Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

The test item was not mutagenic in bacteria strains in the absence or presence of metabolic activation (reference 7.6.1 -1).

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1996-10-22 to 1996-11-01
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
1983-05-26
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OTS 798.5265 (The Salmonella typhimurium Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test)
Version / remarks:
September 1985
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Deviations:
not specified
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The study was conducted according to OECD 471 from 1983. According to that guideline version only 4 strains were required.
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
histidine
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9 : rat liver
- method of preparation of S9 mix: Sufficient S9 fraction was thawed immediately at room temperature before each test. One volume of S9 fraction (protein concentration 49.9 g/L for both experiments) was mixed with 9 volumes of the S9 cofactor solution, which was kept on ice until used. The concentrations of the different compounds in the S9-mix were: 8 mM MgCI2, 33 mM KCI, 5 mM glucose-6-phosphate, 4 mM NADP, 100 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.4
- volume of S9 mix used in agar: 0.5 mL
- quality controls of S9: Sterility test was done on plates and for each batch of S9 an independent validation was performed with a minimum of two different mutagens, e.g. 2-aminoanthracene and dimethylbenzanthracene, to confirm metabolic activation by microsomal enzymes,
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
4, 20, 100, 500, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle used: DMSO
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
other: 2-Aminoanthracene With metabolic activation for all strains
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: triplicate
- Number of independent experiments : 2

METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Test substance added in agar (plate incorporation)

TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 48 h

METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
Precise toxicity testing was performed as follows using dose levels selected on the basis of toxicity results in the first test: 0.1 mL of the different concentrations of the test compound were thoroughly mixed with 0.1 mL of 10^6 dilution of the overnight culture of TA 100 (designated TA 100 D) and plated with histidine and biotin rich top agar (3 plates per dose). The solvent control was compared with the number of colonies per plate in the presence of the test compound. Results were determined as a ratio of these values (= surviving fraction).
Evaluation criteria:
A test compound was classified as mutagenic if it had either of the following effects:
a) it produced at least a 2-fold increase in the mean number of revertants per plate of at least one of the tester strains over the mean number of revertants per plate of the appropriate vehicle control at complete bacterial background lawns.
b) it induced a dose-related increase in the mean number of revertants per plate of at least one of the tester strains over the mean number of revertants per plate of the appropriate vehicle control in at least two to three concentrations of the test compound at complete bacterial background lawns.
If the test substance did not produce reproducible increases of at least 2 times the concurrent solvent controls, at any dose level with any bacterial strain, it was considered to show no evidence of mutagenic activity in this system.
The test results had to be reproducible.
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid

Table 1: Experiment 1

Dose (µg/plate) Mean number of revertant colonies/3 replicate plates (± S.D.) with different strains of Salmonella typhimurium
  TA98 TA100 TA1535 TA1537
   
  Results without S9
DMSO 18.7 ± 3.2 137.0 ± 21.1 17.0 ± 2.6 12.0 ± 2.0
untreated 20.3 ± 6.1 163.3 ± 2.5 19.7 ± 3.1 10.7 ± 1.2
4 21.7 ± 6.4 128.3 ± 9.7 19.3 ± 2.5 14.7 ± 4.5
20 17.7 ± 0.6 109.3 ± 20.8 18.0 ± 3.0 10.3 ± 4.5
100 17.0 ± 1.7 117.7 ± 12.9 20.0 ± 4.0 14.0 ± 5.2
500 19.7 ± 0.6 124.0 ± 34.9 19.7 ± 2.9 11.3 ± 2.1
2500 18.0 ± 2.6 103.7 ± 17.9 19.3 ± 2.1 10.3 ± 4.2
5000 18.7 ± 2.1 62.7 ± 21.5 17.0 ± 1.0 11.7 ± 1.5
2-NF 567.3 ± 95.1      
SA (1)   782.7 ± 21.0 397.7 ± 24.4  
9-AA (50)       169.7 ± 18.6
   
  Results with S9
DMSO 22.7 ± 3.1 162.7 ± 13.1 20.3 ± 2.5 11.0 ± 3.6
untreated 22.7 ± 1.5 146.3 ± 21.7 13.7 ± 1.5 15.7 ± 2.1
4 26.3 ± 8.4 137.0 ± 2.6 19.0 ± 4.6 11.0 ± 1.0
20 25.0 ± 4.6 141.0 ± 14.1 21.0 ± 2.0 11.7 ± 3.8
100 20.7 ± 3.8 137.0 ± 11.5 20.7 ± 1.4 11.0 ± 5.0
500 19.7 ± 3.2 122.7 ± 16.7 22.7 ± 1.5 9.0 ± 3.0
2500 22.7 ± 1.2 132.3 ± 10.3 19.7 ± 4.0 10.7 ± 2.1
5000 18.0 ± 1.0 116.7 ± 30.6 22.0 ± 1.0 10.3 ± 3.5
2-AA (0.5) 1870.0 ± 71.6 1971.0 ± 128.7    
2-AA (1)     194.0 ± 14.7 331.0 ± 48.0

