Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 242-182-6 | CAS number: 18299-85-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 013
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- July 22, 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- (from the competent authority) Landesamt für Umwelt, Wasserwirtschaft und Gewerbeaufsicht Rheinland-Pfalz
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-Propenoic acid, C12-14-alkyl esters
- EC Number:
- 282-516-8
- EC Name:
- 2-Propenoic acid, C12-14-alkyl esters
- Cas Number:
- 84238-60-8
- Molecular formula:
- Unspecified
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-Propenoic acid, C12-14-alkyl esters
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
- Details on test material:
- Name of test substance: Laurylacrylate 1214
Batch identification: 110014P040
Purity/composition: 93.9 corr. area-% as a sum of two main compounds
Homogeneity: The homogeneity of the test substance was guaranteed by mixing before preparation of the test substance preparations.
Storage stability: The stability of the test substance under storage conditions throughout the study period was guaranteed
Date of production: 18 Aug 2011
Molecular weight: 250 g/mol
Physical state, appearance: Liquid, colorless, clear
Storage conditions: Room temperature
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Cell line and storage
The V79 cell line is a permanent cell line derived from the Chinese hamster and has a
− high proliferation rate (doubling time of about 12 - 14 hours),
− high plating efficiency (≥ 90%),
− stable karyotype (modal number of 22 chromosomes).
Stocks of the V79 cell line (1-mL portions) were maintained at -196°C in liquid nitrogen using 7% (v/v) DMSO in culture medium as a cryoprotectant. Each batch used for the cytogenetic experiments was checked for
− mycoplasma contamination,
− karyotype stability,
− plating efficiency (=colony forming ability) incl. vital staining.
Culture media
MEM (minimal essential medium with Earle's salts) containing a L-glutamine source supplemented with
− 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS)
− 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin (10 000 IU / 10 000 μg/mL)
− 1% (v/v) amphotericine B (250 μg/mL)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-Mix (Phenobarbital/beta-naphthoflavone iduced rat liver of Wistar rats)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1st experiment:
with and without S9 mix (4 hours exposure)
1.25 μg/mL, 2.50 μg/mL, 5.00 μg/mL, 10.00 μg/mL, 20.00 μg/mL, 40.00 μg/mL, 80.00 μg/mL
2nd experiment:
without S9 mix (24 hours exposure)
0.39 μg/mL , 0.78 μg/mL , 1.56 μg/mL , 3.13 μg/mL , 6.25 μg/mL, 12.50 μg/mL
with S9 mix (4 hours exposure)
6.25 μg/mL,12.50 μg/mL, 25.00 μg/mL, 50.00 μg/mL, 100.00 μg/mL
3rd experiment:
without S9 mix (24 hours exposure)
3.13 μg/mL, 6.25 μg/mL, 12.50 μg/mL, 25.00 μg/mL, 50.00 μg/mL, 100.00 μg/mL
with S9 mix (4 hours exposure)
12.50 μg/mL, 25.00 μg/mL, 50.00 μg/mL, 100.00 μg/mL, 200.00 μg/mL, 400.00 μg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Ethanol
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation: 500 and 600 μg/mL ethyl methanesulfonate, With metabolic activation: 2.5 μg/mL cyclophosphamide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
Three independent experiments were performed with different expsoure times and test concentrations.
In Experiment I the exposure period was 4 hours with and without metabolic activation.
In Experiment II the exposure period was 24 hours without S9 mix and 4 hours with metabolic activation.
In Experiment III the exposure period was 24 hours without S9 mix and 4 hours with metabolic activation
The cells were prepared 24 hours after start of treatment with the test item.
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 or 24 h
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Wrights solution (modified May-Grünwald solution)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: at least 1 000 cells per culture, means at least 2 000 cells per dose group
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
For additional information about the cytotoxic potential of the test substance cells were seeded in flasks (2.5 x 10E5 cells per 25 cm2 flask) about 24 – 30 hours prior to exposure. The cells were treated similar to the slides using the same media and test substance concentrations. At the end of recovery period single cell suspensions were prepared from each test group (all test groups, except the positive controls) and the cells were counted using a cell counter. Based on these data the relative increase in cell count (RICC) was calculated.
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
pH value
Changes in the pH were recorded by a change in the color of the indicator in the culture medium (phenol red: no color change from pH 6.7 - 8.3). The pH was measured, at least for the two top doses and for the vehicle control with and without S9 mix.
Osmolarity
Osmolarity was measured, at least for the top dose and for the vehicle control with and without S9 mix.
