Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 247-611-0 | CAS number: 26322-14-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
The substance is negative for mutagenicity in vitro in the Ames test, a Mouse Lymphoma Assay and in vitro micronucleus. Therefore no further in vivo cytogenicity and/or mutagenicity testing is required.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- With this test it is not possible to identify certain oxidising mutagens, cross-linking agents and hydrazines. Such substances may be detected by E.coli WP2 strains or S. typhimurium TA102 which have an AT base pair at the primary reversion site in stead of GC base pairs which the strains tested in this study have. No independent repeat was performed to confirm the negative result.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The procedures used in this mutagenic assay are described in detail by Ames et al (1975).
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- pre-GLP
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 0.012, 0.04, 0.11, 0.33, 1.0 mg test product per 0.1 ml acetone per plate
0, 12, 40, 110, 330, 1000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: None - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Acetone
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: See below.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 72 hours
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): histidine
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicate
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: colonies (revertants which are histidine-independent) are counted, and the background lawn of bacterial growth examined.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- No data
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- With strain TA 1538 the backgound lawn of bacterial growth, was slightly less dense at 1mg per plate than in the concomitant control plates.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
It was concluded that the test substance did not reveal mutagenic activity in the Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity test. - Executive summary:
The mutagnic activity. Of the test subsatnce was examined in the Salmonella/micosome mutagenicity test, using a set of five histidine
requiring mutants of S. typhimurium (TA 1535, TA 1537, TA1538, TA 98 and TA 100) and liver homogenate of Aroclor-induced rats.
Incorporation of the test product with the bacteria up to non-inhibitory levels (i.e. 1.0 mg per plate) did not increase the numbers of his revertants in any of the five tester strains either in the presence or in the absence of the liver microsome activation system.
It was concluded that the present results did not reveal any mutagenic activity of the test sample in the Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012-01-19 to 2012-10-22
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: According to OECD Guideline 487 and GLP.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, adopted July 22, 2010, Guideline No. 487 “In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test”.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Dulbeccos's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F12 medium
- Properly maintained: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- With metabolic activation:
Experiment I: 0.2, 0.3, 0.7, 1.4, 2.7, 5.5, 10.9, 21.9, 43.8, 87.5, 175.0, 350.0, 700.0, 1400.0 µg/mL
Experiment II: 0.7, 1.4, 2.7, 5.5, 10.9, 21.9, 43.8 µg/mL
Without metabolic activation:
Experiment I: 0.2, 0.3, 0.7, 1.4, 2.7, 5.5, 10.9, 21.9, 43.8, 87.5, 175.0, 350.0, 700.0, 1400.0 µg/mL
Experiment II: 0.7, 1.4, 2.7, 5.5, 10.9, 21.9, 43.8, 87.5, 175.0, 350.0, 700.0, 1400.0 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: THF
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: solubility and relatively low cytotoxicity in accordance to the OECD Guideline 487 - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: demecolcin
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Two independent experiments were performed. In Experiment I the exposure period was 4 hours with and without metabolic activation. In Experiment II the exposure period was 4 hours with S9 mix and 20 hours without S9 mix. The chromosomes were prepared 40 hours after start of treatment with the test item. Evaluation of two cultures per dose group.
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in culture medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 hours (+/- S9 mix) and 20 hours (- S9 mix)
- Recovery after 4 hours treatment: 16 hours
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 40 hours
CYTOKINESIS BLOCK (cytogenetic assays): Cytochalasin B 20 hours
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: about 1.5
NUMBER OF BINUCLEATED CELLS EVALUATED: 1000 per culture
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Cytokinesis Block Proliferation Index (CBPI)
- Evaluation criteria:
- Evaluation of the slides will be performed using NIKON microscopes with 40 x objectives. The micronuclei will be counted in cells showing a clearly visible cytoplasm area. The criteria for the evaluation of micronuclei are described in the publication of Countryman and Heddle. The micronuclei have to be stained in the same way as the main nucleus. The area of the micronucleus should not extend the third part of the area of the main nucleus. At least 1000 binucleate cells per culture were scored for cytogenetic damage on coded slides. The frequency of micronucleated cells will be reported as % micronucleated cells. To describe a cytotoxic effect the CBPI is determined in approximately 500 cells per culture and cytotoxicity is described as % cytostasis. A CBPI of 1 (all cells are mononucleate) is equivalent to 100 % cytostasis.
