Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-471-4 | CAS number: 60-34-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
An in vitro microbial assay, an in vitro mouse lymphoma assay, an in vitro unscheduled DNA synthesis assay and two in vivo tests (dominant lethal assays, in rats and mice) were available.
Methylhydrazine was mutagenic only in an activation, in vitro microbial reversion test if the test was conducted as suspension test and not if conducted as standard plate tests. Except for this, there was no indication of genetic activity in any of the other tests.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The publication is a summary of several mutagenicity studies performed on methylhydrazine. The summarized report has been reviewed by the Information Office (OI) and is releasable to the National Technical Information Service (NTIS). Some data are absent (GLP statement, data on the test item(batch number, expiry date...)).
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- other: bacterial reverse mutation assay (Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli)
- Target gene:
- histidine
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: G-46
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- mouse hepatic microsomes
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- In agar assay without activation:
0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 1 and 5 µL/plate
In agar assay with activation:
0.01, 0.1, 1 and 5 µL/plate
Suspension assay with activation:
1 and 5 µL/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: direct acting mutagens were employed in non activation assays, mutagens requiring microsomal activation were used in activation assays
- Remarks:
- Dimethylnitrosamine was used as the positive control compound in the suspension assay
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation) + additional assay with S. Typhimurium TA-1535 in suspension
DURATION:
- Exposure duration: 48 to 72 hours for plate incorporation assays, 1 hour for suspension assay - Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: G-46
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- In the suspension assay, MH was found to be positive. Mutagenic activity was observed at MH concentrations of 1 µL and 5 µL after a 60-minute incubation with a mouse liver activation system.
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
There were no clear indications of mutagenic activity by MH in any of the microbial assays performed. The toxicity of MH for bacterial and yeast was high and concentrations of 10 µL/plate were too toxic to use.
MH was mutagenic in activation, microbial reversion test conducted as a suspension test. - Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The publication is a summary of several mutagenicity studies performed on methylhydrazine. The summarized report has been reviewed by the Information Office (OI) and is releasable to the National Technical Information Service (NTIS). Some data are absent (GLP statement, data on the test item(batch number, expiry date...)).
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The procedure used was a modification of that reported by Clive and Spector.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- thymidine kinase locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- mouse liver microsomes
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Without activation:
0.0005, 0.001, 0.05 and 0.1 µL/mL
With activation:
0.001, 0.005, 0.01 and 0.05 - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: direct acting mutagens were employed in non activation assays, mutagens requiring microsomal activation were used in activation assays
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION:
- Exposure duration: 5 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 3 days
MUTATION FREQUENCY:
Mutation frequency was = (mutant counts)/(viable counts) x 10-4
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY:
- Method: measure of loss in growth potential of the cells induced by a five-hour exposure to methylhydrazine - Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
In a mammalian cell gene mutation test, methylhydrazine was clearly non genotoxic, with and without activation. - Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The publication is a summary of several mutagenicity studies performed on methylhydrazine. The summarized report has been reviewed by the Information Office (OI) and is releasable to the National Technical Information Service (NTIS). Some data are absent (GLP statement, data on the test item(batch number, expiry date...)). Exposure duration was not reported.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 482 (Genetic Toxicology: DNA Damage and Repair, Unscheduled DNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells In Vitro)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- DNA damage and repair assay, unscheduled DNA synthesis in mammalian cells in vitro
- Target gene:
- Not applicable.
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mammalian cell line, other: human diploid embryonic lung cells (WI-38)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- mouse liver microsomes
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- With and without activation:
0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: direct acting mutagens (MNNG) were employed in non activation assays, mutagens requiring microsomal activation (2-acetylaminofluorene) were used in activation assays
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: not indicated
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): untill confluency was reached
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: toxicity was monitored visually by altered cell morphology and adhesion. - Species / strain:
- mammalian cell line, other:
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The results were negative, but there was no information about exposure duration. Moreover, no data were available on cytotoxicity: it was impossible to determine if cytotoxicity was achieved in the high dose level (a preliminary test was performed to determine cytotoxicity and dose-levels of the main test, but the results are not available).
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (positive)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian germ cell study: cytogenicity / chromosome aberration
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The publication is a summary of several mutagenicity studies performed on methylhydrazine. The summarized report has been reviewed by the Information Office (OI) and is releasable to the National Technical Information Service (NTIS). Some data are absent (GLP statement, data on the test item(batch number, expiry date), environmental conditions...).
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 478 (Genetic Toxicology: Rodent Dominant Lethal Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- rodent dominant lethal assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- ICR
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 7 to 8 week-old
- Weight at study initiation: 30 +/- 2.5 g
- Fasting period before study: no data
- Housing: 5 per cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): 4% fat diet
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): acidified water
- Acclimation period: no data
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
No data - Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: corn oil or water
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Five days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Post exposure period:
- 8 weeks
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0.26, 0.86 and 2.6 mg/kg/day
Basis:
no data - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 males per dose-level
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- - Triethylenemelamine
- Route of administration: intraperitoneal
- Doses / concentrations: 0.3 mg/kg in 0.85% saline - Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Dominant lethality, which is indicated by a high percentage of dead implants to total implants, was not demonstrated (a clear dominant lethal effect was observed with the positive control but only in the first 3 weeks of observation). - Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian germ cell study: cytogenicity / chromosome aberration
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The publication is a summary of several mutagenicity studies performed on methylhydrazine. The summarized report has been reviewed by the Information Office (OI) and is releasable to the National Technical Information Service (NTIS). Some data are absent (GLP statement, data on the test item(batch number, expiry date...)).
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 478 (Genetic Toxicology: Rodent Dominant Lethal Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- rodent dominant lethal assay
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 10 to 12 week-old
- Weight at study initiation: 325 +/- 25 g
- Fasting period before study: not indicated
- Housing: 5 per cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): 4% fat diet
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): acidified water
- Acclimation period: no data
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- no data - Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: corn oil or water
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 5 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Post exposure period:
- 7 weeks
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0.215, 0.72 and 2.15 mg/kg/day
Basis:
no data - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 males per dose-level
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- - Triethylenemelamine
- Route of administration: intraperitoneal
- Doses / concentrations: 0.3 mg/kg in 0.85% saline - Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Methylhydrazine was not considered to be genotoxic in a dominant lethal assay in rats. Statistically significant high ratio of dead to total implants was observed in week 7, but it was associated with the absence of dead implants in controls. Moreover this ratio was less than ratios calculated in positive controls during weeks 1 to 5. Therefore this observation was not considered to be biologically relevant.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Methylhydrazine was mutagenic only in an activation, in vitro microbial reversion test if the test was conducted as suspension test and not if conducted as standard plate tests. Except for this, there was no indication of genetic activity in any of the other tests conducted in a three tier test initiated by Toxicology Branch, Toxic Hazards Division, Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.
Justification for classification or non-classification
As mutagenic activity was only demonstrated in one strain of Salmonella Typhimurium in a reverse bacterial gene mutation test in suspension conditions, monomethylhydrazine is not considered to have mutagenic potential and shall not be classified for mutagenicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.