Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 214-189-4 | CAS number: 1112-39-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 23 Aug - 13 Sep 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2 October 2012
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Natural water instead of recommended medium was used.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 850.1300 (Daphnid Chronic Toxicity Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Remarks:
- HPLC/MS-MS
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: control and 12 mg/L
- Sampling method: The bulk exposure solutions (lab dilution water (LDW) control and 12.0 mg/L solutions) were sampled for analytical confirmation of the fortified test material concentrations on days 0, 2, 7, 14, and 19. On days 0, 2, 7, 14, and 19, single aliquots (6 mL) of LDW control bulk exposure solution was collected using a glass pipette and transferred to a 20 mL vial. On days 0, 14, and 19, four aliquots (6 mL) of 12.0 mg/L bulk exposure solution were collected from random locations at mid depth using a glass pipette and transferred to 20 mL vials to evaluate exposure solution concentration and homogeneity. On days 2, 5, 9, 16, and 21, single aliquots (1.50 mL) of each test vessel were pooled in 20 mL glass vials via Eppendorf pipette. Vials were capped and briefly vortex-mixed. Aliquots (0.100 mL) from the bulk and pooled spent solutions were transferred to autosampler vials containing 0.900 mL of MS grade water. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: The 12 mg/L (nominal) test solution was prepared by adding 180 mg of the test material directly to the dilution water (15 L contained in a 20 L glass carboy) and was utilized for the duration of the study. Bulk solutions were maintained at ambient temperature covered with dark plastic and stirred at 60 rpm with Teflon lined stir bars. Slight aeration was provided.
- Differential loading: no
- Controls: only dilution water
- Evidence of undissolved material: no undissolved material observed - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: water flea
- Source: laboratory culture
- Age of parental stock (mean and range, SD): less than 24 h old neonates (neonates were only used from daphnids which have had at least 3 broods).
- Feeding during test: yes
- Food type and amount: From test initiation through test day 6 Daphnids were fed with 0.4 mL Raphidocelis subcapitata and 0.1 mL YTC (yeast, wheat grass, finfish food suspension). On test days 7 through 20, the feeding ration was increased from 0.4 ml to 0.5 mL R. subcapitata with 0.1 mL YTC. . The total organic carbon (TOC) concentration was determined from representative samples of the two food types. The R. subcapitata and YTC suspensions contained 0.371 mg C/mL and 0.638 mg C/mL respectively. The final feeding ration level was approx. 0.2 mg C/daphnid/day.
- Frequency: daily (Daphnids were not fed on Day 21) - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Hardness:
- 54-64 mg CaCO3/L
- Test temperature:
- 20-21 °C
- pH:
- 7.4-8.0
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 7.4-8.9 mg/L (84-102% air saturation)
- Conductivity:
- 160-195 µS/cm (control)
157-200 µS/cm (test item vessel) - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: 0 (Control), 12 mg/L
Measured: < LOQ (Control), 12.6 mg/L (TWA) - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 125 mL glass borosilicate jars
- Type: vessel were loosely covered
- Fill volume: 90 mL
- Renewal rate of test solution: renewal every Monday, Wednesday and Friday
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 10
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Dilution water was Lake Huron water. The water was obtained from the upper Saginaw Bay of Lake Huron off Whitestone Point and was limed and flocculated with ferric chloride. Before use in the laboratory, the water was sand-filtered, pH-adjusted with gaseous CO2, carbon-filtered, and UV-irradiated. Concentrations of contaminants were below levels of concern that may have interfered with the results of the test.