CBPI=(MONCx1)+(BINCx2)+(MUNCx3)/n
CBPI Cytokinesis-block proliferation index
n Total number of cells
MONC Mononucleate cells
BINC Binucleate cells
MUNC Multinucleate cells
Cytostasis % = 100 – 100 [(CBPIT – 1) / (CBPIC – 1)]
T Test item
C Solvent control - Statistics:
- Statistical significance can be confirmed by means of the Chi square test.
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes:
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The test item Dihexadecyl peroxodicarbonate (CAS 26322-14-5), dissolved in THF, was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes in vitro in the absence and presence of metabolic activation by S9 mix.
Two independent experiments were performed. In Experiment I, the exposure period was 4 hours with and without S9 mix. In Experiment II, the exposure periods were 4 hours with S9 mix and 20 hours without S9 mix. The cells were prepared 40 hours after start of treatment with the test item.
In each experimental group two parallel cultures were analysed. 1000 binucleate cells per culture were scored for cytogenetic damage on coded slides. To determine a cytotoxic effect the CBPI was determined in approximately 500 cells per culture and cytotoxicity is described as % cytostasis.
The highest treatment concentration in this study, 1400.0 µg/mL was chosen with regard to the solubility properties of the test item and with respect to the OECD Guideline 487 for the in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test.
In Experiment I, visible precipitation of the test item in the culture medium was observed at 10.9 µg/mL and above in the absence of S9 mix and at 5.5 µg/mL and above in the presence of S9 mix at the end of treatment. In addition, precipitation occurred in Experiment II at 5.5 µg/mL and above in the absence and presence of S9 mix at the end of treatment. No relevant influence on osmolarity or pH value was observed.
In this study, at both preparation intervals, in the absence as well as in the presence of S9 mix, no biologically relevant cytotoxicity could be observed.
In both experiments, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no biologically relevant increase in the number of cells carrying micronuclei was observed. The micronucleus rates of the cells after treatment with the test item (0.30 - 1.20 % micronucleated cells) were close to the range of the solvent control values (0.40 - 0.95 % micronucleated cells) and within the range of the laboratory historical control data.
In both experiments, either Demecolcin (100.0 ng/mL), MMC (2.0 µg/mL) or CPA (7.5 or 12.5 µg/mL) were used as positive controls and showed distinct increases in cells with micronuclei. Demecolcin showed increased micronucleus rates in mono- and binucleate cells. - Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type: human lymphocytes
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the in vitro micronucleus test in human lymphocytes.
Therefore, Dihexadecyl peroxodicarbonate (CAS 26322-14-5) is considered to be non-mutagenic in this in vitro micronucleus test, when tested up to precipitating concentrations. - Executive summary:
The test item Dihexadecyl peroxodicarbonate (CAS 26322-14-5), dissolved in THF, was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes in vitro in two independent experiments. The following study design was performed:
Without S9-Mix
With S9-Mix
Exp. I
Exp. II
Exp. I and II
Exposure period
4 hrs
20 hrs
4 hrs
Recovery
16 hrs
-
16 hrs
Cytochalasin B exposure
20 hrs
20 hrs
20 hrs
Preparation interval
40 hrs
40 hrs
40 hrs
Total culture period
88 hrs
88 hrs
88 hrs
In each experimental group two parallel cultures were analysed. 1000 binucleate cells per culture were scored for cytogenetic damage on coded slides.
The highest applied concentration in this study (1400.0 µg/mL of the test item) was chosen with regard to the solubility properties of the test item and with respect to the current OECD Guideline 487.
