Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 268-452-3 | CAS number: 68092-28-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
ACUTE TOXICITY: ORAL
- LD50 >2000 mg/kg bodyweight in female Wistar strain rats
ACUTE TOXICITY: DERMAL
- LD50 >2000 mg/kg bw in male and female Wistar rats
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Quality of whole database:
- The key study was conducted under GLP conditions in accordance with the standardised guidelines OECD 420 and EU Method B.1 bis. It was assigned a reliability score of 1 in accordance with the criteria detailed by Klimisch (1997).
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 3 October 2012 to 17 October 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Strain: RccHan:WIST
- Age at study initiation: 8 to 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: The animals weighed at least 200 g. The bodyweight variation did not exceed ± 20 % of the mean weight for each sex.
- Fasting period before study: No.
- Housing: The animals were housed in suspended solid-floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes. Animals were housed individually during the 24 hour exposure period and in groups of 5, by sex, for the remainder of the study.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum access to mains drinking water.
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 to 25 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70 %
- Air changes (per hr): At least 15 changes per hour.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): The lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (0600 to 1800) and twelve hours darkness.
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 3 October 2012 To: 17 October 2012 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- arachis oil
- Details on dermal exposure:
- TEST SITE
- Preparation: On the day before treatment, the back and flanks of each animal were clipped free of hair.
- % coverage: Approximately 10 % of the total body surface area.
- Type of wrap if used: A piece of surgical gauze was placed over the treatment area and semi-occluded with a piece of self-adhesive bandage.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): The treated skin and surrounding hair were wiped with cotton wool moistened with arachis oil BP to remove any residual test material.
- Time after start of exposure: 24 hours.
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 2000 mg/kg bodyweight.
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied: The appropriate amount of the test material was moistened with arachis oil BP and applied as evenly as possible. - Duration of exposure:
- 24 hours
- Doses:
- 2000 mg/kg
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 animals per sex per dose
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Animals were observed for deaths or overt signs of toxicity 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently once daily for 14 days.
After the removal of the dressings and subsequently once daily for 14 days, the test sites were examined for any evidence of primary irritation and scored according to the criteria of Draize (shown below).
Individual bodyweights were recorded prior to application of the test material on day 0 and on days 7 and 14.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: Yes; all animals were subjected to gross necropsy. Animals were killed by cervical dislocation. An external examination was performed and opening of the abdominal and thoracic cavities. The appearance of any macroscopic abnormalities was recorded.
Draize Scale for Primary Irritation:
Erythema and eschar formation:
No erythema 0
Very slight erythema (barely perceptible) 1
Well-defined erythema 2
Moderate to severe erythema 3
Severe erythema (beet redness) to slight eschar formation (injuries in depth) 4
Oedema formation:
No oedema 0
Very slight oedema (barely perceptible) 1
Slight oedema (edges of area well-defined by definite raising) 2
Moderate oedema (edges raised approximately 1 millimetre) 3
Severe oedema (raised more than 1 millimetre and extending beyond the area of exposure) 4 - Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- There were no deaths.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No signs of systemic toxicity were observed. DERMAL REACTIONS Individual dermal reactions are given in Table 1 and Table 2. Red coloured staining, which prevented evaluation of erythema, was noted at the test sites of all animals one day after patch rem
- Gross pathology:
- No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
- Interpretation of results:
- other: CLP criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- LD50 >2000 mg/kg bodyweight
- Executive summary:
The acute dermal toxicity potential of the test material to Wistar strain rats was assessed in a limit test conducted in accordance with the standardised guidelines OECD 402 and EU Method B.3 under GLP conditions.
A group of 5 male and 5 female animals was given a single dermal dose of the test material to intact skin at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. The test site was covered with a semi-occlusive dressing and left in place for 24 hours. The animals were subsequently observed for 14 days.
There was no mortality and no clinical signs were observed. All animals showed the expected gains in bodyweight throughout the observation period. Signs of dermal irritation noted were very slight to well-defined erythema, very slight oedema, moderate desquamation, crust formation and small, superficial, scattered scabs.
Under the conditions of this study, the acute dermal LD50 was >2000 mg/kg bodyweight and the test material requires no classification in accordance with EU criteria.
