Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 222-981-6 | CAS number: 3687-46-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- March 4th, 1994 - June 20th, 1994
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP - Guideline study, tested with the source substance Oleyloleate . In accordance to the ECHA guidance document "Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (March 2010)", the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 994
- Report date:
- 1994
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Fatty acids, C18-unsatd., C16 and C18-unsatd. alkyl esters
- EC Number:
- 297-617-2
- EC Name:
- Fatty acids, C18-unsatd., C16 and C18-unsatd. alkyl esters
- Cas Number:
- 93685-70-2
- IUPAC Name:
- 93685-70-2
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Oleyloleate
- Batch No.: 00034039
- Physical state: yellow liquid
- Molecular weight: approx. 510-535
- Purity: approx. 55 - 70 %
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): other wax esters
- Stability: pure: stable for months; in solvent: not indicated by the sponsor
- Storage: room temperature, light protected
- expiration date: August 9th, 1994
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- The test was used to detect the potential of a test material to induce structural chromosomal aberrations in the Chinese hamster cell line V79.
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: MEM supplemented with 10 % FCS
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes/no
- doubling time of clone V79/T5 in stock cultures: 12 h as determined on April 29th, 1993.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix (Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver microsomal fraction); 50 µL /mL cell culture was used.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- With and without S9 mix:
18 h: 1, 3, 10, 30, 60, 100 µg/mL
28 h: 10, 30, 60, 100 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
On the day of the experiment (immediately before treatment), the test substance was dissolved in ethanol (E. Merck, Darmstadt, Germany, purity > 99.8 %). The solvent was chosen according to its solubility properties and its non-toxicity to the cells. The final concentration of ethanol in the culture medium did not exceed 1 % v/v.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- culture medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- ethanol
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: ethylmethanesulphonate (final conc.: 600 µg/mL, without metab. act.) and cyclophosphamide (final conc.: 0.47µg/mL, with metab. act.)
- Remarks:
- purity of control substances were > 98 %
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium;
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4h with metabolic activation, 18 and 28 h without metabolic activation
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): Preparation interval was 18 and 28 hours for all experiments. Therefore, for the cells exposed for 4 h with metabolic activation, the medium was changed to complete medium after the exposure for the remaining time up to preparation. The cells treated without metabolic activation were kept for the whole exposure duration of 18 or 28 hours in medium containing the test substance.
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 2.5 h after adding colcemid (at 18 and 28 h)
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): 15.5 and 25.5 h after the start of the treatment colcemid was added (0.2 µg/mL)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicates
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: at least 100 well spreach metaphases per culture
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index;
up to 100 µg/mL no substantial reduction of mitotic indices was found.
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes, the number of polyploid cells was scored (% polyploid metaphases)
- Determination of endoreplication: no data - Evaluation criteria:
- Significant increases of the number of cells with structural chromosomal aberrations (outside the historical range of 0.00 - 4.00 %).
The test material is considered as mutagenic, if it includes either a concentration-related increase in the number of structural chromosomal aberrations or a significant positive response for at least one of the test points.
The test material neither producing a concentration-related increase in the number of structural chromosomal aberrations nor a significant and positive response at any of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system. - Statistics:
- chi-square test at five per cent level (p < 0.05)
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Remarks:
- precipitation occured at concentrations > 100 µg/mL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: limited
Due to limited solubility of the test substance higher concentrations than 100 µg/mL for the cytogenetic evaluation were not feasible.
- Precipitation: at concentrations higher than 100 µg/mL
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES/ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
A pre-test was performed to determine the toxicity of the test article.
The test substance was dissolved in ethanol due to its solubility properties. The highest attainable concentration was 100 µg/mL.
No toxic effects were observed, however a slight precipitation occured a this concentration.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
Range of historical control data: 0.00 - 4.00 %
In the absence and presence of S9-mix, the mitotic indices were not substantially reduced after treatment with the highest evaluated concentration at each fixation interval.
