Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 278-355-8 | CAS number: 75980-60-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1989
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate (in the preliminary toxicity study);
0, 8, 40, 200, 1000, and 5000) µg/plate (first experiment);
0, 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500, and 5000) µg/plate (second experiment) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- other: N-methyl-n-nitro-n-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- without S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- with S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48 hours at 37°C
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): histidine (or tryptophan in the case of WP2uvrA-)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: 0.1 ml of bacterial suspension (TA100 or WP2uvrA-) and 0.1 ml of test solution were added to 2 ml of molten, trace histidine or tryptophan supplemented media (histidine/biotin or tryptophan & top agar) and overlayed onto sterile plates of Vogel-Bonner agar (minimal agar -25 ml/ plate). Five doses of the test substance and a solvent control were tested in duplicate. After 48-72 hours incubation the plates were scored for revertant colonies and examined for a thinning of the background lawn. - Evaluation criteria:
- - The test chemical is considered positive in this assay if it induces a dose-related and statistatistically significant increase in mutation rate (of at least twice the spontaneous reversion rate) in one or more strains of bacteria in the presence and/or absence of the S-9 microsomal enzymes in both experiments.
- The test substance is generally considered non-mutagenic in this test if the number of induced revertants compared to spontaneous revertants is less than 2-fold at each dose level employed, the intervals of which should be between 2 and 5 fold and extend to the limits imposed by toxicity or solubility or up to the maximum recommended dose of 5000 µg/plate. - Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: observed at the highest tested dose (5000 µg/plate) - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions in this study, the test substance is not a mutagenic agent in a bacterial reverse mutation test in vitro.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- according to Japanese MOL/MHW/MITI
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: Chinese Hamster Lung cell line (CHL)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Without S9
6-hour treatment (0, 15, 20, 23.3 and 25 µg/ml),
24-hour treatment (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 µg/ml)
48-hour treatment (0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20 µg/ml)
With S9
6-hour treatment (0, 20, 23.3, 26.6, 30 µg/ml) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO (test substance concentration: 3 mg/ml)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: solubility - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 0.075 µg/ml Mitomycin C (MMC) for 24/48 hours treatment without S-9 mix, 10 µg/ml cyclophosphamide (CP) for for 6 hours treatment both with and without S-9 mix.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- DURATION
- Preincubation period: 24 hours (0.5 x 10E6 cells and 0.25 x 10E6 cells were seeded per flask)
- Exposure duration: without S-9: 6h, 24h, 48h; with S-9: 6h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 18 hours (only after 6h exposure)
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): cells harvested after exposure (24/48-hour exposure) or after expression time (6-hour exposure)
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): demecolcine 2 hours before the required harvest time.
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): in 2% Gurrs Giemsa R66 for 5 minutes
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:
Where possible the first 100 consecutive well-spread metaphases from each culture were counted. If the cell had 23 to 27 chromosomes, any gaps, breaks or rearrangements were noted.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: sample of the cell suspension from each harvest time was counted to measure growth inhibition at each concentration. - Evaluation criteria:
- A positive response was recorded for a particular treatment if the % cells with abberations (gaps included) was equal to or exceeded 10 %, an equivocal response was recorded for values between 5 % and 10 % and a negative response for values less than 5 %. For polyploid cells, an incidence greater than 10 % is generally recorded at positive.
- Statistics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain:
- other: Chines Hamster Lung cell line (CHL)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- see below
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- other: Chines Hamster Lung cell line (CHL)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- see below
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: in preliminary test the test substance at concentration level of 80 µg/ml caused precipitation.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: in preliminary test the test substance at concentration level up to 30 µg/ml (without S-9) or up to 40 µg/ml (with S-9) was found to be cytotoxic after 6 hours treatment. Concentration level up to 20 µg/ml after 24 hours was not found to be cytotoxic (50% cell survival), whereas concentration level at 20 µg/ml was found to be cytotoxic after 48 hours treatment (28% cell survival). - Remarks on result:
- other: other: 6h exposure with S9, 24 and 48h exposure
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted July 1997
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted May 2008
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Version / remarks:
- adopted Aug. 1998
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HPRT
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: MEM containing Hank's salt supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% amphotericin, and 1% neomycin
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/ß-naphthoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 4h, without S9: 1.3, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0 (20.0, 30.0, 40.0)µg/mL
4h, with S9 (1st exp.): 3.4, 6.8, 13.5, 27.0, 40.5, (54.0)µg/mL
4h with S9 (2nd exp.): 10.0, 20.0, 30.0, 40.0(precipiation occured) (45.0, 50.0, 55.0, 60.0)µg/mL
24h without S9: 10.0, 15.0, 20.0, 25.0, 30.0 (35.0, 40.0)µg/mL
Concentrations in brackets could not be scored due to cytotoxicity. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: good solubility of the test substance and relative non-toxicity to cell culture - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- Remarks:
- with S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4h or 24h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 8 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 6-thioguanine
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency - Evaluation criteria:
- The gene mutation assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
The numbers of mutant colonies per 10^6 cells found in the solvent controls falls within the laboratory historical control data.
