Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 273-836-9 | CAS number: 69029-97-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Additional physico-chemical information
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- other: representative mineralogy
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: No GLP study but other quality assurance
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
Materials and methods
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Chemistry /elemental analysis was determined using ICP (inductively Coupled Plasma spectroscopy). Metal speciation/metal mineralogy was assessed from Sequential extraction/metal analysis and mineralogical analysis (XRD and microscopes equipped with EDS (Energy Dispersive Spectrometry) and WDS (Wavelength Dispersive Spectrometry) analysers. The interpretation of the overall results was performed by expert (with profound knowledge of metal particularities).
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- but equivalent Quality Assurance
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Speiss, copper
- EC Number:
- 273-836-9
- EC Name:
- Speiss, copper
- Cas Number:
- 69029-97-6
- IUPAC Name:
- Speiss, copper
- Details on test material:
- sample collection made according Standards (material collected over long period was mixed, crushed and homogenised); sample representative for copper speiss
B7, sample description: Speiss, representative (grinded, homogenised & sieved), sample code: BM_B7_2008, lab code: 09TT02684
Constituent 1
Results and discussion
- Results:
- The tested materials were characterized (physico-chemical and mineralogical properties) in view of the upcoming REACH registrations of copper intermediates and copper slags by the Copper Consortium.
The studied speiss sample contains 55.9% copper, 10.2% antimony, 7.35% arsenic, 7% nickel, 0.12% lead and 2.4% sulphur.
The studied speiss sample consists mainly of metallic copper (32.4%), covellite, CuS, (26.2%), iron arsenic -alloy, FeAs (17.5%), nickel antimony –alloy, NiSb, (14.9%) with accessory copper arsenides and copper- tin alloys.
Metallic copper carries 51.3% of the speiss total copper content, and covellite carries (34%). The rest is carried by copper and iron arsenides and copper- tin alloys. The main carrier of arsenic is iron- arsenic –alloy (72%), other carries being metallic copper and copper arsenide. The lead in the studied sample occurs as metallic.
Any other information on results incl. tables
1.1. Chemical and mineralogical characterization
The chemical analysis of studied sampled are given inTable7and mineralogical composition inTable8with distribution of main elements within different minerals.
The microscope images, XRD and TG/DSC –graphs and results of water solubility tests are given for samplein Appendix A.
Table 7: Chemical composition of studied sample
Lab code |
|
|
09TT02684 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sample |
|
|
Speiss |
|
|
|
|
|
Sample code |
|
|
B7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cu |
P1 |
% |
<0.005 |
|
Co |
TOT |
% |
0.25 |
|
P2 |
% |
1.43 |
|
Sb |
TOT |
% |
10.20 |
|
P3 |
% |
24.40 |
|
Sn |
TOT |
% |
2.80 |
|
P4 |
% |
28.90 |
|
Zn |
TOT |
% |
0.24 |
|
Sum |
|
54.73 |
|
Mo |
TOT |
% |
0.07 |
|
TOT |
% |
55.90 |
|
Ag |
TOT |
% |
0.12 |
As |
P1 |
% |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
P2 |
% |
0.16 |
|
SiO2 |
KEM |
% |
0.82 |
|
P3 |
% |
0.79 |
|
Al2O3 |
TOT |
% |
0.14 |
|
P4 |
% |
6.39 |
|
Cr2O3 |
TOT |
% |
