Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 269-789-9 | CAS number: 68333-79-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 19 March 2010 to 11 May 2010
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The study was conclusive, performed to a valid guideline (OECD TG 476, adopted 21 July 1997) and was conducted under GLP conditions. No deviations from the test methods were noted. The reliability has been assigned in accordance with 'practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories' which states that the maximum reliability for a read-across study is 2. The study is considered to be adequate and reliable for the purpose of registration under REACH (Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006) as part of a weight of evidence approach. Read-across in accordance with Annex XI, Section 1.5 of Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 (REACH) is justified on the following basis: Polyphosphoric acids, ammonium salt (also known as ammonium polyphosphate) is a mixture of oligomeric species of ammonium phosphate. When analysed the substance appears to consist mainly of ammonium orthophosphates, ammonium diphosphate and ammonium triphosphate. Phosphate is not considered to be mutagenic as it is frequently present within the buffers used for in vitro mutagenicity tests (i.e. as sodium or potassium phosphates). Therefore in order to assess the mutagenicity potential of ammonium polyphosphate it is the ammonium ion that is of interest. As such it is scientifically justified to read-across to other ammonium phosphates. Such as, ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate and diammonium hydrogenorthophosphate.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Polyphosphoric acids, ammonium salts
- EC Number:
- 269-789-9
- EC Name:
- Polyphosphoric acids, ammonium salts
- Cas Number:
- 68333-79-9
- Molecular formula:
- [NH4PO3]n
- IUPAC Name:
- undecaammonium bis(phosphonatooxy)phosphinate dihydrogen phosphate hydrogen (phosphonatooxy)phosphonate hydrogen phosphate
- Test material form:
- solid: crystalline
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate
- CAS Number: 7722-76-1
- Physical state: white crystals
- Analytical purity: 99.8%
- Lot/batch No.: 0927299
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 03 February 2011 (allocated by NOTOX, 1 year after receipt of the test substance)
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature in the dark
- Stability under storage conditions: stable
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Thymidine kinase, TK +/-, locus of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell line.
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 medium
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1, 3, 10, 33, 100, 333, 750, 1150 µg/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: RPMI 1640 medium
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Vehicle (RPMI medium) treatment groups were used as the vehicle controls
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Vehicle (RPMI medium) treatment groups were used as the vehicle controls.
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Two mutagenicity experiments were performed. In the first experiment, L5178Y TK mouse lymphoma cells were treated with the test material at eight dose levels, in duplicate, together with vehicle and positive controls. The exposure groups used were as follows: 3 hour exposures both with and without metabolic activation (8% S9-mix).
In the second experiment, L5178Y TK mouse lymphoma cells were treated with the test material at eight dose levels, in duplicate, together with vehicle and positive controls. The exposure groups used were as follows: 3 hour exposure with metabolic activation (12% S9-mix), and 24 hours without metabolic activation.
For expression of the mutant phenotype, the remaining cells were cultured for 2 days after the treatment period. During this culture period at least 4 x 10^6 cells (if possible) were subcultered every day in oder to maintain log phase growth. Two days after the end of the treatment with the test substance the cells were plated for determination of the cloning efficiency (CEday2) and the mutation frequency (MF).
The dose range of test material was selected following the results of a preliminary toxicity test and was 1 to 1150 µg/mL. There was no evidence of any marked toxicity in the preliminary toxicity test up to and including the highest test substance concentration of 1150 µL.
The vehicle (solvent) controls had acceptable mutant frequency values that were within the normal range for the L5178Y cell line at the TK +/- locus. The positive control materials induced marked increases in the mutant frequency indicating the satisfactory performance of the test and of the activity of the metabolising system.
Cell culture:
Horse serum was inactivated by incubation at 56 °C for at least 30 minutes.
Basic medium: RPMI 1640 Herpes buffered medium (Dutch modification) containing penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL and 50 µg/mL, respectively), 1mM sodium pyruvate and 2mM L-glutamin.
Growth medium: Basic medium, supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-activated horse serum (=R10 medium)
Exposure medium: For 3 hour exposure: Cells were exposed to the test substance in basic medium supplemented wuith 5% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (R5-medium). For 24 hour exposure: Cells were exposed to the test substance in basic medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (R10-medium).
