Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 251-201-7 | CAS number: 32764-98-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2004
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study performed under GLP
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 004
- Report date:
- 2004
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Tetrahydro-6-(3-pentenyl)-2H-pyran-2-one
- EC Number:
- 251-201-7
- EC Name:
- Tetrahydro-6-(3-pentenyl)-2H-pyran-2-one
- Cas Number:
- 32764-98-0
- Molecular formula:
- C10H16O2
- IUPAC Name:
- tetrahydro-6-(3-pentenyl)-2H-pyran-2-one
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: liquid
- Storage condition of test material: Approximately 4ºC in the dark under nitrogen
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary test (toxicity test): 0, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 ug/plate.
Range-finding test: 50, 150, 5000, 1500 and 5000 ug/plate
Main test: 50, 150, 5000, 1500 and 5000 ug/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: diemthyl sulphoxide
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test material was immiscible in sterile distilled water at 50 mg/ml (the most concentrated stock solution) but was fully miscible in dimethyl sulphoxide.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: All of the plates were incubated at 37ºC for approximately 48 hours and the frequency of revertant colonies assessed using a Domino colony counter.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- The test material may be considered positive in this test system if the following criteria are met:
The test material should have induced a reproducible, dose-related and statistically (Dunnett's method of linear regression) significant increase in the revertant count in at least one strain of bacteria.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- In the preliminary test, the test material was non-toxic to the strains of bacteria used (TA100 and WP2uvrA-).
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Range finding test
Range-finding test with and without S9 | |||||||||||
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) | |||||||||||
S9 Mix | Test substance concentration (ug/plate) | TA100 | Mean | TA1535 | Mean | WP2uvrA- | Mean | TA98 | Mean | TA1537 | Mean |
- | 0 | 74 | 89 | 22 | 27 | 24 | 21 | 24 | 20 | 11 | 10 |
90 | 32 | 16 | 17 | 7 | |||||||
102 | 26 | 22 | 19 | 11 | |||||||
- | 50 | 95 | 97 | 29 | 32 | 17 | 17 | 16 | 17 | 8 | 8 |
90 | 37 | 19 | 16 | 7 | |||||||
105 | 30 | 15 | 19 | 9 | |||||||
- | 150 | 94 | 95 | 21 | 24 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 23 | 8 | 10 |
C | 25 | 13 | 15 | 8 | |||||||
95 | 15 | 17 | 38 | 15 | |||||||
- | 500 | 118 | 105 | 24 | 29 | 20 | 23 | 25 | 23 | 7 | 9 |
87 | 34 | 21 | 22 | 15 | |||||||
110 | 30 | 29 | 22 | 6 | |||||||
- | 1500 | 89 | 95 | 28 | 26 | 20 | 21 | 18 | 17 | 4 | 7 |
106 | 26 | 24 | 12 | 12 | |||||||
89 | 24 | 18 | 21 | 6 | |||||||
- | 5000 | 97 | 106 | 33 | 34 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 12 | 5 | 6 |
111 | 30 | 18 | 7 | 10 | |||||||
109 | 39 | 22 | 11 | 4 | |||||||
+ | 0 | 85 | 89 | 13 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 24 | 24 | 16 | 11 |
93 | 11 | 25 | 25 | 10 | |||||||
89 | 10 | 16 | 23 | 6 | |||||||
+ | 50 | 88 | 81 | 12 | 24 | 20 | 24 | 29 | 24 | 6 | 12 |
74 | 12 | 23 | 30 | 13 | |||||||
82 | 9 | 29 | 12 | 17 | |||||||
+ | 150 | 85 | 91 | 11 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 25 | 26 | 15 | 20 |
89 | 6 | 17 | 30 | 19 | |||||||
98 | 7 | 13 | 23 | 26 | |||||||
+ | 500 | 72 | 78 | 10 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 22 | 24 | 10 | 14 |
79 | 10 | 21 | 23 | 15 | |||||||
83 | 3 | 20 | 26 | 18 | |||||||
+ | 1500 | 94 | 79 | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 16 | 19 | 19 | 14 |
76 | 13 | 22 | 16 | 11 | |||||||
67 | 10 | 20 | 24 | 13 | |||||||
+ | 5000 | 78 | 79 | 7 | 23 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
77 | 11 | 27 | 9 | 17 | |||||||
81 | 7 | 20 | 13 | 13 | |||||||
Positive controls | ENNG | ENNG | ENNG | 4NQO | 9AA | ||||||
Concentration (ug/plate) | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0.2 | 80 | ||||||
without S9 | 436 | 469 | 193 | 191 | 828 | 858 | 120 | 128 | 1034 | 869 | |
487 | 202 | 894 | 146 | 1160 | |||||||
484 | 179 | 851 | 118 | 412 | |||||||
Positive controls | 2AA | 2AA | 2AA | BP | 2AA | ||||||