Dose selection of the cytogenetic experiment was performed considering the toxicity data and the occurrence of test item precipitation in accordance with OECD Guideline 487.
In the absence and presence of S9 mix, no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest applied concentration.
In both independent experiments, neither a statistically significant nor a biologically relevant increase in the number of micronucleated cells was observed after treatment with the test item.
Appropriate mutagens were used as positive controls. They induced statistically significant increases in cells with micronuclei.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- according to OECD 476 Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to a valid guideline and the study was conducted under GLP conditions.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- first experiment: 4 hours treatment with and without metabolic activation
second experiment: 24 hours treatment without metabolic activation, 4 hours treatment with metaoblic activation - GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Thymidine Kinase Locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: Clone 3.7.2C
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/Beta-Naphtoflavone induced Rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I:
without S9 mix: 10.0; 21.9; 43.8; 87.5; 175.0 (p); and 350.0 (p) µg/mL
with S9 mix: 10.0; 21.9; 43.8; 87.5; 175.0 (p); and 350.0 (p) µg/mL
Experiment II:
without S9 mix: 10.0; 21.9; 43.8 (p); 87.5 (p); 175.0 (p); and 350.0 (p) µg/mL
with S9 mix: 10.0; 21.9; 43.8; 87.5 (p); 175.0 (p); and 350.0 (p) µg/mL
Following the expression phase of 48 hours the cultures (printed in bold letters) at the lowest concentration of 10.9 µg/mL with and without metabolic activation in experiment I and II were not continued since a minimum of only four analysable concentrations is required by the guidelines. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: tetrahydrofuran (THF)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: solubility properties - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 hours with and without metabolic activation in experiment 1, 24 hours without metaoblic activation in experiment and 4 hours with metabolic activation in experiment 2
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hours
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10 to 15 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): RPMI 1640 medium by addition of 5 µg/mL TFT
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: >1,5 x 10 exp. 6 cells
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth
- Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as mutagenic if the induced mutation frequency reproducibly exceeds a threshold of 126 colonies per 10 exp. 6 cells above
the corresponding solvent control or negative control, respectively.
A relevant increase of the mutation frequency should be dose-dependent.
A mutagenic response is considered to be reproducible if it occurs in both parallel cultures.
However, in the evaluation of the test results the historical variability of the mutation rates in negative
and/or vehicle con¬trols and the mutation rates of all negative and/or vehicle controls of this study are taken into consideration.
Results of test groups are generally rejected if the relative total growth, and the cloning efficiency 1 is less than 10 % of the vehicle control
unless the exception criteria specified by the IWGT recommendations are fulfilled.
Whenever a test item is considered mutagenic according to the above mentioned criteria, the ratio of small versus large colonies is used
to differentiate point mutations from clastogenic effects. If the increase of the mutation frequency is accompanied by a reproducible and
dose dependent shift in the ratio of small versus large colonies clastogenic effects are indicated. - Statistics:
- Linear regression analysis (least squares) using SYSTAT 11 (SYSTAT Software, Inc., 501, Canal Boulevard, Suite C, Richmond, CA 94804, USA)
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: Not effected (pH 7.48 in the solvent control versus pH 7.52 at 1400 µg test item/mL)
- Effects of osmolality: Not increased (341 in the solvent control versus 329 at 1400 test item/mL)
- Evaporation from medium: Not examined
- Water solubility: --
- Precipitation:
Main experiments:
Precipitation was noted at 175 and 350 µg/mL following 4 hours treatment with and without metabolic activation in both experiments. At the end of the 24h treatment period precipitation occurred at 43.8 µg/mL and above in the second experiment without metabolic activation.
- Other confounding effects: None
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The pre-experiment was performed in the presence (4 h treatment) and absence (4 h and 24 h treatment) of metabolic activation. Test item concentrations between 10.9 µg/mL and 1400 µg/mL were used with respect to the current guidelines.