- Total organic carbon: 1.7 mg/L
- Total Suspended Solids: < 2 mg/L
- Alkalinity: 38-46 mg CaCO3/L (control) and 38-44 mg CaC0 3/L (test item vessel)
- Intervals of water quality measurement: Dissolved oxygen, temperature and pH were measured at test initiation and at each test solution renewal from the bulk water control and bulk test solution. Dissolved oxygen, temperature and pH were also measured from spent replicate solutions once per week and at exposure termination. Water temperature was continuously monitored from one surrogate vessel. Alkalinity, hardness, and conductivity were measured at least one time per week from the bulk water control and bulk test solution. Periodically, the water was monitored for total organic carbon (TOC), total suspended solids (TSS), and selected inorganic and organic compounds.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: see source/preparation of dilution water
- Photoperiod: 16 hour light/8 hour dark
- Light intensity: 1042-1484 lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED: Observations were made daily for parent mortality and neonate production (reproduction was quantified every M, W, and F). The time (days) to production of first brood was also recorded. Any sublethal effects (abnormal behavior or appearance) were recorded. On Day 21, lengths (distance measured from apex of helmet to base of the shell spine) were measured to the nearest 0.1 mm and recorded for all surviving parent Daphnia. Daphnids were then dried at 60°C for 24 h and dry weights was determined to the nearest 0.01 mg.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Test concentrations: Definitive test concentrations were based on the 48 h EC50 value of > 117 mg/L, determined from the daphnid acute toxicity test with the same substance. - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 12.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 12.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- - Analyses were conducted in SAS/STAT software, version 9.2 (SAS System, Copyright 2002-2008, SAS Institute Inc. SAS and all other SAS Institute Inc. products or services are registered trademarks or trademarks of SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina).
- The determination of a NOEC for offspring, weight and length was made by comparing the treated groups to the control group with a lower railed Dunnett ' s test, since the data met the normality and homogeneity assumptions.
- The statistically significant effect observed in weight was interpreted to be a result of the absence of neonate production of select control organisms (3 of 9) on day 21 (exposure termination) as compared to limit test level (1 of 9). This resulted in a higher mean dry weight for the control due to the suspected presence of unreleased progeny. Therefore an additional analysis was conducted removing the weight data for animals with an absence of neonate production on day 21 (exposure termination). The NOEC for weight was based on the analysis where the data were removed. This interpretation is supported by the absence of effects in reproduction, survival and the additional growth parameter (length).
- The survival data were not statistically analyzed as the percent survival was equal for the two concentrations. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- For further details please refer to “Any other information on results incl. tables”.
- Conclusions:
- The chronic toxicity concerning reproduction (NOEC) for Daphnia magna exposed to a limit concentration of the test item over a 21-day static-renewal exposure period and based on time-weighted mean measured concentrations was 12.6 mg/L. The respective LOEC was > 12.6 mg/L.
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- Please refer to the analogue approach justification provided in Section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 12.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 12.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- - Analyses were conducted in SAS/STAT software, version 9.2 (SAS System, Copyright 2002-2008, SAS Institute Inc. SAS and all other SAS Institute Inc. products or services are registered trademarks or trademarks of SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina).
- The determination of a NOEC for offspring, weight and length was made by comparing the treated groups to the control group with a lower railed Dunnett ' s test, since the data met the normality and homogeneity assumptions.
- The statistically significant effect observed in weight was interpreted to be a result of the absence of neonate production of select control organisms (3 of 9) on day 21 (exposure termination) as compared to limit test level (1 of 9). This resulted in a higher mean dry weight for the control due to the suspected presence of unreleased progeny. Therefore an additional analysis was conducted removing the weight data for animals with an absence of neonate production on day 21 (exposure termination). The NOEC for weight was based on the analysis where the data were removed. This interpretation is supported by the absence of effects in reproduction, survival and the additional growth parameter (length).
- The survival data were not statistically analyzed as the percent survival was equal for the two concentrations. - Conclusions:
- The chronic toxicity concerning reproduction (NOEC) for Daphnia magna exposed to a limit concentration of the source substance over a 21-day static-renewal exposure period and based on time-weighted mean measured concentrations was 12.6 mg/L. The respective LOEC was > 12.6 mg/L. The source substance is the hydrolysis product of the target substance. Since the hydrolysis half life is < 1 h, the results derived for the source substance describe additionally the effects of the the target substance.
Referenceopen allclose all
ANALYTICAL RESULTS:
The percent of measured concentration of bulk exposure solutions ranged from 100 - 109% of the nominal target values. The percent of measured concentration of corresponding spent (pooled replicate) solutions ranged from 96.9-108% of the nominal target values. This indicated that the test material was not degraded or otherwise lost from the test vessels over the course of the 21-day static-renewal exposure period.
Table 1: Results form analysis of the test substance.