In the cytogenetic experiment, at both fixation intervals in the absence and presence of S9-mix, the test material did not increase the frequency of cells with aberrations to a biologically and statistically relevant extent. No biological relevant increase of polyploid metaphases as compared to the rates of the controls was found after treatment with the test material.
EMS and CPA were used as positive controls and showed distinct increases in cells with structural chromosomal aberrations.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Number of Polyploid Cells and Mitotic Index
|
conc. per mL |
Exposure duration (hours) |
S9 mix |
fixation interval |
mean number of polyploid cells* |
mitotic index** (%) |
neg. control |
|
4 |
- |
18 |
1.5 |
100.0 |
vehicle control |
1.0 % |
4 |
- |
18 |
1.5 |
100.0 |
EMS |
600 μg |
4 |
- |
18 |
3.0 |
68.9 |
test substance |
10 μg |
4 |
- |
18 |
1.0 |
83.4 |
test substance |
60 μg |
4 |
- |
18 |
2.5 |
100.0 |
test substance |
100 μg |
4 |
- |
18 |
2.0 |
89.7 |
neg. control |
|
18 |
+ |
18 |
2.0 |
100.0 |
vehicle control |
1.0 % |
18 |
+ |
18 |
3.0 |
100.0 |
CPA |
0.47 μg |
18 |
+ |
18 |
3.0 |
63.0 |
test substance |
10 μg |
18 |
+ |
18 |
1.5 |
127.1 |
test substance |
60 μg |
18 |
+ |
18 |
2.0 |
113.7 |
test substance |
100 μg |
18 |
+ |
18 |
2.0 |
104.3 |
vehicle control |
1.0 % |
4 |
- |
28 |
4.0 |
100.0 |
test substance |
100 μg |
4 |
- |
28 |
5.0 |
119.0 |
vehicle control |
1.0 % |
28 |
+ |
28 |
2.5 |
100.0 |
test substance |
100 μg |
28 |
+ |
28 |
2.5 |
91.5 |
* The number of polyploid cells was determined in 100 cells per culture of each test group.
** The mitotic index was determined in 1000 cells per culture of each test group.
Table 2: Structural chromosomal aberrations
|
conc. per mL |
S9 mix |
fixation interval |
cells scored |
aberrant cells |
(%mean) exchanges |
|
incl. gaps |
excl. gaps |
||||||
neg. control |
|
- |
18 |
200 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
vehicle control |
1.0 % |
- |
18 |
200 |
1.5 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
EMS |
600 μg |
- |
18 |
200 |
23.5 |
22.0 |
16.5 |
test substance |
10 μg |
- |
18 |
200 |
1.5 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
test substance |
60 μg |
- |
18 |
200 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
test substance |
100 μg |
- |
18 |
200 |
5.0 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
neg. control |
|
+ |
18 |
200 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
vehicle control |
1.0 % |
+ |
18 |
200 |
4.0 |
3.5 |
0.5 |
CPA |
0.47 μg |
+ |
18 |
200 |
23.0 |
22.0 |
11.0 |
test substance |
10 μg |
+ |
18 |
200 |
3.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
test substance |
60 μg |
+ |
18 |
200 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
1.5 |
test substance |
100 μg |
+ |
18 |
200 |
3.0 |
1.5 |
0.0 |
vehicle control |
1.0 % |
- |
28 |
200 |
4.0 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
test substance |
100 μg |
- |
28 |
200 |
3.5 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
vehicle control |
1.0 % |
+ |
28 |
200 |
4.0 |
2.5 |
0.5 |
test substance |
100 μg |
+ |
28 |
200 |
4.0 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
EMS = Ethylmethanesulphonate
CPA = Cyclophosphamide
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative Under the given conditions the test substance did not induce significant increases of chromosomal aberrations in V79 chinese hamster cells in vitro.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.