Toxic effects leading to RSG values below 50% were solely observed at 350 µg/mL and above in the absence of metabolic activation following 24 hours treatment.
The test medium was checked for precipitation or phase separation at the end of the treatment period (4 hours) before the test item was removed. Precipitation was observed at 175.0 µg/mL and above after 4 hours treatment with and without metabolic activation, and at 87.5 µg/mL and above following 24 hours treatment.
Both, pH value and osmolarity was determined in the pre-experiment at the highest concentration of the test item and in the solvent control without metabolic activation. There was no relevant shift of both parameters.
The dose range of the main experiments was set according to the solubility data of the test item. In both main experiments the individual concentrations were spaced by a factor of 2.0.
To overcome problems with possible deviations in toxicity and solubility the main experiments were started with more than four concentrations.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Complies
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: None - Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type: in vitro gene mutation assay with L5178Y cells
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Under the experimental conditions reported the test item did not induce mutations in the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase locus assay using the cell line L5178Y in the absence and presence of metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
The study was performed to investigate the potential of Dihexadecyl peroxodicarbonate (CAS 26322-14-5) to induce mutations at the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase locus using the cell line L5178Y.
The assay was performed in two independent experiments, using two parallel cultures each. The first main experiment was performed with and without liver microsomal activation and a treatment period of 4 hours. The second experiment was performed in the absence of metabolic activation with a treatment period of 24 hours in the absence and 4 hours in the presence of metabolic activation.
The main experiments were evaluated at the following concentrations with and without metabolic activation:
Experiment I
without S9 mix: 21.9; 43.8; 87.5; 175.0; 350.0 µg/mL
with S9 mix: 21.9; 43.8; 87.5; 175.0; 350.0 µg/mLExperiment II
without S9 mix: 21.9; 43.8; 87.5; 175.0; 350.0 µg/mL
with S9 mix: 21.9; 43.8; 87.5; 175.0; 350.0 µg/mLPrecipitation of the test item at the end of treatment was evaluated by the naked eye. Precipitation was noted at 175 and 350 µg/mL following 4 hours treatment with and without metabolic activation in both experiments. At the end of the 24h treatment period precipitation occurred at 43.8 µg/mL and above in the second experiment without metabolic activation.
No relevant cytotoxic effects indicated by a relative total growth of less than 50 % of survival in both parallel cultures were observed up to the maximum concentration with and without metabolic activation, following 4 and 24 hours of treatment.
No substantial and reproducible dose dependent increase of the mutation frequency was observed in both experiments. The mutation frequency did not reach or exceed the threshold of 126 above the corresponding solvent control.
A linear regression analysis (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies using SYSTATâ11statistics software. No significant dose dependent trend of the mutation frequency indicated by a probability value of <0.05 was determined in all experimental groups.
In this study the range of the solvent controls was from 90 up to 119 mutant colonies per 106cells; the range of the groups treated with the test item was from 49 up to 146 mutant colonies per 106cells.
MMS (19.5 µg/mL in experiment I and 13.0 µg/mL in experiment II) and CPA (3.0 and 4.5 µg/mL) were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase in induced total mutant colonies and an increase of the relative quantity of small versus large induced colonies with at least one of the concentrations.
Under the experimental conditions reported the test item did not induce mutations in the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase locus assay using the cell line L5178Y in the absence and presence of metabolic activation.
