Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-810-4 | CAS number: 7747-35-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1982
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Meets generally accepted scientific standards with GLP and is described in sufficient detail
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 982
- Report date:
- 1982
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Microbiological Associates Protocol
- Deviations:
- no
- Remarks:
- Not specified in the report.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- none
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 7a-ethyldihydro-1H,3H,5H-oxazolo[3,4-c]oxazole
- EC Number:
- 231-810-4
- EC Name:
- 7a-ethyldihydro-1H,3H,5H-oxazolo[3,4-c]oxazole
- Cas Number:
- 7747-35-5
- Molecular formula:
- C7H13NO2
- IUPAC Name:
- 7a-ethyl-tetrahydro-1H-[1,3]oxazolo[3,4-c][1,3]oxazole
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Zoldine ZE (BIOBANTM CS-1246 Antimicrobial)
- Physical state: Orange Liquid
- Analytical purity: 96.84% active ingredient (Oxazolidine E)
- Lot/batch No.: 1
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Histedine operon
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and TA1538
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S-9 liver homogenates prepared from Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague-Dawley rats and were stored at approximately -70 °C or below.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Toxicity Assay: 10,000, 3,125, 977, 305, 95, 30, 9.4, 2.9 and 0 ug/plate
Mutagenesis Assay:
In the absence & presence of metabolic activation (S9): 600, 300, 150, 30, 6.0 and 0 ug/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water ( distilled water)
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: All strains with activation = 2-aminoanthracene, TA98 without activation = 2-nitrofluorene, TA100 without activation = 1,3-propane sultone, TA1535(-S9) = 1,3-propane sultone, TA1537 (-S9) = 9-aminoacriaminoacridine, TA1538(-S9)=2-nitrofluorene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Preincubation period: No pre-incubation, plate incorporation method utilized.
- Exposure duration: 48 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Triplicate
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Bacterial background lawn evaluation - Evaluation criteria:
- Concentrations of the test chemical which are overtly toxic are easily visualized as showing no bacterial growth on the plate (i.e. absence of background lawn). Lower levels of toxicity may be seen as a thin or sparse bacterial lawn, a reduction in the number of revertants, or the appearance of microcolonies (overgrown background lawn). Positive and negative controls were run concurrently with the test chemical, and appropriate responses for these controls are prerequesites for evaluating the response of the bacteria to the test chemical.
A test chemical is considered a bacterial mutagen if both the mean number of revertant colonies observed is at least three times higher than the mean of the negative (solvent) control and at the same time it produces a dose response relationship over several concentrations. If a chemical produces reproducible reversion rates in excess of 3x over background, but no definitive dose response relationship, it is considered to be a presumptive bacterial mutagen. If a chemical produces reproducible reversion rates greater than 2x but less than 3x over the negative controls, the results are considered to be equivocal or inconclusive. Test substances failing to meet the above criteria are considered non-mutagenic in this system.
The test material must cause at least a doubling in the average revertants per plate or at least one tester strain. The increase must be accompanied by a dose response to increasing concentrations of the test article, and in the cases where the increase is less than three-fold, the response must be reproducible. - Statistics:
- (Only average and standard deviation calculated)
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- other: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: Results indicated that the maximum dose to be tested, which would cause a detectable reduction in the number of revertants per plate in the mutagenicity assay, would be 600 ug/plate. Slight toxicity was noted at 305 uL/plate, and the viable counts and re
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Preliminary Toxicity Assay
Results indicated that the maximum dose to be tested, which would cause a detectable reduction in the number of revertants per plate in the mutagenicity assay, would be 600 ug/plate. Slight toxicity was noted at 305 uL/plate, and the viable counts and revertants on plates dosed with 977 uL/plate were drastically reduced.
