Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 216-343-6 | CAS number: 1562-00-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Dermal absorption
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- dermal absorption in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 07 July 2022 - 29 October 2022
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Report date:
- 2023
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 428 (Skin Absorption: In Vitro Method)
- Version / remarks:
- 2004
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Environmental Health and Safety Publications Series on Testing and Assessment No. 28. Guidance Document for the Conduct of Skin Absorption Studies
- Version / remarks:
- 2004
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The dermal uptake value used for risk assessment purposes was calculated based on the Guidance on Dermal Absorption (EFSA Journal, 2017, 15(6): 4873).
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium 2-hydroxyethanesulphonate
- EC Number:
- 216-343-6
- EC Name:
- Sodium 2-hydroxyethanesulphonate
- Cas Number:
- 1562-00-1
- Molecular formula:
- C2H6O4S.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium 1,4-bis[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]-1,4-dioxobutane-2-sulfonate
- Test material form:
- solid
- Remarks:
- powder
- Details on test material:
- Physical Description: White powder
Storage Conditions: Ambient
1
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium 2-hydroxyethanesulphonate
- EC Number:
- 216-343-6
- EC Name:
- Sodium 2-hydroxyethanesulphonate
- Cas Number:
- 1562-00-1
- Molecular formula:
- C2H6O4S.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium 1,4-bis[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]-1,4-dioxobutane-2-sulfonate
- Test material form:
- not specified
- Details on test material:
- Name: Sodium [14C]-Isethionate
Specific Activity: 29 mCi/mmol (194.6 µCi/mg)
Stored: freezer at 20°C - Radiolabelling:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Carbon-14 is the isotope of choice in metabolic studies. The position of labelling is one which is considered to be metabolically stable.
- Species:
- human
- Sex:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Samples of full-thickness human skin (abdominal) were obtained from four female donors aged 33 to 55 years old. Skin samples were obtained from Tissue Solutions Limited and BioIVT. The samples arrived at Charles River deep frozen on dry ice and were stored in a freezer set to maintain a temperature of -20°C until used in the study.
- Type of coverage:
- open
- Vehicle:
- other: Ultrapure water
- Duration of exposure:
- 8 hours
- Doses:
- Single dose
- No. of animals per group:
- 12 samples obtained from 4 different donors (3 samples per donor)
- Details on in vitro test system (if applicable):
- PREPARATION OF SPLIT-THICKNESS SKIN
Human skin samples were removed from -20°C storage and allowed to thaw at ambient temperature. The thickness of the full-thickness skin membranes was measured using a micrometer. Split-thickness membranes were prepared by pinning the full-thickness skin, stratum corneum uppermost, onto a raised cork board and cutting with an electric dermatome (Zimmer®) at a setting equivalent to 200-400 µm depth. The thickness of the membranes was measured using a micrometer. Membranes were then wrapped in foil, placed into a self-sealing bag and stored in a freezer, set to maintain a temperature of -20°C, for a maximum period of two months.
DIFFUSION CELL APPARATUS
Equipment and Settings:
An automated flow-through diffusion system (McGregor/Toner) was used. The flow-through diffusion cells were placed in a steel manifold heated via a circulating water bath set to maintain the skin surface temperature at 32°C ± 1°C. The cells were connected to multi-channel peristaltic pumps from their afferent ports with the receptor fluid effluent dropping via fine bore tubing into scintillation vials on a fraction collector. The surface area of exposed skin within the cells was 0.64 cm2. The receptor chamber volume was 0.33 mL.
Receptor Fluid:
The receptor fluid chosen for use in this study was phosphate buffered saline receptor fluid containing ca 5% (v/v) human serum, amphotericin B (10 mL of a 250 µg/mL solution per liter of receptor fluid), streptomycin (ca 0.1 mg/mL) and penicillin (ca 100 units/mL).