Reference
Table 1 Individual Dermal Reactions (Male)
Animal Number |
Observation |
Effects Noted After Initiation of Exposure (days) |
|||||||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
||
1-0 |
Erythema Oedema Other |
? 0 0 |
1 0 S |
1 0 D |
1 0 D |
1 0 D |
1 0 D |
0 0 D |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
1-1 |
Erythema Oedema Other |
? 0 0 |
1 0 0 |
1 0 D |
1 0 D |
1 0 D |
1 0 D |
0 0 D |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
1-2 |
Erythema Oedema Other |
? 0 0 |
1 0 S |
1 0 D |
1 0 D |
0 0 D |
1 0 D |
0 0 0 |
0 0 D |
0 0 D |
0 0 D |
0 0 D |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
1-3 |
Erythema Oedema Other |
? 0 0 |
2 0 S |
2 0 S,D |
2 0 S,D |
1 0 S,D |
1 0 D |
0 0 D |
0 0 D |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
1-4 |
Erythema Oedema Other |
? 0 0 |
1 0 S |
1 0 D |
1 0 D |
1 0 D |
1 0 D |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
? = Red coloured staining prevented the evaluation or erythema.
S = Pale red coloured staining
D = Moderate desquamation
Table 2 Individual Dermal Reactions (Female)
Animal Number |
Observation |
Effects Noted After Initiation of Exposure (days) |
|||||||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
||
2-0 |
Erythema Oedema Other |
? 0 0 |
2 1 S |
2 1 S,C |
2 1 S,C |
2 1 S,C |
2 1 C |
1 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 0 |
2-1 |
Erythema Oedema Other |
? 0 0 |
2 1 S |
2 1 S,C |
2 1 S,C |
2 1 S,C |
2 1 C |
1 0 C |
1 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 0 |
0 0 0 |
2-2 |
Erythema Oedema Other |
? 0 0 |
2 1 S |
2 1 C |
2 1 C |
2 1 C |
2 1 C |
1 0 C |
1 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C* |
0 0 D* |
0 0 D |
0 0 * |
0 0 * |
2-3 |
Erythema Oedema Other |
? 0 0 |
2 1 S |
2 1 S,C |
2 1 S,C |
2 1 S,C |
2 1 S,C |
1 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 0 |
2-4 |
Erythema Oedema Other |
? 0 0 |
2 1 S |
2 1 C |
2 1 C |
2 1 C |
2 1 C |
1 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C |
0 0 C* |
0 0 C* |
0 0 C* |
0 0 C* |
0 0 * |
? = Red coloured staining prevented the evaluation or erythema.
S = Pale red coloured staining
D = Moderate desquamation
C = Crust formation
* = Small, superficial, scattered scabs
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Quality of whole database:
- The key study was conducted under GLP conditions in accordance with the standardised guidelines OECD 402 and EU Method B.3. It was assigned a reliability score of 1 in accordance with the criteria detailed by Klimisch (1997).
Additional information
Acute Toxicity: Oral
The acute oral toxicity potential of the test material in female Wistar strain rats was assessed in accordance with the standardised guidelines OECD 420 and EU Method B.1bisunder GLP conditions.
Following a sighting test in a single animal at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg, the test material was administered by gavage as a solution in arachis oil BP at the same dose level to an additional four animals. The animals were observed for 14 days.
There was no mortality and no clinical signs were observed. All animals showed the expected gains in bodyweight throughout the observation period.
Under the conditions of this study, the acute oral LD50 was >2000 mg/kg bodyweight and the test material requires no classification in accordance with EU criteria.
Acute Toxicity: Inhalation
In accordance with the Column 2 adaptation of Annex VIII of Regulation (EC) 1907/2006 (REACH), it is considered justified to omit the acute toxicity by the inhalation route study (required under point 8.5.2) as testing by this route is inappropriate. Exposure via the inhalation route is not relevant due to the substance being an immobile paste with a low vapour pressure; therefore the acute oral and acute dermal studies are deemed more appropriate to address acute toxicity exposure.
Acute Toxicity: Dermal
The acute dermal toxicity potential of the test material to Wistar strain rats was assessed in a limit test conducted in accordance with the standardised guidelines OECD 402 and EU Method B.3 under GLP conditions.
A group of 5 male and 5 female animals was given a single dermal dose of the test material to intact skin at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. The test site was covered with a semi-occlusive dressing and left in place for 24 hours. The animals were subsequently observed for 14 days.
There was no mortality and no clinical signs were observed. All animals showed the expected gains in bodyweight throughout the observation period. Signs of dermal irritation noted were very slight to well-defined erythema, very slight oedema, moderate desquamation, crust formation and small, superficial, scattered scabs.
Under the conditions of this study, the acute dermal LD50 was >2000 mg/kg bodyweight and the test material requires no classification in accordance with EU criteria.
Justification for selection of
acute toxicity – oral endpoint
Only one study available.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – inhalation endpoint
A data waiver has been submitted to address this endpoint.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
Only one study available.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data and in accordance with the criteria for classification as defined in Annex I, Regulation 1272/2008, the test material does not require classification for acute toxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.