Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Density

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
relative density
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
August 2, 2006 to December 8, 2006
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted to GLP in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 109 (Density of Liquids and Solids)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.3 (Relative Density)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
pycnometer method
Type:
relative density
Density:
1.3
Temp.:
20 °C

At 20.0 +/- 0.5 °C the mean density was determined to be 1.3 x 10 3 kg/m3

The relative density was determined to be 1.30.

The pressure readings, calculated volumes and density values obtained for the test material are shown in the following table:

Determination P1 P2 Volume (cm3) Density (kg/m3)
A 17.804 7.258 17.069 1.3026 x 103
B 17.461 7.129 17.408 1.3013 x 103
Conclusions:
The relative density of the test material has been determined to be 1.30 at 20.0 ± 0.5°C.
Executive summary:

In a general physico-chemical properties study (0370/0351), the test material was determined have a relative density of 1.30 at 20.0 ± 0.5°C by the gas comparison pycnometer method based on OECD Test Method 109.

Description of key information

The relative density of the test material has been determined to be 1.30 at 20.0 ± 0.5 °C.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Relative density at 20C:
1.3

Additional information

In a general physico-chemical properties study (0370/0351), the test material was determined have a relative density of 1.30 at 20.0 ± 0.5 °C by the gas comparison pycnometer method based on OECD Test Method 109. The study was awarded a reliability score of 1 in accordance with the criteria set forth by Klimisch et al. (1997).

Categories Display