Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 212-661-4 | CAS number: 840-65-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation:
There were no signs of dermal irritation seen after 24, 48, and 72 hour exposures of NDC to rabbits (mean score = 0) (IIT Research Institute, 1990).
Eye irritation:
There were no signs of eye irritation after 24, 48, and 72 hour exposures of NDC to rabbits (mean cornea score = 0, mean iris score = 0, mean conjunctivae score 0.33 and mean chemosis score 0.11) (IIT Research Institute, 1990).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- November 1990
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Well documented and scientifically acceptable.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- NDC was applied for 4 hours to the pre-moistened, shaved backs of three rabbits at a dose of 0.5 g. Following unwrapping, the test sites were rinsed with approximately 2 mL of 0.9% saline. All test sites were examined for signs of dermal irritation (i.e., edema, erythema and/or eschar formation) and corrosivity (i.e., ulceration and/or necrosis) at 30-60 minutes, and 24, 48 and 72 hours following removal of the wrappings.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- None stated.
- Type of coverage:
- not specified
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 g
No additional data - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- 30-60 minutes, 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Number of animals:
- 3 rabbits
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Test sites were rinsed with approximately 2 mL of 0.9% saline.
- Time after start of exposure: 4 hours
No additional data - Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No signs of dermal irritation were evident in any rabbit at any time during the study. The Primary Dermal Irritation Score for Dimethyl-2,6-Naphthalene Dicarboxylate (DM-2,6-NDC) is 0.0.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- In a dermal irritation study conducted equivalent to OECD 404 (not conducted according to GLP), no signs of irritation were seen 24, 48 and 72 hours after exposure of rabbits to NDC (mean score = 0), therefore, NDC is considered not irritating.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- November 1990
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Well documented and scientifically acceptable.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- NDC was placed in the right eye of each of three rabbits at a dose of 0.1 g, with the left eye serving as an untreated control. The treated eye of each rabbit was scored for irritation at 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours following test article application. The control eye was used for comparison.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 3-4 months of age
- Weight at study initiation: approximately 2.0-3.5 kg
- Housing: Each rabbit will be housed individually in a stainless steel cage (45.5 x 41 x 61 cm) suspended over excrement pans.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Approximately 150 g of Purina Lab Rabbit Chow HF #5326 will be provided daily for each rabbit.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Water purified by reverse osmosis will be provided ad libitum by means of an automatic watering system.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Room temperature will be regulated to avoid extreme fluctuations.
- Humidity (%): Humidity will be regulated to avoid extreme fluctuations.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle
No additional data - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- at a dose of 0.1 g
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 72 hours
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM: DRAIZE
No additional data - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: Mean of 24, 48 & 72 hrs
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: Mean of 24, 48 & 72 hrs
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: Mean of 24, 48 & 72 hrs
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: Mean of 24, 48 & 72 hrs
- Score:
- 0.11
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The maximum eye irritation score of 6.7/110.0 was obtained 1 hour after application of Dimethyl-2,6-Naphthalene Dicarboxylate (DM-2,6-NDC).
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- NDC was found to be a non-irritant to the eyes.
Reference
Cornea (Density of Opacity)
Animal Number |
Sex |
Scoring Interval |
||||
1 hr |
24 hr |
48 hr |
72 hr |
Meana |
||
626 627 628 |
M F F |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0.0 0.0 0.0 |
Iris
Animal Number |
Sex |
Scoring Interval |
||||
1 hr |
24 hr |
48 hr |
72 hr |
Meana |
||
626 627 628 |
M F F |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0.0 0.0 0.0 |
Conjunctiva
Animal Number |
Sex |
Scoring Interval |
|||||||||
1 hr |
24 hr |
48 hr |
72 hr |
Meana |
|||||||
Ab |
Bc |
A |
B |
A |
B |
A |
B |
A |
B |
||
626 627 628 |
M F F |
1 1 2 |
1 0 2 |
0 0 2 |
0 0 1 |
0 0 1 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0.0 0.0 1.0 |
0.0 0.0 0.3 |
aExcludes the 1-hr scores, as per the EEC criteria.
bA = Erythema
cB = Chemosis
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
This registration contains a combined approach for addressing the required endpoints. The required endpoints are addressed using, when available, data on the substance to be registered, dimethyl naphthalene-2,6-dicarboxylate (CAS Number 840-65-3) (NDC). When these data are not available, data from the following close structural analogs is used to address the required endpoints.