<0.006 |
|
Sum |
|
7.35 |
|
K2O |
TOT |
% |
<0.129 |
|
TOT |
% |
10.20 |
|
MgO |
TOT |
% |
0.09 |
Fe |
P1 |
% |
<0.005 |
|
MnO |
TOT |
% |
0.01 |
|
P2 |
% |
0.84 |
|
Na2O |
TOT |
% |
0.05 |
|
P3 |
% |
0.25 |
|
CaO |
TOT |
% |
0.08 |
|
P4 |
% |
3.43 |
|
TiO2 |
TOT |
% |
<0.010 |
|
Sum |
|
4.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOT |
% |
5.23 |
|
S |
Leco |
% |
2.42 |
Ni |
P1 |
% |
0.01 |
|
SO42- |
KEM |
% |
<0.03 |
|
P2 |
% |
0.14 |
|
C |
Leco |
% |
0.09 |
|
P3 |
% |
0.82 |
|
Satmagan |
|
% |
0.33 |
|
P4 |
% |
6.07 |
|
Surface area |
|
m2/g |
0.22 |
|
Sum |
|
7.04 |
|
Density |
|
g/cm3 |
7.90 |
|
TOT |
% |
7.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pb |
P1 |
% |
<0.005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
P2 |
% |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
P3 |
% |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
P4 |
% |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sum |
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOT |
% |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P1= H2O , P2= H2SO4, P3= KCN+Br-MeOH, P4= HNO3–soluble, TOT= total -, BM= bromine-methanol dissolutions, KEM= ion exchange chromatography, LECO = S/C analyzer, satmagan = Fe3O4analyzer
Table 8: Mineral composition and distribution of main elements
Sample |
|
09TT02684 |
Type |
|
Speiss |
Mineral composition |
|
B7 |
Cu |
Copper |
32.41 |
CuS |
Covellite |
26.16 |
FeAs |
Modderite |
17.49 |
NiSb |
Breithauptite |
14.86 |
Cu5As2 |
Koutekite |
4.29 |
Cu3Sn2 |
Stannopalladinite |
3.62 |
Si(Fe,Al,Ca)O2-3 |
Glass |
1.63 |
ZnS |
Sphalerite |
0.40 |
Fe3O4 |
Magnetite |
0.33 |
Pb |
Lead |
0.12 |
Total |
|
101.30 |
|
|
|
Distribution of copper, -% |
|
|
Cu |
|
51.27 |
CuS |
|
34.06 |
NiSb |
|
0.98 |
Cu3Sn2 |
|
2.86 |
Cu5As2 |
|
5.15 |
FeAs |
|
5.67 |
Si(Fe,Al,Ca)O2-3 |
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
Distribution of iron, -% |
|
|
FeAs |
|
77.34 |
CuS |
|
14.47 |
Fe3O4 |
|
3.13 |
Si(Fe,Al,Ca)O2-3 |
|
2.83 |
Cu |
|
1.45 |
NiSb |
|
0.49 |
ZnS |
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
Distribution of arsenic, -% |
|
|
FeAs |
|
72.01 |
Cu |
|
14.07 |
Cu5As2 |
|
11.72 |
NiSb |
|
2.17 |
Si(Fe,Al,Ca)O2-3 |
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
Distribution of antimony, -% |
|
|
NiSb |
|
88.78 |
Cu |
|
7.06 |
Cu5As2 |
|
3.22 |
FeAs |
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
Distribution of tin, -% |
|
|
Cu3Sn2 |
|
71.76 |
Cu |
|
28.24 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- good quality study that assessed full chemistry and mineralogy of a representative Copper speiss. Proposed mineralogy (distribution pattern for each key element, i.e. % from Total into the various mineralogical forms/species present into the UVCB) can be used for classification of the UVCB substance (mixture toxicity rules)
- Executive summary:
The tested materials were characterized (physico-chemical and mineralogical properties)inview of the upcoming REACH registrations of copper intermediates and copper slags by the Copper Consortium.
The studied copper speiss sample consists mainly of copper, 55, 9%Cu with 10.2% antimony, 7.4% arsenic, 7% nickel, 0.12% lead and 2.4% sulfur and it consist mainly of metallic copper, copper sulfides and copper, iron and nickel arsenides and alloys.
Metallic copper carry most 51% of speiss’s total copper content, copper sulfides carry 34% and the rest 15% is carried mainly bycopperand iron arsenides.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.