Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation
Remarks:
in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Acceptable publication which meets basic scientific principles

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
A collection of guinea pig sensitization test results - grouped by chemical class
Author:
Rao KS et al.
Year:
1981
Bibliographic source:
Drug. Chem. Toxicol. 4, 331-351
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2000
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
SIDS Initial Assessment Report - 2-Methylbut-3-yn-ol
Author:
Rao KS et al.
Year:
2002
Bibliographic source:
OECD SIDS

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Method: in compliance with Maguire H. C.: J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 24, 151, 1973
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
other: modified Split adjuvant test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-methylbut-3-yn-2-ol
EC Number:
204-070-5
EC Name:
2-methylbut-3-yn-2-ol
Cas Number:
115-19-5
Molecular formula:
C5H8O
IUPAC Name:
2-methylbut-3-yn-2-ol

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: ca. 300 g
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, urina guinea pig chow supplemented with green vegetables
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, open
Vehicle:
no data
Concentration / amount:
no data given
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, open
Vehicle:
no data
Concentration / amount:
no data given
No. of animals per dose:
10
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS: yes
- test substance was applied to clipped flank; if irritation was observed dilutions were prepared
- The highest concentration which did not cause primary irritation was used for the guinea pig sensitization test


MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 4
- Test groups: 10 animals
- Site: clipped and depilated back of animals
- Frequency of applications: 4 times in 10 days
- Concentrations: no data
- Additions: at the time of the third application, 0 .2 ml of Freund's Adjuvant was injected intradermally at one point adjacent to the insult site


B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) after induction: 2 weeks
- Control: solvent control on other flank of the same animal; 10 animal for positive control
- Site: clipped flank
- Concentration: 100%
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24, 48 h


Evaluation:
- A moderate erythema and/or edema in two or more guinea pigs was considered sufficient to classify the test material as a potential human skin sensitizer .
Challenge controls:
- solvent
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
Epoxy Resin

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
100%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 100%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
100%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 100%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information