Concentration (ug/plate) | 1 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 2 | ||||||
With S9 | 767 | 834 | 187 | 221 | 314 | 282 | 166 | 214 | 222 | 250 | |
845 | 245 | 277 | 223 | 273 | |||||||
891 | 232 | 252 | 254 | 254 |
Table 2. Main test
Main test with and without S9 | |||||||||||
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) | |||||||||||
S9 Mix | Test substance concentration (ug/plate) | TA100 | Mean | TA1535 | Mean | WP2uvrA- | Mean | TA98 | Mean | TA1537 | Mean |
- | 0 | 84 | 94 | 28 | 23 | 20 | 21 | 17 | 18 | 10 | 9 |
88 | 17 | 18 | 18 | 9 | |||||||
111 | 25 | 24 | 19 | 9 | |||||||
- | 50 | 94 | 93 | 29 | 22 | 20 | 22 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 12 |
86 | 22 | 20 | 16 | 17 | |||||||
98 | 29 | 26 | 24 | 10 | |||||||
- | 150 | 109 | 107 | 30 | 21 | 17 | 21 | 17 | 14 | 6 | 8 |
116 | 32 | 24 | 15 | 8 | |||||||
97 | 29 | 33 | 9 | 9 | |||||||
- | 500 | 112 | 109 | 32 | 18 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 10 | 8 |
103 | 30 | 20 | 21 | 4 | |||||||
113 | 22 | 19 | 21 | 10 | |||||||
- | 1500 | 96 | 98 | 30 | 18 | 11 | 18 | 18 | 20 | 11 | 11 |
102 | 39 | 17 | 30 | 15 | |||||||
96 | 19 | 25 | 11 | 8 | |||||||
- | 5000 | 113 | 110 | 31 | 13 | 5 | 13 | 6 | 11 | 5 | 6 |
100 | 28 | 23 | 8 | 6 | |||||||
118 | 32 | 11 | 18 | 6 | |||||||
+ | 0 | 103 | 98 | 10 | 10 | 36 | 30 | 21 | 27 | 15 | 19 |
96 | 10 | 26 | 29 | 20 | |||||||
96 | 11 | 27 | 31 | 21 | |||||||
+ | 50 | 104 | 103 | 10 | 13 | 24 | 27 | 23 | 24 | 13 | 18 |
101 | 19 | 22 | 26 | 24 | |||||||
105 | 11 | 35 | 24 | 16 | |||||||
+ | 150 | 106 | 104 | 11 | 9 | 19 | 21 | 27 | 25 | 11 | 14 |
105 | 9 | 24 | 18 | 19 | |||||||
100 | 7 | 19 | 29 | 13 | |||||||
+ | 500 | 101 | 97 | 15 | 13 | 26 | 21 | 23 | 22 | 12 | 13 |
102 | 9 | 24 | 22 | 13 | |||||||
89 | 16 | 12 | 22 | 13 | |||||||
+ | 1500 | 82 | 93 | 12 | 13 | 19 | 23 | 28 | 23 | 11 | 18 |
115 | 17 | 24 | 21 | 27 | |||||||
83 | 11 | 26 | 19 | 15 | |||||||
+ | 5000 | 104 | 93 | 9 | 14 | 25 | 25 | 20 | 20 | 16 | 16 |
101 | 18 | 25 | 21 | 12 | |||||||
73 | C | 26 | 19 | 19 | |||||||
Positive controls | ENNG | ENNG | ENNG | 4NQO | 9AA | ||||||
Concentration (ug/plate) | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0.2 | 80 | ||||||
without S9 | 493 | 493 | 307 | 302 | 600 | 600 | 161 | 153 | 1145 | 1179 | |
497 | 323 | 613 | 133 | 1131 | |||||||
488 | 277 | 588 | 165 | 1262 | |||||||
Positive controls | 2AA | 2AA | 2AA | BP | 2AA | ||||||
Concentration (ug/plate) | 1 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 2 | ||||||
With S9 | 482 | 706 | 266 | 249 | 310 | 299 | 264 | 249 | 119 | 189 | |
807 | 263 | 309 | 237 | 117 | |||||||
828 | 218 | 278 | 245 | 332 |
BP - Benzo(a)pyrene
2AA - 2-Aminoanthracene
ENNG - N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
4NQO - 4 -Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
9AA - 9 -Aminoacridine
C - Contaminated
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Under the conditions of this study the test material was considered to be non-mutagenic in the presence and absence of S9 activation. - Executive summary:
The study was performed to the requirements of OECD Guideline 471 under GLP conditions, to evaluate the potential mutagenicity of the test substance in a bacterial reverse mutation assay using S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in both the presence and absence of S-9 mix.
A preliminary test was performed to determine the toxicity of the test material.A range-finding study was performed to to determine the doses used for the main test. In the main test, the plate incorporation method was used and was evaluated at a concentration of up to 5000 µg/plate. Positive controls appropriate for each strain, in the presence and absence of S9 -mix, were included. The test substance did not induce any significant, reproducible increases in the observed number of revertant colonies in any of the strains tested, either in the presence or absence of S9-mix. The sensitivity of the test system and the metabolic activity of the S9-mix were clearly demonstrated by the increases in the numbers of revertant colonies induced by the positive control substances. It was concluded that, under the conditions of this assay, the test substance gave a negative, i.e. non-mutagenic response in S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in the presence and absence of S-9 mix.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.