Selective medium: selective medium consisted of basic medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (total amount of serum = 20%, R20) and 5 µg/mL triflurothymidine (TFT)
Non-selective medium: non-selective medium consisted of basic medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (total amount of serum = 20%, R20).
Environmental conditions:
All incubations were carried out in a controlled environment in the dark, in which optimal conditions were a humid atmosphere of 80-100% (actual range 59-94%), containing 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2 in air, at a temperature of 37.0 ± 1.0 °C (actual range 34.9 - 37.9 °C). Temperature and humidity were continuously monitored throughout the experiment. The CO2 percentage was monitored once on each working day. Temporary deviations from the temperature (in the range of 35.1 - 36.0 °C), humidity (with a maximum of 9%) and CO2 percentage (with a maximum of 1%) occured that were caused the opening and closing of the incubator door, but the time of these deviations did not exceed 1 hour. Based on laboratory historical data these deviations are considered not to affect the study integrity. - Evaluation criteria:
- Data evaluation and statistical procedures:
In addition to the criteria stated below, any increase of the mutation frequency should be evaluated for biological relevance including a comparison of the results with the historical control data range.
The global evaluation factor (GEF) has been defined by the IWTG as the mean of the negative/solvent MF distribution plus one standard deviation. For the micro well version of the assay the GEF is 126 (ref. 12).
A test substance is considered positive (mutagenic) in the mutation assay if it induced a MF of more than MF(controls) + 126 in a dose-dependent manner. An observed increase should be biologically relevant and will be compared with the historical control data range.
A test substance is considered equivocal (questionable) in the mutation assay if no clear conclusion for positive or negative result can be made after an additional confirmation study.
A test substance is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the mutation assay if:
a) None of the tested concentrations reached a mutation frequency of MF(controls) + 126.
b) The results are confirmed in an independently repeated test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
Table 1 shows the cell counts of the cultures after 3 hours of treatment with various concentrations of ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate and after 24 hours and 48 hours of subculture and the calculated suspension growth and the relative suspension growth.
Both in the absence and presence of S9 -mix, no toxicity in the relative suspension growth was observed up to and including the highest test substance concentration of 1150 µg/mL compared to the suspension growth of the solvent control.
Table 2 shows the cell counts of the cultures after 24 hours of treatment with various concentrations of ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate and after 24 hours of subculture and the calculated suspension growth and relative suspension growth.
In the absence of S9 -mix, no toxicity in the relative suspension growth was observed up to and including the highest test substance concentration of 1150 µg/mL compared to the suspension growth of the solvent control.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: The spontaneous mutation frequencies in the solvent-treated control cultures were between the minimum and maximum value of the historical control data range. - Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type: Thymidine kinase, TK +/-, locus of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell lines
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
First mutagenicity test:
Table 3 shows the percentages of cell survival and the mutation frequencies for various concentrations of ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate.
No toxicity was observed and all dose levels were evaluated in the absence and presence of S9-mix.
No significant increase in the mutation frequency at the TK locus was observed after treatment with ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate either in the absence or presence of S9-mix. The numbers of small and large colonies in the ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate treated cultures were comparable to the numbers of small and large colonies of the solvent controls.
Second mutagenicity test:
Table 4 shows the percentages of cell survival and the mutation frequencies for various concentrations of ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate.
No toxicity was observed and all dose levels were evaluated in the absence and presence of S9-mix.
No significant increase in the mutation frequency at the TK locus was observed after treatment with ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate either in the absence or in the presence of S9-mix. The numbers of small and large colonies in the ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate treated cultures were comparable to the numbers of small and large colonies of the solvent controls.
