Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 265-053-6 | CAS number: 64741-52-2 A complex combination of hydrocarbons produced by vacuum distillation of the residuum from atmospheric distillation of crude oil. It consists of hydrocarbons having carbon numbers predominantly in the range of C15 through C30 and produces a finished oil with a viscosity of less than 100 SUS at 100°F (19cSt at 40°C). It contains relatively few normal paraffins.
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
One key (OECD 453) carcinogenicity study was identified that evaluated multiple unrefined/acid treated oils. Of the 94 oils tested in mice, there were 3 unrefined paraffinic distillates and 3 unrefined naphthenic distillates. All of these unrefined oils were carcinogenic.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the study results, and the EU harmonised classification, unrefined/acid treated oils are classified as Carcinogenic Category 1A (H350), according to the EU CLP Regulation (EC No.1272/2008).
Additional information
Chasey and McKee (1993) evaluated ninety-four oils in the mouse epidermal cancer bioassay in order to understand the effects of various types of refining processes on carcinogenic potential. These studies were conducted over a 15 year period. In these studies, male C3H mice, about 6-10 weeks of age, were obtained from either Jackson Laboratories (C3H/HeJ) or Charles River Laboratories (C3H / HeNCrlBR). These mice were randomly distributed into test groups of 40 or 50 animals. In early studies, mice were housed five per cage in suspended wire-mesh cages. In later studies, they were housed singly, in the same type of cages. The hair in the interscapular area was clipped once weekly to facilitate test material application. The test materials were applied by automatic pipette in either 37.5 microlitre aliquots twice a week or 25 microlitre aliquots three times a week. In early studies, treatment continued until the animals died spontaneously or were sacrificed in a moribund state. In later studies, surviving mice were sacrificed either after 24 months of treatment or at the time at which grossly diagnosed squamous cell carcinomas developed. Animals were examined twice weekly for the appearance of dermal tumours. Each tumour in the treatment area was examined carefully and classified grossly. All grossly diagnosed tumours were examined microscopically after study termination. Of the 94 oils tested, there were 3 unrefined paraffinic distillates and 3 unrefined naphthenic distillates. All of these unrefined oils were carcinogenic.
Additional data supports that unrefined/acid treated oils should be classified as Carcinogenic, Category 1A, H350 (API, 1989; ARCO, 1985c,d,e; ARCO, 1986a,b,c,d; Blackburn et al., 1984, 1986; CONCAWE, 1988, 1994; Horton and Denman, 1955; IARC, 1984; Kane et al., 1984; McKee et al., 1989; Roy et al., 1988). This information is presented in the dossier.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