The positive control substances should produce a significant increase in mutant colony frequencies.
The cloning efficiency II (absolute value) of the solvent controls should exceed 50 %.
A test item is classified as positive if it induces either a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency or a reproducible and positive response three times above the spontaneous mutation frequency at one of the test points.
A test item producing neither a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
However, in a case by case evaluation this decision depends on the level of the corresponding solvent control data. If there is by chance a low spontaneous mutation rate within the laboratory´s historical control data range, a concentration-related increase of the mutations within this range has to be discussed. The variability of the mutation rates of solvent controls within all experiments of this study was also taken into consideration. - Statistics:
- linear regression (least squares)
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 4h without S9: >=29µg/mL, 4h with S9: >=45µg/mL, 24h without S9: >=35µg/mL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: none
- Effects of osmolality: none
- Precipitation: With S9 mix, precipitation occured at and above 40µg/mL, without S9 at and above 30µg/mL and 40µg/mL after 4 or 24h, respectively.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In a pretest, cytotoxicity was observed after 4h without S9 at 27.1µg/mL, and at 54.4µg/mL after 24h or after 4h (+S9) - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Referenceopen allclose all
Mean maximum revertants/plate and the corresponding concentration with/without S-9 mix are resumed below:
- First experiment:
Mean maximum revetants observed/plate [corresponding test concentration (µg/plate)] | ||||||
Solvent control | Test substance | Positive control (substance) | ||||
Strains | with | without | with | without | with | without |
TA100 | 78 | 87 | 90 [40] | 83 [40] | 732 [3.3] (2-AA) | 472 [2.0] (MNNG) |
TA1535 | 18 | 9 | 19 [40, 5000] | 12 [40, 1000] | 49 [3.3] (2-AA) | 139 [2.0] (MNNG) |
WP2uvrA- | 24 | 30 | 31 [40] | 31 [8] | 126 [10.0] (2-AA) | 734 [3.3] (4NQO) |
TA98 | 25 | 18 | 27 [200, 1000] | 22 [200] | 501 [3.3] (2-AA) | 803 [10.0] (4NOPD) |
TA1537 | 6 | 4 | 6 [8] | 4 [8, 200, 1000] | 48 [3.3] (2-AA) | 202 [50.0] (9-AA) |
The spontaneous reversion counts/plate was 17.7, 8.3, 29, 107.7 and 33 respectively for TA1535, TA1537, TA 98, TA100 and WP2uvrA-.
- Second experiment
Mean maximum revetants observed/plate [corresponding test concentration (µg/plate)] | ||||||
Solvent control | Test substance | Positive control (substance) | ||||
Strains | with | without | with | without | with | without |
TA100 | 70 | 75 | 78 [5000] | 79 [312.5] | 1060 [3.3] (2-AA) | 599 [2.0] (MNNG) |
TA1535 | 14 | 11 | 14 [312.5] | 12 [312.5, 2500] | 74 [3.3] (2-AA) | 289 [2.0] (MNNG) |
WP2uvrA- | 24 | 21 | 27 [312.5] | 22 [625] | 127 [10.0] (2-AA) | 823 [3.3] (4NQO) |
TA98 | 23 | 19 | 24 [2500] | 19 [5000] | 444 [3.3] (2-AA) | 741 [10.0] (4NOPD) |
TA1537 | 7 | 6 | 7 [625] | 6 [5000] | 59 [3.3] (2-AA) | 134 [50.0] (9-AA) |
The spontaneous reversion counts/plate was 15.5, 5, 23.7, 83.3 and 148.3 respectively for TA1535, TA1537, TA 98, TA100 and WP2uvrA-.