The maximum concentration of test item in the receptor fluid was estimated at a level assuming 10 x 10% absorption in 1 h following application of the concentrate formulation to skin. Radiolabelled test item was radiodiluted to an appropriate level. Then ca 60.8 mg (Sodium Isethionate) was transferred into each of two 25 mL volumetric flasks. Receptor fluid was added to the first flask, and solvent of known high test item solubility (positive control) was added to the second flask. The solutions were mixed for ca 1 h at ca 32°C and then centrifuged at ca 2000 g for ca 5 min. A minimum of three replicate aliquots were taken from the resultant supernatant and were analysed by liquid scintillation counting. The acceptable coefficient of variation (CV) was <5% and the acceptability of CV >5%.
Flow-Through Diffusion Cell Preparation:
Split-thickness skin samples were removed from -20°C storage and allowed to thaw at ambient temperature. Sections of human split-thickness skin membrane, ca 1.5 x 1.5 cm, were cut and positioned on the receptor chamber of the diffusion cell. The donor chamber was tightened into place with screws and the prepared cells were then placed in the heated manifold and connected to the peristaltic pump. An equilibration period of ca 15 min was allowed while receptor fluid was pumped through the receptor chambers at 1.5 mL/h ± 0.15 mL/h.
Application of Test Preparation to Human Skin:
Sodium [14C]-Isethionate in ultrapure water was applied evenly over the surface of the exposed skin of 12 split-thickness samples of human skin using a Rainin MR25 positive displacement pipette set to deliver ca 6.4 µL (10 µL/cm2). The donor chambers of the cells were not occluded. Seven representative aliquots of Sodium [14C]-Isethionate in ultrapure water were dispensed into vials at the time of dosing, mixed with Scintanol and analysed by liquid scintillation counting.
The results of representative aliquots for Sodium [14C]-Isethionate in ultrapure water are:
- Target test item concentration: 570 g/L
- Mean test concentration: 571 g/L
- CV test item concentration: 0.38 % - Time point:
- 8 h
- Concentrate / Dilution:
- dilution
- Dose:
- 10 µL (570 g/L)/cm2
- Parameter:
- percentage
- Absorption:
- 0.09 %
- Remarks on result:
- other: Potentially Absorbable Dose
- Time point:
- 8 h
- Concentrate / Dilution:
- dilution
- Dose:
- 10 µL (570 g/L)/cm2
- Parameter:
- percentage
- Absorption:
- 0.17 %
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated value for risk assessment purposes
- Conversion factor human vs. animal skin:
- n.a.
- Conclusions:
- Using the results of an in vitro skin absorption study with sodium [14C]-isethionate, performed according to OECD guideline 428 and GLP principles, the dermal absorption value for risk assessment for SI was calculated to be 0.17% (based on the Guidance on Dermal Absorption (EFSA Journal, 2017, 15(6): 4873)).
- Executive summary:
An in vitro skin absorption study was performed according to OECD guideline 428 and GLP principles with sodium [14C]-isethionate (SI). A total of 12 samples of human split-thickness skin membranes obtained from 4 different donors were dosed topically with Sodium [14C]-Isethionate in ultrapure water.
The mean mass balance was 96.73% of the applied dose at 24 h post dose. The majority of the applied dose was washed off at 8 h post application (3.97%, 92.64% and <0.01% recovered in the skin wash, tissue swab and pipette tips, respectively). At 24 h post dose, a further 0.02% was recovered in the donor chamber wash. The material recovered in the donor wash was almost certainly material that was dislodged from the skin during the washing procedure. Therefore, the total dislodgeable dose was 96.63% of the applied dose. The mean total unabsorbed dose
was 96.66% of the applied dose. This consisted of the dislodgeable dose, unexposed skin (<0.01%) and the radioactivity associated with the stratum corneum (0.03%). The absorbed dose (0.05%) was the sum of the receptor fluid (0.04%), receptor chamber wash (0.01%) and receptor rinse (<0.01%). The exposed skin (0.02%) was the sum of the epidermis (0.01%) and dermis (0.01%). Dermal delivery (0.07%) was the sum of the absorbed dose and the exposed skin.The total absorbed dose, dermal delivery, potentially absorbable dose and mass balance were 0.05% (2.62 μg equiv./cm2), 0.07% (3.84 μg equiv./cm2), 0.09% (5.01 μg equiv./cm2) and 96.73% (5525 μg equiv./cm2) of the applied dose, respectively.
