Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: limited but acceptable documented study report which meets basic scientific principles

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1974
Report date:
1974

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Method: other: in vivo skin irritation study with rabbits
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N-isopropyl-N'-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine
EC Number:
202-969-7
EC Name:
N-isopropyl-N'-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine
Cas Number:
101-72-4
Molecular formula:
C15H18N2
IUPAC Name:
N1-phenyl-N4-(propan-2-yl)benzene-1,4-diamine
Details on test material:
Santoflex IP

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White

Test system

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
other: intact and abraded skin tested
Vehicle:
other: moistened with water
Controls:
no
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 h
Observation period:
7 d
Number of animals:
6

Results and discussion

In vivo

Results
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
8
Reversibility:
other: no effects
Remarks on result:
other: no effects

Any other information on results incl. tables

AVERAGE SCORE
0.0/8.0

Non irritating to rabbit skin

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Remarks:
Migrated information