Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 215-252-9 | CAS number: 1315-01-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Long-term toxicity to fish
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- fish short-term toxicity test on embryo and sac-fry stages
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- For tin disulfide an algal study is available. This study demonstrated that the tin sulfide has no toxic effects at the limit of water solubility, i.e., at 0.67 µg/L. The other aquatic endpoints were covered using data from tin sulfide which has an almost identical water solubility, i.e., 0.6 µg/L. The algal study was used as bridging study since the WHO concluded in their report that alge are the most sensitive group. Furthermore, the WHO concluded that Sn II is more toxic than Sn IV. Hence, read across from tin sulfide (Sn II) to tin disulfide (Sn IV) was considered justified.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Vehicle:
- no
- Duration:
- 13 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 33 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 13 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 33 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mortality up to the highest concentration
- Duration:
- 13 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 33 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- number hatched
- Duration:
- 13 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 33 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- number hatched
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effect up to highest tested concentration
- Duration:
- 13 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 33 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- weight
- Duration:
- 13 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 11 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- weight
- Key result
- Duration:
- 13 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 7 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- weight
- Duration:
- 13 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 33 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- length
- Duration:
- 13 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 18 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- length
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The ECx values based on survival, hatching, weight and length data were calculated by probit method. Lethal and sub-lethal effects are assessed and compared with control to determine LOEC and hence NOEC values. The LOEC (Lowest Observed Effect Concentration) is the lowest concentration of the test item used in the test at which a significant effect was observed when compared with the control. The NOEC (No Observed Effect Concentration) is the test concentration immediately below the LOEC. The LOEC and NOEC values were estimated based on statistical analysis.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Effects were observed only at concentrations higher than the water solubility limit. Therefore, these effects are considered as not relevant.
- Executive summary:
The 13–day chronic toxicity of tin sulfide to early life stage of Brachydanio rerio was studied under semi-static conditions. Testmedia: conditioned tap water. Totally 60 embryos were exposed to measured tin sulfide concentrations up to 33 µg/L. Highest concentration was prepared as a saturated fraction from a nominal 100 mg/L Tin sulfide in conditioned tap water. The test system was maintained at 23.9 to 25.8 ºC and a pH of 6.91 to 7.67. The 13–day EC50 and NOEC value, based on mortality, was >33 µg a.i./L. The sublethal effects included were hatching, weight and length of animals. The most sensitive end point was weight.
This toxicity study is classified as valid without restrictions and satisfies the guideline requirement for early life toxicity study with fish.
Results Synopsis
Test Organism Size: Brachydanio rerio embryos
Test Type: Semi-static
Test media: conditioned tap water
LOEC: 11 µg a.i./L
NOEC: 7 µg a.i./L
EC50: >33µg/L (maximum observed effect: 18%)
Endpoint(s) Effected: weight
Conclusion: Effects were observed only at concentrations higher than the water solubility of tin sulfide (0.6 µg/L). Therefore, these effects are considered as not relevant.
The results are considered relevant for tin disulfide since both substances have the same metal moiety and have similar physico-chemical properties, e.g., they are almost insoluble in water. Further evidence is provided in the read across justification.
Reference
In the highest test concentration 100% Vol/Vol one embryo was coagulated, tail detached from yolk and somites were observed for all survivors on day 1. On day 2 four embryos were found dead (coagulated) but for all survivors heart beat was recorded. On day 3 five were not hatched, among all hatched one with scoliosis of tail was reported. On day 4 one was still non‑hatched. On day 6 normal development, mobility, positive reaction to stimuli for most of survivors, but scoliosis of tail for one and yolk sac-edema for two larvae were observed. Further, mobility deteriorated with time, reactions became slower and zebrafish were weaker with progressing yolk absorption. Cumulative mortality increased with time and at test termination survivors were very weak with yolk absorbed, no scoliosis or edemas were observed among survivors.
In test concentration 50% Vol/Vol one embryo was coagulated, for all survivors tail detached from yolk and somites were observed on day 1. On day 2 heart beat was reported. On day 3 four non-hatched and among hatched one with scoliosis of tail were observed. On day 4 one was still non-hatched, but on day 5 all were hatched with normal mobility and reaction to stimuli. On day 6 apart from the one with scoliosis of tail, one was with yolk sac edema, but no other abnormalities in development were reported. Mobility of survivors deteriorated with time, reactions became slower and zebrafish were weaker with progressing yolk absorption. At test termination mortality increased to 11.7% and development of survivors was normal.
In test concentration 25% Vol/Vol coagulation of one embryo was reported on day 1. Four other embryos were coagulated on day 2. On day 3 only two embryos were non-hatched, among hatched two larvae with scoliosis of tail were observed. On day 4 one was still non-hatched. Mobility of survivors deteriorated with time, reactions became slower and zebrafish were weaker with progressing yolk absorption. At test termination mortality increased to 18.3% and development of all survivors was normal.