· naphthalene-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (CAS number 1141-38-4); and
Naphthalene-2,6-dicarboxylic acid is structurally similar to NDC, the registered substance, with a smiles code of c12c(cc(C(O)=O)cc2)ccc(c1)C(O)=O compared to that of c12c(cc(C(OC)=O)cc2)ccc(c1)C(OC)=O of NDC. The additional two methyl groups present in NDC are not expected to cause any significant differences in the toxicological effects of the registered substance nor it's degradation products.
Naphthalene-2,6-dicarboxylic acid data are used to address the following endpoints:
· Skin irritation (supporting study); and
· Eye irritation (supporting study).
Skin irritation
Key study:
In the key study conducted equivalent to OECD Guideline 404 (not conducted according to GLP), no signs of dermal irritation were seen after 72 hour exposure to rabbits (species not specified) with NDC (mean score = 0) (IIT Research Institute, 1990).
Supporting studies:
In a study, conducted equivalent to OECD Guideline 404 (not conducted according to GLP), no signs of dermal irritation were seen after 72 hour exposure to New Zealand White rabbits with NDC (mean score = 0.2) (Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc., 1974).
In a read across study, conducted equivalent to OECD 404 (not conducted according to GLP), after 72 hour exposure to New Zealand White rabbits with naphthalene-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (EC Number 214-527-0 and CAS Number 1141-38-4), there were no signs of dermal irritation seen in any test animal during the study (mean score 0.2) (IIT RESEARCH INSTITUTE, 1991).
In a read across study, (no guideline followed, the test procedure was modeled after that of Draize et al., not conducted according to GLP), no signs of dermal irritation were seen after 72 hour exposure to New Zealand White rabbits with 2,6 -dimethylnaphthalene (EC number 209 -464 -0 and CAS number 581 -42 -0) (mean score = 0) (Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc., 1974).
Eye irritation
Key study:
In the key study, conducted equivalent to OECD Guideline 405 (not conducted according to GLP), no signs of eye irritation were seen after 24, 48, and 72 hour exposure to New Zealand White rabbits with NDC (mean cornea score = 0, mean iris score = 0, mean conjunctivae score = 0.33 and mean chemosis score = 0.11) (IIT Research Institute, 1990).
Supporting studies:
In a study, conducted equivalent to OECD Guideline 405 (not conducted according to GLP), no signs of eye irritation were seen after 24, 48, and 72 hour exposure to New Zealand White rabbits with NDC, (mean cornea score = 0, mean iris score = 0, mean conjunctivae score = 0.33 and mean chemosis score = 0.11) (IIT Research Institute, 1990).
In a study, conducted equivalent to OECD Guideline 405 (not conducted according to GLP), no signs of eye irritation were seen after exposure to rabbits (species not specified) with NDC (IIT Research, Institute, 1990).
In a read across study, conducted equivalent to OECD Guideline 405 (not conducted according to GLP), 2,6 -dimethylnaphthalene (EC number 209 -464 -0 and CAS number 581 -42 -0) is considered not irritating to eyes after 24 and 48 hour exposure to New Zealand White rabbits (mean cornea score = 0.42, mean iris score = 0.17, mean conjunctivae score = 0.5 and mean chemosis score = 0.17, all fully reversible within 7 days) (Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc., 1974).
In a read across study, conducted equivalent to OECD Guideline 405 (not conducted according to GLP), naphthalene-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (EC Number 214-527-0 and CAS Number 1141-38-4), is considered not irritating to eyes after 24 and 48 hour exposure to New Zealand White rabbits (mean cornea score = 0.11, mean iris score = 0, mean conjunctivae score = 0.78, and mean chemosis score = 0.78 all fully reversible within 72 hours) (IIT Research, Institute, 1990).
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
This study was carried out with rabbit based on equivalent or similar to OECD 404. The study was not conducted according to GLP. This was considered not to effect validity.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
This study was carried out with rabbit based on equivalent or similar to OECD 405. Study used FDA GLP conditions as an alternative, this was considered not to effect validity.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation:
In the key study conducted equivalent to OECD 404 (not conducted according to GLP),there were no signs of dermal irritation after 24, 48, and 72 hour exposures of NDC to rabbits (mean score = 0) (IIT Research Institute, 1990), therefore, according to Regulation EC No. 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) of substances and mixtures, NDC is not classified for skin irritation/corrosion.
Eye irritation
In the key study conducted equivalent to OECD 405 (not conducted according to GLP),There were no signs of eye irritation after 24, 48, and 72 hour exposures of NDC to rabbits (cornea score (mean) = 0, iris score (mean) = 0, conjunctival redness (mean) = 0.33 & chemosis (mean) = 0.11) (IIT Research Institute, 1990), therefore, according to Regulation EC No. 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) of substances and mixtures, NDC is not classified for eye irritation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.