Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 234-448-5 | CAS number: 12004-14-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Casul-Pulver getrocknet (Ettringite) was tested in 2 series in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test with the strains TA 1535, TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100, and TA 102 with and without S9 Mix over 48 hours in concentrations from 50 to 5050 µg/plate.
The testarticle was suspended in ddeionised water. None of the concentrations caused a significant increase in the number of revertant colonies. No signs of toxicity towards the bacteria were observed.
The test item Casul-Pulver getrocknet (Ettringite) is not mutagenic in the Bacerial Reverse Mutation Test (Paulus 2010).
As Casul-Pulver getrocknet (Ettringit) was not soluble in water or DMSO an eluate was produced and assessed with respect to its mutagenic potential with and without S9 mix from male rats, treated with phenobarbital/ß-naphthoflavone.
By addition of phytohaemagglutinin human lymphocytes in whole blood culture were stimlated to divide and exposed to the test item for 4 or 22 hours. At the end of the exposure period the cells were spun down by gentle centrifugation for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded and the cells were re-suspended and incubated for 22 hours. 3 hours before harvesting 0.1 µg Colcemid/ml was added to the resuspended cell culture. Two independent experiments were performed.No cytotoxicity or precipitate were observed.
The test item didn't cause any increase of structural chromosome aberrations (Paulus 2010).
Additional information from the registration dossier of CaSO4:In vitro gene mutation study in bacteria:
In a reliable OECD guideline study (NIER 2001) calcium sulfate dihydrate was tested in a bacterial reverse mutation assay in Salmonella typhimurium (strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537) and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA with and without metabolic activation (S9). The concentrations tested were12, 37, 111, 333, 1,000 and 3,000 μg/plate. No mutations occurred.
In vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells:
In a reliable OECD guideline study (Flanders 2010) calcium sulfate dihydrate was tested for its abilty to induce mutations in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. Calcium sulfate dihydrate did not induce any toxicologically significant increases in the mutant frequency at the TK +/- locus in L5178Y cells and was therefore considered to be non mutagenic under the conditions of the test.
In vivo micronucleus assay:
In a reliable OECD guideline study (NIER 2002) male mice were given 1,250, 2,500 and 5,000 mg/kg bw doses of calcium sulfate dihydrate. Bone marrow was sampled 24h after the last dose and PCE/NCE ratio determined. Calcium sulfate dihydrate showed negative results in the micronucleus test in vivo up to the test concentration of 5000 mg/kg bw
Short description of key information:
Genotoxicity tests (Ames, HPRT) are negative. Therefore, no further testing of genetic toxicity is neccessary.
Further Data and assessment from CaSO4 according to justification for read across (see separate document in iuclid chapter 13).
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
It is concluded that the available data indicate that Ettringite has no genotoxicity and therefore does not warrant classification for mutagenicity under DSD or CLP.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.