In test concentration 12.5% Vol/Vol three embryos on day 1 and three other embryos on day 2 were coagulated. On day 3 only one non-hatched embryo was observed but one larvae was found dead. Mortality did not change further during the test. Development of all survivors was normal, i.e. tail detachment and formation of somites on day 1, heart beat on day 2 and hatching started on day 3. Mobility and reaction to stimuli were weak at test termination.
In lowest test concentration 6.25% Vol/Vol two embryos were coagulated on day 2. No abnormalities in comparison with zebrafish in controls were observed. On day 3 two with scoliosis of tail were reported and three embryos were non-hatched, but on day 4 hatching was completed. Two larvae without any visible developmental abnormalities were found dead on day 8 and two other were found dead on day 9. Total number of survivors was fifty four what remained unchanged till the test termination.
In the control double filtered initial mortality was two embryos coagulated on day 1 and one embryo on day 2. Hatching started on day 3, ten zebrafish with delay of one day, and was completed on day 4. Normal development for all zebrafish was recorded. On day 8 one larvae was found dead. One zebrafish was found dead on each of days 11, 12 and 13. Therefore, total number of survivors was fifty two.
In the control with non filtrated conditioned water one embryo was coagulated on day 2, one non-hatched and two hatched larvae were dead on day 3. Hatching was completed on day 3. Mortality increased by one zebrafish on days 8 and 11. On day 12 three and on day 13 two zebrafish were found dead.
No other effects were recorded.
Overview of observed endpoints and calculated effect concentrations |
| |||||||
Concentration of test item [% of filtrate from soluble fraction of 100 mg/L] | Control non-filtered | Control | 6.25 | 12.5 | 25 | 50 | 100 | |
time-weighted mean of concentrations of the test item [µg/L] | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 33 | |
not hatched on day 3 [%] | 1.8 | 17.5 | 5.2 | 1.9 | 3.6 | 6.8 | 9.1 | |
fry mortality after 13 days [%] | 18.3 | 13.3 | 10 | 18.3 | 18.3 | 11.7 | 13.3 | |
reduction of fry fish dry weight per survivor after 13 days [%] | 4.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 11.4 | 18.2 | 13.6 | |
reduction of fry fish length after 13 days [%] | -1.0 | 0.0 | -1.7 | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.0 | 6.4 | |
Hatchability endpoints (based on time-weighted means of concentrations of the test item) | ||||||||
EC10 | >33µg/L | |||||||
LOEC | >33µg/L | |||||||
NOEC | ≥33µg/L | |||||||
Survival endpoints (based on time-weighted means of concentrations of the test item) | ||||||||
EC10 | >33µg/L | |||||||
LOEC | >33µg/L | |||||||
NOEC | ≥33µg/L | |||||||
Weight endpoints (based on time-weighted means of concentrations of the test item) | ||||||||
EC50 | >33µg/L | |||||||
LOEC | 11µg/L | |||||||
NOEC | 7µg/L | |||||||
Length endpoints (based on time-weighted means of concentrations of the test item) | ||||||||
EC10 | >33µg/L | |||||||
LOEC | 33µg/L | |||||||
NOEC | 18µg/L | |||||||
The results are considered relevant for tin disulfide since both substances have the same metal moiety and have similar physico-chemical properties, e.g., they are almost insoluble in water. Further evidence is provided in the read across justification.
Description of key information
The test was perfomed on the read-across substance tin sulfide but is considered relevant for tin disulfide as well. Up to the limit of water solubility, tin disulfide is not toxic to fish in a long-term study.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water fish
Fresh water fish
- Effect concentration:
- 7 µg/L
Additional information
The endpoint was covered by read across from tin sulfide.
The 13–day chronic toxicity of tin sulfide to early life stage of Brachydanio rerio was studied under semi-static conditionsaccording to OECD 212. Testmedia: conditioned tap water. Totally 60 embryos were exposed to measured tin sulfide concentrations up to 33 µg/L. Highest concentration was prepared as a saturated fraction from a nominal 100 mg/L Tin sulfide in conditioned tap water. The test system was maintained at 23.9 to 25.8 ºC and a pH of 6.91 to 7.67. The 13–day EC50and NOEC value, based on mortality, was >33 µg a.i./L. The sublethal effects included were hatching, weight and length of animals. The most sensitive end point was weight.
This toxicity study is considered as valid without restrictions and satisfies the guideline requirement for early life toxicity study with fish.
Results Synopsis
Test Organism Size:Brachydanio rerio embryos
Test Type: Semi-static
Test media: conditioned tap water
LOEC: 11 µg a.i./L
NOEC: 7 µg a.i./L
EC50: >33µg/L (maximum observed effect: 18%)
Endpoint(s) Effected: weight
Conclusion: Effects from tin sulfide were only observed at concentrations higher than the water solubility of tin sulfide (0.6 µg/L). Therefore, these effects are considered as not relevant. Read across from tin sulfide to tin disulfide was considered as possible (see Read Across justification document attached to the dossier). Hence it can be concluded that there is no long-term toxicity to fish at the limit of water solubility of tin disulfide, i.e., at 0.67 µg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

Route: .live2