Referenceopen allclose all
Summary
of results of thein vitro micronucleus
test
in human lymphocytes with
Dihexadecyl peroxodicarbonate (CAS
26322-14-5)
Exp. |
Preparation |
Test item |
Proliferation |
Cytostasis |
Micronucleated |
|
interval |
concentration |
index |
in %* |
cells |
|
|
in µg/mL |
CBPI |
|
in %** |
Exposure period 4 hrs without S9 mix |
|||||
I |
40 hrs |
Negative control |
2.03 |
|
0.40 |
|
|
Solvent control1 |
1.98 |
|
0.95 |
|
|
Positive control2 |
1.71 |
31.1 |
10.70S |
|
|
2.7 |
1.95 |
3.4 |
0.70 |
|
|
5.5 |
1.95 |
4.0 |
0.75 |
|
|
10.9P |
1.94 |
4.3 |
1.00 |
Exposure period 20 hrs without S9 mix |
|||||
II |
40 hrs |
Negative control |
1.72 |
|
0.80/0.55*** |
|
|
Solvent control1 |
1.67 |
|
0.40 |
|
|
Positive control3 |
1.50 |
29.8 |
2.10S/2.60S*** |
|
|
1.4 |
1.66 |
1.2 |
0.45 |
|
|
2.7 |
1.69 |
n.c. |
0.55 |
|
|
5.5P |
1.71 |
n.c. |
0.30 |
* For
the positive control groups, the relative values are related to the
negative controls;
for the test item treatment groups the values are related to the solvent
controls
** The number of micronucleated cells was determined in a sample of 2000 binucleated cells
*** The number of micronucleated cells was determined in a sample of 2000 mononucleated cells
P Precipitation occurred at the end of treatment
S The number of micronucleated cells is statistically significantly higher than corresponding control values
n.c. Not calculated as the CBPI is equal or higher than the solvent control value
1 THF 0.5
% (v/v)
2 MMC 2.0
µg/mL
3 Demecolcin 100.0
ng/mL
Summary of results of thein vitro micronucleus test in human lymphocytes with Dihexadecyl peroxodicarbonate (CAS 26322-14-5) (continued)
Exp. |
Preparation |
Test item |
Proliferation |
Cytostasis |
Micronucleated |
|
interval |
concentration |
index |
in %* |
cells |
|
|
in µg/mL |
CBPI |
|
in %** |
Exposure period 4 hrs with S9 mix |
|||||
I |
40 hrs |
Negative control |
2.07 |
|
0.45 |
|
|
Solvent control1 |
2.08 |
|
0.70 |
|
|
Positive control2 |
1.83 |
22.7 |
2.45S |
|
|
1.4 |
2.04 |
4.3 |
0.45 |
|
|
2.7 |
2.09 |
n.c. |
1.00 |
|
|
5.5P |
2.02 |
6.0 |
0.65 |
II |
40 hrs |
Negative control |
1.87 |
|
1.05 |
|
|
Solvent control1 |
1.85 |
|
0.80 |
|
|
Positive control3 |
1.65 |
25.1 |
2.95S |
|
|
1.4 |
1.78 |
8.1 |
1.10 |
|
|
2.7 |
1.81 |
4.4 |
1.20 |
|
|
5.5P |
1.86 |
n.c. |
0.60 |
* For
the positive control groups, the relative values are related to the
negative controls;
for the test item treatment groups the values are related to the solvent
controls
** The number of micronucleated cells was determined in a sample of 2000 binucleated cells
P Precipitation occurred at the end of treatment
S The number of micronucleated cells is statistically significantly higher than corresponding control values
1 THF 0.5
% (v/v)
2 CPA 7.5
µg/mL
3 CPA 12.5 µg/mL
Summary Table
relative | mutant | relative | mutant | |||||
conc. µg | S9 | total | colonies/ | total | colonies/ | |||
per mL | mix | growth | 106cells | threshold | growth | 106cells | threshold | |
Column | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
Experiment I / 4 h treatment | culture I | culture II | ||||||
Solv. control with THF | - | 100.0 | 119 | 245 | 100.0 | 90 | 216 | |
Pos. control with MMS | 19.5 | - | 90.3 | 440 | 245 | 53.1 | 292 | 216 |
Test item | 10.9 | - | culture was not continued# | culture was not continued# | ||||