Nominal Concentration [mg/L] | Fresh | Spent | Fresh | Spent | Fresh | Spent | Fresh | Spent | Fresh | Spent | TWA | % of Target |
Day 0 | Day 2 | Day 2 | Day5 | Day 7 | Day 9 | Day 14 | Day 16 | Day 19 | Day 21 | |||
Control | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | N/A |
12 | 12.5 | 12.6 | 13.1 | 12.7 | 12.7 | 12.7 | 12 | 11.6 | 13.1 | 13 | 12.6 | 105% |
BIOLOGICAL RESULTS:
Table 2: Summary of biological observations and results
Time Weighted Mean Measured Conc. [mg/L] | % Survival | Average Cumulative Offspring Per Surviving Adult | Length [mm] | Dry Weight [mg] |
0 (Control) | 90 | 120.7± 9.9 | 4.19± 0.06 | 0.53± 0.15 |
12 | 90 | 118.2± 11.6 | 4.17± 0.07 | 0.44± 0.07 |
Growth (Length)
LOEC, MATC: >12.6 mg/L (limit concentration tested)
NOEC: 12.6 mg/L (limit concentration tested)
Growth (Dry weight)
LOEC, MATC: >12.6 mg/L (limit concentration tested)
NOEC:12.6 mg/L(limit concentration tested)
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Table 3: Results for statistical assumptions
Endpoint | Shapiro's-Wilk's test for normality | Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variance | Data transform | Comparison test Procedure |
Total Offspring | 0.19519 | 0.7241 | none | Dunnett's 1-tailed |
Weight (mg) | 0.25169 | 0.2038 | none | Dunnett's 1-tailed |
Length (mm) | 0.035432 | 0.6106 | none | Dunnett's 1-tailed |
Animals with absence of neonate production are removed from analysis | ||||
Weight | 0.16889 | 0.2049 | none | Dunnett's 1-tailed |
* Rejection criterion for normality is p<0.01; homogeneity of variance is p<0.05
Table 4: Statistical Results
Endpoint | Test Run | Significance a alpha=0.05 |
Total Offspring | ANOVA p-value = 0.6374 | none* |
Weight (mg) | ANOVA p-value = 0.0804 | 12 |
Length (mm) | ANOVA p-value = 0.4829 | none* |
Survival | N.A. | N.A. |
Animals with absence of neonate production are removed from analysis | ||
Weight | ANOVA p-value = 0.1646 | none* |
*Dunnett's test for test of control concentration versus treated groups
N.A.: not applicable as both concentration groups had the same percent survival.
VALIDITY CRITERIA:
Table 5: Validity criteria for OECD 211.
Criterion from the guideline |
Outcome |
Validity criterion fulfilled |
The mortality of the parent animals in the control (female Daphnia) does not exceed 20% at the end of the test. |
The survival in the water control was 90% |
yes |
The mean number of living offspring produced per parent animalsurvivingat the end of the test is ≥ 60 in the control. |
The mean number of offspring per surviving adult female in the water control was 120.7 with a standard deviation of 9.9. |
yes |
ANALYTICAL RESULTS:
The percent of measured concentration of bulk exposure solutions ranged from 100 - 109% of the nominal target values. The percent of measured concentration of corresponding spent (pooled replicate) solutions ranged from 96.9-108% of the nominal target values. This indicated that the test material was not degraded or otherwise lost from the test vessels over the course of the 21-day static-renewal exposure period.
Table 1: Results form analysis of the test substance.
