Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 284-362-7 | CAS number: 84852-49-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- one-generation reproductive toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on test type (migrated information)
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 12.09. 1977 to 19.06.1978
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: 2c The study was conducted according to a test protocol that is comparable to the appropriate OECD test guideline. It was not compliant with GLP.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 979
- Report date:
- 1979
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 415 [One-Generation Reproduction Toxicity Study (before 9 October 2017)]
- Version / remarks:
- Conducted prior to adoption of OECD test guideline.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- No analytical confirmation of exposure, no pre-mating exposure, no assessment of oestrus cycle or sperm analyses, no evaluation of sexual milestones in pup. Males treated only as F1 and F2 generation.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- [[(phosphonomethyl)imino]bis[ethane-2,1-diylnitrilobis(methylene)]]tetrakisphosphonic acid
- EC Number:
- 239-931-4
- EC Name:
- [[(phosphonomethyl)imino]bis[ethane-2,1-diylnitrilobis(methylene)]]tetrakisphosphonic acid
- Cas Number:
- 15827-60-8
- IUPAC Name:
- [(bis{2-[bis(phosphonomethyl)amino]ethyl}amino)methyl]phosphonic acid
- Reference substance name:
- [[(phosphonomethyl)imino]bis[ethane-2,1-diylnitrilobis(methylene)]]tetraki sphosphonic acid
- IUPAC Name:
- [[(phosphonomethyl)imino]bis[ethane-2,1-diylnitrilobis(methylene)]]tetraki sphosphonic acid
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Long-Evans
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Females: Blue Spruce Farms. Males: BioDynamics Inc. in-house Long Evans breeding colony.
- Age at study initiation: (P) x 15-16 wks; (F1) x 3 wks
- Weight at study initiation (means): Females approximately 240 g. Males not weighed.
- Fasting period before study: No
- Housing: Individually in elevated stainless steel cages.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: No data
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): No data
- Humidity (%): No data
- Air changes (per hr): No data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 12.09. 1977 to 19.06.1978
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): Weekly
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): Purina Laboratory Chow
- Storage temperature of food: No data - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1:2
- Length of cohabitation: nightly until signs of mating.
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug or sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy.
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): Individually in elevated stainless steel cages.
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: Dosing not started until Day 0 of gestation. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Test substance administration to F0 females was initiated on gestation Day 0 and continued throughout gestation and lactation, and for F1males and females through the F2a and f2b litters.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Details on study schedule:
- - F1 parental animals not mated until one week after selection from the F1 litters.
- Selection of parents from F1 generation when pups had reached maturity.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
300, 1000 or 3000 ppm
Basis:
nominal in diet
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- F0 females: 20.
F1 Parents: females - 20; males - 10. - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: No data
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Random.
- F1 offspring were separated from siblings seven days after weaning of the last litter and were randomly selected to continue as future parents (f1). More offspring than needed were selected (12 males and 24 females) for the growth period to insure the required number of adults (10 males and 20 females) necessary for mating. Following pup selection, remaining offspring and F0 females were sacrificed and discarded after gross external and internal examinations.
F1 animals were raised to maturity and mated to produce the F2a litters. F2a pups were sacrificed, necropsied and discarded at weaning. All F1 females were remated after a rest period of at least 14 days to produce the F2b litters. F2b pups were sacrificed and necropsied at weaning. Following completion of the F2b sacrifice, all F1 parents were sacrificed, necropsied and selected tissues preserved. - Positive control:
- None
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: mortality and gross signs of toxicity in F0 and F1: twice daily.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Weekly (F0 and F1)
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Males and nonpregnant females (F1): weekly in growth and rest periods of F1 generation. Pregnant females (F0 and F1): Days 0, 6, 15 and 20 of gestation. Lactation females (F0 and F1): Days 0, 4, 14 and 21 of lactation.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
-Males and nonpregnant females: weekly for growth and rest periods of F1 generation.
-Test substance consumption was calculated from body weight and food consumption values: Males and nonpregnant females: weekly during growth and rest periods of F1 generation.
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Not examined as dosing in F0 dams started on Day 0 gestation, F0 males not dosed.
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Parameters examined in [all/P/F1/F2] male parental generations: No data
- Litter observations:
- STANDARDISATION OF LITTERS
- Performed on day 4 postpartum: yes
PARAMETERS EXAMINED:
Gestation period: On day 19 of gestation, dams were provided with nesting material and were examined daily for signs of parturition.
Lactation period (Day 0 is day on which all pups had been delivered): General appearance of pups and presence of dead pups examined daily in all litters (F1, F2a and F2b). LIve, dead and missing pups were recorded on Days 0, 1, 4 (pre-cull and post-cull), 14 and 21 of lactation in all litters (F1, F2a and F2b). Live pups were weighed as a litter on Days 0, 4 (pre-cull) and 21 (calculated from individual weights) of lactation for all litters, and individually on Day 21 of lactation for all litters.
Litter Data and Observations: The number of each sex per litter was determined on Days 0 and 4 (pre- and post-cull) of lactation for all litters. Individual sex determination on Day 21 of lactation for all litters.