The dermal absorption to be used for risk assessment purposes was calculated based on the Guidance on Dermal Absorption (EFSA Journal, 2017, 15(6): 4873) as 0.17%.
Reference
Constituent 1
Test animals
Administration / exposure
Results and discussion
Percutaneous absorptionopen allclose all
Any other information on results incl. tables
Overall, the absorption profiles looked similar for the majority of samples, with absorption of Sodium [14C]-Isethionate increasing to 24 h post dose. For Cell 2, the trend was similar however the absorption profile was significantly higher. The mean absorption calculated throughout the course of the experiment was above the LoRM for all timepoints; however, multiple individual cell values were below the limit of reliable measurement (LoRM) at various timepoints throughout the experiment. Cell 2 was rejected as skin damage at dosing was suspected due to an abnormally high absorption profile compared to its donor group.
The mass balance for most individual samples was >95% and <110%, except Cell 1 (93.73%). Cell 1 was included in results as total absorbed dose was comparable to other cells. The following results are provided as mean values (n = 11).
The mean mass balance was 96.73% of the applied dose at 24 h post dose. The majority of the applied dose was washed off at 8 h post application (3.97%, 92.64% and <0.01% recovered in the skin wash, tissue swab and pipette tips, respectively). At 24 h post dose, a further 0.02% was recovered in the donor chamber wash. The material recovered in the donor wash was almost certainly material that was dislodged from the skin during the washing procedure. Therefore, the total dislodgeable dose was 96.63% of the applied dose. The mean total unabsorbed dose was 96.66% of the applied dose. This consisted of the dislodgeable dose, unexposed skin (<0.01%) and the radioactivity associated with the stratum corneum (0.03%). The absorbed dose (0.05%) was the sum of the receptor fluid (0.04%), receptor chamber wash (0.01%) and receptor rinse (<0.01%). The exposed skin (0.02%) was the sum of the epidermis (0.01%) and dermis (0.01%). Dermal delivery (0.07%) was the sum of the absorbed dose and the exposed skin.
More than 75% of the absorption occurred within the first half of the experiment. As defined in the EFSA Scientific Opinion – Guidance on Dermal Absorption 2017; 15(6): 4873, this result suggests complete absorption. However, the majority of the receptor fluid values obtained were below the limit of reliable measurement, so potentially absorbable dose was calculated. The potentially absorbable dose was 0.09%.
The distribution of Sodium [14C]-Isethionate, by mass, at 24 h post dose.
The mass balance, total dislodgeable dose, unabsorbed dose, absorbed dose and dermal delivery and potentially absorbable dose were 5525, 5519, 5521, 2.62, 3.84 and 5.01 μg equiv./cm2, respectively.
Post dose washing efficiency (8 hours):
Overall, most of the applied dose recovered in tissue swabs 1-5 was removed with tissue swab 1. Thereafter, there was a general decrease in the percentage of the applied dose removed with tissue swabs 2-5. In the final tissue swab, a mean of <0.01% of the applied dose was detected, indicating that the washing process was efficient at removing the applied dose.
Results in tabular format
Recovery (%) | Recovery (ug equiv/cm2) | |||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
Stratum Corneum* | 0.021 | 0.051 | 1.173 | 2.913 |
Epidermis | 0.010 | 0.022 | 0.592 | 1.245 |
Dermis | 0.011 | 0.032 | 0.627 | 1.834 |
Receptor Fluid | 0.046 | 0.038 | 2.622 | 2.159 |
PAD^ | 0.088 | 0.124 | 5.013 | 7.109 |
DD~ | 0.067 | 0.077 | 3.840 | 4.401 |
Mass Balance | 96.73 | 1.81 | 5525.20 | 103.17 |
*Tape strips 3-20; ^Potentially absorbable dose ~Dermal Delivery
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.