Nominal Concentration [mg/L] | Fresh | Spent | Fresh | Spent | Fresh | Spent | Fresh | Spent | Fresh | Spent | TWA | % of Target |
Day 0 | Day 2 | Day 2 | Day5 | Day 7 | Day 9 | Day 14 | Day 16 | Day 19 | Day 21 | |||
Control | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | < LOQ | N/A |
12 | 12.5 | 12.6 | 13.1 | 12.7 | 12.7 | 12.7 | 12 | 11.6 | 13.1 | 13 | 12.6 | 105% |
BIOLOGICAL RESULTS:
Table 2: Summary of biological observations and results
Time Weighted Mean Measured Conc. [mg/L] | % Survival | Average Cumulative Offspring Per Surviving Adult | Length [mm] | Dry Weight [mg] |
0 (Control) | 90 | 120.7± 9.9 | 4.19± 0.06 | 0.53± 0.15 |
12 | 90 | 118.2± 11.6 | 4.17± 0.07 | 0.44± 0.07 |
Growth (Length)
LOEC, MATC: >12.6 mg/L (limit concentration tested)
NOEC: 12.6 mg/L (limit concentration tested)
Growth (Dry weight)
LOEC, MATC: >12.6 mg/L (limit concentration tested)
NOEC:12.6 mg/L(limit concentration tested)
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Table 3: Results for statistical assumptions
Endpoint | Shapiro's-Wilk's test for normality | Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variance | Data transform | Comparison test Procedure |
Total Offspring | 0.19519 | 0.7241 | none | Dunnett's 1-tailed |
Weight (mg) | 0.25169 | 0.2038 | none | Dunnett's 1-tailed |
Length (mm) | 0.035432 | 0.6106 | none | Dunnett's 1-tailed |
Animals with absence of neonate production are removed from analysis | ||||
Weight | 0.16889 | 0.2049 | none | Dunnett's 1-tailed |
* Rejection criterion for normality is p<0.01; homogeneity of variance is p<0.05
Table 4: Statistical Results
Endpoint | Test Run | Significance a alpha=0.05 |
Total Offspring | ANOVA p-value = 0.6374 | none* |
Weight (mg) | ANOVA p-value = 0.0804 | 12 |
Length (mm) | ANOVA p-value = 0.4829 | none* |
Survival | N.A. | N.A. |
Animals with absence of neonate production are removed from analysis | ||
Weight | ANOVA p-value = 0.1646 | none* |
*Dunnett's test for test of control concentration versus treated groups
N.A.: not applicable as both concentration groups had the same percent survival.
VALIDITY CRITERIA:
Table 5: Validity criteria for OECD 211.
Criterion from the guideline |
Outcome |
Validity criterion fulfilled |
The mortality of the parent animals in the control (female Daphnia) does not exceed 20% at the end of the test. |
The survival in the water control was 90% |
yes |
The mean number of living offspring produced per parent animalsurvivingat the end of the test is ≥ 60 in the control. |
The mean number of offspring per surviving adult female in the water control was 120.7 with a standard deviation of 9.9. |
yes |
Description of key information
NOEC (21 d) ≥ 12.6 mg/L (meas. TWA, OECD 211, D. magna; read across from silanol hydrolysis product DMSD
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Remarks:
- for silanol hydrolysis product (relevant assessment entity)
- Effect concentration:
- >= 12.6 mg/L
Additional information
Experimental data for dimethoxy(dimethyl)silane (CAS No. 1112-39-6) are not available. However, since dimethoxy(dimethyl)silane hydrolyses rapidly to dimethylsilanediol and methanol (DT50 < 0.6 h) the hydrolysis products rather than the parent substance should be considered for the assessment and read-across data for the hydrolysis product, dimethylsilanediol, are considered appropriate for the assessment. The other hydrolysis product, methanol, is well described in the public domain literature. It has a low environmental hazard profile and is therefore not considered contributory to the overall aquatic toxicity of the registered substance (OECD SIDS, 2004). Thus, the ecotoxicity assessment was based on the silanol hydrolysis product dimethylsilanediol (DMSD, CAS No. 1066-42-8).
The experimental study conducted with the hydrolysis product dimethylsilanediol was performed according to OECD 211 (GLP, Dow, 2017). Daphnia magna was exposed to the test item under semi-static conditions. Based on the result from the short-term study with an EC50 (48 h) of > 117 mg/L a limit concentration of 12 mg/L was tested. This concentration is sufficient to conclude the environmental hazard classification as well as the PBT/vPvB assessment. The actual exposure concentrations were verified by HPLC/MS with corresponding measured concentrations of the pooled replicates ranging from 96.9-108% of the nominal target values. After 21 d the reproduction as well as length and weight of Daphnids was measured. No effects on reproduction, growth and length were recorded resulting in a NOEC (21 d) ≥ 12.6 mg/L based on the time-weighted average of the measured concentrations. Thus, the silanol hydrolysis product is of low toxicity to aquatic invertebrates.
Reference
OECD SIDS, 2004. Methanol - SIDS Initial Assessment Report For SIAM 19, Berlin, Germany: UNEP Publications.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.