The observed chromosome damages and aberrations (number of cells observed: 200 in treatment groups and positive control group without s-9 mix, 50 in positive control group with S-9 mix) are resumed below:
1) After 6 hours treatment
Treatment group | Total | Chromatid | Chromosome | Others | Total abs. | Total abs. | Total abs. | Cells with abs. | |||||||||||||
+S-9 [-S-9] | Gaps | Breaks | Exchanges | Breaks | Exchanges | X | (+Gaps) | (-Gaps) | (+Gaps) | (-Gaps) | |||||||||||
(µg/ml) | +S-9 | -S-9 | +S-9 | -S-9 | +S-9 | -S-9 | +S-9 | -S-9 | +S-9 | -S-9 | +S-9 | -S-9 | +S-9 | -S-9 | +S-9 | -S-9 | +S-9 | -S-9 | +S-9 | -S-9 | |
DMSO | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
20 [15] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | |
23.3 [20] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |
26.6 [23.3] | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 6 | |
30 [25] | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 0 | |
Pos ctrl | 11 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 4 | 36 | 4 | 27 | 3 | 23 | 3 |
2) After 24 or 48 hours treatment (without S-9 mix; number of cells observed: 200 in treatment groups excepting 10 [112 cells observed after 48 hours treatment] and 20 µg/ml [18 cells observed after 48 hours treatment] groups, 50 in positive control group [48 hours treatment]:
Treatment group | Total | Chromatid | Chromosome | Others | Total abs. | Total abs. | Total abs. | Cells with abs. | |||||||||||||
24 [48] hours | Gaps | Breaks | Exchanges | Breaks | Exchanges | X | (+Gaps) | (-Gaps) | (+Gaps) | (-Gaps) | |||||||||||
(µg/ml) | 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | |
DMSO | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
5 [2.5] | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 12 | 6 | 7 | 4 | |
10 [5] | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 5 | |
15 [10] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | |
20 [20] | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 0 | |
Pos ctrl | 10 | 6 | 16 | 24 | 13 | 42 | 7 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 47 | 90 | 37 | 84 | 26 | 39 | 20 | 39 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
- 15 to 25 ug/ml for the 6 -hour treatment without S-9
- 20 to 30 ug/ml for the 6 -hour treatment with S-9
- 5 to 20 ug/ml for the 24-hour treatment
- 2 .5 to 20 ug/ml for the 48-hour treatment
- 4h, without S9: 1.3, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0 (20.0, 30.0, 40.0)µg/mL
- 4h, with S9 (1st exp.): 3.4, 6.8, 13.5, 27.0, 40.5, (54.0)µg/mL
- 4h with S9 (2nd exp.): 10.0, 20.0, 30.0, 40.0(precipiation occured) (45.0, 50.0, 55.0, 60.0)µg/mL
- 24h without S9: 10.0, 15.0, 20.0, 25.0, 30.0 (35.0, 40.0)µg/mL
Gene mutation in bacteria
Salmonella tyahimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA' were treated with diphenyl(2,4,6 -trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide by the Ames plate incorporation method for 48h at five dose levels in triplicate,
both with and without the addition of Aroclor induced rat liver S9 (BASF Japan 1989). Up to 5000 ug/plate were tested in two independent experiments. No increase in the number of revertant colonies and no cytotoxicity was observed. The vehicle and positive controls gave results within the ranges expected from historical control data.
This result is supported by a second Ames test using the plate incorporation method to expose five Salmonella strains (TA 1535, 100, 1537, 1538, and 98) to up to 2500µg/plate of diphenyl(2,4,6 - trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide for 48 hours in the presence or absence of Aroclor induced rat liver S9 mix (BASF 1979). Cytotoxicity was observed at 2500µg/plates after the addition of S9 mix in all strains and without S9 in TA1535, but no increase in the number of his+-revertants could be detected under all conditions tested.
Chromosome aberration
Chinese hamster lung (CHL) cells were treated with diphenyl(2,4,6 - trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide for 6h (with and without Arcoclor induced rat liver S9), 24h, and 48h (without S9) (BASF Japan 1989). Cells were left to recover for 18h after the 6h treatment. The dose range was selected based on the results of preliminary toxicity tests:
No significant, dose-related increases in the frequency of aberrations was demonstrated in any of the treatment cases. Precipitation was observed at 80µg/ml and thus not relevant at the concentrations chosen.
Gene mutation in mammalian cells
In a study according to OECD 476 (BASF 2012) Chinese hamster V79 cells were treated in two independent experiments for 4h with and for 4 and 24h without phenobarbital/ß-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9. The maximum test substance concentration was
Concentrations in brackets could not be scored due to severe cytotoxicity, which was observed only about 5µg/ml above the maximum concentration. After an expression time of 7days, mutant cells were selected using 6 -thioguanine for 8 days. No increase in mutant frequency was detected in any dose group, vehicle and positive controls led to frequencies as expected based on historical control data.
Short description of key
information:
Ames negative (BASF Japan 1989, GLP, Guidelines for Screening
Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals (Japan), equivalent to OECD 471)
Ames negative (BASF 1979, similar to OECD 471)
Chromosome aberration negative (BASF Japan 1989, GLP, Japanese guideline
according to MOC/MHW/MITI, similar to OECD 473)
HPRT negative (BASF 2012, GLP, OECD 476)
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Since no gene mutation or chromosome aberration was observed in bacteria or mammalian cells, diphenyl(2,4,6 -trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide does not need to be labelled according to 67/548/EEC and CLP/EU-GHS.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.