Mutagenicity Assay
CS-1246 was tested at 0, 6, 30, 150, 300, and 600 ug/plate in the five Salmonella tester strains with and without metabolic activation. The test material was negative in all tester strains with and without activation, and is considered negative for mutagenicity in this system. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table for Bacterial Assay for Gene Mutations in the Absence of S-9
Revertants Per Plate |
||||||
|
||||||
|
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
TA1538 |
TA98 |
TA100 |
|
Vehicle Control |
38 |
7 |
11 |
19 |
183 |
|
Test Article (ug/plate) |
6.0 |
36 |
6 |
5 |
22 |
188 |
30 |
37 |
6 |
7 |
17 |
163 |
|
150 |
33 |
8 |
8 |
26 |
185 |
|
300 |
29 |
10 |
5 |
29 |
193 |
|
600 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
22 |
|
Positive Control |
1693 |
332 |
1949 |
1152 |
1316 |
Table forBacterial Assay for Gene Mutations in the Presence of S-9
Revertants Per Plate |
||||||
|
||||||
|
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
TA1538 |
TA98 |
TA100 |
|
Vehicle Control |
11 |
9 |
19 |
32 |
158 |
|
Test Article (ug/plate) |
6.0 |
9 |
13 |
19 |
31 |
143 |
30 |
16 |
9 |
20 |
28 |
145 |
|
150 |
8 |
9 |
15 |
32 |
158 |
|
300 |
15 |
12 |
16 |
36 |
197 |
|
600 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
14 |
54 |
|
Positive Control |
205 |
254 |
326 |
337 |
700 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The test material was negative in all tester strains with and without activation, and is considered negative for mutagenicity in this system. - Executive summary:
The Ames mutagenicity test was conducted in the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome assay using five tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538 ; both with and without metabolic actavation by rat liver microsomes.
The test material was prepared in water. Top agar for selection of histidine revertants was prepared with Difco bacto agar and NaCl. The top agar was supplemented with histidine and D-biotin for viable cell count determination plates. The Salmonella tester strains were were received from Dr. Ames, of UC Berkeley.
Toxicity Assay
Eight serial half-log dilutions of the test article were plated with a diluted TA100 culture on non-selective agar, and with an undiluted TA100 culture on selective agar. For viability determinations, equal numbers of cells were seeded on each plate in the presence of the solvent and the test article. The percent survival of an appropriately-diluted TA100 culture on non-selective agar was determined by comparing the number of colonies on the solvent control with those on the plates containing the test article. Toxicity on the revertant plates was detectable by a decrease in the number of revertant colonies per plate, or by a thinning or disappearace of the background bacterial lawn.
Mutagenicity Assay
The test article was solubilized and serially diluted immediately before its use. Five doses of the test article were first plated with all five tester strains with metabolic activation (Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver homogenate), after which they were plated on all tester strains without metabolic activation. All positive controls, solvent controls, negative controls, and test material doses were plated in triplicate. Without activation, 50uL of tester strain and 50 uL of solvent or test material were added to 2.5 mL of molten top agar. In activated systems, 0.5 mL of S-9 mix was added in addition. After mixing, the agar mixtures were poured over the minimal bottom agar. Plates were inverted and incubated for 48 hours at 37C. Positive controls were:
All strains with activation = 2-aminoanthracene
TA98 without activation = 2-nitrofluorene
TA100 without activation = 1,3-propane sultone
TA1535 without activation = 1,3-propane sultone
TA1537 without activation = 9-aminoacridine
TA1538 without activation = 2-nitrofluorene
Revertant colonies were counted either entirely by an automated colony counter or entirely by hand. Plates with precipitate were counted manually. The condition of the background bacterial lawn was evaluated macroscopically and microscopically for evidence of test material toxicity. All plating was done in triplicate. For each triplicate set, an average and standard deviation were calculated.
Criteria for Positive Result
The test material must cause at least a doubling in the average revertants per plate or at least one tester strain. The increase must be accompanied by a dose response to increasing concentrations of the test article, and in the cases where the increase is less than three-fold, the response must be reproducible.The test material was tested at 0, 6, 30, 150, 300, and 600 ug/plate in the five Salmonella tester strains with and without metabolic activation. The test material was negative in all tester strains with and without activation, and is considered negative for mutagenicity in this system. The test material was negative in all tester strains with and without activation, and is considered negative for mutagenicity in this system.
The test material was negative in all tester strains with and without activation, and is considered negative for mutagenicity in this system.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.