Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 230-049-5 | CAS number: 6925-69-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: genome mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 2001
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Standard guideline study under GLP regulation
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 001
- Report date:
- 2001
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 12H-phthaloperin-12-one
- EC Number:
- 230-049-5
- EC Name:
- 12H-phthaloperin-12-one
- Cas Number:
- 6925-69-5
- Molecular formula:
- C18H10N2O
- IUPAC Name:
- 12H-phthaloperin-12-one
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: no data
- Age at study initiation: 6 to 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 29 to 32,6 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Fasting period before study: no data
- Housing: groups of five
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21+/- 3
- Humidity (%): > 70%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Corn oil
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: 100 to 500 mg/10 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 and 48 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- single injection
- Post exposure period:
- none
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0 (Control) - 100 - 250 - 500 (max. tol. dose) mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Cyclophospamide
- Route of administration: intraperitoneal
- Doses / concentrations: 50 mg/kg bw
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- bone marrow from both femora.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: highest dose = max tolerated, lower doses at intervals of about 2x
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields): 24 h and 48 h after injection
The animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation 24 or 48 h after dosing of SOLVENT ORANGE 60, 24 h after dosing of the vehicle and 48 h after dosing of the positive control. Both femurs were removed and freed of blood and muscles. Both ends of the bone were shortened until a small opening to the marrow canal became visible. The bone was flushed with approximately 2 ml of foetal calf serum. The cell suspension was collected and centrifuged at 1000 rpm (approximately 100 g) for 5 min.
The supernatant was removed with a Pasteur pipette. A drop of serum was left on the pellet. The cells in the sediment were carefully mixed with the serum by aspiration with the remaining serum. A drop of the cell suspension was placed on the end of a slide which was previously cleaned (24 h immersed in a 1:1 mixture of 96% (v/v) ethanol/ether and cleaned with a tissue) and marked (with the study identification number and the animal number). The drop was spread by moving a clean slide with roundwhetted sides at an angle of approximately 45° over the slide with the drop of bone marrow suspension.
The preparations were air-dried, fixed for 5 min in 100% methanol and air-dried overnight. Two slides were prepared per animal.
Staining of the bone marrow smears. The slides were automatically stained using the "Wright-stain-procedure" in an "Ames" HEMA-tek slide stainer (Miles, Bayer Nederland B.V.). The dry slides were dipped in xylene before they were embedded in MicroMount and mounted with a coverslip.
Analysis of the bone marrow smears for micronuclei All slides were randomly coded before examination. An adhesive label with NOTOX study identification number and code was stuck over the marked slide. At first the slides were screened at a magnification of 100 x for regions of suitable technical quality, i.e. where the cells were well spread, undamaged and well stained. Slides were scored at a magnification of 1000 x. The number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was counted in 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes. The ratio polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was determined by counting and differentiating the first 1000 erythrocytes at the same time.
Micronuclei were only counted in polychromatic erythrocytes. Averages and standard deviations were calculated. - Evaluation criteria:
- Equivocal results should be clarified by further testing using modification of experimental conditions.
A test substance is considered positive in the micronucleus test if:
It induced a biologically as well as a statistically significant (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test; two-sided test at P < 0.05) increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (at any dose or at any sampling time).
A test substance is considered negative in the micronucleus test if:
None of the tested concentrations or sampling times showed a statistically significant (P < 0.05) increase in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes.
The preceding criteria are not absolute and other modifying factors may enter into the final evaluation decision.
-
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- lethargy; rough coat; hunched posture; eyes closed
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Group |
Treatment |
Dose (mg/kg body weight)
|
Sampling time (h) |
Number of micronucleated+ polychromatic erythrocytes per 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (mean± S.D.) |
Ratio polychromatic/ normochromatic erythrocytes (mean± S.D.) |
A |
solvent control |
0
|
24 |
1.6±1.1 |
1.48 ± 0.23
|
B |
test item |
500 |
24 |
0.8±1.1 |
0.95±0.18
|
C |
test item |
500 |
48 |
0.2±0.4 |
0.96±0.31
|
D |
test item |
250 |
24 |
0.6±0.9 |
0.74±0.15
|
E |
test item |
100 |
24 |
0.6 ± 1.3 |
1.25±0.15 |
F |
CP |
50 |
48 |
29.4±18.6(2
|
0.36±0.13 |
Solvent control = corn oil
CP = Cyclophosphamide
(1) Five animals per treatment group
(2) Significantly different from corresponding control group (Wilcoxon Rank SumTest,P</=0.01).
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
SOL VENT ORANGE 60 is not mutagenic in the micronucleus test under the experimental conditions described - Executive summary:
The test item was tested in the Micronucleus Test in mice, to evaluate its genotoxic effect on erythrocytes in bone marrow.
Four groups each comprising 5 males, received an intraperitoneal injection. Two groups were dosed with 500 mg/kg body weight, one group was dosed with 250 mg/kg body weight and one group was dosed with 100 mg/kg body weight.
After dosing, the animals of the dose levels of 500 and 250 mg/kg body weight showed the following toxic signs: lethargy, rough coat, hunched posture and closed eyes. The animals of the dose levels of 100 mg/kg body weight showed lethargy one day after dosing only. A vehicle treated group served as negative control (corn oil), a group treated with an intraperitoneal injection of cyclophosphamide (CP) at 50 mg/kg body weight served as positive control.
Bone marrow of the groups treated with the test item was sampled 24 or 48 hours after dosing. Bone marrow from the negative control group was harvested at 24 hours after dosing only and bone marrow from the positive control group was harvested at 48 hours after dosing only.
Cyclophosphamide, the positive control substance, induced a statistically significant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes. No increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was observed in the polychromatic erythrocytes of the bone marrow of animals treated with the test item.
The groups that were treated with the test item showed no decrease in the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes compared to the vehicle controls, which reflects a lack of toxic effects of this compound on the erythropoiesis. The group that was treated with cyclophosphamide showed a decrease in the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes compared to the vehicle controls.
It is concluded that the test item is not mutagenic in the micronucleus test under the experimental conditions described in this report.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.