Table 1 – Dose range finding test; Cytotoxicity of ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate (3 hours treatment)
dose (µg/mL) |
cell count after 3 hours of treatment (cells/mL x 105) |
cell count after 24 hours of subculture (cells/mL x 105) |
cell count after 48 hours of subculture (cells/mL x 105) |
SG1(x 105cells/mL) |
RSG2(%) |
without metabolic activation |
|||||
SC |
5.3 |
3.8 |
7.5 |
96 |
100 |
33 |
5.6 |
4.0 |
7.7 |
110 |
114 |
100 |
5.5 |
3.6 |
7.7 |
98 |
102 |
333 |
5.2 |
3.6 |
7.8 |
94 |
98 |
750 |
5.3 |
3.6 |
7.8 |
96 |
99 |
1150 |
5.1 |
3.4 |
7.9 |
87 |
90 |
with metabolic activation |
|||||
SC |
5.5 |
3.9 |
8.2 |
113 |
100 |
33 |
5.7 |
3.8 |
9.1 |
126 |
112 |
100 |
5.7 |
3.8 |
8.4 |
116 |
103 |
333 |
5.5 |
4.1 |
8.2 |
118 |
105 |
750 |
5.4 |
4.0 |
7.9 |
109 |
97 |
1150 |
5.3 |
3.6 |
8.7 |
107 |
95 |
Table 2 – Dose range finding test; Cytotoxicity of ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate (24 hours treatment)
dose (µg/mL) |
cell count after 3 hours of treatment (cells/mL x 105) |
cell count after 24 hours of subculture (cells/mL x 105) |
SG1(x 105cells/mL) |
RSG2(%) |
without metabolic activation |
||||
SC |
5.7 |
8.1 |
37 |
100 |
33 |
6.1 |
8.1 |
40 |
107 |
100 |
6.4 |
7.5 |
38 |
104 |
333 |
5.9 |
7.7 |
37 |
100 |
750 |
4.9 |
7.5 |
29 |
80 |
1150 |
4.9 |
6.5 |
25.69 |
|
Note: all calculations were made without rounding off
SC = solvent control = RPMI medium
(1)
(2)
Table 3 – Dose range finding test: Cytotoxic and mutagenic response of ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate in the mouse lymphoma L5178Y test system
dose (µg/mL) |
RSG (%) |
CEday2(%) |
RSday2(%) |
RTG (%) |
Mutation frequency x 10-6 |
||
total |
small |
large |
|||||
without metabolic activation: 3 hours treatment |
|
|
|||||
SC1 |
100 |
91 |
100 |
100 |
101 |
51 |
45 |
SC2 |
95 |
104 |
55 |
43 |
|||
1 |
109 |
99 |
107 |
116 |
93 |
52 |
37 |
3 |
107 |
95 |
102 |
109 |
108 |
48 |
54 |
10 |
110 |
93 |
99 |
109 |
109 |
59 |
44 |
33 |
117 |
111 |
119 |
140 |
94 |
56 |
34 |
100 |
104 |
98 |
105 |
109 |
82 |
43 |
35 |
333 |
101 |
83 |
89 |
89 |
74 |
40 |
31 |
750 |
101 |
99 |
107 |
107 |
95 |
41 |
49 |
1150 |
93 |
102 |
110 |
102 |
84 |
47 |
34 |
MMS |
67 |
54 |
58 |
39 |
1095 |
607 |
338 |
with 8% (v/v) metabolic activation: 3 hours treatment |
|
|
|||||
SC1 |
100 |
97 |
100 |
100 |
106 |
54 |
46 |
SC2 |
97 |
83 |
38 |
41 |
|||
1 |
112 |
105 |
109 |
122 |
82 |
45 |
34 |
3 |
112 |
93 |
96 |
107 |
94 |
41 |
49 |
10 |
99 |
99 |
103 |
102 |
88 |
55 |
29 |
33 |
99 |
94 |
97 |
96 |
85 |
49 |
33 |
100 |
100 |
101 |
104 |
104 |
90 |
51 |
35 |
333 |
95 |
98 |
101 |
96 |
94 |
58 |
32 |
750 |
88 |
97 |
100 |
88 |
97 |
53 |
39 |
1150 |
89 |
101 |
104 |
93 |
118 |
67 |
44 |
CP |
73 |
48 |
49 |
36 |
1809 |
877 |
564 |
Table 4 – Experiment 2: Cytotoxic and mutagenic response of ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate in the mouse lymphoma L5178Y test system
dose (µg/mL) |
RSG (%) |
CEday2(%) |
RSday2(%) |
RTG (%) |
Mutation frequency x 10-6 |
||
total |
small |
large |
|||||
without metabolic activation: 24 hours treatment |
|
|
|||||
SC1 |
100 |
80 |
100 |
100 |
95 |
60 |
32 |
SC2 |
65 |
79 |
51 |
28 |
|||
1 |
109 |
72 |
100 |
108 |
69 |
20 |
48 |
3 |
112 |
58 |
80 |
90 |
96 |
57 |
36 |
10 |
116 |
60 |
83 |
96 |
95 |
61 |
32 |
33 |
116 |
59 |
82 |
94 |
81 |
30 |
49 |
100 |
112 |
58 |
80 |
90 |
59 |
36 |
22 |
333 |
98 |
49 |
67 |
65 |
69 |
35 |
33 |
750 |
77 |
51 |
70 |
55 |
89 |
56 |
31 |
1150 |