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
Yes, for external and internal abnormalities. - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
F0 generation: All females sacrificed after weaning of F1 offspring, and necropsy performed.
F1 generation: All surviving males and females sacrificed after weaning and necropsy of the last F2b litter. Necropsy performed, and selected organs weighed and tissues preserved.
Extra F1 males and females: sacrifice at initiation of mating, necropsy performed and discarded.
Dead and moribund dams: Necropsy performed. Uterine contents examined and presence of implantation sites and/or scars recorded.
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
The tissues indicated in Table 1 were weighed and/or prepared for microscopic examination. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
- The F1 offspring not selected as parental animals and all F2 offspring were sacrificed after weaning. Necropsy performed including internal sex determination peformed, then carcassed discarded.
- F2a: necrospy included internal sex determination performed. All offspring where then discarded.
- F2b: necrospy included internal sex determination performed. Selected tissues were preserved from ten randomly chosen males and females from all groups.
F2b found dead after Day 14 of lactation: necropsy including internal sex determination performed and discarded.
Culled F1, F2a and F2b: sacrifice on Day 4 of lactation. Necropsy including internal sex determination performed and discarded.
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
- Dead pups: sex was determined and pups checked for presence of milk in their stomach and discarded.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGTHS
The tissues indicated in Table 1 were preserved for F2b offspring. - Statistics:
- Body weight, body weight gain, food consumption and litter examination data, organ weights, organ/body weight and organ/brain weight ratios were analysed. Group I and Group II (control groups) were compared to each other. If no statistically significant differences, the control groups were combined and compared against test groups. If controls differed, individual control/test comparisons conducted - continuous and discrete data (body weight, food intake, organ weight): Dunnett's test. - gestation length: F-test and Student's T-test (Cochran's approximation). - offspring data: Chi-square. Incidence data for control Group II was compared to control Group I and incidence data for each test substance treated group was compared to each control group.
- Reproductive indices:
- F0 females: Pregnancy rates, gestation length, percentage of mothers that weaned litters.
F1 females: Mating and fertility indices, pregnancy rates, parturition indices, gestation length, percentage of mothers that weaned litters. - Offspring viability indices:
- F1 litters: Mean numbers of live and dead pups at birth, pup survival (at representative intervals through lactation), body w eight, sex distribution.
F2 litters: Mean numbers of live and dead pups at birth, pup survival (at representative intervals through lactation), body w eight, sex distribution.
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
Details on results (P0)
BODY WEIGHT AND FOOD CONSUMPTION (PARENTAL ANIMALS): There were no effects on body weight/body weight gain.
TEST SUBSTANCE INTAKE (PARENTAL ANIMALS): There are no comments on this, but as food consumption was not affected, test substance intake should also have not been affected.
REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE (PARENTAL ANIMALS): No effects. A statistically significant reduction in mean gestation length for F2a animals from the 1000 ppm group (22.1 d) versus the pooled F2a controls (22.4 d) was considered spurious by the authors. Also, the lower pregnancy rate recorded in the F1/F2a mating (not significant) was not replicated in the second mating (F1/2b).
ORGAN WEIGHTS (PARENTAL ANIMALS): No effects found.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS): No abnormal findings.
HISTOPATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS): No abnormal findings.
Effect levels (P0)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 3 000 ppm
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
Details on results (F1)
CLINICAL SIGNS (OFFSPRING): There were no clinical signs of toxicity.
BODY WEIGHT (OFFSPRING): In the highest dose group (F1) there was a non-statistically significant reduction in mean pup weights at birth. There was a slightly lower pup birth weight in mid and high dose groups, but the difference was only statistically significant in the highest dose group compared with the combined controls. There was no difference at other time points or in the F2b generation.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (OFFSPRING): No abnormal findings.
Effect levels (F1)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 1 000 ppm
Results: F2 generation
Effect levels (F2)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F2
- Effect level:
- 1 000 ppm
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 2 Summary of Gestation length, litter survival, growth of offspring and weaning sex ratio data.
