Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-989-5 | CAS number: -
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: This study is rated a "1" because it applied GLP, used appropriate testing procedures, and followed an accepted test guideline.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 994
- Report date:
- 1994
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- Buehler test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid, di-C10-12-branched alkyl esters, C11-rich
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid, di-C10-12-branched alkyl esters, C11-rich
- Reference substance name:
- Diundecyl phthalate, branched and linear
- EC Number:
- 287-401-6
- EC Name:
- Diundecyl phthalate, branched and linear
- Cas Number:
- 85507-79-5
- IUPAC Name:
- diundecyl phthalate
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Jayflex DIUP, Di-isoundecyl phthalate
- Physical state: Clear oily colorless liquid (to light yellow)
- Analytical purity: 99.7% minimum ester content
- Lot/batch No.: Batch No. VE67/94
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 5 July 1995
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: D Hall, Newchurch, Staffordshire, England
- Age at study initiation: 6-7 wks
- Weight at study initiation: 291-340 g
- Housing: Groups of 5 in suspended metal cages with wire floors
- Diet: ad libitum, vitamin C enriched guinea pig diet FD1. Hay was given weekly.
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 12 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 15 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light
IN-LIFE DATES: From: July 14, 1994 To: August 26, 1994
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Concentration / amount:
- 100% undiluted
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Concentration / amount:
- 100% undiluted
- No. of animals per dose:
- 20 test and 20 control animals
- Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS: The topical irritancy of a range of dilution of the test substance was investigated to identify where possible (a) concentrations that would produce irritation suitable for the induction phase of the main study and (b) a maximum non-irritant concentration for the challenge phase. Based on the results of the preliminary investigations, the concentration of Jayflex DIUP was applied as supplied. From preliminary investigations administration of the test substance as supplied did not give rise to irritating effects.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3 induction applications
- Exposure period: A 20 x 20 mm patch of surgical gauze was saturated with ~0.5 ml of Jayflex DIUP, as supplied. The patch was placed on the skin and covered by a length of impermeable plastic adhesive tape. Contact with the skin was maintained for ~6 hours for each induction exposure. The dressings were then removed and the resulting dermal reactions assessed 24 hours later.
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1
- Site: skin on the left shoulder region, clipped free of hair
- Frequency of applications: Applications were made on days 1, 8, and 15
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 1
- Exposure period: 6 hours
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1
- Site: 50 x 50 mm area on the right flank
- Concentrations: As supplied
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24, 48, and 72 hours - Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- The sensitivity of the guinea pig strain used is checked periodically at Huntingdon Research Center with formalin, a known sensitizer. Most recent positive control data collected from Nov 15, 1993 to December 16, 1993.
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- The sensitivity of the guinea pig strain used is checked periodically at Huntingdon Research Center with formalin, a known sensitizer. Most recent positive control data collected from Nov 15, 1993 to December 16, 1993. Of the 10 test female guinea pigs, at a 30% aqueous dilution dose level, all 10 animals showed skin sensitization.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 0
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- No signs of ill health or toxicity were recorded
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: No signs of ill health or toxicity were recorded.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 0
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- No signs of ill health or toxicity were recorded
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: No signs of ill health or toxicity were recorded.
- Reading:
- other: 3rd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 0
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- No signs of ill health or toxicity were recorded
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: other: 3rd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: No signs of ill health or toxicity were recorded.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- as supplied (100%)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- No signs of ill health or toxicity were recorded
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: as supplied (100%). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: No signs of ill health or toxicity were recorded.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- as supplied (100%)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- No signs of ill health or toxicity were recorded
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: as supplied (100%). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: No signs of ill health or toxicity were recorded.
- Reading:
- other: 3rd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- as supplied (100%)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- No signs of ill health or toxicity were recorded
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: other: 3rd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: test group. Dose level: as supplied (100%). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: No signs of ill health or toxicity were recorded.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- In this study, the test substance did not produce evidence of skin sensitization (delayed contact hypersensitivity) in any of the twenty test animals.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed to assess the skin sensitization potential of Jayflex DIUP using the guinea pig based on the EU method B.6 of directive 92/69/EEC and according to GLP. Based on the results of a preliminary study and in compliance with the guideline undiluted test substance was selected as the dose level. Twenty test and twenty control guinea-pigs were used. The test substance did not produce evidence of skin sensitization (delayed contact hypersensitivity) in any of the twenty test animals. In addition, no sign of irritation was reported during the induction period.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