Table 2: Experiment 2

Dose (µg/plate) Mean number of revertant colonies/3 replicate plates (± S.D.) with different strains of Salmonella typhimurium
  TA98 TA100 TA1535 TA1537
   
  Results without S9
DMSO 24.0 ± 6.9 180.3 ± 12.3 25.0 ± 5.3 9.0 ± 1.7
untreated 33.3 ± 6.0 174.0 ± 9.5 23.0 ± 4.6 9.3 ± 2.5
4 29.0 ± 1.0 153.3 ± 9.7 17.7 ± 2.9 8.0 ± 2.0
20 29.0 ± 0.0 176.3 ± 30.0 20.0 ± 3.5 7.3 ± 2.3
100 25.7 ± 3.2 153.0 ± 22.1 18.0 ± 6.1 8.3 ± 2.1
500 30.0 ± 7.5 144.7 ± 15.4 22.0 ± 1.7 8.7 ± 0.6
2500 28.0 ± 5.0 113.7 ± 8.7 15.3 ± 2.5 7.3 ± 0.6
5000 32.3 ± 1.5 113.3 ± 16.2 20.0 ± 6.2 9.0 ± 1.7
2-NF 514.3 ± 49.9      
SA (1)   659.0 ± 26.2 365.7 ± 21.0  
9-AA (50)       182.7 ± 33.7
   
  Results with S9
DMSO 23.3 ± 4.5 170.3 ± 29.2 24.7 ± 2.5 9.3 ± 0.6
untreated 40.3 ± 4.9 194.7 ± 13.2 22.0 ± 1.0 9.3 ± 1.5
4 29.0 ± 1.7 181.0 ± 9.5 22.7 ± 1.2 9.3 ± 0.6
20 29.7 ± 4.5 172.7 ± 22.5 26.0 ± 8.2 8.7 ± 0.6
100 31.3 ± 3.2 189.3 ± 13.2 23.7 ± 6.4 11.3 ± 5.1
500 36.0 ± 3.5 178.3 ± 11.5 26.0 ± 6.2 10.3 ± 3.1
2500 27.3 ± 2.5 161.3 ± 7.8 19.7 ± 2.9 7.3 ± 1.2
5000 27.3 ± 2.5 168.3 ± 12.9 16.3 ± 2.5 9.0 ± 1.7
2-AA (0.5) 2125.7 ± 75.0 2158.7 ± 26.3    
2-AA (1)     194.3 ± 28.7 473.3 ± 10.2
Conclusions:
The test item was not mutagenic in bacteria strains in the absence or presence of metabolic activation.
Executive summary:

A bacterial reverse mutation assay according to OECD 471 was conducted to evaluate the mutagenic potential of the test item. Bacterial strains S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 were treated with 4, 20, 100, 500, 2500 and 5000 µg test item/plate in the absence and presence of metabolic activation with S9-mix in two independent experiments with triplicates for each strain. Furthermore, positive, solvent and untreated controls were conducted. The test item did not precipitate on the plates up to the highest investigated dose of 5000 µg/plate and proved to be not toxic to the bacterial strains. In an additional toxicity test with a dilution of tester strain TA 100 (designated TA 100 D), which was performed in parallel with the second mutation experiment, no toxicity was found. The test item did not cause a significant increase in the number of revertant colonies with any of the tester strains either in the absence or in the presence of S9-mix in either mutation test. No dose-dependent effect was obtained. All positive controls produced significant increases in the number of revertant colonies. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the exogenous metabolic activation system were demonstrated. Based on results obtained it was concluded that the test item was not mutagenic in bacteria strains in the absence or presence of metabolic activation.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Genetic toxicity in vitro

A bacterial reverse mutation assay according to OECD 471 was conducted to evaluate the mutagenic potential of the test item. Bacterial strains S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 were treated with 4, 20, 100, 500, 2500 and 5000 µg test item/plate in the absence and presence of metabolic activation with S9-mix in two independent experiments with triplicates for each strain. Furthermore, positive, solvent and untreated controls were conducted. The test item did not precipitate on the plates up to the highest investigated dose of 5000 µg/plate and proved to be not toxic to the bacterial strains. In an additional toxicity test with a dilution of tester strain TA 100 (designated TA 100 D), which was performed in parallel with the second mutation experiment, no toxicity was found. The test item did not cause a significant increase in the number of revertant colonies with any of the tester strains either in the absence or in the presence of S9-mix in either mutation test. No dose-dependent effect was obtained. All positive controls produced significant increases in the number of revertant colonies. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the exogenous metabolic activation system were demonstrated. Based on results obtained it was concluded that the test item was not mutagenic in bacteria strains in the absence or presence of metabolic activation.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Based on available data on genetic toxicity, the test item does not require classification for genetic toxicity according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP), as amended for the fifteenth time in Regulation (EU) 2020/1182.