Group (ppm) | Mean gestation period (days) | Mean No. | Mean No. weaned/litter | Litters weaned | Mean live offspring weights (g) | Day 21 sex ratio (M/F) | ||||||
Live | Dead | No | % | Day 0 | Day 4a | Day 14 | Day 21 | No. | Ratiob | |||
F0 to F1 | ||||||||||||
I/0 | 22.1 | 12.3 | 0.1 | 9.8 | 18/18 | 100 | 5.9 | 9.4 | 27.3 | 40.8 | 86/90 | 0.96 |
II/0 | 22.1 | 11 | 0.6 | 8.9 | 17/18 | 94.4 | 5.9 | 9.3 | 27.0 | 41.5 | 71/81 | 0.88 |
I+II | 22.1 | 11.6 | 0.3 | 9.4 | 5.9 | 9.3 | 27.2 | 41.1 | ||||
III/300 | 21.9 | 11.3 | 0.8 | 9.5 | 17/18 | 94.4 | 5.9 | 9.6 | 27.9 | 41.3 | 81/81 | 1.00 |
IV/1000 | 21.9 | 10.9 | 0.6 | 8.7 | 17/17 | 100 | 6.1 | 9.8 | 27.3 | 40.4 | 65/83 | 0.78 |
V/3000 | 22.3 | 9.2 | 1.9 | 7.9 | 17/19 | 89.5 | 5.7 | 8.5 | 26.6 | 40.8 | 64/70 | 0.91 |
F1 to F2a | ||||||||||||
I/0 | 22.4 | 10.9 | 0.1 | 8.7 | 13/14 | 92.9 | 6.3 | 9.7 | 26.6 | 35.4 | 55/58 | 0.95 |
II/0 | 22.4 | 10.5 | 0.3 | 9.1 | 14/15 | 93.3 | 6.1 | 10.1 | 25.5 | 35.3 | 64/63 | 1.02 |
I+II | 22.4 | 10.7 | 0.2 | 8.9 | 6.2 | 9.9 | 26.0 | 35.3 | ||||
III/300 | 22.3 | 12.4# | 0.1 | 9.3 | 17/18 | 94.4 | 6.2 | 9.3 | 26.0 | 36.4 | 83/75 | 1.11 |
IV/1000 | 22.1# | 11.1 | 0.0 | 8.8 | 19/19 | 100 | 5.8 | 9.2 | 24.8 | 34.7 | 84/84 | 1.00 |
V/3000 | 22.2 | 11.7 | 0.8 | 9.5 | 13/13 | 100 | 5.8# | 9.2 | 25.6 | 34.6 | 60/63 | 0.95 |
F1 to F2b | ||||||||||||
I/0 | 22.3 | 12.3 | 0.1 | 8.9 | 14/15 | 93.3 | 6.0 | 8.8 | 26.1 | 39.2+ | 59/66 | 0.89 |
II/0 | 22.1 | 9.4 | 0.9 | 7.8 | 15/17 | 88.2 | 6.1 | 9.7 | 29.5 | 45.0* | 61/56 | 1.09 |
I+II | 22.2 | 10.8 | 0.6 | 8.3 | 6.0 | 9.3 | 27.8 | |||||
III/300 | 22.1 | 12.5 | 0.3 | 9.3 | 19/19 | 100 | 6.1 | 9.5 | 27.6 | 41.3 | 83/93 | 0.89 |
IV/1000 | 22.1 | 11.4 | 0.9 | 9.3 | 15/17 | 88.2 | 5.8 | 9.0 | 26.5 | 39.5 ++ | 75/73 | 1.03 |
V/3000 | 22.2 | 11.1 | 0.5 | 9.2 | 14/15 | 93.3 | 5.9 | 9.3 | 27.2 | 40.1 | 63/66 | 0.95 |
Significantly different from control Group I: *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01.
Significantly different from control Group II: +p ≤0.05; ++p ≤0.01.
Significantly different from pooled values of control Groups I and II: #p ≤0.05; ##p ≤0.01.
a Pre-cull weight only.
b Data not analysed statistically.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In a well conducted and documented, pre-GLP one generation reproductive toxicity study (reliability score 2), CP 66257 (DTPMP) administered via the diet caused no clear treatment-related or statistically significant effects in rats. Pregnancy rate and pup body weight were lower for F2a litters from dams fed diets containing 3000 ppm DTPMP, but this was not replicated in the F1 or F2b litters. A NOAEL of 294 mg/kg bw/d for males and 312 mg/kg bw/d in females was therefore concluded.
- Executive summary:
In a well conducted and documented, pre-GLP one generation reproductive toxicity study (reliability score 2), CP 66257 (DTPMP) was administered continuously via the diet to Long-Evans rats at concentrations of 300, 1000 and 3000 ppm through one complete generation. Test substance administration to the F0 generation females (20/group) was initiated at the onset of gestation and continued throughout the ensuing gestation and lactation periods. Administration then continued to the F1 generation animals (10 males and 20 females/group) through a growth period and mating, gestation and lactation period for two successive litters. Parameters evaluated included parental mortality, mating-fertility indices, body weight and food consumption data, necropsy observations and organ weight data (absolute and relative) for the F1 parental generation. Litter parameters included gestation length, pup viability at birth and litter survival indices. Pups were evaluated for survival, growth and necropsy observations at weaning.
In the F0 generation, no treatment-related effects in the low and mid dose groups were evident. In the high dose group, females delivered litters containing fewer live pups and more dead pups (not statistically significant). Pups also had a lower weight at birth (
not statistically significant). No other treatment-related effects were observed. In the F1 generation, no treatment-related effects were evident in the low dose group. In the mid dose group, pup weight at birth was lower than control in the first litters (F2a) only. No such effects were observed in the second litters and no other treatment-related effects were observed during the remainder of the study. Gross pathological examination of five adult F1 generation males and females of the control and high dose groups did not reveal any abnormal findings. A NOAEL of 294 mg/kg bw/d for males and 312 mg/kg bw/d in females was therefore concluded.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.