Test item | 21.9 | - | 92.4 | 137 | 245 | 132.0 | 105 | 216 |
Test item | 43.8 | - | 111.5 | 87 | 245 | 108.8 | 90 | 216 |
Test item | 87.5 | - | 124.7 | 94 | 245 | 121.8 | 86 | 216 |
Test item | 175.0 (p) | - | 130.5 | 144 | 245 | 103.9 | 82 | 216 |
Test item | 350.0 (p) | - | 73.2 | 97 | 245 | 113.1 | 76 | 216 |
Solv. control with THF | + | 100.0 | 102 | 228 | 100.0 | 106 | 232 | |
Pos. control with CPA | 3.0 | + | 58.9 | 365 | 228 | 35.9 | 374 | 232 |
Pos. control with CPA | 4.5 | + | 28.9 | 609 | 228 | 15.7 | 708 | 232 |
Test item | 10.9 | + | culture was not continued# | culture was not continued# | ||||
Test item | 21.9 | + | 125.1 | 105 | 228 | 102.1 | 69 | 232 |
Test item | 43.8 | + | 120.7 | 109 | 228 | 89.0 | 107 | 232 |
Test item | 87.5 | + | 118.3 | 122 | 228 | 75.7 | 89 | 232 |
Test item | 175.0 (p) | + | 91.1 | 80 | 228 | 81.7 | 92 | 232 |
Test item | 350.0 (p) | + | 103.2 | 99 | 228 | 52.2 | 130 | 232 |
Experiment II / 24 h treatment | culture I | culture II | ||||||
Solv. control with THF | - | 100.0 | 107 | 233 | 100.0 | 99 | 225 | |
Pos. control with MMS | 13.0 | - | 24.4 | 370 | 233 | 41.0 | 409 | 225 |
Test item | 10.9 | - | culture was not continued# | culture was not continued# | ||||
Test item | 21.9 | - | 87.7 | 49 | 233 | 96.2 | 106 | 225 |
Test item | 43.8 (p) | - | 78.0 | 50 | 233 | 158.4 | 76 | 225 |
Test item | 87.5 (p) | - | 51.7 | 67 | 233 | 149.3 | 146 | 225 |
Test item | 175.0 (p) | - | 73.1 | 84 | 233 | 168.7 | 56 | 225 |
Test item | 350.0 (p) | - | 69.6 | 64 | 233 | 105.7 | 111 | 225 |
Experiment II / 4 h treatment | culture I | culture II | ||||||
Solv. control with THF | + | 100.0 | 109 | 235 | 100.0 | 99 | 225 | |
Pos. control with CPA | 3.0 | + | 69.6 | 241 | 235 | 34.3 | 263 | 225 |
Pos. control with CPA | 4.5 | + | 53.4 | 294 | 235 | 36.1 | 507 | 225 |
Test item | 10.9 | + | culture was not continued# | culture was not continued# | ||||
Test item | 21.9 | + | 109.8 | 100 | 235 | 93.3 | 84 | 225 |
Test item | 43.8 | + | 87.7 | 134 | 235 | 80.9 | 104 | 225 |
Test item | 87.5 (p) | + | 105.7 | 95 | 235 | 71.2 | 113 | 225 |
Test item | 175.0 (p) | + | 108.9 | 87 | 235 | 70.6 | 98 | 225 |
Test item | 350.0 (p) | + | 94.8 | 78 | 235 | 76.5 | 90 | 225 |
threshold = number of mutant colonies per 106cells of each solvent control plus 126
# culture
was not continued since a minimum of only four analysable concentrations
is required
p precipitation
at the end of treatment visible to the naked eye
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
The substance is negative for mutagenicity in vitro in the Ames test, a Mouse Lymphoma Assay and in vitro micronucleus. Therefore no further in vivo cytogenicity and/or mutagenicity testing is required.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
Ames + MLA+ Micronucleus, K1: The study was performed according to OECD guidelines and GLP.
Short description of key information:
The substance is negative for mutagenicity in vitro in the Ames test, a Mouse Lymphoma Assay and in vitro micronucleus. Therefore no further in vivo cytogenicity and/or mutagenicity testing is required.
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Available data shows a negative outcome for genotoxicity based on these results, the data is conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.