Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
September 1984 - January 1985
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1986
Report date:
1986

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EPA 560/6-82-001
Deviations:
no
Remarks:
slit lamp exam. was added; colour photographic docum. was not performed; 8-hour period with altered temperatur and humidity range; diet was fed at 150 g/d and not ad libitum > none of these dev. had a negative impact on study performance and validity
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1-nitroguanidine
EC Number:
209-143-5
EC Name:
1-nitroguanidine
Cas Number:
556-88-7
Molecular formula:
CH4N4O2
IUPAC Name:
N-nitroguanidine
impurity 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Sodium sulphate
EC Number:
231-820-9
EC Name:
Sodium sulphate
Cas Number:
7757-82-6
Molecular formula:
Na2O4S
IUPAC Name:
disodium sulfate
impurity 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Sodium nitrate
EC Number:
231-554-3
EC Name:
Sodium nitrate
Cas Number:
7631-99-4
Molecular formula:
HNO3.Na
IUPAC Name:
sodium nitrate
impurity 3
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4,6-diamino-1,3,5-triazin-2(1H)-one
EC Number:
211-455-1
EC Name:
4,6-diamino-1,3,5-triazin-2(1H)-one
Cas Number:
645-92-1
Molecular formula:
C3H5N5O
IUPAC Name:
4,6-diamino-1,3,5-triazin-2(1H)-one
impurity 4
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
6-amino-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione
EC Number:
211-456-7
EC Name:
6-amino-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione
Cas Number:
645-93-2
Molecular formula:
C3H4N4O2
IUPAC Name:
6-amino-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Test substance supplier Sunflower AAP

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Elkhorn Rabbitry, 5265 Starr Way, Watsonville, CA, U.S.A.)
- Age at study initiation: young adults
- Sex: males
- Weight at study initiation: 2.4-3.5 kg
- Housing: individually in stainless steel, screen-bottomed, battery-type cages with automatically flushing dump tanks
- Diet: approx. 150 g/day of Certified Purina Chow Diet 5322 (Ralston Purina Company)
- Water: continous drip from a central line
- Pretest conditioning: 1. quarantine from 6 Sept- 19 Sept 1984
2. animal eyes were examined 24 hours before dosing using slit lamp, fluorescein dye and ultraviolet light
- Acclimation period: at least five days after quarantine


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 14.4-17.8; exception: 8-hour period on 22 Sep 84 when the temperature fluctuated between 12.8 and 26.7 °C
- Humidity (%): 40-70%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark/hrs light): 12/12


IN-LIFE DATES:
Group1 > From: 25 Sep 1984 To: 28 Sep 1984
Group2 > From: 2 Oct 1984 To: 5 Oct 1984

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: untreated eye served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 0.025 g (=0.1 ml)
- Administration: the lower lid was pulled away from the conjunctival cul-de-sac to form a cup into which the compound was dropped. Upper and lower lids were then held gently together for one second to prevent loss of material.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single application
Observation period (in vivo):
72 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Three animals per dose group (two dose groups).
Group one was dosed on 25 Sep 84 and group 2 was dosed on 2 Oct 84.
Details on study design:
TEST PROCEDURE:
- prior to study initiation animals were examined for any pre-existing abnormalities.
- For each animal, the eye with the nearest normal appearance was designated for treatment; the contralateral eye served as control.
- On the next day, 0.025 g Nitroguanidine was placed in the treated eye of each rabbit in this group (group 1: 25 Sep 1984; group 2: 2 Oct 1984)


SCORING SYSTEM: Draize-type ocular grading


TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE:
- slit lamp (24, 48, and 72-hour-observations); additionally any areas appearing grossly abnormal were examined under high magnification
- fluorescein: introduced onto the eye which was then observed under unltraviolet light. Any corneal areas reacting with the dye (a sign of discontinuity of the corneal epithelium) were described with respect to area and intensity of fluorescence
- Examination and grading of ocular reactions were performed in this fashion at 1, 4, 24, 48, and 72 h after dosing.
- Fluorescein staining was omitted from the 1 and 4 hour-observations, as was slit lamp examination.
- Due to an almost lack of reaction during the 72 hours after dosing, the study was terminated, according to protocol, after this observation. Therfore no scoring or observations were performed at 7, 14, or 21 days.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1 and 4 h after dosing
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1 and 4 h after dosing
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1 and 4 h after dosing
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 1 day
Remarks on result:
other: slight conjunctival injection
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Remarks:
conjunctival swelling
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Remarks:
conjunctival swelling
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1 and 4 h after dosing
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation

Any other information on results incl. tables

Control Eyes:

- At no time during the study did no contralateral, untreated eyes exhibit any changes from the pre-dosing examination.

- Fine diffuse stippling was present before and after dosing in the control eye of one rabbit.

- All other untreated controls were normal throughout the entire study.

Nitroguanidine produced no positive reactions. Slight conjunctival redness, indicating mild inflammation, was the only response observed. This reaction, although scorable, did not achieve sufficient severity to warrant consideration as a “positive response”. A likely explanation for this slight redness was the observed presence in the lower conjunctival cul-de-sac (the site of gradable redness) of small amounts of the test material. Most of the eyes with gradable redness exhibited undissolved nitroguanidine. Therefore physical irritation, not pharmacological activity, may have been responsible for the slight response observed. Since human exposure would be closely followed with thorough washing, even this slight response may not occur.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In the present study, nitroguanidine produced no response indicative of a potential to cause occular irritation upon direct contact with the eye.
Executive summary:

In an acute eye irritation study using a modified Draize method (US EPA 560/6-82-001), 0.1 ml (corresponding to 0.025 g) of Nitroguanidine was instilled into the conjunctival sac of the eye of six male albino rabbits (New Zealand White strain). Eyes were not washed afterwards. Animals then were observed for 3 days. Irritation was scored by the method of US EPA 560/6-82-001.

Under the experimental conditions employed, Nitroguanidine produced no positive reactions. Slight conjunctival redness, indicating mild inflammation, was the only response observed. This reaction, although scorable, did not achieve sufficient severity to warrant consideration as a “positive response”. A likely explanation for this slight redness was the observed presence in the lower conjunctival cul-de-sac (the site of gradable redness) of small amounts of the test material. Most of the eyes with gradable redness exhibited undissolved nitro guanidine. Therefore physical irritation, not pharmacological activity, may have been responsible for the slight response observed. Since human exposure would be closely followed with thorough washing, even this slight response may not occur.

In the present study, nitroguanidine produced no response indicative of a potential to cause occular irritation upon direct contact with the eye.