Solubility
Test substance precipitation was checked immediately after start of treatment of the test cultures (macroscopically) and at the end of treatment (macroscopically/ microscopically). - Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptance criteria
The in vitro micronucleus assay is considered valid if the following criteria are met:
• The quality of the slides allowed the identification and evaluation of a sufficient number of analyzable cells.
• The number of cells containing micronuclei in the vehicle control was within the range of the historical negative control data
• The positive control substances both with and without S9 mix induced a significant increase in the number of micronucleated cells
Assessment criteria
A test substance is considered "positive" if the following criteria are met:
• A significant, dose-related and reproducible increase in the number of cells containing micronuclei.
• The number of micronucleated cells exceeds both the value of the concurrent vehicle control and the range of the historical negative control data.
A test substance generally is considered "negative" if the following criteria are met:
• The number of micronucleated cells in the dose groups is not significant increased above the concurrent vehicle control value and is within the range of the historical negative control data - Statistics:
- The statistical evaluation of the data was carried out using the MUVIKE program system (BASF SE). The proportion of cells containing micronuclei was calculated for each group. A comparison of each dose group with the concurrent vehicle control group was carried out using Fisher's exact test for the hypothesis of equal proportions. This test is Bonferroni-Holm corrected versus the dose groups separately for each time and was performed one-sided.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: not influenced
- Effects of osmolality: not influenced
- Water solubility:
- Precipitation: not observed up to the highest applied test substance concentration
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
Cytotoxicity indicated by clearly reduced relative increase in cell count (RICC), decrease in proliferation index (PI) or non-scorable slides was observed at least at the highest applied test substance concentrations in the 1st and 3rd Experiment.
OTHER:
The vehicle controls gave frequencies of micronucleated cells within our historical negative control data range for V79 cells.
Both positive control substances, EMS and cyclophosphamide, led to the expected increase in the number of cells containing micronuclei.
On the basis of the results of the present study, the test substance did not cause any biologically relevant increase in the number of cells containing micronuclei either without S9 mix or after adding a metabolizing system.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions chosen here, the conclusion is drawn that the test substance has not the potential to induce micronuclei (clastogenic and / or aneugenic activity) under in vitro conditions in V79 cells in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
The test substance was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in V79 cells in vitro (clastogenic or aneugenic activity). Three independent experiments were carried out with and without the addition of liver S9 mix from induced rats (exogeneous metabolic activation).
Based on the observations and the toxicity data of a previously performed pretest for a HPRT study the following concentrations were tested. The test groups printed in bold type were evaluated.
1st Experiment
4 hours exposure; 24 hours harvest time; without S9 mix
0; 1.25; 2.50; 5.00; 10.00; 20.00; 40.00; 80.00 µg/mL
4 hours exposure; 24 hours harvest time; with S9 mix
0; 1.25; 2.50; 5.00; 10.00; 20.00; 40.00; 80.00 µg/mL
2nd Experiment
24 hours exposure; 24 hours harvest time; without S9 mix
0; 0.39; 0.78; 1.56; 3.13; 6.25; 12.50 µg/mL
4 hours exposure; 24 hours harvest time; with S9 mix
0; 6.25; 12.50; 25.00; 50.00; 100.00 µg/mL
3rd Experiment
24 hours exposure; 24 hours harvest time; without S9 mix
0; 3.13; 6.25; 12.50; 25.00; 50.00; 100.00 µg/mL
4 hours exposure; 24 hours harvest time; with S9 mix
0; 12.50; 25.00; 50.00; 100.00; 200.00; 400.00 µg/mL
A sample of at least 1000 cells for each culture were analyzed for micronuclei, i.e. 2000 cells for each test group.
The vehicle controls gave frequencies of micronucleated cells within our historical negative control data range for V79 cells. Both positive control substances, EMS and cyclophosphamide, led to the expected increase in the number of cells containing micronuclei.
Cytotoxicity indicated by clearly reduced relative increase in cell count (RICC), decrease in proliferation index (PI) or non-scorable slides was observed at least at the highest applied test substance concentrations in the 1st and 3rd Experiment.
On the basis of the results of the present study, the test substance did not cause any biologically relevant increase in the number of cells containing micronuclei either without S9 mix or after adding a metabolizing system.
Thus, under the experimental conditions described, the test substance is considered not to have a chromosome-damaging (clastogenic) effect nor to induce numerical chromosomal aberrations (aneugenic activity) under in vitro conditions in V79 cells in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.