58 |
45 |
61 |
35 |
134 |
60 |
70 |
MMS |
73 |
37 |
51 |
37 |
1424 |
851 |
404 |
with 12% (v/v) metabolic activation: 3 hours treatment |
|
|
|||||
SC1 |
100 |
65 |
100 |
100 |
88 |
53 |
33 |
SC2 |
72 |
89 |
46 |
40 |
|||
1 |
94 |
58 |
85 |
80 |
120 |
74 |
42 |
3 |
95 |
120 |
174 |
165 |
38 |
21 |
17 |
10 |
91 |
60 |
88 |
79 |
78 |
37 |
39 |
33 |
97 |
58 |
84 |
81 |
110 |
66 |
41 |
100 |
88 |
48 |
69 |
61 |
160 |
110 |
44 |
333 |
90 |
97 |
140 |
127 |
85 |
54 |
28 |
750 |
90 |
60 |
88 |
79 |
115 |
65 |
46 |
1150 |
69 |
41 |
60 |
42 |
127 |
75 |
49 |
CP |
15 |
33 |
48 |
7 |
935 |
668 |
212 |
Note: all calculations were made without rounding off
RSG = Relative suspension growth; CE = cloning efficiency; RS = Relative Survival; RTG = Relative Total Growth; SC = Solvent control = RPMI 1640 medium; MMS = methylmethanesulfonate; CP = cyclophosphamide
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate is not mutagenic in the TK mutation test system under the experimental conditions described in this report. - Executive summary:
The report describes the effects of ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate on the induction of forward mutations at the thymidine-kinase locus (TK-locus) in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. The test was performed in two independent experiments in the absence and presence of S9-mix (rat liver S9-mix induced by a combination of phenobarbital and β-napthaflavone).
In the first experiment, ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate was tested up to concentrations of 1150 µg/mL (0.01 M) in the absence and presence of 8% (v/v) S9-mix. The incubation time was 3 hours. In the second experiment, ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate was again tested up to concentrations of 1150 µg/mL, but in the absence and presence of 12% (v/v) S9-mix. The incubation times were 24 hours and 3 hours for incubations in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively. No toxicity was observed at this dose level in the absence and presence of S9-mix.
The spontaneous mutation frequencies in the solvent-treated control cultures were between the minimum and maximum value of the historical control data and within the acceptability criteria of this assay.
Mutation frequencies in cultures treated with positive control chemicals were increased 11-fold and 16-fold for MMS in the absenceof S9-mix, and by 19- and 11-fold for CP in the presence of S9-mix. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions, both in theabsence and presence of S9-mix, were appropriate and that the metabolic activation system (S9-mix) functioned properly.
In the absence of S9-mix, ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate did not induce a significant increase in the mutation frequency in the first experiment. This result was confirmed in an independent repeat experiment with modifications in the duration of treatment time.
In the presence of S9-mix, ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate did not induce a significant increase in the mutation frequency in the first experiment. This result was confirmed in an independent repeat experiment with modifications in the concentration of the S9 for metabolic activation.
It is concluded that ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate is not mutagenic in the mouse lymphoma L5178Y test system under the experimental conditions described.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.