SD | % Reduction of PCE: Total Erythrocytes Ratio | Total No. of PCE's Scored | Total Number of MNPCEs | % of MNPCEs | Mean of % of MNPCEs |
Males | G4 & 2000
| Rg5024 | 282 | 238 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.01 | 7.84 | 4053 | 1 | 0.02 | 0.08 |
Rg5025 | 284 | 240 | 0.46 | 4049 | 4 | 0.10 | ||||||
Rg5026 | 289 | 254 | 0.47 | 4032 | 3 | 0.07 | ||||||
Rg5027 | 275 | 246 | 0.47 | 4072 | 4 | 0.10 | ||||||
Rg5028 | 279 | 253 | 0.48 | 4090 | 4 | 0.10 | ||||||
| Rg5029 | 274 | 244 | 0.47 | 4028 | 3 | 0.07 | |||||
G6 & 100 CPA | Rg5036 | 289 | 243 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.01 | 9.80 | 4058 | 31 | 0.76 | 0.79* | |
Rg5037 | 275 | 240 | 0.47 | 4087 | 30 | 0.73 | ||||||
Rg5038 | 282 | 237 | 0.46 | 4053 | 34 | 0.84 | ||||||
Rg5039 | 285 | 244 | 0.46 | 4044 | 32 | 0.79 | ||||||
Rg5040 | 289 | 251 | 0.46 | 4064 | 32 | 0.79 | ||||||
| Rg5041 | 293 | 243 | 0.45 | 4070 | 33 | 0.81 |
SD: Standard deviation, CPA: Cyclophosphamide monohydrate, *: Statistically significant
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results obtained under the conditions employed during this experiment, it is concluded that the test item, FAT 93504 is neither clastogenic nor aneugenic at and up to 2000 mg/kg bw/day.
- Executive summary:
The test item FAT 93504 was evaluated for the “Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test” as per OECD Guideline No. 474, adopted on 29 July 2016. This study used 6 groups of rats and each group consisted of 6 males. The animals designated as group G1 animals were administered with corn oil as vehicle. The animals designated as groups G2, G3 and G4 were administered 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw/day of FAT 93504, respectively. The animals in group G6 were administered 250 mg/kg bw/day of the positive control ethyl methanesulfonate (for comet assay) and the animals in group G6 were administered 100 mg/kg bw/day of the positive control cyclophosphamide monohydrate (for micronucleus test) for three consecutive days by oral route using gavage cannula. Approximately 3 hours after the last dosing, all rats were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The femurs were collected from each animal of G1 to G4 and G6 groups for bone marrow collection. Bone marrow cells were obtained by cutting open the epiphyses of femur bone immediately following sacrifice. The slides of bone marrow cells were stained with May-Gruenwald and Giemsa stain and observed for incidences of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCE). The average percentage of MNPCEs was 0.06 in males dosed with vehicle. The animals dosed with the test item at 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw/day, the average percentage of MNPCEs were 0.06, 0.07 and 0.08, respectively. There was no statistically significant increase in the percentage of MNPCEs (per 4000 PCEs scored) at the doses of 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw/day of test item, in comparison with the vehicle control. The positive control group (G6), cyclophosphamide monohydrate at 100 mg/kg bw/day exhibited statistically significant increase in the numbers of MNPCEs when compared to vehicle control and the average percentage of MNPCEs (per 4000 PCEs scored) in positive control was 0.79. This demonstrated the sensitivity of the test system towards positive controls and confirmed that the test conditions were adequate. There was no statistically significant variation in body weight for treated animals. The dose formulation samples were analysed for homogeneity and dose concentration by HPLC and the formulation results were within the acceptance criteria of ±15 % recovery to the nominal concentration. Based on the results obtained under the conditions employed during this experiment, it is concluded that the test item, FAT 93504 is neither clastogenic nor aneugenic at and up to 2000 mg/kg bw/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.