Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 242-670-9 | CAS number: 18917-91-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian germ cell study: cytogenicity / chromosome aberration
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable, well-documented publication which meets basic scientific principles
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Effects of aluminium salts on bone marrow chromosomes in rats in vivo
- Author:
- Roy, AK et al.
- Year:
- 1 991
- Bibliographic source:
- Cytobios 66: 105-111
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Aluminium sulphate was orally administered to rats daily for 7, 14 or 21 days. Bone marrow chromosomes were analysed for aberrations.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- chromosome aberration assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 7784-31-8 (Aluminium sulphate)
- IUPAC Name:
- 7784-31-8 (Aluminium sulphate)
- Test material form:
- not specified
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Aluminium sulphate Al2(SO4)3 x 18H2O
- Analytical purity: no data
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- male
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: unspecified
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: deionised water
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 7, 14 or 21 d
- Frequency of treatment:
- once daily
- Post exposure period:
- 24 h
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 212, 265, 353, 530, 1060, 2120 mg Al2(SO4)3x18H2O/kg bw/d
Basis:
nominal conc.
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 17, 22, 28, 43, 85, 172 mg Al/kg bw/d
Basis:
nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 for each time point
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- no
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- bone marrow chromosomes
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Colchicine (0.04%) was injected intraperitoneally, 90 min before sacrifice.
From each animal, 2000 cells were scored for the mitotic index and 60 well scattered metaphase plates for chromosomal aberration, making a total of 10000 cells and 300 metaphases per set, respectively. For the calculation of breaks/cell, chromatid breaks were taken as a single break, dicentrics and translocations as two breaks. Gaps, polyploid and pulverised cells were recorded separately and not included in the calculation of breaks per cell. - Statistics:
- The data were analysed statistically by comparing each group with controls by Student´s t-test and further using the Cochran-Armitage trend test (dose response).
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): positive
Oral administration of Aluminium sulphate to rats for 7, 14 or 21 d induced a dose dependent inhibition of dividing bone marrow cells and an increase in chromosomal aberrations. The effect was not influenced by the duration of exposure. - Executive summary:
In a rat bone marrow micronucleus assay, 5 male rats/dose were treated orally with Aluminium sulphate ( Al2(SO4)3 x 18H2O) at doses of
0, 212, 265, 353, 530, 1060, 2120 mg Al2(SO4)3x18H2O/kg bw/d, corresponding to 0, 17, 22, 28, 43, 85, 172 mg Al/kg bw/d
daily for 7, 14 or 21 days. Bone marrow cells were harvested at 24 h post-treatment. The vehicle was deionised water.
In the bone marrow cells, the mitotic index decreased in direct proportion to the dose used. The decrease was highly pronounced in animals treted with the two higher doses.
The frequency of abnormal cells increased with dose and duration of exposure to Aluminium sulphate. During all three sampling times the trend test p value was found to be highly significant. A duration dependent effect was not found with the lowest (7 mg Al/kg bw/d) dose. Most aberrations were chromatid breaks. Translocations were recorded in higher doses.
There was a significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in bone marrow after any treatment time.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.