Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sub-chronic toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
20.1.1982 to 28.10.1982
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1982
Report date:
1982

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 409 (Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Non-Rodents)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
10 hour light cycle, morbidity and mortality checked once a day, and urinalysis was not performed.
GLP compliance:
yes
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Ethylenebis(oxyethylene) bis[3-(5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-m-tolyl)propionate]
EC Number:
253-039-2
EC Name:
Ethylenebis(oxyethylene) bis[3-(5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-m-tolyl)propionate]
Cas Number:
36443-68-2
Molecular formula:
C34H50O8
IUPAC Name:
ethane-1,2-diylbis(oxyethane-2,1-diyl) bis[3-(3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)propanoate]

Test animals

Species:
dog
Strain:
Beagle
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Animal production stein (Tierfarm) CIBA-GEIGY Ltd.
- Age at study initiation: Males 26-30 weeks; Females 26 -32 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: Males 7.0 - 9.9 kg; Females 5.7 - 9.2 kg
- Housing: 2 dogs to a kennel, each equipped with underfloor heating
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): dogs were fed 350 g/day of a pelleted standard diet
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water was provided ad libitum
- Acclimation period: not reported

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 20 to 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 14/10

IN-LIFE DATES: From: February 17, 1982 To: May 25, 1982

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: capsule
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on oral exposure:
DIET PREPARATION
Batches of diet were assayed for composition and contaminant levels by the manufacturer. The test article was filled in gelatine capsules by the galenical department of the Pharmaceutical Division of CIBA-Geigy Ltd.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
no
Duration of treatment / exposure:
3 months
Frequency of treatment:
once/day
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
10 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Dose / conc.:
30 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Dose / conc.:
100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Dose / conc.:
300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Details on study design:
Animals were randomized into groups and given 0, 10, 30, 100, or 300 mg/kg bw/day
Positive control:
None used.

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
MORTALITY: Yes
- Time schedule: daily

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: mortality and signs of local and/or symtemic toxicity checked daily

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly

FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data

FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Calculated using the following formula - food consumption/group and week (g) / number of animals per group

WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No

OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Pretest and week 13
- Dose groups that were examined: all animals

HEARING TEST
Auditory perception test performed at pretest and week 13

HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: week -1; week 7; week 13
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No data
- Animals fasted: No data
- How many animals: all animals
- Parameters checked: ERYTOEIOCYTES (RBC), HAEMATOCRIT (PCV), HAEMOGLOBIN (Hb), THROMBOCYTES (PLT), LEUCOCYTE COUNT (WBC): TOTAL COUNT, DIFFERENTIAL COUNT, RETICULOCYTES, INCLUSION BODIES, THROMBINE TIME (TT), PROTHROMBINE TIME (PT), PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME (PIT)

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood:week -1; Feb 17, 1982, week 7; April 6, 1982; week 13; May 17, 1982 (between 7:30 and 9:00 am)
- Animals fasted: No data
- How many animals: all animals
- Parameters checked: glucose, Urea (Urea-N), Total Bilirubin, Total Protein, Protein Electrophresis, Sodium (Na), Potassium (K), Chloride (Cl), Calcium (Ca), Phosphorus Inorganic, Asp. Aminotransferase (GOT), Ala. Aminotransferase (GPT), Alkaline Phosphatase (AP), Gamma-Glutamyl transpeptidase (G-GPT).

URINALYSIS: No
Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
At 3 months all dogs were anaesthetized with intravenous injection of T61 (Hoechst) and bled. The total weight of each animal was determined, complete autopsy of all dogs was performed and the following organs were weighed: liver, kidneys, adrenals, thyroid, gonads, brain

HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
Small tissue portions of brain (cerebrum, cerebellum, brainstem), spinal cord, eye, pituitary, lacrymal gland, salivary gland, heart, thymus, thyroid, parathroid, lungs (including bronchi), trachea, spleen, bone (with marrow), lymph nodes, aorta, urinary bladder, oesophagus, stomach, small and large intestine, adrenal glands, pancreas, liver, kidneys, ovaries, testes, epididymis, prostate, uterus, skin, sternum, skeletal muscle, sciatic nerve, gall bladder, mammary gland, were fixed in buffered 10% neutral formalin. The fixed tissue samples were embedded in paraplast and sectioned at 3-5 um. The routine stain was haematoxylin and eosin.
Statistics:
For each time point and parameter an uni-variate statistical analysis was conducted. Each treated group was compared to the control group in respect of dispersion and displacement.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
In both, control and dose groups, diarrhoea was observed. Diarrhoea is often observed in the breed of beagles used and is not considered to be due to the administration of the test article. No animal died.
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
No difference in body weight development was observed between controls and treatment groups throughout the test.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
No difference in food consumption was observed between controls and treatment groups throughout the test.
Food efficiency:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
No difference in food conversion was observed between controls and treatment groups throughout the test.
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
The ophthalmoscopic examination of conjunctiva, sclera, cornea, lens and fundus was performed before and at the end of the administration period, revealed no substance related findings.
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
In the assessment of hematology values, the findings of the treated dogs were unremarkable and comparable to those of the controls.
Clinical biochemistry findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
In the assessment of blood chemistry values, the findings of the treated dogs were unremarkable and comparable to those of the controls.
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Description (incidence and severity):
No impairment of the auditory perception was observed in the control and treatment groups before and at the end of the treatment period.
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
The mean testicular weights in the dogs of the 10, 100 and 300 mg/kg dose groups were slightly, but statistically significantly increased when compared with those of the controls. With exception of tubular atrophy of spermatogenic epithelium noted in one male control dog (animal No. 1), there were no consistent differences in the testicular histopathology between treated and control animals. In addition, the statistical significant increase is mainly triggered by control animal 1 which showed a very low testicular weight therefore reducing the average testicular weight of the control group. Therefore no experimental relevance is attached to the increased mean weights of the testes in treated animals. There were some intra- and intergroup variations in the weights of some organs among the treated and control animals as well. Apart from higher weights of the testes, the analysis of the organ weights and organ to body weight ratios however, revealed no consistent compound related trends or alterations.
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
All macroscopical appearances of the treated animals were comparable to those of the controls.
Neuropathological findings:
not examined
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
In one male dog (No. 1) of the control group, it was observed that both testes displayed moderate tubular atrophy of the spermatogenic epithelium; moderate hyperplasia of the interstitial cells of Leydig, and absence of spermatozoa within the epididymes. However, all microscopical changes noted in some control and test animals were only incidental in nature and not due to the application of the tested compound.
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not examined

Effect levels

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: no adverse effects observed at the highest dose level

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Any other information on results incl. tables

Mean Testicular Weights

Dose group (mg/kg bw) 0 10 30 100 300
absolute testicular weight (g) 13.944 21.534* 19.084 19.598* 18.798*
relative testicular weight 0.134 0.194 0.168 0.179 0.176

* p ≤ 0.05

Individual Testicular Weights

control group 10 mg/kg bw 30 mg/kg bw 100 mg/kg bw 300 mg/kg bw
Animal No Weight (g) Animal No Weight (g) Animal No Weight (g) Animal No Weight (g) Animal No Weight (g)
1 5.15 6 24.18 11 15.25 16 18.58 21 20.65
2 13.4 7 21.09 12 20.05 17 20.83 22 19.3
3 17.16 8 18.63 13 18.02 18 21.72 23 17.72
4 17.02 9 21.71 14 17.89 19 19.48 24 17.63
5 16.99 10 22.06 15 19.21 20 17.38 25 18.69
Mean weight 13.944 Mean weight 21.534 Mean weight 18.084 Mean weight 19.598 Mean weight 18.798

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Daily oral doses of up to 300 mg/kg body weight/day over a period of 3 months did not elicit measureable toxic side effects in male and female beagle dogs.
Executive summary:

In the present study a total of 50 pedigree Beagle dogs (5 males and 5 females per dose group) were used. The test article was administered orally in capsules for 3 months at doses of 0, 10, 30, 100 and 300 mg/kg/day. The results of the study are summarized as follows: In both, control and dose groups, diarrhoea was observed. Diarrhoea is often observed in the breed of beagles used and is not considered to be due to the administration of the test item. No animal died. No differences in body weight development, food consumption and food conversion were observed between controls and treatment groups throughout the test. The ophthalmoscopic examination of conjunctiva, sclera, cornea, lens and fundus was performed before and at the end of the administration period, revealed no substance related findings. No impairment of the auditory perception was observed in the control and treatment groups at the end of the treatment period. In the assessment of haematology and blood chemistry values, the findings of the treated dogs were unremarkable and comparable to those of the controls. Organ weights, organ to body weight ratios and organ to brain weight ratios revealed some intra-and intergroup variations. No toxicological relevance is attributed to these findings. Neither gross nor microscopical changes in the organs and tissues related to the treatment with the test article were noted. All morphological lesions seen in some control and test animals were only incidental in nature and not due to the treatment with the test article. It can be inferred from the above, that daily oral doses of 10, 30, 100 and 300 mg/kg/day of test material, administered over a period of 3 months do not elict measurable toxic side-effects in male and female beagle dogs.